İndüksiyon öncesi transperineal ultrasonografik servikal uzunluk ve Biskop skorunun indüksiyon-doğum süresine etkisi
Amaç: Nullipar ve multipar gebelerde indüksiyon öncesi ultrasonografik servikal uzunluk ve Bishop skorunun indüksiyon-doğum süresine etkisini araştırdık. Gereç ve Yöntem: Çalışmaya 35-44 gebelik haftaları arasında değişen 97 gebe (55 nullipar, 42 multipar) alındı; indüksiyon amacıyla intravaginal yoldan misoprostol 50 g tablet kullanıldı; Bishop skoru dijital muayene ile belirlendi; servikal uzunluk transperineal ultrasonografi ile ölçüldü. Sürekli değişkenler için Mann-Whitney U testi, Pearson korelasyon, Spearman korelasyon ve çoklu doğrusal regresyon kullanıldı. Kategorik değişkenler için ÷2 testi kullanıldı. Bishop skoru ve servikal uzunluk için Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) eğrisi çizildi. Bulgular: Bütün vaginal doğumlar 24 saat içerisinde gerçekleşti. Bulantı 8 (%8.2), kusma 1 (%1) taşisistoli 9 (%9.3), hiperstimülasyon 5 (%5.1) gebede görüldü. Sekiz olgu (%8.2) sezaryen ile doğurtuldu. Nullipar ve multipar gebelerde Bishop skoru ve servikal uzunluk (sırasıyla r=0.752, p=0.000; r=0.691, p=0.000) korelasyon gösterdi. Nullipar gebelerde indüksiyon-doğum süresi ile servikal uzunluk (r=0.490, p=0.000) ve Bishop skoru (r=0.455, p=0.01) korelasyon gösterdi, multiparlarda ise sadece Bishop skorunda (r=0.441, p=0.004) korelasyon bulundu. Çoklu doğrusal regresyon modeline göre nullipar gebelerde servikal uzunluk (t=3.850, p=0.000), multipar gebelerde ise Bishop skorunun (t=11.222, p=0.000) tek bağımsız değişken olduğu görüldü. ROC eğrisine göre nulliparlarda indüksiyon-doğum süresini belirlemede servikal uzunluğun, multiparlarda ise Bishop skorunun daha iyi olduğu bulundu. Sonuç: İntravaginal yoldan misoprostol 50 g uygulaması doğum indüksiyonunda başarılı bulundu. İndüksiyon-doğum süresini belirlemede nullipar gebelerde servikal uzunluğun, multipar gebelerde ise Bishop skorunun kullanılmasının daha uygun olduğu sonucuna varıldı.
Effect of pre-induction transperineal ultrasonographic cervical lengt measurements and Bishop score on induction-to-delivery time
Objective: We aimed to evaluate the effect of preinduction cervical length and Bishop score for induction-to-delivery interval in nulliparae and multiparae. Materials and Methods: A total of 97 pregnant women (55 nulliparae, 42 multiparae) between 35 and 44 weeks of gestation were included in the study. Misoprostol 50 g tablet was used as labour induction agent intravaginally. Cervical length measurement was obtained by transperineal ultrasonographic approach and Bishop score was determined with digital examination. While Mann-Whitney U test, Pearson correlation, spearman correlation and multiple linear regressions were used for continuous variables, chi-square test was used for categorical variables. Receiver Operating Characteristics Curve was used for bishop score and cervical length. Results: All vaginal deliveries were occurred within 24 hours. Eighth patients (8.2%) had nausea, 1 had (1%) vomiting, 9 had (9.3%) tachysystoly and 5 had (5.1%) hiperstimulation. Eight pregnant women (8.2%) were delivered with caesarean section. In nulliparous and multiparous women, Bishop score and cervical length showed correlation (r=0.752, p=0.000; r=0.691, p=0.000; respectively). Cervical length (r=0.490, p=0.000) and Bishop score (r=0.455, p=0.01) were correlated in nulliparae whereas only Bishop score (r=0.441, p=0.04) were correlated in multiparae. To determine the induction-to-delivery time using multiple linear regression, the cervical length for multiparae (t=3.850, p=0.000) and the Bishop Score for multiparae (t=11.222, p=0.000) were the only independent variables. Receiver operating characteristics for induction-to-delivery time curve showed that cervix length was better than Bishop score in nulliparae whereas the Bishop Score was better than cervical length in multiparae. Conclusion: Fifty g misoprostol intravaginally was found successful in induction of delivery. To determine induction-to-delivery time in pregnancies, cervical length in nulliparae and Bishop score in multiparae was found more suitable.
___
- Gonen R, Degani S, Ron A. Prediction of
successful induction of labor: comparison of
transvaginal ultrasonography and the Rishop score
- Eur J Ultrasound 1998; 7:183-187
- Demir N. Normal Doğum. In: Reksaç MS, Demir
N, Koç A, Yüksel A, eds. Obstetrik; Maternal-Fetal
Tıp ve Perinatoloji. 1. bash, Ankara, Medical
Network, 2001: 1258-1298
- Norwitz ER, Robinson JN, Repke JT. Labor and
delivery. In: Gabbe SG, NiebylJR, Simpson JL, eds
- ORSTETRİCS: Normal and Problem Pregnancies
- 4th ed. Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone
Company, 2002: 353-394
- Gelişen O, Gültekin İR. Doğum ve Doğum
Komplikasyonları. in: Beksaç MS, Öcal ŞA, Katoğlu
T, Şenocak Z, Şuğle MA, eds. Doğum Hekimliği
Maternal-Fetal Tıp'ta Etik ve Yasal Royut. Ankara,
Medical Network, 2004: 236-251
- The American Academy of Pediatrics and The
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologist
Publication: Guidelines for Prenatal Care, 4 ed.,
1997
- Cunningham FG, Leveno KJ, Rloom SL, Hauth
JC, Gilstrap IIILC, Wentsrom KD. Induction of labor
- In: Cunningham FG, Leveno KJ, Rloom SL, Hauth
JC, Gilstrap III LC, Wentsrom KD., eds. Williams
Obstetrics. 22nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2005:
535-545
- Induction of labor as compared with serial
antenatal monitoring in post-term pregnancy. A
randomized controlled trial. The Canadian
Multicenter Post-term Pregnancy Trial Group. N
Engl J Med 1992; 326:1587-1592
- Induction of labor and the relationship to cesarean
delivery: A review of 7001 consecutive inductions
- Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999; 180:628-633
- Dhall K, Mittal SC, Kumar A. Evaluation of
preinduction scoring systems. Aust N Z J Obstet
Gynaecol 1987; 27:309-311
- Onderoglu LS. Digital examination and
transperineal ultrasonographic measurement of cervical length to assess risk of preterm delivery. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1997; 59:223-228
- Rishop EH. Pelvic scoring for elective induction
- Obstet Gynecol 1964; 24:266-268
- Farah LA, Sanchez-Ramos L, Rosa C, Del Valle
GO, Gaudier FL, Delke I, et al. Randomized trial
of two doses of the prostaglandin El analog
misoprostol for labor induction. Am J Obstet Gynecol
1997; 177:364-369
- Pandis GK, Papageorghiou AT, Otigbah CM,
Howard RJ, Nicolaides KH. Randomized study of
vaginal misoprostol PGEl and dinoprostone gel
PGE2 for induction of labor at term. Ultrasound
Obstet Gynecol 2001; 18:629-635
- Sanchez-Ramos L, Kaunitz AM, Delke I. Labor
induction with 25 g versus 50 g intravaginal
misoprostol: a systematic review. Am J Obstet
Gynecol 2002; 99:145-151
- Wing DA, RahallA, Jones MM, Goodwin TM,
Paul RH. Misoprostol. An effective agent for cervical
ripening and labor induction. Am J Obstet Gynecol
1995; 172:1811-1816
- Wing DA, RahallA, Jones MM, Goodwin TM,
Paul RH. A comparison of misoprostol and
prostaglandin E2 gel for preinduction cervical
ripening and labor induction. Am J Obstet Gynecol
1995; 172:1804-1810
- Meydanli MM, Caliskan E, RurakF, Narin MA,
Atmaca R. Labor induction post-term with 25
micrograms vs. 50 micrograms of intravaginal
misoprostol. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2003; 81:249-
255
- Hofmeyr GJ, Gulmezoglu AM, Alfirevic Z
- Misoprostol for induction of labour: a systematic
review. Rr J Obstet Gynaecol 1999; 106:798-803
- El-Sherbiny MT, El-Gharieb IH, Gewely HA
- Vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor: 25 vs
- 50 microg dose regimen. Int J Gynaecol Obstet
- 2001; 72:25-30
- Yenen MC, Dede M, Göktolga Ü, Güngör S
- Doğum indüksiyonunda misoprostol ve oksitosin
kullanımının karşılaştırılması. Medikal Network
Klinik Bilimler ve Doktor 2003; 9:630-634
- Sanchez-Ramos L, Danner CJ, Delke I, Kaunitz
AM. The effect of tablet moistening on labor
induction with intravaginal misoprostol: a
randomized trial Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002;
99:1080-1084
- Wang H, Li L, Pu L. The effect of 25 micrograms
misoprostol on induction of labor in late pregnancy
- Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 1998; 33:469-71
(Abstract)
- Has R, Batukan C, Ermiş H, Cevher E, Araman
A, Kilic G, Ibrahimoglu L. Comparison of 25 and
50 microg vaginally administered misoprostol for
preinduction of cervical ripening and labor
induction. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2002; 53:16-21
- Shetty A, Danielian P, Templeton A. A
comparison of oral and vaginal misoprostol tablets
in induction of labour at term. BJOG 2001; 108:238-
243
- Kumru S, Boztosun A, Şimşek M, Sapmaz E
- Doğum indüksiyonu için intravaginal misoprostol
uygulamasınmetkinliğinin ve güvenilirliğinin
araştırılması. Türkiye Klinikleri Jinekoloji Obstethk
Dergisi 2004; 14:47-51
- Pandis GK, Papageorghiou AT, Ramanathan
VG, Thompson MO, Nicolaides KH. Preinduction
sonographic measurement of cervical length in the
prediction of successful induction of labor
- Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2001; 18:623-628
- Richey SD, Ramin KD, Roberts SW, Ramin SM,
Cox SM, Twickler DM.The correlation between
transperineal sonography and digital examination
in the evaluation of the third-trimester cervix. Obstet
Gynecol 1995; 85:745-748
- Mahony BS, Nyberg DA, Luthy DA, Hirsch JH,
HickokDE, Petty CN. Translabial ultrasound of the
third-trimester uterine cervix. Correlation with
digital examination. J Ultrasound Med 1990; 9:717-
723
- Paterson-Brown S, Fisk NM, Edmonds DK,
Rodeck CH. Preinduction cervical assessment by
Bishop's score and transvaginal ultrasound. EurJ
Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1991; 40:17-23
- Boozarjomehri F, Timor-Trirsch I, Chao CR, Fox
HE. Transvaginal ultrasonographic evaluation of
the cervix before labor: presence of cervical weding
is associated with shorter duration of inducced
labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994; 171:1081-1087
- Yang SH, Roh CR, Kim JH. Transvaginal
ultrasonography for cervical assessment before
induction of labor. J Ultrasound Med 2004; 23:375-
382
- Watson WJ, Stevens D, Welter S, Day D. Factors
predicting successful labor induction. Obstet
Gynecol 1996; 88:990-992