___

• Bason, Christian (2010), Leading public sector innovation: Co-creating for a better soci- ety, Policy Press, Bristol.
• Bloch, Carter (2011), Measuring Public Innovation in the Nordic Countries (MEPIN), Danish Centre for Studies in Research and Research Policy: Aarhus.
• Cartensen, Helle Vibeke ve Bason, Christian (2012), “Powering Collaborative Po- licy Innovation: Can Innovation Labs Help”, The Innovation Journal: The Public Sector Innovation Journal, Volume 17(1), article 4.
• COM (2014) 367 final, Proposal for a Decısıon of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a programme on interoperability solutions for European public administrations, businesses and citizens (ISA2) - Interoperability as a means for mo- dernising the public sector, Brüksel.
• Cunningham, Paul ve Karakasidou, Aikaterini (2009), Innovation in the Public Sec- tor, INNO POLICY Trendchart Policy Brief No. 2.
• Dunleavy, Patrick, Margetts, Helen, Bastow, Simon ve Tinkler, Jane (2005), “New Public Management Is Dead—Long Live Digital-Era Governance”, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 16, s. 467-494.
• Flash Eurobarometer 343 (2012), Innovation in the Public Sector: Its Perception and Impact on Business (http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/flash/fl_343_en.pdf, 14.10.2014)
• Jones, Glyn ve Cole, Alistair (2009), “French administrative reform: change and resistance”, Goldfinch, Shaun F. ve Wallis, Joe L. (Ed.), International Handbook of Public Management Reform, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, Birleşik Krallık, Nort- hampton, ABD, s. 220-234.
• Heper, Metin (1974), Bürokratik Yönetim Geleneği: Osmanlı İmparatorluğu ve Türkiye Cumhuriyetinde Gelişimi ve Niteliği, ODTÜ Yayınları, Ankara.
• Heper, Metin (1976), “Political Modernization As Reflected in Bureaucratic Chan- ge: The Turkish Bureaucracy and a “Historical Bureaucratic Empire” Traditi- on”, International Journal of Middle East Studies, 7, ss. 507-521.
• Hollanders, Hugo, Arundel, Anthony, Buligescu, Bianca, Peter, Viola, Roman, La- ura, Simmonds, Paul ve Es-Sadki, Nordine (2013), European Public Sector Inno- vation Scoreboard: A Pilot Exercise, Belçika.
• http://blog.la27eregion.fr/ (14.09.2014)
• http://blog.okfn.org/ (15.09.2014)
• http://challenge.gov (10.09.2014)
• http://digitaliser.dk/resource/432461 (18.09.2014)
• http://ec.europa.eu/isa/index_en.htm (20.10.2014)
• http://grips-public.mediactive.fr/home/ (22.09.2014)
• http://nestainnovation.ning.com/forum/topics/measuring-innovation-within (17.09.2014)
• http://urbact.eu/en/about-urbact/urbact-at-a-glance/urbact-in-words/ (12.09.2014)
• http://urbact.eu/en/our-projects/ (13.09.2014)
• Hughes, Alastair, Moore, Kyla ve Kataria, Nimesh (2011), Innovation in Public Sec- tor Organisations. A pilot survey for measuring innovation across the public sector, NESTA, Londra.
• INNO GRIPS (2009), Innovation Policy Workshop 5, INNO GRIPS (Global Review of Innovation Intelligence and Policy Studies), Brüksel.
• Lewis, J. Owen, Hógáin, Sadhbh Ní, Borghi, Antonio (2013), Building Energy Effici- ency in European Cities, URBACT, Nancy, Fransa.
• Maesschalck, Jeroen (2004), “The Impact of New Public Management Reforms on Public Servants’ Ethics: Towards A Theory”, Public Administration, 82:2, s. 465- 489.
• Mulgan, Geoff (2014), “The radical’s dilemma: an overview of the practice and prospects of Social and Public Labs – Version 1”, Social and Public Labs, 2014, Version 1.
• Mulgan, Geoff ve Albury, David (2003), Innovation in the Public Sector, ver. 1.9, Ka- bine Ofisi Raporu, Londra.
• NAO (2007), The carbon trust: Accelerating the move to a low carbon economy, National Audit Office, HC 7 Session 2007-2008.
• Oktay, Cemil (1997), Siyasal Sistem ve Bürokrasi: Yükselen İstemler Karşısında Türk Siyasal Sistemi ve Kamu Bürokrasisi, Der Yayınları, İstanbul.
• Ongaro, Edoardo (2009), Public Management Reform and Modernization: Trajectories of Administrative Change in Italy, France, Greece, Portugal and Spain, Edward El- gar, Cheltenham, Birleşik Krallık, Northampton, ABD.
• Petkovsek, Veronika - Cankar, Stanka Setnikar (2013), “Public Sector Innovation in the European Union and Example of Good Practice”, Management, Knowledge and Learning International Conference, 19-21 Haziran 2013, Zadar, Hırvatistan, s. 1329-1336 (http://econpapers.repec.org/bookchap/tkpmklp13/, 11.09.2014).
• Rivera León, Lorena, Simmonds, Paul ve Roman, Laura (2012), Trends and Challen- ges in Public Sector Innovation in Europe, Thematic Report 2012 under Specific Contract for the Integration of INNO Policy Trend Chart with ERAWATCH (2011–2012). Inno Policy TendChart. European Commission.
• Soares, Delfina ve Amaral, Luis (2010), “Information Systems Interoperability in Public Administration: Identifying the Major Acting Forces through a Delp- hi Study”, Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, ISSN 0718–1876 Elektronik Versiyon, 6:1, Nisan 2011, s. 61-94
• Tanner, Will (2013), The Case for Private Prisons, Reform Ideas No:2. (http://www. reform.co.uk/resources/0000/0635/Reform_Ideas_No_2_-_The_case_for_pri- vate_ prisons.pdf, 14.09.2014)
• Thenint, Hugo (2010), Mini Study 10 – Innovation in the Public Sector, INNO GRIPS (Global Review of Innovation Intelligence and Policy Studies), Brüksel.
• Waldo, Dwight (1948), The Administrative State: A Study of the Political Theory of American Public Administration, New York: The Ronald Press Company.