TÜRKİYE'DE YÖNETİMLER ARASI TRANSFERLER SİNEKKAĞIDI ETKİSİ YARATIYOR MU? AMPİRİK BİR İNCELEME

Birçok ampirik çalışma merkezi yönetimlerin yerel yönetimlere koşulsuz (götürü) transferlerinin yerel harcamaları yerel gelire oranla daha fazla arttırdığı sonucuna ulaşmıştır. Bu çalışmada Türkiye'de merkezi hibelerin(transferlerin) sinekkağıdı etkisi yaratıp yaratmadığı, 20062014 dönemi için panel regresyon modeli ile test edilmiştir. Sonuçlar merkezi yönetim götürü transferlerinin sinekkağıdı etkisine yol açtığını ve ayrıca yerel gelirlerin götürü transferler kadar olmasa da yerel harcamaları etkilediğini göstermiştir

DOES INTERGOVERNMENTAL TRANSFERS CAUSE FLYPAPER EFFECT IN TURKEY? AN EMPRICALSTUDY

Numerous empirical analyses find that central government lump sum transfers to local governments increase local expenditure by more than increases in local income. In this study,whether central grants(transfers) cause the flypaper effect in Turkey is examined for the 2006-2014 period using a Panel Regression model. The results indicate that the central government lump sum transfers cause the flypaper effect and also local incomes influnce the local expenditure but not the same as lump sum transfers

PDF

___

2380Sayılı Belediyelere ve İl Özel İdarelerine Genel Bütçe Vergi Gelirlerinden Pay Verilmesi Hakkında Kanun.
5246 sayılı Büyükşehir Belediyesi Kanunu.
6360 KanunOn Üç İlde Büyükşehir Belediyesi Ve Yirmi Altı İlçe Kurulması İle Bazı Kanun Ve Kanun Hükmünde Kararnamelerde Değişiklik Yapılmasına Dair Kanun.
Acosta, P.(2010), "The "Fly-PaperEffect" In Presence of SpatialInterdependence: EvidenceFromArgentineanMunicipalities"", TheAnnals of Regional. Sciences, 44(3), 453-466.
Baltagi, B. H. (1995), Econometric Analysis of Panel Data, John Wiley&Sons, Canada.
Batırel, Ö. F.(2014), "Kamusal Tercih Teorisinde Son Gelişmeler"", Kamu Maliyesi Güncel Sorunları, ed: Turgay Berksoy, Mehmet Şahin, Seçkin Yayınları, Ankara.
Becker, E.(1996), "TheIllusion of FiscalIllusion: UnstickingtheFlypaperEffect"", PublicChoice, 86, s. 85-102.
Blanchard, o. J.,de-sılanes f.l.ve Shleıfer, A.(1994),"What Do Firms Do with Cash Windfalls?",Journal of Financial Economics, 36, 337-60.
Cardenas, O. ve Sharma, A. (2011), "MexicanMunicipalitiesandtheFlypaperEffect"", Public Budget Finance, 31(3), 73-93.
Case, A. C., HINES, J.R. ve ROSEN, H.S.(1993), "Budget SpilloversandFiscalPolicyInterdependence: EvidencefromtheStates"", Journal of PublicEconomics, 52, s. 285-307.
Courant, P.,Gramlıch, E. ve RUBINFIELD, D.L.(1979), "TheStimulativeEffects of IntergovernmentalGrants: orWhy Money SticksWhere it Hits" , in P. Mieszkowskiand W.H. Oakland (eds.), FiscalFederalismandGrants-in Aid,5-6.
Cullis, J. ve Jones, P.(1998), Public Finance andPublicChoice, Oxford UniversityPress, NewYork.
Dougan, W. ve Kenyon, D. (1988), "PressureGroupsandPublicExpenditures: TheFlypaperEffectReconsidered"", EconomicInquiry, XXVI, 159-170.
Durmuş, M. (2008), Kamu Ekonomisi (Kamu Harcamaları Ders Notları), Gazi Kitabevi: Ankara.
Filimon, R., Romer, T. ve Rosenthal, H. (1982), "Asymmetric Information andAgenda Control. TheBases of MonopolyPowerInPublicSpending"", Journal of PubicEconomics, 17, 51- 70.
Fisher, R. C. (1982), "Incomeand Grant Effects on LocalExpenditure: TheFlypaperEffectandOtherDifficulties"", Journal of Urban Economics, 12, 324-345.
Gramlich, E. M. ve Galper, H.(1973), "StateandLocalFiscalBehaviorand Federal Grant Policy"", BrookingsPapers on Economic Activity, 1, 15-58.
Gujarati, D. N. (2004), Basic Econometrics, 4th ed.,TheMcGraw-HillCompanies, New York.
Güriş, S. ve Çağlayan, E.(200), Ekonometri-Temel Kavramlar, Der yayınları, İstanbul.
Hines, J. ve Thaler, R. (1995), "TheFlypaperEffect"", Journal of EconomicPerspectives, 9,217-226.
Kahneman, D.,Knetsch, J. ve Thaler, R.H. (1991), "Anomalies: TheEndowmentEffect, LossAversionandStatusQuoBias"", Journal of EconomicPerspectives, 5, 193- 206.
Knight, B. (2002), "Endogenous Federal GrantsandCrowd-Out of StateGovernmentSpending: TheoryandEvidencefromtheFederal HighwayAid Program"", AmericanEconomicReview, 92, 71-92.
Lankford, R. H. (1987), "A Note onMeasuringFlypaperEffects"", Journal of Urban Economics, 22,113-15.
Megdal, S. B. (1987), "TheFlypaperEffectRevisited: An EconometricExplanation"", Review of EconomicsandStatistics, 69, 347-351.
Nagamine, J.(1995), "JapaneseLocal Finance andthe ,,Institutionalised" FlypaperEffect",Public Finance, 50 (3), 420-441.
Oates, W. (1979), "Lump-SumIntergovernmentalGrantsHavePriceEffects"", InMieszkowski, Peter, and William H. Oakland, eds.,FiscalFederalismandGrants-in-Aid, Washington, D.C.: Urban Institute, 23-30.
Pevcın, P. (2012), "Transfer Revenues, ExpendituresandTaxEffort of SlovenianMunicipalities"", AfricanJournal of Business Management, 6 (22), 6721-6728.
Sağbaş I. ve SARUÇ, N.T. (2004), "IntergovernmentalTransfersandtheFlypaperEffect in Turkey"" Turkish. Studies, 5(2), 79-92.
Sour, L. ve GIRON, F. (2009), "ElectoralCompetitionandtheFlypaperEffect in MexicanLocalGovernments"", Paperno. 238. Mexico-Toluca: CIDE.
Strumpf, K. S. (1998), "A Predictive Index ForTheFlypaperEffect"", Journal of PublicEconomics, 69, 389-412.
Tepav.(2012), Yenilenen Yerel Yönetim Sisteminde Belediye ve İl Özel İdarelerinin Genel Bütçe Vergi Gelirlerinden Alacakları Payların Karşılaştırmalı Analizi, Politika Notu, N201278.
Thaler, R. H. (1990), "Anomalies: Saving, FungibilityandMentalAccounts"", Journal of EconomicPerspectives, 4,193-20.
Turnbull, G. K. (1998), "TheOverspendingandFlypaperEffects of FiscalIllusion: TheoryandEmpiricalEvidence"", Journal of Urban Economics, 44, 1-26.
Worthington, A. ve Dollery, B.E. (1999), "FiscalIllusionandtheAustralianLocalGovernment Grant Process: How Sticky is theFlypaperEffect?"", PublicChoice, 99,1-13.
Wyckoff, P. G.(1988), "A BureaucraticTheory of FlypaperEffects"", Journal of Urban Economics, 23, 115-129.
Wyckoff, P. G. (1991), "TheExclusiveFlypaperEffect"", Journal of Urban Economics, 30,310-328.