Meme Kanseri Nedeniyle Tamoksifen veya Arimidex Kullanan Postmenopozal Asemptomatik Hastaların Endometriyal Değişikliklerinin Karşılaştırılması

Amaç: Postmenopozal dönemde meme kanser/i olan ve jinekolojik açıdan asemptomatik olup tamoksijen veya aromataz inhibitörü kullanan hastalardaki endometriyal değişikliklerin değerlendirilmesidir. Materyal metod: Postmenopozal asemptomatik meme kanserli hastalar arasından en az altı aydır tamoksijen kullanan 22 hasta ve arimideks kullanan 40 hasta çalışmaya dahil edildi. Hastalara rutin jinekolojik muayene sonrası bilateral uterin arter doppler sonografisi, transvajinal ultrasonografi ve salin injüzyon sonagrafisi uygulandı. Bu görüntüleme yöntemi sonrasında da hastalara pipelle kanülü ile endometriyal örnekleme uygulandı. Bulgular: Gruplar arasında endometriyal değişiklikler ve ultrasonografik bulgular karşılaştırıldı. Tamoksijen kullanan hastaların 3'ünde (%13,5), arimideks kullanan hastaların 6'sında (%15) endometrial polip saptandı. Eşik değeri 8,5 mm alındığında transvajinal ultrasonografinin patoloji sapıama da duyarlı­ lığı %33, özgüllüğü %90; eşik değeri 7,7 mm alındığında salin infüzyon sonagrafisinin duyarlılığı %33, özgüllüğü %92 olarak bulundu. Sonuç: Bütün hasta grubumuzda tamoksifen kullanımı aromataz inhibitörüne kıyasla endometrial kalınlıkta daha fazla artışa yol aç­ mıştır. Dopplerin endometrial patoloji açısından prediktif değeri saptanmamıştır. Transvajinal ultrasonografi mutlaka uygulanmalı, invazif bir işlem seçilecekse öncesinde salin infüzyon sonagrafisi uygulanmalıdır.

Objective: To evaluate the endometrial changes between asymptomatic postmenopausal women with breası cancer using tamoxifen or aramatas e inhibitors. Design: Asymptomatic postmenopausal patients with breası cancer who were on tamoxifen or arimidex therapy for more than six months w ere enrolled for the study. Twenty two women had been on tamoxifen and jorty women had been on arimidex. Routine gynecologic exam was performed for all patients. Transvaginal ultrasonography, saline injusion sonography and bilateral uterine artery doppler sonography were performed for all patients. Later endometrial biopsy was applied to all patients with pipelle canula. Results: The percentage oj endometrial jormations, sonography findings were compared between the two groups. Endometrial polip was detected in 3 patients who were on tamoxifen (13,5%) and 6 patients who were on arimidex (15%). The sensitivity of transvaginal ultrasonography was jound to be 33% with a specificity of 90% when the cut-off level for endometrial thickness was set as 8,5 mm. When the cut-off level during saline injusion sonography was set as 7,7 mm the sensitivity was 33% and the specificity was 92%. Conclusion:For our group of patients endometrial thickening was found to be higher in tamoxifen group when compared with the aromatase inhibitors group. Doppler sonography showed no predictive value for any endometrial pathology. Ultrasonography should be performed for screening, saline infusion sonography should be applied for any detected sonographic pathology bejare invasive diagnostic tests.

___

1. fordan V The development of tamoxifen for breast cancer therapy: A tribute to the Iate Arthur Walpole. Breast Cancer Res Treat 1988;11:197-209. CiLT: 44 YIL : 2013 SAY!: 1

2. Ward H. Antiestrogen therapy for breast cancer-A trial of tamoxifen at two dose levels. Br Med J 1973;1:13-14.

3. fordan VC, Dix CJ, Ailen KE. The effectiveness of long term treatment in laboratory model for adjuvant hormone therapy of breast cancer. In: Salman SE, Jones SE (ed). Adjuvant therapy of cancer. New York: Grune and Stratton; 1979. pp.l9 -24.

4. Assikis V, fordan V Gynecologic effects of tamoxifen and the association with endometrial carcinoma. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1995;49:241-257.

5. Karaer O, Oru c S, Koyuncu F Aromatase inhibitors: passibi e future applications. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2004;83:699-706.

6. Bulun S, Economos K, Miller D, Simpson E. CYP 19 ( aromatase cytochrome P450) gene expression in human malignant endometrial tumors. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 1994; 79:1831-1834.

7. Lu Q, Nakmura J, Savinov A, et al. Expressian of arara tas e protein an d messen ger ribon ucleic acid in im epithelial ce lls and eviden ce of functional signifıcanceı locally produced estrogen in human breast cancers, Enrj erinology 137:3061-8, 1996.

8. Yamamoto T, Fukuoka M, Fujimoto Y, Kitawaki J, Nakakoshi M, Yoshihama M et al.Inhibitory effect of a new andrast enedione derivative, 14 alpha-hydroxy-4-androstene-3,6, 17-trione (14 alpha-OHAT) on aromatase activity of human uterine tumors. Journal of Steroid Biochemistr. 1990;36:517-521.

9. Duffy S, Jackson TL, Lansdown M, Philips K, Wells M, Pollard S et al. The ATAC adjuvant breast cancer trial in postmenopausal women: baseline endometrial subprotocol data. Bj og 2003; ll 0:1099- 1106

1O. Rose B, VanLe L, Beli J, Walker J, Lee R. A phase II trial of anastrozole in advanced recurrent or persistent endometrial carcinoma:a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. Gynecol Oncol. 2000;78:212- 216

11. Burnett B, Amezcua C. Anastrozole, an aromatase inhibitor, and medroxyprogesterone acetate therapy in premenopausal abese women with endometrial cancer: a report of two cases successfully treated without hysterectomy. Gynecol Oncol. 2004;94:832-834.

12. Bulun S, Chen D, Lu M, Zhao H, Cheng Y, Demura M, et al. Aromatase excess ın cancers of breast, endometrıum and ovary. J Steroid Biochem Mal Biol. 2007 Aug-Sep;106(1-5):81-9.

13. Creasman D. Uterus Adenokarsinomu. Ayhan A. Klinik linekolojik Onkoloji, 6. Baskı, Ankara, Güneş Kitabevi, 2003;142-143.

14. Koss L,Schreiber K,Oberlander SG,et al.Detection of endometrial carcinoma and hyperplasia in asymptomatic women. Obstet Gynecol1984;64: 1-11.

15. Chambers ]. Chambers S. Endometrial sampling: When?Where?Why?With what? Clin Obstet Gynecol1992; 35:28-39.

16. Bourne T, Campbell S, Steer C, et al.Detection of endometrial cancer by transvaginal sonography w ith c olar jlow imaging and blo ad jlow analysis: a preliminary report.Gynecol Oncol1991;40:253- 259.

17. Gerber B, Krause A, Heiner M, et al. Effects of adjuvant tamoxifen in postmenopausal women w ith breast cancer: a prospective long-term study using transvag. ultrasound. J ClinOncol 2000;18:3464- 3470.

18. Gerber B, Krause A, Reimer T, Mylonas I, Makovitzky J, Kundt G et al. Anastrozole versus Tamoxifen Treatment in postmenopausal Women w ith Endocrine-Responsive Breast Can c er and Tamoxifen-Induced Endometrial Pathology; Clin Cancer Res 2006;February15;12(4)

19. Berliere M, Galant C, Charles A, Brichard V, Piette P, Donnez]. Endometrial evaluation is a very important to ol in the management of breast cancer patients. Eur JCancer 2002; 38:S67-8.

20. Duffy S, Jackson T, Lansdown M, Philips K, Wells M, Pollard S et al. The ATAC (Arimidex, Tamoxifen, Alone or in Combination) adjuvant breast cancer trial: first results of the endometrial sub-protocol fallawing 2 years of treatment; Hum Reprod. 2006 feb; 21(2):545-53

21. Howell A, Cuzick J, Baum M, et al. Results of the ATAC (Arimidex, Tamoxifen, Al one or in Combination)trial after completion of 5 years'adjuvant treatment for breast cancer.Lancet2005; 365:60-2.

22. Baum M, Buzdar A, Cuzick J, et al. Anastrozole alone or in combination with tamoxifen versus tamoxifen alone for adjuvant treatment of postmenopausal women with early-stage breast cancer: results of the ATAC (Arimidex, Tamoxifen Al one or in combination) trial efficacy and safety update analyses. Can c er 2003; 98:1802-1 O.

23. Duffy S, Greenwood M. The endometrial cancer data from the ATAC (Arimidex, Tamoxifen, Al oneor in Combination) trial indicates a protective effect of anastrozole (Arimidex) upon the endometrium. Breast Cancer ResTreat 2003; 82:29.

24. W eber G, Merz E, Bahlmann F, Rosch B. Evaluation of different transvaginal sonographic diagnostic parameters in women with postmenopausal bleeding. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol1998;12:265-70.

25. Dijkhuizen F, Br o ·-ımann HAM, Oddens B, Roumen R, Coebergh J, Heintz A. Transvaginal ultrasonography and endometrialchanges in postmenopausal breast cancer patients receiving tamoxifen. Maturitas 1996; 25:45- 50.

26. Goldstein SR. Postmenopausal endometrial jluid collections revisited: look at the doughnut rather than the hale. Obstet Gynecol1994; 83:738-40.

27. Goldstein SR. Unusual ultrasonographic appearance of the uterus in patients receiving tamoxifen. Am! Obstet Gynecol1994;170:447- 51.

28. Mourits M, Van der Zee A, Willemse P, Ten Hoor K, Hallema H, De Vries EGE. Discrepancy between ultrasonography and hysteroscopy and histology of endometrium in postmenopausal breast cancer patients using tamoxifen. Gynecol Oncol 1999; 73:21-6.

29. Baliard P, Tetlow R, Richmond I, Killick S, Purdie DW Errors in the measurement of endometrial depth using transvaginal sonography in postmenopausal women on tamoxifen: randam error is reduced using saline instillation sonography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2000;15:321-6

30. Brown S, Coddington CC, Schnorr J, Taner JP, Gibbons W, Oehninger S. valuation of outpatient hysteroscopy, saline infusion hysterosonography, and hysterosalpingography in infertile women: a prospective, randomized study. Fertil Steril 2000; 74:1 029-34.

31. Schwartz L, Snyder J, Horan C, Porges R, Nachtigall L, Goldstein S. The use of transvaginal ultrasound and saline infusion sonohysterography for the evaluation of asymptomatic postmenopausal breast cancer patients on tamoxifen. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol1998;11:48-53.

32. Timmerrnan D, Deprest J, Bourne T, Van den Berghe I, Collins WP, Vergote I. A randomized trial on the use of ultrasonography or office hysteroscopy for endometrial assessment in postmenopausal patients with breast cancer who were treated with tamoxifen. Am J Obstet Gynecol1998;179:62-70

33. Develioglu O, O mak M, Bilgin T, Esmer A, Tüfekçi M. The endometrium in asymptomatic breast cancer patients on tamoxifen: value of transvaginal ultrasonography with saline infusion and doppler jlow. Gynecologic Oneology 2004; 93:328-335.

34. Fong K, Kung R, Lytwyn A, Trudeau M, Chapman W, Nugent P, et al. Endometrial evaluation w ith transvaginal US and hysterosonography in asymptomatic postmenopausal women with breast cancer receiving tamoxifen. Radiology2001; 220:765-73.

35. Bourne T, Campbell S, Whitehead M, Royston P, Steer C, Collins W Detection of endometrial cancer in postmenopausal women by transvaginal ultrasonography and colour jlow imaging. Br Med J 1990;301:369

36. Sladkevicius P, Valentin L, Marsa 'lK Endometrial thickness and Doppler velocimetry of the uterine arteries as discriminators of endometrial status in women with postmenopausal bleeding: a comparative study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994;171:722-8

3 7. Pepper J, Oyesanya O, Dewart P, Howell A, Se if M. Indices of di.fferential endometrial: myometrial growth may be used to improve the reliability of detecting endometrial neoplasia in women on tamoxifen. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1996;8:408-11.

38. Strauss H, Wolters M, Methfessel G, Buchmann J, Koelbl H. Signifıcance of endovaginal ultrasonography in assessing tamoxifen-associated changes of the endometrium. A prospective study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2000; 79:697-701.

39. Franchi M, Ghezzi F, Donadeila N, Zanaboni F, Beretta P, B olis P. Endometrial thickness in tmx-treated patients: an independent predictor of endometrial disease. Obstet Gynecol 1999;93:1004-8.

40. Ito T, Katagiri C, Murata Y, Hamazoe R, Morita K Indicalian for histological examination of endometrium in breast carcinoma patients receiving tamoxifen therapy. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2001;27(3):141-5.

41. Duffy S, Jackson T, Lansdown M et al. TheATAC (Arimidex, Tamoxifen, Alone or in Combination) adjuvant breast cancer trial: baseline endometrial sub-protocol data on the effectiveness of transvaginal ultrasonography and diagnostic hysteroscopy. Hum Reprod 2005; 20:294-301.

42. Creasman Creasman D. Uterus Adenokarsinomu. Ayhan A. Klinik linekolojik Onkoloji,6. Baskı, Ankara, Güneş Kitabevi, 2003;139-140

43. B erek S. Uterus Kanseri. Erk A, Berek&Novak Jinekoloji, 13.Baskı, İstanbul, Nobel Tıp Kitabevleri, 2002; 1145-1146.

44. Gomel VUterus Kanseri.Attar E. Gomel'in Jinekolojisi, İstanbul, Nobel Tıp Kitabevi, 2007; 155-156 Not: Bu çalışma 2012 Mayıs ayında onaylanmış olan uzmanlık tezimden uyarlanmıştır,etik kurul onayı alınmıştır. Çalışmada herhangi bir spansor kullanılmamıştır. Çalışmamız prospektif bir çalışmanın tanısal doğruluğu açısından STARD ( standards for the reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies ) beyanatma uygundur.
Zeynep Kamil Tıp Bülteni-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-7971
  • Başlangıç: 1969
  • Yayıncı: Ali Cangül