Abdominal Aort Anevrizmalarının Konvensiyonel ve Endovasküler Tamir Sonuçlarının Karşılaştırılması

Bu araştırmada abdominal aort anevrizmalı (AAA) hastalarda, açık cerrahinin ve endovasküler anevrizma tamirinin (EVAR) erken dönem (ilk 30 gün) sonuçlarının, eşlik eden ek hastalıkların ve risk faktörlerinin retrospektif olarak karşılaştırılması amaçlanmıştır. Merkezimizde Ocak 2002-Aralık 2014 tarihleri arasında non-rüptüre AAA (çap >5cm) sebebiyle, elektif olarak opere edilen 50 hasta incelendi. Hastalar iki gruba ayrıldı; EVAR grubu (n=31) ve açık cerrahi grubu (n=19). Demografik bilgiler (yaş, cinsiyet), semptom (karın ağrısı), risk faktörleri (sigara, hipertansiyon, koroner arter hastalığı, kronik böbrek yetmezliği, diabetes mellitus), anevrizma çapı, hastanede ve yoğun bakımda kalış süresi, kan transfüzyonu miktarı, komplikasyon ve mortalite oranları ile ilgili veriler incelendi. Hastaların cinsiyeti büyük oranda (%94) erkekti. EVAR grubunda kan transfüzyonu miktarı, hastanede ve yoğun bakımda yatış süresi daha düşük saptandı (p

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Abdominal aort anevrizması, Açık cerrahi, Endovasküler anevrizma tamiri

Comparision on Outcomes in Conventional and Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms

In this research, we aimed to compare retrospectively; early (first 30 days) outcomes, additional diseases and risk factors of the patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), who underwent endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) or open surgical repair. From January 2002 through December 2014, we reviewed 50 patients with unruptured AAA (>5cm in diameter) who were electively treated at our center. Patients were divided into two groups; EVAR group (n=31) and open surgery group (n=19). Data about; demographic information (age, sex), symptom (abdominal pain), risk factors (smoking, hypertension, coronary artery disease, chronic kidney disease, diabetes mellitus), diameter of aneurysm, duration of intensive care unit and hospital stay, amount of blood transfusion, complication and mortality rates were analyzed. Sex of the patients were mostly (94%) male. EVAR group had lower ratios with respect to amount of blood transfusion, length of stay in intensive care unit and hospital (p

Keywords:

Abdominal aortic aneurysm, Endovascular aneurysm repair, Open surgery,

PDF

___

1. Kent KC. Clinical practice. Abdominal aortic aneurysms. N Engl J Med. 2014; 371(22): 2101-8.
2. Kuivaniemi H, Ryer EJ, Elmore JR, Tromp G. Understanding the pathogenesis of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2015; 13(9): 975-87.
3. Jacomelli J, Summers L, Stevenson A, Lees T, Earnshaw JJ. Impact of the first 5 years of a national abdominal aortic aneurysm screening programme. Br J Surg. 2016;103(9): 1125-31.
4. Lederle FA, Johnson GR, Wilson SE, Ballard DJ, Jordan WD Jr, Blebea J, Littooy FN, Freischlag JA,Bandyk D, Rapp JH, Salam AA; Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study #417 Investigators. Rupture rate of large abdominal aortic aneurysms in patients refusing or unfit for elective repair. JAMA. 2002; 287(22): 2968-72.
5. Chaikof EL, Blankensteijn JD, Harris PL, White GH, Zarins CK, Bernhard VM, Matsumura JS, May J,Veith FJ, Fillinger MF, Rutherford RB, Kent KC; Ad Hoc Committee for Standardized Reporting Practices in Vascular Surgery of The Society for Vascular Surgery/American Association for Vascular Surgery. Reporting standards for endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg. 2002;35(5): 1048-60.
6. Wanhainen A, Verzini F, Van Herzeele I, Allaire E, Bown M, Cohnert T, Dick F, van Herwaarden J, Karkos C, Koelemay M, Kölbel T, Loftus I, Mani K, Melissano G, Powell J, Szeberin Z, Esvs GuidelinesCommittee, de Borst GJ, Chakfe N, Debus S, Hinchliffe R, Kakkos S, Koncar I, Kolh P, Lindholt JS, de Vega M, Vermassen F. European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2019 Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Management of Abdominal Aorto-iliac Artery Aneurysms. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2019; 57(1): 8-93.
7. White GH, May J, Waugh RC, Chaufour X, Yu W. Type III and type IV endoleak: toward a complete definition of blood flow in the sac after endoluminal AAA repair. J Endovasc Surg. 1998;5(4): 305-9.
8. Lal BK, Zhou W, Li Z, Kyriakides T, Matsumura J, Lederle FA, Freischlag J; OVER Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group. Predictors and outcomes of endoleaks in the Veterans Affairs Open Versus Endovascular Repair (OVER) Trial of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 2015; 62(6): 1394-404.
9. Ma B, Wang YN, Chen KY, Zhang Y, Pan H, Yang K. Transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal approach for elective open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016; 2: CD010373.
10. Sampson UK, Norman PE, Fowkes FG, Aboyans V, Song Y, Harrell FE Jr, Forouzanfar MH,Naghavi M, Denenberg JO, McDermott MM, Criqui MH, Mensah GA, Ezzati M, Murray C. Estimation of global and regional incidence and prevalence of abdominal aortic aneurysms 1990 to 2010. Glob Heart. 2014; 9(1): 159-70.
11. Thompson SG, Bown MJ, Glover MJ, Jones E, Masconi KL, Michaels JA, Powell JT, Ulug P,Sweeting MJ. Screening women aged 65 years or over for abdominal aortic aneurysm: a modelling study and health economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess. 2018; 22(43): 1-142.
12. Svensjö S, Björck M, Gürtelschmid M, Djavani Gidlund K, Hellberg A, Wanhainen A. Low prevalence of abdominal aortic aneurysm among 65-year-old Swedish men indicates a change in the epidemiology of the disease. Circulation. 2011; 124(10): 1118-23.
13. Lederle F, Johnson GR, Wilson SE, Chute EP, Hye RJ, Makaroun MS, Barone GW, Bandyk D, Moneta GL, Makhoul RG. The aneurysm detection and management study screening program: validation cohort and final results. Aneurysm Detection and Management Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Investigators. Arch Intern Med. 2000; 160(10): 1425-30.
14. Lederle FA. The strange relationship between diabetes and abdominal aortic aneurysm. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2012; 43(3): 254-6.
15. Karkos CD, Mukhopadhyay U, Papakostas I, Ghosh J, Thomson GJ, Hughes R. Abdominal aortic aneurysm: the role of clinical examination and opportunistic detection. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2000; 19(3): 299-303.
16. Lindholt JS, Vammen S, Juul S, Henneberg EW, Fasting H. The validity of ultrasonographic scanning as screening method for abdominal aortic aneurysm. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 1999; 17(6): 472-5.
17. Lindholt JS, Sogaard R. Population screening and intervention for vascular disease inDanish men (VIVA): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2017; 390(10109): 2256-2265.
18. Parkinson F, Ferguson S, Lewis P, Williams IM, Twine CP; South East Wales Vascular Network. Rupture rates of untreated large abdominal aortic aneurysms in patients unfit for elective repair. J Vasc Surg. 2015; 61(6): 1606-12.
19. Waits SA, Sheetz KH, Campbell DA, Ghaferi AA, Englesbe MJ, Eliason JL, Henke PK. Failure to rescue and mortality following repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg. 2014; 59(4): 909-914.
20. Prinssen M, Verhoeven EL, Buth J, Cuypers PW, van Sambeek MR, Balm R, Buskens E, Grobbee DE,Blankensteijn JD; Dutch Randomized Endovascular Aneurysm Management (DREAM) Trial Group. A randomized trial comparing conventional and endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. N Engl J Med. 2004; 351(16):1607-18.
21. Mani K, Björck M, Lundkvist J, Wanhainen A. Improved long-term survival after abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Circulation. 2009; 120(3): 201-11.
22. Vascular Events In Noncardiac Surgery Patients Cohort Evaluation (VISION) Study Investigators,Devereaux PJ, Chan MT, Alonso-Coello P, Walsh M, Berwanger O, Villar JC, Wang CY, Garutti RI, Jacka MJ, Sigamani A, et.all. Association between postoperative troponin levels and 30-day mortality among patients undergoing noncardiac surgery. JAMA. 2012; 307(21): 2295-304.
23. Kristensen SD, Knuuti J, Saraste A, Anker S, Bøtker HE, Hert SD, Ford I, Gonzalez-Juanatey JR, Gorenek B, Heyndrickx GR, Hoeft A, Huber K, Iung B, Kjeldsen KP, Longrois D, Lüscher TF, Pierard L, P, et.all. 2014 ESC/ESA Guidelines on non-cardiac surgery: cardiovascular assessment and management: The Joint Task Force on non-cardiac surgery: cardiovascular assessment and management of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Society of Anaesthesiology (ESA). Eur Heart J. 2014; 35(35): 2383-431.
24. Blankensteijn, de Bruin J, Grobbee R, Prinssen M, van Sambeek M, van Schaik TG, et al. Very long-term follow-up (12-15 Years) of the Dutch randomized endovascular aneurysm repair management (DREAM) trial. J Vasc Surg. 2016; 63(6): 143S.
25. Greenhalgh RM, Brown LC, Kwong GP, Powell JT, Thompson SG, EVAR trial participants. Comparison of endovascular aneurysm repair with open repair in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR trial 1), 30-day operative mortality results: randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2004; 364(9437): 843-8.
26. Patel R, Sweeting MJ, Powell JT, Greenhalgh RM, EVAR trial investigators. Endovascular versus open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm in 15-years’ follow-up of the UK endovascular aneurysm repair trial 1 (EVAR trial 1): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2016; 388(10058): 2366-74.
27. Lederle FA, Freischlag JA, Kyriakides TC, Padberg FT Jr, Matsumura JS, Kohler TR, Lin PH, Jean-Claude JM, Cikrit DF, Swanson KM, Peduzzi PN; Open Versus Endovascular Repair (OVER) Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group. Outcomes following endovascular vs open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2009; 302(14): 1535-42.
28. Lederle FA, Freischlag JA, Kyriakides TC, Matsumura JS, Padberg FT Jr, Kohler TR, Kougias P, Jean-Claude JM, Cikrit DF, Swanson KM; OVER Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group. Long-term comparison of endovascular and open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. N Engl J Med. 2012; 367 (21): 1988-97.
29. Becquemin JP, Pillet JC, Lescalie F, Sapoval M, Goueffic Y, Lermusiaux P, Steinmetz E, Marzelle J; ACE trialists. A randomized controlled trial of endovascular aneurysm repair versus open surgery for abdominal aortic aneurysms in low-to moderate-risk patients. J Vasc Surg. 2011; 53(5): 1167–73.