Rıza BAYRAK, Ozan BAHAR

4113

OECD ÜLKELERİ TURİZM SEKTÖRÜNÜN EKONOMİK ETKİNLİK ANALİZİ: VZA İLE AMPRİK BİR UYGULAMA

Bu çalışmada, 2011-2015 yıllarına ait verilerle OECD ülkelerinin turizm etkinliğinin iktisadi analizi yapılmaya çalışılmıştır. Çalışmada, girdi değişkeni olarak gelen yolcu sayısı, turizm harcamaları, lojistik performans endeksi; çıktı değişkeni olarak da turizm gelirleri olmak üzere toplam dört değişken kullanılmıştır. Veriler, Dünya Bankası veri tabanından elde edilmiştir. Analiz yöntemi olarak, statik ve dinamik Veri Zarflama Analizi (VZA)’nin çıktıya yönelik modelleri kullanılmıştır. Analiz neticesinde; ABD, Avustralya, İspanya, Lüksemburg, Portekiz, Türkiye ve Yeni Zelanda’nın hem CCR hem de BCC çıktı yönelimli model sonucunda tüm yıllarda etkin ülkeler olduğu gözlenmiştir. Etkin olmayan ülkelerin değişkenler bazında yapmaları gereken iyileştirme değerleri incelendiğinde; turizm harcamalarının yaklaşık %2 azaltılması ve turizm gelirlerinin de yaklaşık %92 artırılması gerektiği ortaya çıkmıştır. Beş yıllık verilerin topluca değerlendirildiği dinamik analiz sonucunda CCR ve BCC çıktı yönelimli modele göre ABD, Avustralya, İspanya, Lüksemburg, Portekiz, Türkiye, Yeni Zelanda ve Yunanistan’ın etkin ülkeler olduğu gözlenmiştir.

ECONOMIC EFFICIENCY ANALYSIS OF TOURISM SECTOR IN OECD COUNTRIES: AN EMPRICAL STUDY WITH DEA

In this study we aim to analyze the efficiency of tourism potential of OECD countries in terms of economics perspective with the data of 2011-2015 years. Number of arrivals (NoA), tourism expenditures (TE) and logistic performance index (LPI) were used as input variables; while tourism revenues (TR) as output variables in accordance with the data acquired from World Bank (WB). Both statical and dynamic DEA were conducted with output oriented models. Considering the results of both the CCR ad BCC models as a whole; USA, Australia, Spain, Luxembourg, Portugal, Turkey and New Zealand were efficient countries in all years. Taking into account the required improvements of the variables of the inefficient countries, it is possible to say that tourism expenditure of the inefficient countries should be decreased approximately 2%. Moreover, it could be put forwarded that tourism revenues should be increased approximately 92%. As a result of a dynamic analysis, eight countries (USA, Australia, Spain, Luxembourg, Portugal, Turkey, New Zealand and Greece) were observed to be efficient DMUs according to both the CCR and BCC models.
PDF

___

  • Akal, Z. (2002). Performance Measurement and Control in Business: Multifaceted Performance Indicators, Ankara: MPM Publication.
  • Aktaş, H. (2001). DEA Analysis Approach to Performance Appraisal in Business, Journal of Management and Economics of Celal Bayar University, 7 (1), 163-175.
  • Aksu, A.A. and Köksal, C.D. (2005). Comparisons of the Efficiency of the Independent Hotel Chains with DEA: An Emprical Study in Antalya, Journal of Economics, Business and Finance, 20(235), 97-107.
  • Atan, M. and Arslantürk, Y. (2015). Efficiency of Tourism Potential of Countries, Gazi Journal of Economics and Business, 1(1), 59-76.
  • Babacan, A. and Özcan, S. (2009). Research of Alanya Region Hotels’ Relative Efficiency: An Application of Data Envelopment Analysis Technique, Mustafa Kemal University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 6(12), 176-189.
  • Bahar, O. and Kozak, M. (2008). Tourism Economics Concepts and Practices, USA: Nova Publishing.
  • Bakırcı, F. (2006). Efficiency in Production and Measuring Productivity: Theory and Application of Data Envelopment Analysis, Ankara: Atlas Publication.
  • Banker, R.D., Charnes, A. and Cooper, W.W. (1984). Some Models For Estimating Technical and Scale Efficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis, Management Sciences, 30(9), 1078-1092.
  • Bayrak, R., Bakırcı, F. and Sarıkaya, M. (2015). Efficiency Analysis with DEA in Defence Industry, Canakkale Onsekiz Mart Journal of Entrepreneurship and Development, 10(2), 26-51
  • Bozkurt, Ö. and Ergun, T. (1998). Public Administration Glossary, Ankara: TODAI.
  • Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W. and Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring The Effıciency of Decision Making Units, European Journal of Operational Research, 2(6), 429-444.
  • Cooper, W., Lawrence, W., Seiford, L., M. and Tone, K. (2000). Data Envelopment Analysis: A Comprehensive Text With Models, Applications, References and DEA Solver Software, USA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • Coelli, T.J., Rao, D.S.P., O’Donnell, T.J. and Battese, G.E. (2005). An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis, USA: Springer.
  • Cooper, W.W., Seiford, L.M. and Zhu, J. (2011). Handbook on Data Envelopment Analysis, USA: Springer.
  • Copeland, B.R. (1991). Tourism, Welfare and De-Industrialization in a Small Open Economy, Economica, 58 (232), 515-529.
  • Dinçer, M.Z. (1993). Tousrism Economics and Tourism in Turkish Economics, İstanbul: Filiz Publication.
  • Efil, İ. (2006). Management and Organization in Business, İstanbul: Alfa Aktüel.
  • Emir, O., Pelit, E., and Günay, F. (2010). Problems of Hotel Managements with Point of View of Employees Who are Graduates: An Application at 5-Star Hotel Managements in Antalya, "Is, Guc" Industrıal Relations And Human Resources Journal, 12(4), 9-31.
  • Emrouznejad, A. and Thanassoulis, E. (2005). A Mathematical Model For Dynamic Efficiency Using Data Envelopment Analysis. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 160 (2), 363-378.
  • Erciş, M.S. and Gülcü, A. (2008). Efficiency Analysis of Accomodation Businesses with Data Envelopment Analysis and an Application, Trakya University 17th Statistics Research Symphosium, 50-61.
  • Färe, R. and Doğramacı, A. (1988). Application of Modern Production Theory: Efficiency and Productivity, Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • Farrell, M.J. (1957). The Measurement of Productivit Efficiency, Journal of Royal Statistical Society, Series A (General), 120(3), 253-290.
  • Hwang, S.N. and Chang T. Y. (2003). Using Data Envelopment Analysis to Measure Hotel Managerial Efficiency Change in Taiwan, Tourism Management, 24(4), 357–369.
  • İçöz, O. and Kozak, M. (1998). Tourism Economics. Ankara: Turhan Publication.
  • İlkiz, O. and Hitay, O. (1992). The Problems of the Tourism Education in Turkey, Tourism Education Conference-Workshop. Ankara: Tourism Ministry.
  • Kök, R. (1991). Industrial Efficieny and Productivity, Erzurum: Atatürk University Publications.
  • Kutlar, A. and Babacan, A. (2008). CCR Efficieny-Scale Efficieny in the Public Universities in Turkey: A DEA Application, Kocaeli University Journal of Social Sciences, 15(1), 148-172.
  • Kecek, G. (2010). Data Envelopment Analysis, Ankara: Siyasal Publication.
  • Kumbhakar, S.C. and Lovell, C.A.K. (2000). Stochastic Frontier Analysis, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Ramanathan, R. (2003). Data Envelopment Analysis, New Delhi: Sage Publications Ltd.
  • Repkova, I. (2013). Estimation of Banking Efficiency in The Czech Republic: Dynamic Data Envelopment Analysis. Law and Economics Review, 4 (4), 261-275.
  • Rohlstadas, A. (1998). Enterprise Performance Measurement. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 18(9/10), 989-999.
  • Schneider, H. (1976). Tourism Development in Africa: Scope and Critical Issues, Africa Spectrum, 11 (1), 5-16.
  • Schmitter, C. and Trechsel, P.A.H. (2004). The Future of Democracy in Europe: Trends, Analyses and Reform. Belgium: Council of Europe. https://book.coe.int/eur/en/making-democratic-institutions-ork/2987-the-future-of-democracy-trends-analyses-and-reforms.html
  • Sengupta, J.K. (1995). Dynamics of Data Envelopment Analysis: Theory of Systems Efficiency. Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • Silver, M.S. and Lowe J.F. (2001). An Appraisal of The Performance of Manufacturing Industry in Wales, Journal of Economic Studies, 16(1), 31-47.
  • Tatlı H. and Bayrak, R. (2016). Assessment of The Efficiency of Automotive Industry Firms Listed in Borsa Istanbul with Statical and Dynamical DEA, Research Journal of Politics, Economics and Management, 4(1), 119-145.
  • Tarım, A. (2001). Data Envelopment Analysis: A Relative Approach on the Basis of Mathematical Programming, Ankara: Hacettepe Publications.
  • Toma, E. (2014). Regional Scale Efficiency Evaluation by Input-Oriented Data Envelopment Analysis of Tourism Sector, International Journal of Academic Research in Environment and Geography, 1(1), 15-20.
  • Tone, K. and Tsutsui, M. (2009). “Network DEA: A Slack Based Measure Approach”. European Journal of Operational Research, 197, 243-252.
  • Tone, K. and Tsutsui, M. (2010). “Dynamic DEA: A Slack Based Measure Approach”. Omega, 38, 145-156.
  • TTYD (2016). http://www.ttyd.org.tr/sayfa/2023e-Dogru-Turk-Turizminde-Yatirim-Hamlesi-19/28, (Accessed Date: 03.03.2016).
  • Turkish Hotelier Federation-TUROFED (2010). Tourism Report, No: 2. Retreved: http://www.turofed. org.tr/galeri/ cop/turi2.pdf.
  • United Nations World Trade Organization-UNWTO (2016). UNWTO Tourism Higlights, 2016. http://www.e-unwto.org/doi/pdf/10.18111/9789284418145.
  • Uyar, S. and Alış, M. (2014). Operational Auditing in Hospitality Businesses via Data Envelopment Analysis, Dokuz Eylul University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences Journal, 29(2), 107-136.
  • Ünlüönen, K., Tayfun, A. and Kılıçlar, A. (2007). Tourism Economics, Ankara: Nobel Publication.
  • Ünlüönen, K. and Şahin, S.Z. (2011). Employment in Tourism, Electronical Journal of Social Sciences, 10 (37), 1-25.
  • Yakut, E., Harbalıoğlu, M. and Pekkan, N.Ü. (2015). The Examination of Financial Performance of Companies in Tourism Sector, Which Are Being, Traded in Exchange Istanbul (EI) with Data Envelopment Analysis and Total Factor Productivity, Journal of Business Research, 7(2), 235-257.
  • Yanardağ, M.Ö. and Avcı, M. (2012). Problems in Tourism Sector Employment: An Empirical Evaluation On Marmaris, Fethiye, Bodrum, Ege Strategic Research Journal, 3(2), 39-62.
  • Yavuz, İ. (2001). Efficieny Analysis in Health Sector: An Emprical Application with DEA, Ankara: MPM Publication.
  • Yolalan, R. (1993). Relative Efficiency Analysis in Businesses, Ankara: National Productivity Center Publications.
  • World Bank-WB. (2014). Indicator. http://data.worldbank.org/.
  • Worthington, A.C. (2001). An Emprical Survey of Frontier Efficiency Measurement Techniques in Education, Education Economics, 9(3), 237-258.
Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari İncelemeler Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 1307-9832
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 2008
  • Yayıncı: Kenan ÇELİK
Arşiv
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

TAMAMLAYICILIK İNDEKSİ ÇALIŞMASI: TÜRKİYE ÖRNEĞİ

Aydın ÇELEN, Ayşe DEMİREL

OECD ÜLKELERİ TURİZM SEKTÖRÜNÜN EKONOMİK ETKİNLİK ANALİZİ: VZA İLE AMPRİK BİR UYGULAMA

Rıza BAYRAK, Ozan BAHAR

ULUSAL GELİR VE SOSYO-EKONOMİK GELİŞMİŞLİK DÜZEYİ İLİŞKİSİ BAĞLA-MINDA ETKİNLİK ANALİZİ: OECD ÜLKELERİ

Tuba YAKICI AYAN, Sinem Dedeoğlu ÖZKAN