Bu çalışma, iş stratejisi, ES stratejisi, bu stratejilerin stratejik uyumu, esneklik ve iş performansı arasındaki ilişkiyi incelemektedir. Çalışma, eşleştirme yaklaşımı olarak hizalamayı incelemektedir. Çalışmada hizmet ve imalat endüstrilerinden Kuzey Amerikalı katılımcılardan veri toplamak için bir anket çalışması kullanılmıştır. Verilerin analizinde Yapılandırılmış Eşitlik Modelleme (SEM) tabanlı bir istatistiksel araç olan Kısmi En Küçük Kareler (PLS) yöntemi kullanılmıştır. Çalışma sonuçları, uyumun performans üzerinde önemli ve olumlu bir etkisi olduğunu göstermektedir. Hizalama, ERP’nin stratejik esnekliği ile iş performansı arasındaki ilişkiye aracılık eder. ES’nin iş değerine veya performansına katkıda bulunması için ES stratejilerinin iş stratejileriyle uyumlu olması gerekir. Bu çalışmanın ana sınırlamaları, örneklem büyüklüğünü (N=92) ve çalışma boylamsal bir çalışma yerine kesitsel verileri kullandığından muhtemelen verilerin çeşidini içerir. Çalışma sonuçları, yöneticilerin ve uygulayıcıların ES planlarına ve yatırımlarına öncelik vermelerine yardımcı olabilir. Bu çalışmanın aracının uygulayıcı odaklı versiyonu ve yöntemler, özellikle iş ortamında bir değişiklik olduğunda, kuruluşların planlanan strateji yerine gerçekleştirdiği iş stratejisini sürekli olarak değerlendirmek için kullanılabilir.
This study examines the relationship between business strategy, ES strategy, strategic alignment of these strategies, flexibility and the business performance. The study examines alignment as a matching approach. A questionnaire survey was conducted to gather data from North American participants from service and manufacturing industries. The Partial Least Squares (PLS) method that is a Structured Equation Modeling (SEM) based statistical tool was used for analyzing the data. The study results show alignment has a significant and positive impact on performance. The alignment mediates the relationship between strategic flexibility of ERP and business performance. In order for ES to contribute to business value or performance, ES strategies need to be aligned with business strategies. The main limitations of this study include sample size (N=92) and possibly the nature of the data as the study uses cross-sectional data rather than a longitudinal study. The study results can help managers and practitioners to prioritize their ES plans and investments. The practitioner-oriented version of the instrument of this study and the methods can be used to continuously assess the organizations’ realized business strategy instead of planned strategies, especially when there is a shift in the business environment. "> [PDF] Kurumsal Sistemlerin Stratejik Hizalanması Üzerine Ampirik Bir Çalışma | [PDF] An Empirical Study on Strategic Alignment of Enterprise Systems Bu çalışma, iş stratejisi, ES stratejisi, bu stratejilerin stratejik uyumu, esneklik ve iş performansı arasındaki ilişkiyi incelemektedir. Çalışma, eşleştirme yaklaşımı olarak hizalamayı incelemektedir. Çalışmada hizmet ve imalat endüstrilerinden Kuzey Amerikalı katılımcılardan veri toplamak için bir anket çalışması kullanılmıştır. Verilerin analizinde Yapılandırılmış Eşitlik Modelleme (SEM) tabanlı bir istatistiksel araç olan Kısmi En Küçük Kareler (PLS) yöntemi kullanılmıştır. Çalışma sonuçları, uyumun performans üzerinde önemli ve olumlu bir etkisi olduğunu göstermektedir. Hizalama, ERP’nin stratejik esnekliği ile iş performansı arasındaki ilişkiye aracılık eder. ES’nin iş değerine veya performansına katkıda bulunması için ES stratejilerinin iş stratejileriyle uyumlu olması gerekir. Bu çalışmanın ana sınırlamaları, örneklem büyüklüğünü (N=92) ve çalışma boylamsal bir çalışma yerine kesitsel verileri kullandığından muhtemelen verilerin çeşidini içerir. Çalışma sonuçları, yöneticilerin ve uygulayıcıların ES planlarına ve yatırımlarına öncelik vermelerine yardımcı olabilir. Bu çalışmanın aracının uygulayıcı odaklı versiyonu ve yöntemler, özellikle iş ortamında bir değişiklik olduğunda, kuruluşların planlanan strateji yerine gerçekleştirdiği iş stratejisini sürekli olarak değerlendirmek için kullanılabilir. "> Bu çalışma, iş stratejisi, ES stratejisi, bu stratejilerin stratejik uyumu, esneklik ve iş performansı arasındaki ilişkiyi incelemektedir. Çalışma, eşleştirme yaklaşımı olarak hizalamayı incelemektedir. Çalışmada hizmet ve imalat endüstrilerinden Kuzey Amerikalı katılımcılardan veri toplamak için bir anket çalışması kullanılmıştır. Verilerin analizinde Yapılandırılmış Eşitlik Modelleme (SEM) tabanlı bir istatistiksel araç olan Kısmi En Küçük Kareler (PLS) yöntemi kullanılmıştır. Çalışma sonuçları, uyumun performans üzerinde önemli ve olumlu bir etkisi olduğunu göstermektedir. Hizalama, ERP’nin stratejik esnekliği ile iş performansı arasındaki ilişkiye aracılık eder. ES’nin iş değerine veya performansına katkıda bulunması için ES stratejilerinin iş stratejileriyle uyumlu olması gerekir. Bu çalışmanın ana sınırlamaları, örneklem büyüklüğünü (N=92) ve çalışma boylamsal bir çalışma yerine kesitsel verileri kullandığından muhtemelen verilerin çeşidini içerir. Çalışma sonuçları, yöneticilerin ve uygulayıcıların ES planlarına ve yatırımlarına öncelik vermelerine yardımcı olabilir. Bu çalışmanın aracının uygulayıcı odaklı versiyonu ve yöntemler, özellikle iş ortamında bir değişiklik olduğunda, kuruluşların planlanan strateji yerine gerçekleştirdiği iş stratejisini sürekli olarak değerlendirmek için kullanılabilir.
This study examines the relationship between business strategy, ES strategy, strategic alignment of these strategies, flexibility and the business performance. The study examines alignment as a matching approach. A questionnaire survey was conducted to gather data from North American participants from service and manufacturing industries. The Partial Least Squares (PLS) method that is a Structured Equation Modeling (SEM) based statistical tool was used for analyzing the data. The study results show alignment has a significant and positive impact on performance. The alignment mediates the relationship between strategic flexibility of ERP and business performance. In order for ES to contribute to business value or performance, ES strategies need to be aligned with business strategies. The main limitations of this study include sample size (N=92) and possibly the nature of the data as the study uses cross-sectional data rather than a longitudinal study. The study results can help managers and practitioners to prioritize their ES plans and investments. The practitioner-oriented version of the instrument of this study and the methods can be used to continuously assess the organizations’ realized business strategy instead of planned strategies, especially when there is a shift in the business environment. ">

Kurumsal Sistemlerin Stratejik Hizalanması Üzerine Ampirik Bir Çalışma

Bu çalışma, iş stratejisi, ES stratejisi, bu stratejilerin stratejik uyumu, esneklik ve iş performansı arasındaki ilişkiyi incelemektedir. Çalışma, eşleştirme yaklaşımı olarak hizalamayı incelemektedir. Çalışmada hizmet ve imalat endüstrilerinden Kuzey Amerikalı katılımcılardan veri toplamak için bir anket çalışması kullanılmıştır. Verilerin analizinde Yapılandırılmış Eşitlik Modelleme (SEM) tabanlı bir istatistiksel araç olan Kısmi En Küçük Kareler (PLS) yöntemi kullanılmıştır. Çalışma sonuçları, uyumun performans üzerinde önemli ve olumlu bir etkisi olduğunu göstermektedir. Hizalama, ERP’nin stratejik esnekliği ile iş performansı arasındaki ilişkiye aracılık eder. ES’nin iş değerine veya performansına katkıda bulunması için ES stratejilerinin iş stratejileriyle uyumlu olması gerekir. Bu çalışmanın ana sınırlamaları, örneklem büyüklüğünü (N=92) ve çalışma boylamsal bir çalışma yerine kesitsel verileri kullandığından muhtemelen verilerin çeşidini içerir. Çalışma sonuçları, yöneticilerin ve uygulayıcıların ES planlarına ve yatırımlarına öncelik vermelerine yardımcı olabilir. Bu çalışmanın aracının uygulayıcı odaklı versiyonu ve yöntemler, özellikle iş ortamında bir değişiklik olduğunda, kuruluşların planlanan strateji yerine gerçekleştirdiği iş stratejisini sürekli olarak değerlendirmek için kullanılabilir.

An Empirical Study on Strategic Alignment of Enterprise Systems

This study examines the relationship between business strategy, ES strategy, strategic alignment of these strategies, flexibility and the business performance. The study examines alignment as a matching approach. A questionnaire survey was conducted to gather data from North American participants from service and manufacturing industries. The Partial Least Squares (PLS) method that is a Structured Equation Modeling (SEM) based statistical tool was used for analyzing the data. The study results show alignment has a significant and positive impact on performance. The alignment mediates the relationship between strategic flexibility of ERP and business performance. In order for ES to contribute to business value or performance, ES strategies need to be aligned with business strategies. The main limitations of this study include sample size (N=92) and possibly the nature of the data as the study uses cross-sectional data rather than a longitudinal study. The study results can help managers and practitioners to prioritize their ES plans and investments. The practitioner-oriented version of the instrument of this study and the methods can be used to continuously assess the organizations’ realized business strategy instead of planned strategies, especially when there is a shift in the business environment.

___

  • Afandi, W. (2017). The Impact of Strategic IT-Business Alignment: Evidence from Saudi Private Small and Midsize Enterprises. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 8 (10), 48-63.
  • Al-Mudimigh, A., Zairi, M., & Al-Mashari, M. (2001). ERP Software Implementation: An Integrative Framework. European Journal of Information Systems, 10, 216–226.
  • Al-Surmi, A., Cao, G., & Duan, Y. (2020). The impact of aligning business, IT, and marketing strategies on firm performance. Industrial Marketing Management, 84, 39-49.
  • AlBar, A.M., & Hoque, M.R. (2019). Factors affecting cloud ERP adoption in Saudi Arabia: An empirical study. Information Development, 35(1), 150-164.
  • Albu, C.-N., Albu, N., Dumitru, M., & Dumitru, V. F. (2015). The impact of the interaction between context variables and enterprise resource planning systems on organizational performance: A case study from a transition economy. Information Systems Management, 32(3), 252-264.
  • Alghamdi, H. A. (2018). A service driven method for evaluating business and IT alignment University of Reading]
  • Armstrong, J. S., & Overton, T. S. (1977). Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys. Journal of Marketing Research, 14, 396-402. A r o i a n , L . A . ( 1 9 4 4 / 1 9 4 7 ) . T h e P r o b a b i l i t y F u n c t i o n o f t h e P r o d u c t o f Tw o N o r m a l l y Distributed Variables. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 18, 265-271.
  • Avison, D., Jones, J., Powell, P., & Wilson, D. (2004). Using and Validating the Strategic Alignment Model. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 13(3), 223-246.
  • Bahli, B., & Büyükkurt, M.D. (2005). Group Performance in Information Systems Project Groups: An Empirical Study. Journal of Information Technology Education, 4, 97-113.
  • Barclay, D. W., Higgins, C., & Thompson, R. (1995). The Partial Least Squares (PLS) Approach to Causal Modeling: Personal Computer Adoption and Use as an Illustration. Technology Studies, Special Issue, Research Methodology, 2(2), 285-309.
  • B a r o n , R . M . , & K e n n y, D . A . (1 9 8 6 ) . T h e M o d e r a t o r M e d i a t o r Va r i a b l e D i s t i n c t i o n i n S o c i a l P s y c h o l o g i c a l - R e s e a r c h - C o n c e p t u a l , S t r a t e g i c , a n d S t a t i s t i c a l C o n s i d e r a t i o n s . J o u r n a l of Personality and Social Psychology, 15(6), 1173-1182.
  • Barua, A., Kriebel, C., & Mukhopadhyay, T. (1995). Information Technologies and Business Value: An Analytic and Empirical Investigation. Information Systems Research, 6(1), 3-24.
  • Bazrafshan, H., & Mahmoudi, S. M. (2018). The Role of IT Flexibility in IT-Business Strategic Alignment. Toloue Mehr, 1(1), 103-124.
  • Bergeron, F., Raymond, J., & Rivard, S. (2001). Fit in Strategic Information Technology Management Research: An Empirical Comparison of Perspectives. Omega, 29(2), 125-142.
  • Bergeron, F., Raymond, J., & Rivard, S. (2004). Ideal Patterns of Strategic Alignment and Business Performance. Information & Management, 41(8), 1003-1020.
  • Bingi, P., Sharma, M. K., & Godla, J. (1999). Critical Issues Affecting an ERP Implementation. Information Systems Management, 16(3), 7-14.
  • Bitsini, N. (2015). Investigating ERP misalignment between ERP systems and implementing organizations in developing countries. Journal of Enterprise Resource Planning Studies, 2015, 1-12.
  • Bose, J. (2001). Achieving Data Quality in a Statistical Agency: A Methodological Perspective. Paper presented at the Proceedings of Statistics Canada
  • Symposium. Bowman, E.H., & Hurry, D. (1993). Strategy through the Option Lens: An Integrated View of Resource Investments and the Incremental-Choice Process. Academy of Management Review, 18(4), 760-782.
  • Brewer, G.A. (2006). All measures of performance are subjective: More evidence on US federal agencies. Public Service Performance: Perspectives on Measurement and Management, 35-54.
  • Brozovic, D. (2018). Strategic flexibility: A review of the literature. International Journal of Management Reviews, 20(1), 3-31.
  • Carignani, A., & Seifert, F. (2000, July). Competitive Advantage, Online Brokerage and IT: Evidence from Italian and German Companies. Paper presented at the Proceedings of ECIS2000, Wien.
  • Chan, Y.E. (1992). Business Strategy, Information Systems Strategy, and Strategic Fit: Measurement and Performance Impacts. The University of Western Ontario.
  • Chan, Y.E. (2002). Why Haven’t We Mastered Alignment? The Importance of the Informal Organizational Structure. MIS Quarterly Executive, 1(2-June).
  • Chan, Y.E., Huff, S.L., Barclay, D.W., & Copeland, D.G. (1997). Business Strategy Orientation, Information Systems Orientation and Strategic Alignment. Information Systems Research, 8(2), 125-150.
  • Chan, Y.E., & Reich, B.H. (2007). IT Alignment: What Have We Learned? Journal of Information Technology, 1-19. 228
  • Chaveesuk, S., & Hongsuwan, S. (2017). A structural equation model of ERP implementation success in Thailand. Review of Integrative Business and Economics Research, 6(3), 194.
  • Chen, Y., Wang, Y., Nevo, S., Benitez, J., & Kou, G. (2017). Improving strategic flexibility with information technologies: insights for firm performance in an emerging economy. Journal of Information Technology, 32(1), 10-25.
  • Chin, W.W., Marcolin, B.L., & Newsted, P.R. (2003). A Partial Least Squares Latent Variable Modeling Approach for Measuring Interaction Effects: Results from a Monte Carlo Simulation Study and an Electronic-mail Emotion/adoption Study. Information Systems Research, 14(2), 189-217.
  • Chin, W.W., & Newsted, P.R. (1999). Structural Equation Modeling Analysis with Small Samples Using Partial Least Squares. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Statistical Strategies for Small Sample Research (pp. 307-341): Thousand Oaks.
  • Chung, S.H., Byrd, T.A., Lewis, B.R., & Ford, F.N. (2005). An Empirical Study of the Relationships between IT Infrastructure Flexibility, Mass Customization, and Business Performance. The DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems, 36(3).
  • Chung, S.H., Rainer Jr., R.K., & Lewis, B.R. (2003). The Impact of Information Technology Infrastructure Flexibility on Strategic Alignment and Applications Implementations. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 11(11), 191–206.
  • Coltman, T., Tallon, P., Sharma, R., & Queiroz, M. (2015). Strategic IT alignment: twenty-five years on. Journal of Information Technology, 30(2), 91-100.
  • Cragg, P., King, M., & Hussin, H. (2002). IT Alignment and Firm Performance in Small Manufacturing Firms. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 11(2), 109-132.
  • Davenport, T.H. (1998). Putting the Enterprise into the Enterprise System. Harvard Business Review, July/ August, 121-131.
  • Davenport, T.H. (2000). The Future of Enterprise System-Enabled Organizations. Information Systems Frontiers; special issue of on The Future of Enterprise Resource Planning Systems Frontiers, 2(2), 163-180.
  • Demi, S., & Haddara, M. (2018). Do cloud ERP systems retire? An ERP lifecycle perspective. Procedia Computer Science, 138, 587-594.
  • Dillman, D.A. (2007). Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method (2nd Ed.). New York: John Wiles and Sons Inc.
  • Drazin, R., & Van de Ven, A.H. (1985). Alternative Forms of Fit in Contingency Theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, 30(4), 514-539.
  • Drummond, P., Araujo, F., & Borges, R. (2017). Meeting halfway: Assessing the differences between the perceptions of ERP implementers and end-users. Business Process Management Journal, 23(5), 936-956.
  • Duncan, N.B. (1995). Capturing Flexibility of Information Technology Infrastructure: A Study of Resource Characteristics and their Measure. Journal of Management Information Systems, 12(2), 37-57.
  • Epik, H. & Gökşen, Y. (2020). Küçük otellerde kurumsal strateji belirleme ı̇çin bir karar destek sistemi: Pilot çalışma. Acta Infologica, 4(1), 11-19. https:// doi.org/10.26650/acin.648401
  • Esteves, J.M., & Pastor, J.A. (1999). An ERP Life-cycle-based Research Agenda. Paper presented at the First International workshop in Enterprise Management and Resource Planning: Methods, Tools and Architectures – EMRPS’99, Venice, Italy.
  • Fink, A. (2008). How to Conduct Surveys: A Step by Step Guide (4th ed.): SAGE.
  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D.F. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
  • Gable, G.G., Chan, T., & Tan, W.G. (2001). Large Packaged Application Software Maintenance: A Research Framework. Journal of Software Maintenance and Evolution: Research and Practice, 13(6), 351-371.
  • Gerow, J.E., Grover, V., Thatcher, J., & Roth, P.L. (2014). Looking toward the future of IT–business strategic alignment through the past. MIS Quarterly, 38(4), 1159-1186.
  • Gerow, J.E., Thatcher, J.B., & Grover, V. (2015). Six types of IT-business strategic alignment: an investigation of the constructs and their measurement. European Journal of Information Systems, 24(5), 465-491.
  • Ghasemaghaei, M., Hassanein, K., & Turel, O. (2017). Increasing firm agility through the use of data analytics: The role of fit. Decision Support Systems, 101, 95-105.
  • Gibson, C.F., Holland, C.P., & Light, B. (1999). Enterprise Resource Planning: A Business Approach to Systems Development. Paper presented at the 32nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Hawaii, IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, California.
  • Goodhue, D.L., & Thompson, R.L. (1995). Task-technology fit and individual performance. MIS Quarterly, 213-236.
  • G o o d m a n , L . A . (19 6 0) . O n t h e E x a c t Va r i a n c e o f P r o d u c t s . J o u r n a l o f t h e A m e r i c a n S t a t i s t i c a l Association, 55, 708-713.
  • Gopal, A., Bostrom, R.P., & Chin, W.W. (1992). Applying Adaptive Structuration Theory to Investigate the Process of Group Support Systems Use. Journal of Management Information Systems, 9(3), 45-69.
  • Gupta, S., Kumar, S., Singh, S.K., Foropon, C., & Chandra, C. (2018). Role of cloud ERP on the performance of an organization: Contingent resource- based view perspective. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 29(2), 659-675.
  • Gupta, S., Qian, X., Bhushan, B., & Luo, Z. (2019). Role of cloud ERP and big data on firm performance: a dynamic capability view theory perspective. Management Decision, 57(8), 1857-1882.
  • Hair, J. F., Black, B., Babin, B., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate Data Analysis (6 Ed.). Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.
  • Hirscheim, R., & Sabherwal, R. (2001). Detours in the Path toward Strategic Information Systems Alignment. California Management Review, 44(1 - Fall), 87-108.
  • Holland, C. P., & Light, B. (1999). A Critical Success Factors Model for ERP Implementation. IEEE Software, May/ June, 30-36.
  • Hou, C.-K. (2020). The effects of IT infrastructure integration and flexibility on supply chain capabilities and organizational performance: An empirical study of the electronics industry in Taiwan. Information Development, 36(4), 576-602.
  • Huth, H. (2008). Organizing Cross-functional New Product Development Projects: The Phase-specific Effects of Organizational Antecedents.
  • Ilmudeen, A. (2021). The impact of managing IT on business-IT alignment and firm performance: an empirical study. Foresight, 23(6), 679-697.
  • Ilmudeen, A., & Bao, Y. (2020). IT strategy and business strategy mediate the effect of managing IT on firm performance: empirical analysis. Journal of Enterprise Information Management.
  • Ilmudeen, A., Bao, Y., & Alharbi, I.M. (2019). How does business-IT strategic alignment dimension impact on organizational performance measures: Conjecture and empirical analysis. Journal of Enterprise Information Management. 3(2),457-476.
  • Johansson, B., Sudzina, F., & Pucihar, A. (2014). Alignment of business and information strategies and its impact on business performance. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 15(5), 886-898.
  • Johnson, A.M. and Lederer, A.L. (2010). CEO/CIO mutual understanding, strategic alignment, and the contribution of IS to the organization. Information & Management, 47 (2010), 138–149.
  • Jorfi, S., Nor, K.M., & Najjar, L. (2017). An empirical study of the role of IT flexibility and IT capability in IT-business strategic alignment. Journal of Systems and Information Technology. 19(1/2), 2-21.
  • Kang, S., Park, J.H., & Yang, H.D. (2008). ERP Alignment for Positive Business Performance: Evidence from Korea’s Market. The Journal of Computer Information Systems, 48(4), 25-38.
  • Kappelman, L., McLean, E., Luftman, J., & Johnson, V. (2013). Key Issues of IT Organizations and Their Leadership: The 2013 SIM IT Trends Study. MIS Quarterly Executive, 12(4).
  • Kirmizi, M., & Kocaoglu, B. (2020). The key for success in enterprise information systems projects: development of a novel ERP readiness assessment method and a case study. Enterprise Information Systems, 14(1), 1-37.
  • Kock, N. (2010). WarpPLS 1.0 User Manual.Unpublished manuscript, Laredo, Texas.
  • Komorita, S.S., & Graham, W.K. (1965). Number of scale points and the reliability of scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 25, 987–995.
  • Kumar, R.L., & Stylianou, A.C. (2014). A process model for analyzing and managing flexibility in information systems. European Journal of Information Systems, 23(2), 151-184.
  • Lambert, D.M., & Harrington, T.C. (1990). Measuring Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys. Journal of Business Logistics, 11(5-25).
  • Lederer, A.L., & Mendelow, A.L. (1989). The Coordination of Information Systems Plans with Business Plans. Journal of Management Information Systems, 6(2-Fall), 5-19.
  • Li, Q., Wang, C., Wu, J., Li, J., & Wang, Z. Y. (2011). Towards the business–information technology alignment in cloud computing environment: an approach based on collaboration points and agents. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 24(11), 1038-1057.
  • Loukis, E., Sapounas, I., & Aivalis, K. (2010). Enterprise Systems Strategic Alignment and Business Value.
  • Luftman, J., Papp, R., & Brier, T. (1999). Enablers and Inhibitors of Business-IT Alignment. Communications of the AIS, 1(11). 238.
  • Luftman, J.N. (Ed.). (1996). Competing in the Information Age: Strategic Alignment in Practice. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Majhi, S.G., Anand, A., Mukherjee, A., & Rana, N.P. (2021). The Optimal Configuration of IT-Enabled Dynamic Capabilities in a firm’s Capabilities Portfolio: a Strategic Alignment Perspective. Information Systems Frontiers, 1-16.
  • Malik, M.O., & Khan, N. (2021). Analysis of ERP implementation to develop a strategy for its success in developing countries. Production Planning & Control, 32(12), 1020-1035.
  • Matalamäki, M.J., & Joensuu-Salo, S. (2021). Digitalization and strategic flexibility–a recipe for business growth. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development.
  • Mikalef, P., Pateli, A., & van de Wetering, R. (2021). IT architecture flexibility and IT governance decentralisation as drivers of IT-enabled dynamic capabilities and competitive performance: The moderating effect of the external environment. European Journal of Information Systems, 30(5), 512-540.
  • Miles, R.E., & Snow, C.C. (1978). Organizational Strategy, Structure, and Process. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Morgan, R.E., & Strong, C.A. (2003). Business performance and dimensions of strategic orientation. Journal of Business Research, 56(3), 163-176.
  • Motalab, M.B., & Shohag, S.A.M. (2011). Cloud computing and the business consequences of ERP use. International Journal of Computer Applications, 28(8), 31–37.
  • Muscatello, J.R., Small, M.H., & Chen, I.J. (2003). Implementing Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) Systems in Small and Midsize Manufacturing Firms. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 23(8), 850.
  • Nunnaly, J. (1978). Psychometric Theory. New York, NY: McGraw Hill. Oh, W., & Pinsonneault, A. (2007). On the assessment of the strategic value of information technologies: conceptual and analytical approaches. MIS Quarterly, 239-265.
  • Ozbek, A., Yildiz, A., & Alan, M. A. (2021). Türk tekstil işletmelerinin endüstri 4.0’a adaptasyonunun incelenmesi. Acta Infologica, 5(2), 255-265. https:// doi.org/10.26650/acin.910774
  • Panayiotou, N.A., Gayialis, S.P., Evangelopoulos, N.P., & Katimertzoglou, P.K. (2015), A business process modeling-enabled requirements engineering framework for ERP implementation. Business Process Management Journal, 21(3), 628-664.
  • Panorama, C.S. (2016). 2016 ERP Report. Retrieved from http://go.panorama-consulting.com/rs/panoramaconsulting/images/2016/ERPReport.pdf
  • Pasaribu, R.B. (2016). Flexibility of Adempiere Free Open Source ERP. Proceeding, The 1st Sebelas Maret Conference on Entrepreneurship, Innovation and Community Development (SMARTCEIC)(2016).
  • Pollack, T.A. (2010). Strategic Information Systems Planning. Paper presented at the Proceedings of ASCUE.
  • Porter, M.E. (1980). Competitive Strategy. New York: The Free Press.
  • Porter, M.E. (1987). From Competitive Advantage to Corporate Strategy. In Readings in Strategic Management (pp. 234-255). Palgrave, London.
  • Prieto, V.C., & de Carvalho, M.M. (2018). Can internal strategic alignment influence performance? An empirical research applying structural equation modelling. Academia Revista Latinoamericana de Administración, 31(3), 585-604.
  • Rao, S.S. (2000). Enterprise Resource Planning: Business Needs and Technologies. Journal: Industrial Management & Data Systems, 100(2), 81-88.
  • Reich, B.H., & Benbasat, I. (1996). Measuring the Linkage between Business and Information Technology Objectives. MIS Quarterly, 20(1), 55-81.
  • Reich, B.H., & Benbasat, I. (2000). Factors that Influence the Social Dimensions of Alignment Between Business and Information Technology Objectives. MIS Quarterly, 24(1), 81-113.
  • Sabherwal, R., & Chan, Y.E. (2001). Alignment between Business and IS Strategies: A Study of Prospectors, Analyzers, and Defenders. Information Systems Research, 12(1), 11-34. Copyright (2001), the Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences, 7240 Parkway Drive, Suite 300, Hanover, Maryland 21076 USA.
  • Sabherwal, R., Sabherwal, S., Havakhor, T., & Steelman, Z. (2019). How does strategic alignment affect firm performance? The roles of information technology investment and environmental uncertainty. MIS Quarterly, 43(2), 453-474.
  • Sadrzadehrafiei, S., Chofreh, A.G., Hosseini, N.K., & Sulaiman, R. (2013). The benefits of enterprise resource planning (ERP) system implementation in dry food packaging industry. Procedia Technology, 11, 220-226.
  • Segev, E. (1989). A Systematic Comparative Analysis and Synthesis of Two Business-Level Strategic Typologies. Strategic Management Journal, 10(5), 487-505.
  • Shukla, S., Agarwal, S., & Shukla, A. (2012). Trends in cloud-ERP for SMB’s: A review. International Journal of New Innovations in Engineering and Technology, 1(1), 7-11.
  • Singh, S., Darwish, T.K., & Potočnik, K. (2016). Measuring organizational performance: A case for subjective measures. British Journal of Management, 27(1), 214-224.
  • Siswanto, J., & Utomo, A.P. (2008). ERP System Selection Model for Low Cost NGN Phone Company. International Journal of Electronic Business Management, 6(3), 153-160.
  • S o b e l , M . E . (19 8 2) . A s y m p t o t i c I n t e r v a l s f o r I n d i r e c t E f f e c t s i n S t r u c t u r a l E q u a t i o n s M o d e l s . I n S. Leinhart (Ed.), Sociological Methodology (pp. 290-312). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Stefanou, C. (2001). A Framework for the Ex-Ante Evaluation of ERP Software. European Journal of Information Systems, 10(4), 204.
  • Tallon, P.P., & Pinsonneault, A. (2011). Competing Perspectives on the Link between Strategic Information Technology Alignment and Organizational Agility: Insights from a Mediation Model. MIS Quarterly, 35(2), 463-486.
  • Taskin, N., Verville, J., & Keskin, T. (2014). Strategic alignment of enterprise systems and business strategies under systems and bivariate approaches. In 2014 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 4034-4043).
  • Tian, J., Wang, K., Chen, Y., & Johansson, B. (2009). From IT Deployment Capabilities to Competitive Advantage: An Exploratory Study in China. Information Systems Frontiers. 12(3), 239-255.
  • Umble, E.J., Haft, R.R., & Umble, M.M. (2003). Enterprise Resource Planning: Implementation Procedures and Critical Success Factors. European Journal of Operational Research, 146(2), 241-257.
  • Uysal, M. P., & Cetinkaya, E. (2021). Information technology governance practices, challenges and effects on enterprise performance. Acta Infologica, 5(1), 65-78. https://doi.org/10.26650/acin.832561
  • Venkatraman, N. (1989). Strategic Orientation of Business Enterprises: The Construct, Dimensionality, and Measurement. Management Science, 35(8), 942-963.
  • Venkatraman, N. (1985). Strategic Orientation of Business Enterprises: The Construct and its Measurement (Management) University of Pittsburgh].
  • Vij, S., & Bedi, H.S. (2016). Are subjective business performance measures justified? International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 66(5), 603-621.
  • Ward, J., & Peppard, J. (2002). Strategic Planning for Information Systems (3rd Edition ed.): John Wiley and Sons Ltd. Weill, P., & Broadbent, M. (1998). Leveraging the New Infrastructure: How Market Leaders Capitalize on Information Technology. Boston: Harvard University Press.
  • We i l l , P. , & O l s o n , M . (19 8 9) . M a n a g i n g I n v e s t m e n t i n I n f o r m a t i o n Te c h n o l o g y - M i n i C a s e Examples and Implications. MIS Quarterly, 13(1), 3-17.
  • Wiedemann, A., Wiesche, M., Gewald, H., & Krcmar, H. (2020). Understanding how DevOps aligns development and operations: a tripartite model of intra-IT alignment. European Journal of Information Systems, 29(5), 458-473.
  • Wu, S. P.-J., Straub, D.W., & Liang, T.-P. (2015). How information technology governance mechanisms and strategic alignment influence organizational performance. MIS Quarterly, 39(2), 497-518.
  • Yuliansyah, Y., & Jermias, J. (2018). Strategic performance measurement system, organizational learning and service strategic alignment: Impact on performance. International Journal of Ethics and Systems, 34(4), 564-592.
Acta Infologica-Cover
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 2 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 2017
  • Yayıncı: İstanbul Üniversitesi
Academic Researches Index - FooterLogo