___

• Acar, A. (2010). On EIL Competence. Journal of English as an International Language, 5, 11-26.
• Acar, A. (2018). Evaluating goals and methodologies in the Turkish primary school ELT curriculum. Milli Eğitim. 47 (219), 5-18.
• Acar, A. (2019). The Action-Oriented Approach: Integrating Democratic Citizenship Education into Language Teaching. English Scholars Beyond Borders Journal. 5(1), 122-141.
• Alptekin, C. (2002). Towards intercultural communicative competence in ELT. ELT Journal, 56(1), 57-64.
• Aydın, B. (2017). Türkiye’de Hazırlık Okullarında Yaşanan Sorunlara Bir Çözüm Önerisi: Anadolu Üniversitesi Örneği. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
• Bowen, G.A. (2009). Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research Method. Qualitative Research Journal. 9 (2), 27-40.
• Brooker, R. and Macdonald, D. (1999). Did we hear you?: issues of student voice in a curriculum innovation. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 31(1), 83-97.
• Canale, M. 1983. ‘From communicative competence to communicative language pedagogy’ in J.C. Richards and R. W. Schmidt (eds.). Language and Communication. London: Longman.
• Council of Europe (CoE). (2001). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Handler, B. (2010). Teacher as curriculum leader: A consideration of the appropriateness of that role assignment to classroom-based practitioners. International Journal of Teacher Leaders- hip, (3)3, 32-42.
• Kaplan, P. (2017). Yeni müfredata tepki: 100 bini aşkın şikayet ve öneri. Ekim 2017, http://www. pervinkaplan.com/detay/yeni-mufredata-tepki-100-bini-askin-sikayet-ve-oneri/2268.
• Kırkgöz, Y., Çelik, S., Arıkan, A. (2016). Laying the Theoretical and Practical Foundations for a New Elementary English Curriculum in Turkey: A Procedural Analysis. Kastamonu Eği- tim Dergisi, 24(3), 1199-1212.
• Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı ¸ (MEB) [Turkish Ministry of National Education]. (1991). Ortaöğretim İngilizce dersi (ortaokullar 1,2, ve 3. Sınıflar) öğretim programı [English language curriculum for primary education (grades 4,5,6,7 and 8)]. Milli Eğitim Bakanliği Tebliğler Dergisi, pp. 1-32, [MEB official journal].
• Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı, (MEB)[ Turkish Ministry of National Education] . (1997). İlköğretim okulu4. ve 5. Sınıf Yabanci Dil (İngilizce) Ögretim Programi. [Primary Education Grades 4 and 5 Foreign Language (English) Curriculum]. Pp. 606. Milli Eğitim bakanlığı Tebliğler Der- gisi, No.2481 [MEB Official Journal]
• Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı ¸ (MEB) [Turkish Ministry of National Education]. (2006). İlköğretim İngilizce dersi (4,5,6,7 ve 8. Sınıflar) öğretim programı [English language curriculum for primary education (grades 4,5,6,7 and 8)]. Ankara: T.C. Millî Eğitim Bakanlığı.
• Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı ¸ (MEB) [Turkish Ministry of National Education]. (2013). İlköğretim Kurumları (İlkokullar ve Ortaokullar) İngilizce Dersi (2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ve 8. Sınıflar) Öğretim Programı [Elementary (Primary and Lower Secondary) English Language Teaching Program (Grades 2-8)]. Ankara: T.C. Millî Eğitim Bakanlığı.
• Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı ¸ (MEB) [Turkish Ministry of National Education]. (2017). İngilizce Dersi Öğretim Programı (Taslak) (İlkokul ve Ortaokul 2,3,4,5,6,7 ve 8. Sınıflar) [English Language Teaching Program (Draft) (Primary and Secondary Schools Grades 2,3,4,5,6,7 and 8)]. Ankara: T.C. Millî Eğitim Bakanlığı.Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı ¸ (MEB) [Turkish Ministry of National Education]. (2018). İngilizce Dersi
• Öğretim Programı (İlkokul ve Ortaokul 2,3,4,5,6,7 ve 8. Sınıflar) [English Language Teaching Program (Primary and Secondary Schools Grades 2,3,4,5,6,7 and 8)]. Ankara: T.C. Millî Eğitim Bakanlığı.
• McKay, S.L. (2002). Teaching English as an international language: Rethinking goals and approaches.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• McKay, S. L. (2003). Toward an appropriate EIL pedagogy: Re-examining common ELT assumptions. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 13(1), 1-22.
• Nunan, D. (1988). Syllabus Design. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Nunn, R. (2005). Competence and teaching English as an international language, Asian EFL Journal, Vol. 7/3, pp.61-74.
• Nunn, R. (2007). “Redefining communicative competence for international and local communities”, The Journal of English as an international language, Vol. 2(2), pp.7-49.
• Nunn, R. (2011). From Defining to Developing Competence in EIL and Intercultural Communication. Journal of English as an International Language, 6(1), 21-46.
• Puren, C. (2002). Perspectives actionnelles et perspectives culturelles en didactique des langues-cultures : vers une perspective coactionnelle co-culturelle. Retrieved from (25 June 2019) https://www.christianpuren.com/mes-travaux/2002b/.
• Puren, C. (2008). De l’approche communicative à la perspective actionnelle, et de l’interculturel au co-culturel. Retrieved from (25 June 2019) https://www.christianpuren.com/mes-tra- vaux/2008e/
• Puren, C. (2014). Approche communicative et perspective actionnelle, deux organismes métho- dologiques génétiquement opposés… et complémentaires. Retrieved from (25 June 2018) https://www.christianpuren.com/mes-travaux/2014a/.
• Saracaloğlu, S., Yılmaz, S., Çengel, M., Çöğmen, S., Karademir, Ç.A., Kanmaz, A. (2010). Elementary teachers’ views about their roles in curriculum development and evaluation process: The case of Denizli. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2, 2427–2434.
• Taba, H. (1962). Curriculum development: Theory and practice. New York: Harcourt Brace.
• Tyler, R. W. (1949). Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.