Yüksek dereceli skuamöz intraepitelyal lezyonun ekarte edilemediği atipik skuamöz hücreler (ASC-H): Sitomorfolojik özellikleri ve biopsi korelasyonu
Amaç: Bethesda Sistem 2001'de oluşturulan "yüksek dereceli skuamöz intraepitelyal lezyonun ekarte edilemediği atipik skuamöz hücreler " sitolojik tanımının değerini araştırmak. Materyal ve Metod: Mayıs 2002- Kasım 2003 tarihleri arasında "yüksek dereceli skuamöz intraepitelyal lezyonun ekarte edilemediği atipik skuamöz hücreler" tanısı alarak kolposkopi ve biopsi yapılan 17 olgunun sonuçları irdelendi. Bulgular 17 olgunun biopsi sonuçlarmda % 35 oranında benignreaktif değişiklikler, % 64 CIN I ve üzeri lezyonlar, % 52 oranında CİN II ve üzeri lezyonlar saptandı. Sonuçlar 'Yüksek dereceli skuamöz intraepitelyal lezyonun ekarte edilemediği atipik skuamöz hücreler" tanımının CİN II ve üzeri lezyonlar için yüksek pozitif öngörücü değere sahip olduğ sonucuna vardık. Bu gruba vakit kaybetmeden kolposkopi ve biopsi yapılması gerekliliğine katildik
Atypical squamous cells cannot exclude highgrade squamous intraepithelial lesion (ASC-H) cytomorphologic features and biopsy correlation
Objective : To determine the validity of "atypical cells cannot exclude high-grade intraepithelial lesion" which was included in 2001 Bethesda System. Materials and Methods: The results of 17 cases, which were diagnosedas "atypical squamous cells cannot exclude high grade intraepithelial lesion" and underwent colposcopic examination and biopsy from May 2002 to November 2003, were evaluated. Results: Of 17 cases, benign reactive changes were % 35, histologic CİN I and more severe lesions were 64%, histologic CİN II and more severe lesions were %52. Conclusion: We concluded that "atypical squamous cells cannot exclude high grade intraepithelial lesion" terminology has highpositive predictive value for CİN II and more severe lesions. We also agreed to the necessity of immediate colposcopic examination and biopsy.
___
- 1. Selvaggi S M. 'Reporting of atypical squamous
cells,.cannot exclude 'a high-grade squamous
intraepithelial'le\sşiön(ASC-H) on cervical s amples:
is it significant? Diagn Cytopathol2003; 29: 38-41
- 2. Alii P, Ali SZ. Atypical squamous cells of
undetermined significance-rule out high-grade
squamous intraepithe Hal lesion: cytopathologic
charecteristics and clinical correlates. Diagn
Cytopathol2003; 28: 308-12
- 3. Quddus MR, Sung CR, SteinhoffMM, Lauchlean SC, Singer DR, Hutchinson ML. Atypical squamous metaplastic cells. Reproducibility outcome and diagnostic features on thin-prep pap test. Cancer Cytopathol 2001; 93: 16-22
- 4. Sherman ME, Tabbara ME, Scott DR, Kurman
RJ, Glass AG, Mono s MM, Rurk RD, Rush RR,
Schiffman M. "ASCIIS rule out HSIL" cyto logic
features, histologic correlates and human papiRoma
virus detection. Mod Pathol 1999; 12: 335-42
- 5. Sherman ME, Solomon D, Schiffman M. ASCIIS
LSIL Triage Study Group. Qualification ofASCUS
- A comparison of equivocal LSIL and equivocal
HSIL cervical cytology in the ASCUS LSIL triage
study. Am J Clin Pathol 2001; 116: 386-94
- 6. Solomon D, Davey D, Kurman R, Moriarty A,
O'ConnerD, PreyM, Raab S, Sherman M, Wilbur
D, Wright TC, Young N. The 2001 Rethesda System:
terminologyfir reporting res ults of cervical ecology
- JAMA 2002; 287: 2114-9
- 7. GenestDR, DeanR, Lee KR, ShoutE, Crum C
Cibas ES. Qualfiying a cytologic diagnosis of'
"atypical squamouis cells of undetermined
significance" affects the predictive value of a
squamous intraepithe Hal lesion on subsequent
biopsy. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1998; 122: 338-41
- 8. Collins LC, Wang HH, Abu-J awdeh GM. Qualifier
of atypical squamous cells of undetermined
significance help in patients management. Mod
Pathol 1996; 9: 677-81
- 9. Taylor RR, GuerrieriJP, NashJD, Henry MR,
O'Conner DM. Atypical cervical cytology:
colposcopic follow-up using the Rethesda System,
f ReprodMed 1994; 38: 443-7
- 10. LauroAP, Robersonf, Eltaum I, Chhieng DC
- Atypical squamous cells cannot exclude high-
grade squamous intraepithe lial lesion. A follow-up
s tudy of conventional and liquid-bas e d preperations
in a high-risk population. Am f Clin Pathol 2003;
120: 392-7