Ecmel IŞIK KAYGUSUZ, Handan ÇETİNER, Meryem KÜREK EKEN, Cuma YORGANCI, Suna CESUR, Hülya YAVUZ, Nermin KOÇ

Uterın Leıomyosarkom: 22 Olguda Patolojik Değerlendirme

Amaç: Leiomyosarkomuterusun nadir görülen malign bir tümörüdür. Bu retrospektif çalışmada 8 yıllık periottabölümümüzde değerlendirilmiş le-iomyosarkom tanısı almış olgular çalışılmıştır.Materyal-Metod: Ocak 2005 ile Ekim 2013 tarih-leri arasında leiomyosarkom tanısı ile opere edi-len olguların tüm hastane kayıtları geriye yönelik olarak değerlendirildi. 22 hastaya ait tüm mater-yeller histolojik olarak değerlendirildi. Bulgular: Yaşları 41 ile 73 arasında değişen (or-talama 54) 22 kadın hasta değerlendirildi. Tümör-lerin en geniş çapları 1,5 ile 16 cm arasında deği-şiyordu (ortalama 8,8). Sonuç: Leiomyosarkomagresif bir neoplazmdır.Leiomyosarkomların tanısı kombine mikroskopik bulgulara dayanmaktadır. Bizim olgularımızın kli-nikopatolojik verileri literatür verilerine paralellik göstermekteydi.

Uterine Leiomyosarcoma: Pathologic evaluation of 22 Cases

Aim: Leiomyosarcoma is a rare malign neoplasm of the uterus. The current retrospective study examined leiomyosarcoma who were evaluated at our institution over a 8 year period.Material-Method: Clinical records of the cases operated with the diagnosis of leiomyosarcoma, between January 2005 and October 2013, reviewed retrospectively. All material belonging to 22 cases were evaluated histologically.Results: There were 22 females, whose age range from 41 to 73 (median 54 years). The neoplasm measured from 1,5 to 16 cm greatest diameter ( median 8,8 cm).Conclusion: In conclusion, leiomyosarcoma is a aggressive neoplasm. The diagnosis of leiomyosarcomas depends on a combination of microscopic features. Our cases clinicopathological correlation values were parallel to the literature

PDF

___

Kurman RJ. Blaustein'sPathology of theFema- leGenitalTract. In: Zaloudek C, Hendrickson MR (eds). MesenchymalTumors of theUterus. 5th editi- on. New York: Springer-Verlag; 2002. 561-92.
Tavassolli FA, Devilee P, (eds). World Organiza- tionClassification of TumorsPathologyand Geneti- cs, Tumors of theBreastandFemaleGenitalOrgans. Lyon: IARC Press, 2003.233-42.
Ryan KJ, Berkowitz RS, Barbieri RL. Kistner'sGy- necologyPrinciplesandPractice. In: Muto MG, Fried- man AJ (eds). TheUterineCorpus. 6th edition. St. Louis, Missouri: Mosby;1995.159-61.
Bell SW, Kempson RL, Hendrickson MR. Prob- lematicuterinesmoothmuscleneoplasm. A clini- copathologicstudy of 213 cases. Am J Surg Pat- hol.1994;18:535-538.
Van Dinh T, Woodruff JO: Leiomyosarcoma of theuterus. Am J ObstetGynecol 1982, 144:817-823
Hendrickson MR, Kempson RL: SurgicalPatho- logy of theUterineCorpus, in Bennington JL(ed): Majorproblems in Patholgy. Philadelphia, Saun- ders,1980 Vol12,468-529.
Mayerhofer K, Obermair A, Windbichler G, et al. Leiomyosarcoma of theuterus: a clinicopatho- logicmulticenterstudy of 71 cases. GynecolOncol. ;74:196-201. Wang WL, Soslow R, Hensley M, Asad H et al. Histopathologicprognosticfactors in stage 1 leiom- yosarcoma of theuterus: adetailedanalysis of 27 ca- ses. Am J SurgPathol. 2011, 35:522-529
Lusby K, Savannah KB, Demicco EG et al. UterineLeiomyosarcoma come, andAssociatedMolecularBiomarkers: A SingleInstitution'sExperience. (2013),20:2364-2372 Management, Out- AnnSurgOncol
Barter JF, Smith EB, Szpak CA: Leiomyosarco- ma of theuterus: a clinicopathologicstudy of 21 ca- ses. GynecolOncol 1985,21:220-227
Schwartz Z, Dgani R, Lancet M,:Uterinesarco- ma in Israel: a sudy of 104 cases. GynecolOncol , 20:354-363
Evans HL, ChawlaSp, Simpson C: Smooth- muscleneoplasm of the uterus other than ordinary leiomyoma: A study of 46 cases, with emphasis on diagnostic criteria and prognostic factors. Cancer ,62:2239-2247.
Bazzocchi F, Brandi G, Pileri S: Clinicalandprog- nosticfeatures of leiomyosarcoma of theuterus. Tu- mori 1983,69:75-77.
Rauh-Hain JA, Oduyebo T, Diver EJ. Uterine- Leiomyosarcoma, an updateseries. Int J of Gynecol Can. 2013;23:1036-1043.