İMKB'de fiyat-hacim ilişkisi-Asimetrik etkileşim

Bu çalısmada İMKB’de işlem gören hisse senetlerine iliskin fiyat-hacim iliskisinin varlıgı ve iliski varsa bu iliskinin asimetrik olup olmadıgının arastırılması amaçlanmıstır. Ocak 2001 – Eylül 2008 (1845 gözlem) döneminde devamlı olarak İMKB-30 ve İMKB-50’de yer alan hisse senetlerinin günlük fiyat - islem hacmi serileri kullanılmıstır. Arastırma bulguları fiyat-hacim iliskisinin asimetrik nitelikte oldugunu desteklemektedir. Söz konusu sonuç Karısım Dagılımı Hipotezi’ni (MDH) de dogrulamaktadır. Dolayısıyla getiriler (getiri degisimi-volatilite) ve hacim arasında pozitif korelasyon oldugu ifade edilebilecektir.

Price-volume relationship in ISE – Asymmetric interaction

In this paper, we tried to examine whether the price-volume relationship exists in ISE, and if so whether or not it is asymmetric. Daily price and trading volume series of stocks, which have been traded in ISE-30 and ISE-50 on a continual basis between January 2001 and September 2008, were used in this study. The findings of the study support the asymmetric relationship between price and volume, and further confirm the Mixture of Distribution Hypothesis. Consequently, the positive relationship between return (return change and volatility) and volume is said to be validated

___

  • BADHANI, K. N., (2005), “Stock Price-Volume Causality at Index Level”, http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=874914
  • BASÇI, E., ÖZYILDIRIM, S. ve AYDOGAN, K., (1996), “A note on price-volume dynamics in an emerging stock market”, Journal of Banking and Finance, 20, 389-400.
  • BRAILSFORD (1994), “The Empirical Relationship between Volume, Returns and Volatility”,www.technicalanalysis.org.uk/volume/Brai94.pdf, (05/04/2009).
  • CHAN, W.S., ve TSE, Y.K., (2005), “Price–volume relation in stocks: a multiple time series analysis on the Singapore market Asia Pacific Journal of Management” 10 (1), 39-56.
  • CHEN, G., FIRTH, M. ve RUI, O. M., (2001), “The Dynamic Relation between Stock Returns,Trading Volume and Volatility”, Financial Review, 36, 153-173.
  • CROUCH, R. L., (1970), “A Nonlinear Test of the Random Walk Hypothesis”, American Economic Review, 60, 199-202.
  • DEO, M., SRINIVASAN, K. ve DEVANADHEN, K., (2008), “The Empirical Relationship between Stock Returns, Trading Volume and Volatility: Evidence from Select Asia-Pacific Stock Market”, European Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Sciences, 12, 58-68.
  • EPPS, T. W., (1975), “Security Price Changes and Transaction Volumes: Theory and Evidence”,American Economic Review, 65, 586-597.
  • EPPS, T. W., (1977), “Security Price Changes and Transaction Volumes: Some Additional Evidence”, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 12, 141-146.
  • FLOROS, C. ve VOUGAS, D. V., (2007), “Trading Volume and Returns Relationship in Greek Stock Index Futures Market: GARCH vs. GMM”, International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, 12, 98-115.
  • GODFREY, M. D., GRANGER, C. W. J. ve MORGANSTERN, O., (1964), “The Random Walk Hypothesis of Stock Market Behavior”, Kyklos, 17, 1-30.
  • GÖKÇE, A., (2002), “MKB’de Fiyat-Hacim iliskisi: Granger Nedensellik Testi”, G. Ü. İ.İ.B.F.Dergisi, 3, 43-48.
  • GRANGER, C. W. J. ve MORGANSTERN, O., (1963), “Spectral Analysis of New York Stock Market Prices”, Kyklos, 16, 1-27.
  • GUNDUZ, L. ve HATEMI-J, A., (2005), “Stock price and volume relation in emerging markets”,Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 41, 29-44.
  • HIEMSTRA, C. ve JONES, J.D., (1995). “Testing for linear and nonlinear Granger causality in the stock price–volume relation” Journal of Finance, 49, 1639–1664.
  • KAMATH, R. R., (2008), “The Price-Volume Relationship In The Chilean Stock Market”,International Business & Economics Research Journal, 7 (10), 7-14.
  • KARPOFF, J. M., (1987), “The Relation between Price Changes and Trading Volume: A Survey”,Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 22, 109-126.
  • LEE, B-S. ve RUI, O. M., (2002), “The Dynamic Relationship between Stock Returns and Trading Volume: Domestic and Cross-Country Evidence”, Journal of Banking and Finance, 26,51-78.
  • ROGALSKI, R.J., (1978), “The dependence of prices and volume”, Review of Economics and Statistics, 60 (2), 268–274.
  • SAATÇİOGLU, K. ve STARKS, L. T., (1998), “The stock price-volume relationship in emerging stock markets: The case of Latin America”, International Journal of Forecasting, 14, 215-225.
  • SALMAN, F. (2002), “Risk-return-volume relationship in an emerging stock market”, Applied Economics Letters, 9 (8), 549-552(4).
  • SILVAPULLE, P. ve CHOI, J.-S., (1999), “Testing for linear and nonlinear Granger causality in the stock price–volume relation: Korean evidence” The Quarterly of Economics and Finance,39, 59–76.
  • SMIRLOCK, M. ve STARKS, L.T., (1988), “An empirical analysis of the stock price–volume relationship”, Journal of Banking and Finance 12 (1), 31–41.