Enerji piyasası reformlarının elektrik enerjisi piyasasına etkisi: EÜAŞ ve ayrıcaklı şirketler üzerine bir analiz

1980’li yıllarda baslayan özellestirme ve serbestlestirme politika ve uygulamalarının önemli bir ayagını elektrik enerjisi piyasaları olusturmus, bu konuda pek çok önemli kanun yürürlüge konmus ve piyasaların isleyisine iliskin önemli degisiklikler yapılmıstır. Ancak enerji piyasası reformları baslıgı altında toplanan bu köklü degisikliklerin saglıklı bir enerji piyasası olusturulması için yeterli olup olmadıgı hala tartısma konusudur. Bu çalısmada Türkiye’de elektrik üretimini gerçeklestiren kuruluslardan EÜAS ve ayrıcalıklı sirketlerin üretimlerine iliskin 1970- 2007 yılları arasında 38 yılı kapsayan üretim verileri veriler kullanılmıs, bu veriler bir takım istatistiki ve görsel testlerden geçirilerek analizde kullanılacak olan ARIMA Modeline uygun hale getirilmistir. Sonrasında veriler kullanılarak olusturulan modeller içerisinde en uygunu seçilerek müdahale analizine geçilmistir. Bu asamada modele kukla degiskenler ilave edilerek reformların etkisi sınanmıstır. Sonuç olarak reformların EÜAS ve ayrıcalıklı sirketlerin elektrik üretimleri üzerinde nasıl bir etkiye sahip olduguna iliskin eldeki bulgular yorumlanmıs, mevcut reformların söz konusu kurulusların elektrik enerjisi üretimi üzerinde kısa vadede olumlu bir etkiye sahip olmadıgı ortaya konmustur.

Reforms the effects of the energy market reforms on electricity market: The case of EUAS and privileged companies

The market of electricity energy formed an important step of the policy and implementation of privatization and liberalization beginning on 1980's and very important laws were put into force about this issue and some important changes about running of the markets were made. However, the matter whether the radical changes collected under the heading “Reforms for Energy Market” are sufficient or not for forming a healthy energy marker is still under discussion. In this study the generation data covering 38 years between 1970 - 2007 about the total electricity generation, electricity generation of Electricity Generation Co. Inc.(EUAS) and privileged companies, an establishment generating electricity, were used and they were made suitable to the ARIMA Model, which will be used during analysis, subjecting these data to some statistical and visual tests. Following this, selecting the best one in the model formed, it was gone to intervention analysis. In this stage, adding the dummy variables to the model, the influence of the reforms was tested. As a conclusion, the available findings about how the reforms have an effect on the electricity generations of the EUAS and privileged companies generating energy were interpreted and it was suggested that it had not a significant and positive effect in the short term.

___

  • ATİYAS İ. and Dutz M. (2003), “Competition and Regulatory Reform in Turkish Electricity Industry”, Conference on EU Accession: Turkey, May 10-11, Ankara.
  • BAGDADIOGLU N. ve ODYAKMAZ N. (2009), “Turkish Electricity Reform”, Utilities Policy 17(1) 144-152.
  • BARTOLOTTİ B., Fantini M and Siniscalca D. (1998), “Regulation and Privatization: The Case of Electricity”, Working Paper, Department of Economics and Finance, University of Turin.
  • BLONDAL S. and Pilat D.(1997), The Economic Benefits Of Regulatory Reform, OECD Economic Studies No. 28, 1997/I.
  • BORENSTEIN S., Bushnell J.B., Wolak F.(2002), “Measuring market efficiencies in California’s restructured wholesale electricity market”, The American Economic Review 92 (5), p.p. 1376-1405.
  • BOUIN D. and Michalet C.A. (1991), Rebalancing the Public and Private Sectors: Developing Country Experience, OECD, Paris.
  • ERDOGDU, (2006), Türkiye Enerji Piyasası Reformları: Ekonomik Analiz, Enerji Piyasası Düzenleme Kurumu Uzmanlık Tezi.
  • HATTORİ T. ve Tsutsui M. (2004), “Economic impact of regulatory reforms in the electricity supply industry: a panel data analysis for OECD countries”, Energy Policy 32, p.p. 823- 832.
  • HEPBASLI, Arif (2005), “Development and restructuring of Turkey’s electricity sector: a review”, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 9, 311–343.
  • JAMASB T. and Pollitt M. (2000), “Benchmarking and Regulation of Electricity Transmission and Distribution Utilities: Lessons from International Experience”, Working Paper, University of Cambridge.
  • JOSKOW L.P. and Kahn E.(2002), A quantitive analysis of pricing behavior in California’s wholesale electricity market during summer 2000, Energy Journal 23(4), p.p. 1- 35.
  • KLEIT A.N. and Terrel D. (2001), Measuring Potential Efficiency Gains From Deregulation Of Electricity Generation: A Bayesian Approach, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 83(3), p.p. 523– 530.
  • KWOKA J.E. (1996), Power Structure, Ownership, Integration and Competition in the US Electricity Industry, Boston: Kluwer.
  • LEVY B. and Spiller P.T. (1996), Regulations, Institutions and Commitment: Comparative Studies of Telecommunications, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • MARTIN R. ve Vansteenkiste I. (2001), “EU Telecommunications and Electricity Markets- Heading Towards Price Convergence?”, Intereconomics, May/ June, p.p. 131- 141.
  • ÖZKIVRAK, Özlem (2005), “Electricity restructuring in Turkey”, Energy Policy 33, pp.1339- 1350.
  • STEINER (2000), Regulation, industry structure and performance in the electricity supply industry, OECD Economics Department Working Paper, ECO/ WKP 11.
  • TORP J.E. and Rekve P. (1998), “Privatization in Developing Countries: Lessons to be Learnt from the Mozombican Case”, Transformation, No:36, p.p. 73- 92.
  • VILLALONGA B. (2000), “Privatization and efficiency: Differentiating Ownership Effects from Political, Organizational and Dynamic Effects”, Journal of Economic Behaviour & Organization, 42, p.p. 43- 74.
  • WILSON R. (2002), Architecture of power markets. Econometrica 70(4), p.p. 1299- 1340.
  • WOLFRAM C.(1999), “Measuring duopoly power in the British electricity spot market”, The American Economic Review 89(4), p.p. 805- 826.
  • ZHANG Y-F., Kirkpatrick C. and Parker D. (2002), Centre on Regulation and Competition Working Paper Series, Paper No: 31, Electricity Sector Reform in the Effects of Privatization, Competition and Regulation, Published by Institute for Development Policy and Management, University of Manchester.
  • ZHANG Y-F., Parker D. and Kirkpatrick C. (2008), Electricity sector reform in developing countries: an econometric assessment of the effects of privatization, competition and regulation. Journal of Regulatory Economics 33(2), p.p. 159- 178.
  • http://www.teias.gov.tr/