Automated measurement of follicle volume for the determination of trigger day in poor responder IVF patients
Automated measurement of follicle volume for the determination of trigger day in poor responder IVF patients
Objective: To identify a cutoff value for volume using Sono-automatic volume calculation (Sono-AVC) that could be used to determine the appropriate time of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) during COH in antagonist cycles of low ovarian response in vitro fertilization (IVF) patients. Material and Methods: Sixty-four IVF cases first underwent two-dimensional ultrasound. Subsequently, the follicles were analyzed via Sono-AVC. Using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, a cutoff value was identified for volume, to be used as the hCG criterion on the day of hCG measurement. A total of 544 follicles from 64 patients were screened by Sono-AVC and sorted descendingly. In all of the patients, the follicles in both ovaries had been visualized; only follicles identified manually as being larger than 10 mm and those measured by Sono-AVC to be over 0.4 cc in volume were screened and sorted. Results: ROC analysis was done using the number of mature oocytes, and an hCG volume of 1.06 cc or greater on the day of measurement was identified as a cutoff value with a sensitivity of 91% for estimating maturation. Conclusion: Using the Sono-AVC method to determine hCG timing in cases with a low ovarian reserve and/or those who are poor responders might enhance the efficacy and reliability of treatment.
___
- 1. Dokuzeylül Güngör N, Gürbüz T. Prediction of the number of oocytes based on AMH and FSH levels in IVF candidates J Surg Med 2020;4:733–7.
- 2. Rosen MP, Shen S, Dobson AT, Rinaudo PF, McCulloch CE, Cedars MI. A quantitative assessment of follicle size on oocyte developmental competence. Fertil Steril 2008;90:684–90.
- 3. Raine-Fenning N, Deb S, Jayaprakasan K, Clewes J, Hopkisson J, Campbell B. Timing of oocyte maturation and egg collection during controlled ovarian stimulation: A randomized controlled trial evaluating manual and automated measurements of follicle diameter. Fertil Steril 2010;94:184–8.
- 4. Murtinger M, Aburumieh A, Rubner P, Eichel V, Zech MH, Zech NH. Improved monitoring of ovarian stimulation using 3D transvaginal ultrasound plus automated volume count. Reprod Biomed Online 2009;19:695–9.
- 5. Kwan I, Bhattacharya S, McNeil A, van Rumste MM. Monitoring of stimulated cycles in assisted reproduction (IVF and ICSI). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008:CD005289.
- 6. Jayaprakasan K, Deb S, Raine-Fenning N. Imaging in assisted reproduction. European J Obstet Gynecol 2008;1:43–7.
- 7. Raine-Fenning N, Jayaprakasan K, Clewes J. Automated follicle tracking facilitates standardization and may improve work flow. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2007;30:1015–8.
- 8. Raine-Fenning N, Jayaprakasan K, Clewes J, Joergner I, Bonaki SD, Chamberlain S, et al. SonoAVC: A novel method of automatic volume calculation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2008;31:691–6.
- 9. Raine-Fenning N, Jayaprakasan K, Chamberlain S, Devlin L, Priddle H, Johnson I. Automated measurements of follicle diameter: A chance to standardize? Fertil Steril 2009;91(Suppl 4):1469–72.
- 10. Raine-Fenning N, Jayaprakasan K, Deb S, Clewes J, Joergner I, Dehghani Bonaki S, et al. Automated follicle tracking improves measurement reliability in patients undergoing ovarian stimulation. Reprod Biomed Online 2009;18:658–63.
- 11. Lamazou F, Arbo E, Salama S, Grynberg M, Frydman R, Fanchin R. Reliability of automated volumetric measurement of multiple growing follicles in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation. Fertil Steril 2010;94:2172–6.
- 12. Salama S, Arbo E, Lamazou F, Levailllant JM, Frydman R, Fanchin R. Reproducibility and reliability of automated volumetric measurement of single preovulatory follicles using SonoAVC. Fertil Steril 2010;93:2069–73.
- 13. Deutch TD, Joergner I, Matson DO, Oehninger S, Bocca S, Hoenigmann D, et al. Automated assessment of ovarian follicles using a novel three-dimensional ultrasound software. Fertil Steril 2009;92:1562–8.
- 14. Ata B, Seyhan A, Reinblatt SL, Shalom-Paz E, Krishnamurthy S, Tan SL. Comparison of automated and manual follicle monitoring in an unrestricted population of 100 women undergoing controlled ovarian stimulation for IVF. Hum Reprod 2011;26:127–33.
- 15. Pan P, Chen X, Li Y, Zhang Q, Zhao X, Bodombossou-Djobo MM, et al. Comparison of manual and automated measurements of monodominant follicle diameter with different follicle size in infertile patients. PLoS One 2013;8:e77095.
- 16. Re C, Mignini Renzini M, Rodriguez A, Dal Canto M, Buccheri M, Sacchi S, et al. From a circle to a sphere: The ultrasound imaging of ovarian follicle with 2D and 3D technology. Gynecol Endocrinol 2019;35:184–9.
- 17. Rodríguez-Fuentes A, Hernández J, García-Guzman R, Chinea E, Iaconianni L, Palumbo A. Prospective evaluation of automated follicle monitoring in 58 in vitro fertilization cycles: Follicular volume as a new indicator of oocyte maturity. Fertil Steril 2010;93:616–20.
- 18. Deb S, Jayaprakasan K, Campbell BK, Clewes JS, Johnson IR, Raine-Fenning NJ. Intraobserver and interobserver reliability of automated antral follicle counts made using three-dimensional ultrasound and SonoAVC. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009;33:477–83.
- 19. Jayaprakasan K, Campbell BK, Clewes JS, Johnson IR, Raine-Fenning NJ. Three-dimensional ultrasound improves the interobserver reliability of antral follicle counts and facilitates increased clinical work flow. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2008;31:439–44.
- 20. Deb S, Campbell BK, Clewes JS, Raine-Fenning NJ. Quantitative analysis of antral follicle number and size: A comparison of two-dimensional and automated three-dimensional ultrasound techniques. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2010;35:354–60.