Hüseyin Gürkan Güneç, Hüseyin Hamza Onay, Beril Ekinci, Ayşegül Özyer Yaran, Tennur Kasimi, Aleyna Danacı

Geçmişten günümüze endodontide kullanılan Nikel Titanyum aletler; evrimden devrime jenerasyonlar arası bir yolculuk

Modern Endodontik tedavilerin başarı ve başarısızlıklarında diş hekimlerinin tecrübesi ve kullanılan teknolojik ürünlerin payı günümüzde çok önemli bir rol oynamaktadır. Özellikle, klinisyenlerin büyüteç, dental operasyon mikroskobu, den- tal volumetrik tomografi, rubber-dam ve nikel-titanyum (NiTi) kanal eğeleri gibi ürünleri kullanması endodontik tedavinin başarısını anlamlı derecede arttırmaktadır. Kliniklerimizde, endodontik tedavi yaparken genellikle en çok kullandığımız alet ise paslanmaz çelik veya NiTi kök kanal eğe sistemleridir. Her iki farklı türdeki eğelerin kendi içerisindeki avantaj ve de- zavantajlarına rağmen, günümüzde endodontik tedavi yapı- lırken NiTi’den yapılmış aletler daha çok tercih edilmektedir. NiTi eğelerin hızlı ve pratik kullanımına rağmen, diş hekimleri endodontik tedavi uygulamalarında bu eğelerin kullanımın- da dikkatli davranmaları ve kullanacakları NiTi eğeleri çok iyi tanımaları gerekmektedir. Bu derlemenin amacı; modern en- dodonti pratiğinde sıklıkla kullandığımız NiTi aletlerin yıllar içerisinde yapmış olduğu tasarım değişikliklerini, sistem gün- cellemelerini ve jenerasyonlar arası farklılıklarını değerlendir- mek ve açıklamaktır.

Nickel-Titanium instruments used in endodontics from past to present; a journey between generations from evolution to revolution

n the success and failures of modern endodontic treatments, both the experience of dentists and the using technological products’s parts are played a very important role today. In particular, practitioners make use of products such as loupe, dental operation microscope, dental volumetric tomography, rubber-dam and nickel-titanium (NiTi) rotary files significant- ly increases the success of endodontic treatment. The most commonly used instrument in endodontic treatment is stain- less steel or NiTi rotary file systems in our clinics. Despite the advantages and disadvantages of both different types of files, the instruments made of NiTi are more preferred when ad- ministering endodontic treatment. In addition to despite the rapid and practical using of NiTi files, dentists need to be ca- reful in the using of these files and know them very well in en- dodontic treatments. The purpose of this review is to evaluate and explain the design changes, system updates and interge- nerational differences of NiTi instruments that we frequently use in modern endodontics treatment over the years.

PDF

___

1. Esposito PT, Cunningham CJ. A comparison of canal preparation with nickel-titanium and stainless steel instru- ments. J Endod. 1995; 21: 173-176.
2. Cleary P. Five steps for success in endodontics. J Ir Dent Assoc. 2017; 63: 30-37.
3. Valavanis D, Spyropoulos, G Kerezoudis N. The signifi- cance of endodontic therapy before an endodontic sur- gery. Odontostomatol Prood. 1990; 44: 387-394.
4. Schneider SW. A comparison of canal preparations in straight and curved root canals. Oral Surgery, Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1971; 32: 271-275.
5. Tabassum S, Zafar K, Umer F. Nickel-Titanium Rotary Systems: What’s New. Eur Endod J. 2019; 4: 111-117.
6. Shen Y, Zhou HM, Zheng YF, Peng B, Haapasalo M. Current challenges and concepts of the thermomecha- nical treatment of nickel-titanium instruments. J Endod. 2013; 39: 163-172.
7. Deari S, Zehnder M, Al‐Jadaa A. Effect of dentine cut- ting efficiency on the lateral force created by torquecont- rolled rotary instruments. Int Endod J. May 2020:iej.13319.
8. Shantiaee Y, Dianat O, Mosayebi G, Namdari M, Tordik P. Effect of Root Canal Preparation Techniques on Crack Formation in Root Dentin. J Endod. 2019; 45: 447-452.
9. Üstün Y. Dört farklı döner sistemlerle yapılan kök kanal preparasyonunun epoks rezin içerikli bir patın dentin tü- büllerine penetrasyonuna olan etkisinin SEM kullanılarak incelenmesi. 2011.
10. Ya S, Haapasalo M. Three-dimensional Analysis of Cutting Behavior of Nickel-Titanium Rotary Instruments by Microcomputed Tomography. J Endod. 2008; 34: 606-610.
11. Tharuni SL, Parameswaran A, Sukumaran VG. A com- parison of canal preparation using the K-file and lightspe- ed in resin blocks. Journal of Endodontics 1996; 22(9): 474-476.
12. Cai HX, Cheng HL, Song JW, Chen SY. Comparison of Hero 642 and K3 rotary nickel-titanium files in curved canals of molars and a systematic review of the literature. Exp Ther Med. 2014; 8: 1047-1054.
13. Taşdemir T, Aydemir H, Inan U, Unal O. Canal prepa- ration with Hero 642 rotary Ni-Ti instruments compared with stainless steel hand K-file assessed using computed tomography. Int Endod J. 2005; 38: 402-408.
14. Guppy DR, Curtis RV, Ford TR. Dentine chips produ- ced by nickel-titanium rotary instruments. Dent Trauma- tol. 2000; 16: 258-264.
15. Hülsmann M, Herbst U, Schäfers F. Comparative study of root-canal preparation using Lightspeed and Quantec SC rotary NiTi instruments. Int Endod J. 2003; 36: 748- 756.
16. Gavini G, dos Santos M, Caldeira CL, Machado M, Fre- ire L et al. Nickel-titanium instruments in endodontics: A concise review of the state of the art. Braz Oral Res. 2018; 32: 44-65.
17. Cohen S BR. Cohen’s Pathways of the Pulp Expert Consult. 8th Edition. 2002. p.306,308,311,312,317.318,3 36,534,535.
18. Miserendino LJ, Moser JB, Heuer MA, Osetek EM. Cutting efficiency of endodontic instruments. Part II: Analysis of tip design. J Endod. 1986; 12: 8-12.
19. Madan N, Rathnam A, Shigli AL, Indushekar KR. K-file vs ProFiles in cleaning capacity and instrumentation time in primary molar root canals: an in vitro study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2011;2 9: 2-6.
20. Guilford WL, Lemons JE, Eleazer PD. A Comparison of Torque Required to Fracture Rotary Files With Tips Bound in Simulated Curved Canal, Journal of Endodontics 2005; 31: 468-470.
21. Albrecht LJ, Baumgartner JC, Marshall JG. Evaluation of apical debris removal using various sizes and tapers of ProFile GT files. J Endod. 2004; 30: 425-428.
22. Adiguzel M, Isken I, Pamukcu II. Comparison of cyclic fatigue resistance of XP-endo Shaper, HyFlex CM, Flex- Master and Race instruments. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2018; 12: 208-212.
23. Hübscher W, Barbakow F, Peters OA. Root-canal pre- paration with FlexMaster: canal shapes analysed by mic- ro-computed tomography. Int Endod J. 2003; 36(11): 740- 7.
24. Gambarini G, Grande NM, Plotino G, Somma F, Garala M, De Luca M, et al. Fatigue resistance of engine-driven rotary nickel-titanium instruments produced by new ma- nufacturing methods. J Endod. 2008; 34: 1003-5.
25. Schäfer E, Vlassis M. Comparative investigation of two rotary nickel-titanium instruments: ProTaper versus RaCe. Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability in se- verely curved root canals of extracted teeth. Int Endod J. 2004; 37: 239-48.
26. Busquim S, Cunha RS, Freire L, Gavini G, Machado ME, Santos M. A micro-computed tomography evaluation of long-oval canal preparation using reciprocating or ro- tary systems. Int Endod J. 2015; 48: 1001-1006.
27. Gianluca G. The K3 rotary nickel titanium instrument system. Endod Top. 2005; 10: 179-182.
28. Mohammadzade Akhlaghi N, Khalilak Z, Baradaran Mohajeri L, Sheikholeslami M, Saedi S. Comparison of Canal Preparation Pattern of K3 and ProTaper Rotary Files in Curved Resin Blocks. Iran Endod J. 2008; 3: 11-16.
29. Plotino G, Grande NM, Falanga A, Di Giuseppe IL, La- morgese V, et al. Dentine removal in the coronal portion of root canals following two preparation techniques. Int Endod J. 2007; 40: 852-858.
30. Veltri M, Mollo A, Mantovani L, Pini P, Balleri P, et al. A comparative study of Endoflare-Hero Shaper and Mtwo NiTi instruments in the preparation of curved root canals. Int Endod J. 2005; 38: 610-616.
31. Bürklein S, Schäfer E. Apically extruded debris with reciprocating single-file and full-sequence rotary instru- mentation systems. J Endod. 2012; 38: 850-852.
32. Ha J-H, Kwak SW, Kim S-K, Kim H-C. Screw-in forces during instrumentation by various file systems. Restor Dent Endod. 2016; 41: 304.
33. Ellemieke SH, Wu MK, Wesselink PR, Shemesh H. Effects of Self-Adjusting File, Mtwo, and ProTaper on the Root Canal Wall. JOE 2013; 39(2); 262-264.
34. Gagliardi J, Versiani MA, De Sousa-Neto MD, Pla- zas-Garzon A, Basrani B. Evaluation of the shaping chara- cteristics of ProTaper Gold, ProTaper NEXT, and ProTaper Universal in curved canals. J Endod. 2015; 41: 1718-1724.
35. Pentelescu C, Colceriu L, Pastrav O, Culic C, Chisnoiu R. In vitro evaluation of root canal preparation with two ro- tary instrument systems - pro taper and hero shaper. Clu- jul Med. 2015; 88: 395-402.
36. Aydin C, Inan U, Yasar S, Bulucu B, & Tunca, Y. M. Comparison of shaping ability of RaCe and Hero Shaper instruments in simulated curved canals. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endo- dontology, (2008). 105(3), e92–e97.
37. Kesim B. Farklı özellikteki nikel-titanyum kök kanal eğelerinin kök kanalında mikro çatlak oluşturma etkisinin in vitro incelenmesi (uzmanlık tezi). 2015.
38. Gambarini G, Plotino G, Grande NM, Al-Sudani D, De Luca M, et al. Mechanical properties of nickel-titanium rotary instruments produced with a new manufacturing technique. Int Endod J. 2011; 44: 337-341.
39. Johnson E, Lloyd A, Kuttler S, Namerow K. Compa- rison between a Novel Nickel-Titanium Alloy and 508 Nitinol on the Cyclic Fatigue Life of ProFile 25/.04 Rotary Instruments. J Endod. 2008; 34: 1406-1409.
40. Gambarini G, Testarelli L, Galli M. The effect of a new finishing process on the torsional resistance of twisted ni- ckel-titanium rotary instruments. Minerva Stomatol. 2010; 59(7-8): 401-6.
41. Xia M, Sun Q. Rotation and temperature jumps in non-linear torsional vibration of NiTi wire. Int J Solids Stru- ct. 2015; 56-57: 220-234.
42. Rodrigues RCV, Lopes HP, Elias CN, Amaral G, Vieira VTL, et al. Influence of different manufacturing methods on the cyclic fatigue of rotary nickel-titanium endodontic instruments. J Endod. 2011; 37: 1553-1557.
43. Huang X, Shen Y, Wei X, Haapasalo M. Fatigue Re- sistance of Nickel-titanium Instruments Exposed to Hi- gh-concentration Hypochlorite. J Endod. 2017; 43: 1847- 1851.
44. Pérez-Higueras JJ, Arias A, de la Macorra JC. Cyclic fatigue resistance of K3, K3XF, and twisted file nickel-tita- nium files under continuous rotation or reciprocating mo- tion. J Endod. 2013; 39(12): 1585-8.
45. Üstün Y, Aslan T, Sagsen B, Kesim B. The effects of different nickel-titanium instruments on dentinal microc- rack formations during root canal preparation. Eur J Dent. 2015; 9: 41-46.
46. Da Cunha Peixoto IF, Pereira ES, da Silva JG, Viana AC, Buono VT, Bahia MG. Flexural fatigue and torsional resistance of ProFile GT and ProFile GT series X instru- ments. J Endod. 2010; 36(4): 741-4.
47. Shen Y, Zhou HM, Wang Z, Campbell L, Zheng YF, et al. Phase transformation behavior and mechanical pro- perties of thermomechanically treated K3XF nickel-titani- um instruments. J Endod. 2013; 39: 919-923.
48. De Arruda Santos L, De Azevedo Bahia MG, De Las Casas EB, Buono VTL. Comparison of the mechanical behavior between controlled memory and superelastic nickel-titanium files via finite element analysis. J Endod. 2013; 39: 1444-1447.
49. Bhatt A, Rajkumar B. A comparative evaluation of cyc- lic fatigue resistance for different endodontic NiTi rotary files: An in-vitro study. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2019; 9: 119-121.
50. Azim AA, Aksel H, Zhuang T, Mashtare T, Babu JP, et al. Efficacy of 4 Irrigation Protocols in Killing Bacteria Co- lonized in Dentinal Tubules Examined by a Novel Confo- cal Laser Scanning Microscope Analysis. J Endod. 2016; 42: 928-934.
51. Bao P, Shen Y, Lin J, Haapasalo M. In Vitro Efficacy of XP-endo Finisher with 2 Different Protocols on Biofilm Removal from Apical Root Canals. J Endod. 2017; 43: 321- 325.
52. Uslu G, Özyürek T, Yılmaz K, Gündoğar M, Plotino G. Apically Extruded Debris during Root Canal Instrumenta- tion with Reciproc Blue, HyFlex EDM, and XP-endo Sha- per Nickel-titanium Files. J Endod. 2018; 44: 856-859.
53. Dental I. Ürünler, duyurular: EndoArt. Türk Diş Hekim- leri Birliği Dergisi. 2020; 175: 50.
54. Pit AB, Borcean IA, Vărgatu IA, Mai A, Shyblak M, et al. Evaluatıon of the tıme and effıcıency of trunatomy, VDW. Rotate, Protaper Gold and Recıproc Blue ın shapıng root canals - an ın vıtro study. Romanian Journal of Oral Reha- bilitation 2020; 12; 250-258.
55. Shen Y, Hieawy A, Huang X, Wang ZJ, Maezono H, et al. Fatigue Resistance of a 3-dimensional Conforming Nickel-Titanium Rotary Instrument in Double Curvatures. J Endod. 2016; 42: 961-964.
56. Plotino G, Grande NM, Cotti E, Testarelli L, Gambari- ni G. Blue treatment enhances cyclic fatigue resistance of vortex nickel-titanium rotary files. J Endod. 2014; 40: 1451-1453.
57. Gao Y, Shotton V, Wilkinson K, Phillips G, Ben John- son W. Effects of raw material and rotational speed on the cyclic fatigue of profile vortex rotary instruments. J En- dod. 2010; 36: 1205-1209.
58. Peters OA, Gluskin AK, Weiss RA, Han JT. An in vit- ro assessment of the physical properties of novel Hyflex nickel-titanium rotary instruments. Int Endod J. 2012; 45: 1027-1034.
59. Lee JY, Kwak SW, Ha JH, Abu-Tahun I, Kim HC, et al. Mechanical Properties of Various Glide Path Preparation Nickel-titanium Rotary Instruments. J Endod 2019; 45; 199-204
60. Mathew PA, Nair RS, Christaine Angelo JM, Mathai V, Vineet RV, Christopher SR. A comparative evaluation of cyclic fatigue resistance of FlexiCON (Edge Endo) files in rotary versus reciprocating motion at various curvatures - An in vitro study. J Conserv Dent. 2019; 22: 554-558.
61. De Menezes SEAC, Batista SM, Lira JOP, de Melo Monteiro GQ. Cyclic Fatigue Resistance of WaveOne Gold, ProDesign R and ProDesign Logic Files in Curved Canals In Vitro. Iran Endod J. 2017; 12: 468-473.
62. Bürklein S, Börjes L, Schäfer E. Comparison of prepa- ration of curved root canals with Hyflex CM and Revo-S rotary nickel-titanium instruments. Int Endod J. 2014; 47: 470-476.
63. Gavini G, Caldeira CL, Akisue E, Candeiro GTDM, Kawakami DAS. Resistance to flexural fatigue of reciproc R25 files under continuous rotation and reciprocating movement. J Endod. 2012; 38: 684-687.
64. Yared G. Canal preparation using only one Ni-Ti rotary instrument: preliminary observations. Int Endod J. 2008; 41: 339-344
65. Yılmaz K, Özyürek T. Cyclic fatigue life of Tango-Endo, WaveOne GOLD, and Reciproc NiTi instruments. Restor Dent Endod. 2017; 42: 134-139.
66. Wan J, Rasimick BJ, Musikant BL, Deutsch AS. A com- parison of cyclic fatigue resistance in reciprocating and rotary nickel-titanium instruments. Aust Endod J. 2011 ;37: 122-127.
67. Scelza P, Harry D, Silva LE, Barbosa IB, Scelza MZ. A comparison of two reciprocating instruments using ben- ding stress and cyclic fatigue tests. Braz Oral Res. 2015; 29: 1-7.
68. Ahn SY, Kim HC, Kim E. Kinematic effects of nickel-ti- tanium instruments with reciprocating or continuous rota- tion motion: A systematic review of in vitro studies. J En- dod. 2016; 42: 1009-1017.
69. Arslan H, Alsancak M, Doğanay E, Karataş E, Çapar İD, et al. Cyclic fatigue analysis of Reciproc R25 instruments with different kinematics. Aust Endod J. 2016; 42: 22-24.
70. Nakamura VC, Candeiro GT de M, Cai S, Gavini G. Ex vivo evaluation of three instrumentation techniques on E. faecalis biofilm within oval shaped root canals. Braz Oral Res. 2015; 29: 1-7.
71. Espir CG, Nascimento-Mendes CA, Guerreiro-Tano- maru JM, Freire LG, Gavini G, et al. Counterclockwise or clockwise reciprocating motion for oval root canal pre- paration: a micro-CT analysis. Int Endod J. 2018; 51: 541- 548.
72. Cruz Junior JA, Coelho MS, Kato AS, Vivacqua-Go- mes N,Fontana CE, et al. The Effect of Foraminal Enlarge- ment of Necrotic Teeth with the Reciproc System on Pos- toperative Pain: A Prospective and Randomized Clinical Trial. J Endod. 2016; 42: 8-11.
73. Bueno CSP, Oliveira DP de, Pelegrine RA, Fontana CE, Rocha DGP, et al. Fracture Incidence of WaveOne and Re- ciproc Files during Root Canal Preparation of up to 3 Pos- terior Teeth: A Prospective Clinical Study. J Endod. 2017; 43: 705-708.
74. Kherlakian D, Cunha RS, Ehrhardt IC, Zuolo ML, Kis- hen A, et al. Comparison of the Incidence of Postoperati- ve Pain after Using 2 Reciprocating Systems and a Conti- nuous Rotary System: A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial. J Endod. 2016; 42: 171-176.
75. Cakici F, Cakici EB, Sadik B, Keles A, Fundaoglu Kucu- kekenci F. Comparison of newly formed microcracks after instrumentation using protaper next, reciproc and self-ad- justing file systems. Eur Oral Res. 2019; 53: 21-24.
76. Bago I, Suk M, Katić M, Gabrić D, Anić I. Comparison of the effectiveness of various rotary and reciprocating systems with different surface treatments to remove gut- ta-percha and an epoxy resin-based sealer from straight root canals. Int Endod J. 2019; 52: 105-113.
77. Keskin C, Sariyilmaz E, Sariyilmaz Ö. Efficacy of XP-en- do Finisher File in Removing Calcium Hydroxide from Simulated Internal Resorption Cavity. J Endod. 2017; 43: 126-130.
78. Adıgüzel M, Capar ID. Comparison of Cyclic Fatigue Resistance of WaveOne and WaveOne Gold Small, Pri- mary, and Large Instruments. J Endod. 2017; 43: 623-627.
79. De-Deus G, Silva EJNL, Vieira VTL, Belladonna FG, Elias CN et al. Blue Thermomechanical Treatment Opti- mizes Fatigue Resistance and Flexibility of the Reciproc Files. J Endod. 2017; 43: 462-466.
80. Topçuoğlu HS, Düzgün S, Aktı A, Topçuoğlu G. La- boratory comparison of cyclic fatigue resistance of Wave- One Gold, Reciproc and WaveOne files in canals with a double curvature. Int Endod J. 2017; 50: 713-717.
81. Dagna A, Poggio C, Beltrami R, Colombo M, Chiesa M, Bianchi S. Cyclic fatigue resistance of OneShape, Re- ciproc, and WaveOne: An in vitro comparative study. J Conserv Dent. 2014; 17: 250-254.
82. Elsaka SE, Elnaghy AM, Badr AE. Torsional and ben- ding resistance of WaveOne Gold, Reciproc and Twisted File Adaptive instruments. Int Endod J. 2017; 50: 1077- 1083.
83. Webber J. Shaping canals with confidence: WaveO- ne GOLD single-file reciprocating system. Internatıonal Dentıstry – Afrıcan edition 2015; 6: 6-17
84. Pedullà E, Genovesi F, Rapisarda S, La Rosa GR, Gran- de NM, Plotino G, Adorno CG. Effects of 6 Single-File Sys- tems on Dentinal Crack Formation. J Endod. 2017; 43: 456-461.
85. Calefı PHS, Osaki RB, Evedove NFD, Cruz VM, And- rade FB, et al. Resistência à fadiga cíclica e torcional dos instrumentos reciprocantes W File e X1 Blue File. Dental Press Endod. 2020; 10: 60-66.
86. Peters OA, Boessler C, Paqué F. Root canal preparati- on with a novel nickel-titanium instrument evaluated with micro-computed tomography: Canal surface preparation over time. J Endod. 2010; 36: 1068-1072.
87. Dagna A, Arciola CR, Visai L, Selan L, Colombo M, Bi- anchi S, Poggio C. Antibacterial efficacy of conventional and single-use Ni-Ti endodontic instruments: an in vitro microbiological evaluation. Int J Artif Organs. 2012; 35: 826-31.
88. Cyclic fatigue resistance of OneShape and WaveOne instruments using different angles of curvature. Dent Ma- ter J. 2015; 34: 358-363.
89. Reddy PJ, Kumar VS, Aravind K, Kumar HT, Vishal M B, Vizaikumar VN, Das R, Vamsilatha K. Canal shaping with one shape file and twisted files: a comparative study. J Clin Diagn Res. 2014; 8: ZF01-3. -
90. Elnaghy AM, Elsaka SE. Assessment of the mechani- cal properties of ProTaper next nickel-titanium rotary files. J Endod. 2014; 40: 1830-1834.
91. Jacob J, Paul M, Sara B, Steaphen P, Philip N, Mat- hew J. Comparative Analysis of Dentinal Crack Formation Following Root Canal Instrumentation with Hand K-Flex Files, ProTaper Next, and Self-adjusting Files. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2019; 20: 935-939.
92. Theisen W, Schuermann A. Electro discharge mac- hining of nickel-titanium shape memory alloys. Mater Sci Eng A. 2004; 378: 200-204.
93. Pernot J, Xavier R, Euvrard H. Endodontic instrument with rough surfaces, and method for manufacturing such an instrument. JOE 2013; 37:1553-1557.
94. Pirani C, Iacono F, Generali L, Sassatelli P, Nucci C, et al. HyFlex EDM: superficial features, metallurgical analy- sis and fatigue resistance of innovative electro discharge machined NiTi rotary instruments. Int Endod J. 2016; 49: 483-493.
95. Pedullà E, Lo Savio F, Boninelli S, Plotino G, Grande NM, et al. Torsional and Cyclic Fatigue Resistance of a New Nickel-Titanium Instrument Manufactured by Elect- rical Discharge Machining. J Endod. 2016; 42: 156-159.
96. Iacono F, Pirani C, Generali L, Bolelli G, Sassatelli P, et al. Structural analysis of HyFlex EDM instruments. Int En- dod J. 2017; 50: 303-313.
97. Arias A, Macorra JC, Govindjee S, Peters OA. Corre- lation between Temperature-dependent Fatigue Resis- tance and Differential Scanning Calorimetry Analysis for 2 Contemporary Rotary Instruments. J Endod. 2018; 44: 630-634.
98. Gündoğar M, Özyürek T, Yılmaz K, Uslu G. Cyclic fati- gue resistance of HyFlex EDM, Reciproc Blue, WaveOne Gold, and Twisted File Adaptive rotary files under diffe- rent temperatures and ambient conditions. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2019; 13: 166-171.