Özer İŞİSAĞ, Onur ŞAHİN, Ayşegül KÖROĞLU

Diş Hekimliğinde Tam Seramik Sistemler

Diş hekimliğinde porselen; estetik ve biyouyumlu olmasının yanı sıra fiziksel özelliklerinden dolayı doğrudan veya metal destekli olarak sıklıkla kullanılan bir materyaldir. Metal-seramik restorasyonlar, eksik veya defektif dişlere uygulanan tedavi yaklaşımlarından biri olmasına rağmen kullanılan opak porselen ve metal, porselen altındaki olumsuz renk oluşumlarından dolayı bu restorasyonların estetik bölgelerde kullanımını sınırlandırmaktadır. Ayrıca bazı hastalarda metale karşı alerjik reaksiyonlar gözlenmektedir. Metal alt yapılı restorasyonlardaki bu dezavantajlar tam seramik sistemlerini gündeme getirmiştir. Tam seramik restorasyonlar, herhangi bir metal alt yapıya sahip değildir ve üst düzeyde gösterdiği translusent özellik ile estetik bölgelerde kullanılabilirler

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Tam seramik, metal seramik, estetik

All-Ceramic Systems In Dentistry

In dentistry, porcelain is commonly used material which is aesthetic and biocompatible as well as it can be used direct or with a metal support because of its physical properties. Although metal-ceramic restoration systems are one of the treatment approaches of missing or defective teeth, using opaque porcelain and metal, limits the usage of these restorations in aesthetic regions because of the negative colour formations below the porcelain. Also allergic reactions against metal may be observed in some patients.These disadvantages in restorations with metal substucture has revived the all-ceramic systems. Allceramic restorations don’t include any metal substructure and with their high translucent feature they can be used at aesthetic regions

Keywords:

All ceramic, metal ceramic, aesthetic,

PDF

___

1. Yüksel DG, Çekiç C, Özkan DP. Metal desteksiz porselen sistemleri. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi 2000; 10(2): 79-88.
2. Coşkun A, Yaluğ S. (2002). Metal desteksiz porselen sistemleri. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi 2002;5: 97-102.
3. Azer SS, Ayash GM, Johnston WM, Khalil MF, Rosenstiel SF. Effect of esthetic core shades on the final color of IPS Empress all-ceramic crowns. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 2006; 96(6): 397-401.
4. Conrad HJ, Seong WJ, Pesun IJ. Current ceramic materials and systems with clinical recommendations: a systematic review. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 2007; 98(5): 389-404.
5. Yavuzyılmaz H, Turhan B, Bavbek B, Kurt E. Tam porselen sistemleri II. Acta Odontologica Turcica 2005; 22(1): 49-60.
6. Yalım BB, Türker ŞB. (2012). Klinikte tam seramik sistemler. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi 2012; 5: 76-90.
7. Della Bona A, Mecholsky JJ, Anusavice KJ. Fracture behavior of lithia disilicate-and leucite-based ceramics. Dental Materials 2004; 20(10): 956-962.
8. Brochu JF, El-Mowafy O. Longevity and clinical performance of IPS-Empress ceramic restorations-a literature review. Journal-Canadian Dental Association 2002; 68(4): 233-238.
9. Rizkalla AS, Jones DW. Mechanical properties of commercial high strength ceramic core materials. Dental Materials 2004; 20(2): 207-212.
10. Guazzato M, Albakry M, Ringer SP, Swain MV. Strength, fracture toughness and microstructure of a selection of all-ceramic materials. Part I. Pressable and alumina glassinfiltrated ceramics. Dental Materials 2004; 20(5): 441-448.
11. Krämer N, Frankenberger R. Clinical performance of bonded leucite-reinforced glass ceramic inlays and onlays after eight years. Dental Materials 2005; 21(3): 262-271.
12. Höland W, Rheinberger V, Apel E, van’t Hoen C, Höland, M, Dommann A, Obrecht M, Mauth C, Graf-Hausner U. Clinical applications of glass-ceramics in dentistry. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine 2006; 17(11): 1037-1042.
13. Barabde AS, Adwani DG, Thakare A, Bhagat A, Wasu PA. Digital Revolution in Ceramics.Heal Talk 2013; 5(4): 25-27.
14. Yalım BB, Türker ŞB. Klinikte tam seramik sistemler. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi 2012; 5: 76,90.
15. Tsitrou EA, Northeast SE, van Noort R. Brittleness index of machinable dental materials and its relation to the marginal chipping factor, Journal of Dentistry 2007; 35(12): 897 - 902.
16. Bayramoğlu DE, Özkan Y. Cam seramik restorasyonlar ve zirkonya alt yapılı seramik restorasyonların karşılaştırılması. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi 2012; (6):110-123.
17. Bindl A, Lüthy H, Mörmann WH. Strength and fracture pattern of monolithic CAD/CAM-generated posterior crowns. Dental Materials 2006; 22(1): 29-36.
18. Leinfelder K F. (2000). Porcelain esthetics for the 21st century. The Journal of the American Dental Association 2000; 131: 47-51
19. Garcia RN, do Nascimento RF, Gomes ACR, Giannini M, Miguel LCM, Moon PC. Bond strength of resin cements to leucite-reinforced ceramics. RSBO Revista Sul-Brasileira de Odontologia 2012; 9(2): 183-189.
20. Tanthanuch S, Patanapiradej V. The science and art of ceramic restorations. Chulalongkorn University Dental Journal 2013; 30(3): 325-36.
21. Sethu, S. In-vitro studies on the color stability and masking ability of composite cores and the influence of posts and cores on the shades of all-ceramic systems. National Unıversity of Singapore. PhD Thesis, Singapore, 2004.
22. Sarikaya I, Güler AU. Effects of different polishing techniques on the surface roughness of dental porcelains. Journal of Applied Oral Science 2010; 18(1): 10-16.
23. Mansour YF, AL-Omiri MK, Khader YS, Al-Wahadni AM. Clinical performance of IPS-Empress 2 ceramic crowns inserted by general dental practitioners. J Contemp Dent Pract 2008; 9(4): 9-16.
24. Raigrodski AJ. Contemporary materials and technologies for all-ceramic fixed partial dentures: a review of the literature. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 2004; 92(6): 557-562.
25. Yamanel K, Çaglar A, Gülsahı K, Özden U A. (2009). Effects of different ceramic and composite materials on stress distribution in inlay and onlay cavities: 3-D finite element analysis. Dental Materials Journal 2009; 28(6): 661-670.
26. Cho HO, Kang DW. Marginal fidelity and fracture strength of IPS-Empress 2 ceramic crowns according to different cement types. The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics 2002; 40(6): 545-60.
27. Stappert CFJ, Dai M, Chitmongkolsuk S, Gerds T, Strub JR. Marginal adaptation of three-unit fixed partial dentures constructed from pressed ceramic systems. British Dental Journal 2004; 196(12): 766-770.
28. Cal E, Türkün LŞ, Türkün M, Toman M, Toksavul S. Effect of an antibacterial adhesive on the bond strength of three different luting resin composites. Journal of Dentistry 2006; 34(6): 372-380.
29. Gonzaga CC, Cesar PF, Okada CY, Fredericci C, Beneduce Neto F, Yoshimura HN. Mechanical properties and porosity of dental glass-ceramics hot-pressed at different temperatures. Materials Research 2008; 11(3): 301-306.
30. Zarone, F, Russo, S, Sorrentino, R. From porcelain-fused-tometal to zirconia: clinical and experimental considerations. Dental Materials 2011; 27(1): 83-96.
31. Vohra FA, Rashid H, Ghani SMA (2014). Modern adhesive ceramic onlay, a predictable replacement of full veneer crowns: a report of three cases. Journal of Dow University of Health Sciences 2014; 8(1): 35-40.
32. Karntiang P, Leevailoj C. Effect of resin cement thickness and ceramic thickness on fracture resistance of enamelbonded ceramic. Chulalongkorn University Dental Journal 2014; 37(2): 161-70.
33. Peampring C, Sanohkan S. All-ceramic systems in esthetic dentistry: A review. Mahidol Dental Journal 2014; 34: 82- 90.
34. Janabi AU. The mechanical properties of full-contour zirconia. Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI), School of Dentistry, Doctoral Dissertation, Indiana, 2014.
35. Case KC. Esthetics built to last: treatment of functional anomalies may need to precede esthetic corrections. Compendium 2014; 35(2): 118-122.
36. Pongcharoensuk K, Leevailoj C. Restoration of dental erosion in silent gastroesophageal reflux patients: a case report. Chulalongkorn University Dental Journal 2014;37(1): 69-82.
37. Alhekeir DF, Al-Sarhan RA, Al Mashaan AF. Porcelain laminate veneers: Clinical survey for evaluation of failure. The Saudi Dental Journal 2014; 26(2): 63-67.
38. Bürke H. IPS E.Max Press and IPS E.Max CAD Two Stateof-the-Art Glass Ceramics.Report 2006; 17: 6-16.
39. Silva NRFA, Bonfante EA, Martins LM, Valverde GB, Thompson VP, Ferencz JL, Coelho P. G. Reliability of reduced-thickness and thinly veneered lithium disilicate crowns. Journal of dental research 2012; 91(3): 305-310.
40. Asai T, Kazama R, Fukushima M, Okiji T. Effect of overglazed and polished surface finishes on the compressive fracture strength of machinable ceramic materials. Dental Materials Journal 2010; 29(6): 661-667.
41. Tysowsky G. The science behind lithium disilicate: today’s surprisingly versatile, esthetic & durable metal-free alternative. Oral Health Group (İnternet yayını) 2009;99(3). http://www.oralhealthgroup.com/news/the-sciencebehind-lithium-disilicate-today-s-surprisingly-versatileesthetic--durable-metal-free-al/1000229938/?&er=NA
42. Li RWK, Chow TW, Matinlinna J P (2014). Ceramic dental biomaterials and CAD/CAM technology: State of the art. Journal of Prosthodontic Research 2014;58(4): 208-216.
43. Coldea, A. Suitability of Polymer-Infiltrated-CeramicNetworks for CAD/CAM based dental restorative materials. PhD Thesis. University of Otago, 2014.
44. Şener I D, Türker ŞB. Kimyasal Yapılarına Göre Tam Seramik Restorasyonlar. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi 2009; 19(1): 61-67.
45. McLaren EA. All-ceramic alternatives to conventional metal-ceramic restorations. Compendium 1998; 19(3): 307-25.
46. Valandro LF, Ozcan M, Amaral R, Leite FP, Bottino MA. Microtensile bond strength of a resin cement to silicacoated and silanized In-Ceram Zirconia before and after aging. The International Journal of Prosthodontics 2006; 20(1): 70-72.
47. Bona A D, Borba M, Benetti P, Cecchetti D. Effect of surface treatments on the bond strength of a zirconia-reinforced ceramic to composite resin. Brazilian Oral Research 2007; 21(1): 10-15.
48. Bottino MA, Salazar‐Marocho SM, Leite FP, Vasquez VC, Valandro LF. Flexural strength of glass‐infiltrated zirconia/ alumina‐based ceramics and feldspathic veneering Porcelains. Journal of Prosthodontics 2009; 18(5): 417-420.
49. Denissen H, Dozić A, van der Zel J, van Waas M. Marginal fit and short-term clinical performance of porcelainveneered CICERO, CEREC, and Procera onlays. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 2000; 84(5): 506-513.
50. Dozić A, Kleverlaan CJ, Meegdes M, van der Zel J, Feilzer AJ. The influence of porcelain layer thickness on the final shade of ceramic restorations. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 2003; 90(6): 563-570.
51. Mantri SS, Bhasin AS. CAD/CAM in dental restorations: an overview. Annuals and Essences of Dentistry 2010; 2(3):123-128.
52. Hummel M, Kern M. Durability of the resin bond strength to the alumina ceramic Procera. Dental Materials 2004; 20(5): 498-508.
53. Etman MK, Woolford MJ. Three-year clinical evaluation of two ceramic crown systems: a preliminary study. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 2010; 103(2): 80-90.
54. Miyazaki T, Hotta Y, Kunii J, Kuriyama S, Tamaki Y. A review of dental CAD/CAM: current status and future perspectives from 20 years of experience. Dental Materials Journal 2009; 28(1): 44-56.
55. Malkoç MA, Sevimay M. Protetik diş hekimliğinde zirkonyum ve kullanım alanları. SÜ Dişhek Fak Derg 2009; 18: 208-216.
56. Özkurt Z, Iseri U, Kazazoglu E. (2010). Zirconia ceramic post systems: a literature review and a case report. Dental Materials Journal 2010; 29(3): 233-245.
57. Uludamar A, Aygün DŞ, Özkan YK. Zirkonya esaslı tam seramik restorasyonlar. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi2012; (5): 132-141.
58. Karakoca DS, Yılmaz H. Zirkonyum ve Sabit Protezlerde Kullanımı. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi 2006; 1: 36-44.