A Brief History of Research of Ancient Settlements and Myths, Ancient Names of the Middle Flow of Syrdarya

The steppes of the Syrdaria are the natural boundary between the nomadic peoples of Central Asia and the peoples involved in sedentary agriculture. Due to the large number of ancient settlements and settlements on the Syrdaria River and the dense population of the settlers in this area of Syrdaria is a natural boundary between nomadic and sedentary peoples of Central Asia. The article begins with the confluence of the Naryn and Karadaria rivers in the Fergana basin and ends with several tributaries: the Incardarya and Janadarya rivers, as well as the main tributary of the Syr-Darya, draining into the Aral Sea. Medieval cities and toponyms such as Sutkent and Bairkum were also studied and scientifically analysed. To this end, the authors investigated written information and archaeological sources, and made an attempt to systematically characterize the named settlements. The article attempts to attract the attention of the general public to the archaeological study, popularization of the named monuments in order to include the monuments in the list of tourist sites, the introduction of monuments into scientific circulation

A Brief History of Research of Ancient Settlements and Myths, Ancient Names of the Middle Flow of Syrdarya

The steppes of the Syrdaria are the natural boundary between the nomadic peoples of Central Asia and the peoples involved in sedentary agriculture. Due to the large number of ancient settlements and settlements on the Syrdaria River and the dense population of the settlers in this area of Syrdaria is a natural boundary between nomadic and sedentary peoples of Central Asia. The article begins with the confluence of the Naryn and Karadaria rivers in the Fergana basin and ends with several tributaries: the Incardarya and Janadarya rivers, as well as the main tributary of the Syr-Darya, draining into the Aral Sea. Medieval cities and toponyms such as Sutkent and Bairkum were also studied and scientifically analysed. To this end, the authors investigated written information and archaeological sources, and made an attempt to systematically characterize the named settlements. The article attempts to attract the attention of the general public to the archaeological study, popularization of the named monuments in order to include the monuments in the list of tourist sites, the introduction of monuments into scientific circulation

___

  • 1. Shalekenov U. Onegelі omіr / bas redak. Mutanov G. Sh. 33. [Moral life]. – Almaty: Kazak universitetі, 2014. – 500 b. [in Kazakh]
  • 2. Kozha M.B. Ortagasyrlyk Otyrar: anyzdar, derekter, zertteuler [Medieval Otrar: legends, facts, research]. – Turkіstan: Turan, 2006. – 238 b. [in Kazakh]
  • 3. Kazakstan tarihy turaly kytai derektemelerі. І tom. / bas redak. Kul-Muhammed M.A. [Chinese details about the history of Kazakhstan]. – Almaty: Daik-Press, 2005. – 396 b. [in Kazakh]
  • 4. Baypakov K.M. Ezhelgі zhane ortagasyrdagy Otyrar [Otrar in ancient and medieval Times]. – Almaty: Kazygurt, 2007. – 248 b. [in Kazakh]
  • 5. «Otyrar» ensiklopediyasy [Otrar encyclopedia]. – Almaty: Arys, 2005. – 372 b. [in Kazakh]
  • 6. Kazakstan tarihy turaly turkі derektemelerі. ІІ tom / bas redak. Tasmagambetov I.N. [Turkic details about the history of Kazakhstan]. – Almaty: Daik-Press, 2005. – 397 b. [in Kazakh]
  • 7. Seraly N.O., Sizdikov B.S. Ogyz taypalarynyn dіni nanym-senіmderі [Religious and religious beliefs of the Oghuz tribes] // Iasaui universitetіnіn habarshysy. – 2021. – №2(120). – B. 30–40. https://doi.org/10.47526/habarshy.vi2.604 [in Kazakh]
  • 8. Seraly N.O., Sizdikov B.S., Seraliev A.A. Farab oazisіndegі Ogyz memleketіnіn sayasi ortalyktary [Political centers of the Oghuz state in the farab Oasis] // L.N. Gumilev atyndagy Euraziya ulttyk universitetіnіn Habarshysy. Tarihi gylymdar. Filosofiya. Dіntanu seriiasy. – 2020. – №3 (132). – B. 55–67. https://doi.org/10.32523/2616-7255-2020-132-3-55-67 [in Kazakh]
  • 9. Mahmut Kashkari. Turіk tіlіnіn sozdіgі (Diani lugat-it-turіk). 3 tomdyk shygarmalar zhinagy. І tom. [Dictionary of Turkish (Diani lugat-it-Turk)]. – Almaty: Hant, 1997. – 531 b. [in Kazakh]
  • 10. Ageeva E.I., Pacevich G.I. Iz istorii osedlyh poselenii i gorodov Yuzhnogo Kazahstana V kn.: Trudy instituta istorij, arheologii i etnografii. Tom-5. [From the history of settled settlements and cities of Southern Kazakhstan]. – Alma-Ata: Akademiya nauki Kazahskoi SSR, 1958. – S. 147–157. [in Russian]
  • 11. [Electronic resource]. URL: https://kk.wikipedia.org
  • 12. Biyarov B.B. Zher-su attarynyn sozzhasamdyk ulgіlerі [Word-forming examples of land-water names]. – Almaty: Memlekettіk tіldі damytu instituty, 2012. – 459 b. [in Kazakh]
  • 13. Maksimova A.G., Mershiyev M.S., Vaynberg B.I., Levina L.M. Drevnosti Chardary (Arheologicheskie issledovaniya v zone Chardarinskogo vodohranilisha) [Antiquities of Chardara (Archaeological research in the area of the Chardara reservoir)]. – Alma-Ata: 1968. – S. 264. [in Russian]
  • 14. [Electronic resource]. URL: https://kk.encyclopedia.kz/.
  • 15. Parmenkul S.T., Seraliev A., Sizdikov B.S., Almazuly Sh. 2020 zhyly Otyrar kalazhurtynda zhurgіzіlgen arheologiyalyk kazba zhumystarynyn natizhelerі [Results of archaeological excavations conducted in the Otyrar settlement in 2020] // Iasaui universitetіnіn habarshysy. – 2020. – №4(118). – B. 283–297. https://doi.org/10.47526/2020/2664-0686.054 [in Kazakh]
  • 16. Baypakov K.M., Avizova A.K. Tamgoobraznye znaki na keramike s pamyatnikov Otrarskogo oazisa doarabskoy epohi [Tamgo-like signs on ceramics from the monuments of the Otrar oasis to the Arab era] // Povolzhskaya Arheologiya. –2017. – №3 (21). – S. 142–155. https://doi.org/10.24852/pa2017.3.21.155.167 [in Russian]