A.k. SADİBEKOV, Zh.s. YERGUBEKOVA, B.u. ATİKOL

Ancıent Turkıc Inscrıptıon Based on Symbols of Ancıent Turkıc Trıbes

The author seeks to substantiate the fact that the symbols of the ancient Turkic tribes influenced the formation of ancient Turkic inscription. This article discusses the views of other scientists of this research area. The author reviews and analyzes the scientific works of famous turkologists. The topicality of this paper is the conclusions against the idea that the ancient Turkic writing was formed from Western countries or under the influence of other peoples writings. The article interprets the views of ancient Turkic scripts of such scholars as DG Messershmidt, F. Stralenberg, V. Thomsen and V. Radlov, who founded the Turkic sciences in the XVII-XVII centuries. To scientifically substantiate his position, the author relied on the work of eminent Turkologists, such as A. Amanzholov, K. Sartkozhauly, N. Bazylkhan, A. Kairzhanov.

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Ancient Turkic Language, Turkic inscriptions, symbols, tribal symbols, Turkic runic inscriptions, Turkology

Ancıent Turkıc Inscrıptıon Based on Symbols of Ancıent Turkıc Trıbes

Keywords:

Ancient Turkic Language, Turkic inscriptions, symbols, tribal symbols, Turkic runic inscriptions, Turkology,

PDF

___

1. Nazarbaev N. Uly dalanyń jetі qyry. // https://aikyn.kz/2018/11/21/73794.html
2. Bazylhan N. Túrіk bіtіktaný salasynyń teorııalyq máselelerі: tarıhı-mádenı aspektіlerі. Kóne túrkі jazýlarynyń zerttelýі: búgіnі men bolashagy. –Astana: Er-Dáýlet, 2004. -232 bet.
3. Bazylhan N. Qazaqstan tarıhy týraly túrkі derektemelerі. 2-tom. -Almaty: Daık-Press, -2005 j. -245 bet.
4. Sartqojauly Q. Hýnný jazýy. // Álem.Almanah. 1. Almaty, 1991.
5.Nazarbaev N.Á. «Tarıh tolqynynda». Almaty: – Atamura, 2003. 288 b.
6.Qazaq rýlary. kk.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qazaq_rýlary
7. Zlobın P. Tıýrkskaıa pısmennost proızoshla ot rodovoı tamgı // «Komsomolskaıa Pravda» 26.04.2017. http://www.kp.kz/3252
8. Torlanbaeva K.Ý. Tıýrkskıe rýnıcheskıe pamıatnıkı kak ıstochnık po ıstorıı kazahstana. Reports of the national academy of sciences of the republic of Kazakhstan. Volume 3, number 307 (2016), 156 – 166. ISSN 2224-5227
9.Kaırjanov A. K. Genezıs tıýrkskogo rýnıcheskogo pısma (na materıale tamgı-znakov evrazııskıh kochevnıkov) / A. K. Kaırjanov // Mova. - 2014. - № 22. - S. 12-24. ISSN 2307-4558.
10.N.Konstantinov, V.Soenov, S.Trifanova, S.Svyatko. History and culture of the early Tűrkic period: A review of archaeological monuments in the Russian Altai from the 4th–6th century AD. Archaeological Research in Asia. Available online 29 June 2018 ISSN 2352-2267 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ara.2018.06.002
11. Torlanbaeva K.W. Tyurkskïe rwnïçeskïe pamyatnïkï kak ïstoçnïk po ïstorïï kazaxstana. Reports of the national academy of sciences of the republic of Kazakhstan. Volume 3, number 307 (2016), 156 – 166. ISSN 2224-5227
12.Kaïrjanov A.K. Genezïs tyurkskogo rwnïçeskogo pïsma (na materïale tamgï-znakov evrazïyskïx koçevnïkov) / A. K. Kaïrjanov // Mova. - 2014. - № 22. - S. 12-24. ISSN 2307-4558.
13. Konstantinov N., Soenov V., Trifanova S., Svyatko S. History and culture of the early Tűrkic period: A review of archaeological monuments in the Russian Altai from the 4th–6th century AD. Archaeological Research in Asia. Available online 29 June 2018 ISSN 2352-2267 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ara.2018.06.002