TALCOTT PARSONS’IN HIRİSTİYANLIK SOSYOLOJİSİ: AMERİKA’DA SEKÜLER DİNİN OLUŞUMU

Bu makalenin temel eksenini işlevselci sosyolojinin önemli temsilcilerinden oluşturmaktadır. Sosyoloğun genel din kuramı hakkında ise kısmî bilgilere yer verilmektedir. O, çeşitli yazılarında tarihsel ve ampirik verilerden hareketle evrimci bir Hıristiyanlık analizi yaparak, Batı ve Amerikan modernliğinin temellerini Hıristiyanlık dinine bağlar. Makale beş kısımdan oluşmaktadır. Birinci kısımda Parsons'ın din ve Hristiyanlık hakkındaki görüşleri ve Hristiyanlık üzerine yaptığı çalışmalar hakkında genel bilgiler ile Hıristiyanlığın ilk dönemine ilişkin analizlerine yer verilmektedir. İkinci kısımda Parsons'ın Doğu ve Batı kiliseleri karşılaştırmaları hakkında bilgiler verilmektedir. Üçüncü kısımda modernitenin oluşumunda Protestanlığın özellikle Kalvinizmin etkisi hakkındaki düşünceleri betimsel olarak aktarılmaktadır. Dördüncü kısımda Parsons'ın Amerikan Hıristiyanlığı ile Amerika'nın ekonomik ve siyasal modernleşmedeki öncü rolü hakkında görüşleri aktarılmaktadır. Çalışma buraya kadar birincil kaynaklar üzerinden betimsel olarak kurgulanmıştır. Beşinci ve sonuç kısmında ise ikincil kaynaklardan da yararlanılarak, Parsons'ın modern toplumlarda dinin durumu hakkındaki genel düşünceleri eleştirel bir değerlendirmeye tâbi tutulmaktadır. Bu çalışma, din sosyolojisinde sekülerleşme kuramının başat konumunu kaybetmeye başladığı günümüzde Parsons'ın Durkheimcı ve işlevselci paradigmasının din olgusunun anlaşılmasına farklı katkılar sunabileceğini hatırlatma; Parsons'ın modernitedeki kutsallık ve dinsellik olgusunun analizinde başvurduğu "sivil din" ve "seküler din" kavramlarını kullanırken yaşadığı tereddüdün altını çizme; onun Hıristiyanlık sosyolojisinin yirminci yüzyıl Amerikan toplumunu veya Amerikan modernitesini meşrulaştırma gibi öznel bir çabanın ürünü olduğunu gösterme gibi amaçları bulunmaktadır

TALCOTT PARSONS’S ANALYSIS OF CHRISTIANITY: THE FORMATION OF SECULAR RELIGION IN AMERICA

Talcott Parsons’s sociology of Christianity constitutes the main point of this article as one of the most important functionalist sociologists. This article includes partial information about his general theory of religion. According to Parsons principles of Western and American modernization arise from Christianity from an evolutionist perspective which is formed by historical and empirical data. There are five chapters in the article. In the first part, there are Parsons’s point of view about religion and Christianity, general information about his studies on Christianity, also his ideas about the first period of Christianity. In the second part information on Parsons’s comparisons of East and West Church can be seen. His ideas about the effects of Protestantism especially Calvinism on modernization have been descriptively explained in the third part. The next part is about his views on American Christianity and the pioneering role of America on economical and political modernization. In the fifth and result section, what Parsons think about religion in modern society is being critically considered. The aim of this work is reminding how can be contributory the Parsons’s functionalist and Durkheimian paradigm. Otherwise emphasizing the hesitation of using “civil religion” and “secular religion” terms when he identifies holiness and spirituality is another aim of this study. Lastly, the idea of Parsons’s sociology of Christianity has a subjective role on legitimating American modernization or 20th century American society is another crucial point Talcott Parsons’s sociology of Christianity constitutes the main point of this article as one of the most important functionalist sociologists. This article includes partial information about his general theory of religion. According to Parsons Principles of Western and American modernization arise from Christianity from an evolutionist perspective which is formed by historical and empirical data. There are five chapters in the article. In the first part, there are Parsons’s point of view about religion and Christianity, general information about his studies on Christianity, also his ideas about the first period of Christianity. In the second part information on Parsons’s comparisons of East and West Church can be seen. His ideas about the effects of Protestantism especially Calvinism on modernization has been descriptively explained in the third part. The next part is about his views on American Christianity and the pioneering role of America on economic and political modernization. In the fifth and result section, what Parsons think about religion in modern society is being critically considered. The aim of this work is reminding how can be contributory the Parsons’s functionalist and Durkheimian paradigm. Otherwise emphasizing the hesitation of using “civil religion” and “secular religion” terms when he identifies holiness and spirituality is another aim of this study. Lastly, the idea of Parsons’s sociology of Christianity has a subjective role on legitimating American modernization or 20th century American society is another crucial point. Talcott Parsons, as one of the most important functionalist sociologists, considers religion both theoretical and historical/empirical perspectives. His sociology of religion constitutes of a crucial synthesis with analytic, theoretic and empirical/historical materials. The role of modernization through associating needs of the system with empiric world leads him to analyze the history of Christianity. In this study his historical analyses of Christianity and the correlation he put between the modernization of West and Christianity (especially Calvinist Protestantism) will be considered. Although K. Marx and M. Weber, as sociologists in capitalistic world, considered the analysis of modern economical structure, Parsons was mainly interested of the complete analysis of modernization. According to him American society is the most important and dominant case of modernization and this situation is an outcome of combined French democratic revolution and British industrial revolution which this combination can be seen in no European country. When he tried to explain the success of American modernization, he also considered Christianity with its evolutionary/modernizing function. Parsons acknowledged institution of religion as the forth evolutionary universals along with relationship, language and technology, but specifically Christianity is the most evolutionary religion among others. According to him, Christianity makes its modernizing and evolutionary functions actual by using cultural heritage and providing moral motivation to religious people, but not directly manipulating political and social life. Therefore, from one side society getting more secularization which means differentiating religion and politics, on the other side Protestantism (or Christianity) maintaining its informal control on society because cultural norms are formed by religion. American ethos is a reflection of institutive and cultural Christianity (Protestantism); also, all attempts of secularization constitute an expound of Christian patterns in secular world. Parsons’s interest of religion evolves through his curiosity on modernization and evolution. According to him the evolution begins with Ancient Greece which is the cultural back ground of Jewish and Christian culture. And this process respectively continuous with the emerge of the intuition of the church, separation of western church from Eastern Church, the advanced institutionalization of Christian societies, Protestant reformation and developments through modernization. Among these, the most important step is Protestantism. Because Parsons claims that turning point for modern society is not the industrial revolution in 18th century but the Protestant movement in 16th century. At this point he is not agree with the idea that says Christianity, as a religious movement, generates modern society. He tries to understand the complex relation between the religious system and values and the economic and politic interests and organizations. Christianity legitimates social values of this evolution through modern society. Christianity is a complex agent which contains transformist developments at the same time a very rich variety of nonreligious situations. Christianity as a synthesis of Greek and Jewish culture improved a religious pattern which regards both the salvation of human soul and the social life in secular world. This pattern provides “kingdom (monarchy)” and “city” where people lives under the religious rules become more institutional. These patterns form a convenient frame for social life in modern world lately. This long term tendency in Christian history, Parsons claims that rules the secular world (real world) and increases the differences. According to Parsons there are more than one Christianity; one of these seems like refuses the real world. In this section of Christianity there are two worlds. One is material world symbolized by nihilism and the other is spiritual world which is the reflection of divine soul. While Catholicism monopolizes this divine soul, ascetism abolishes this monopolization. Parsons calls this the fall of “Christian dualism”. The separation between two worlds ends and goals for these two worlds support each other. The meaning of the activism of Ascetic Protestantism is constituted by coinciding of secular space and religious testament. Thereby, a reformed life has been become coherent with Christianity. Parsons considers that human condition is bracketed by the first stage of Christianity in comparison of Middle age Christianity, the Orthodox in comparison of Catholicism, Catholicism in comparison of Protestantism, Lutheranism in comparison of Calvinism. His analysis of Christianity is also a universal historiography. This historiography occurs through the perspective of a specific history of civilization, culture or belief but not through the accumulation of all civilizations cultures and beliefs when it occurred in an evolutionary manner.

___

  • Berger, Peter L. ve Luckmann, Thomas (2015), Modernite Çoğulculuk ve Anlam Krizi, çev. M. D. Dereli, Ankara, Hermetik Yayınları.
  • Casanova, Jose (2014), Modern Dünyada Kamusal Dinler, çev. ed. M. M. Şahin, Sakarya, Sakarya Üniversitesi Kültür Yayınları.
  • Collins, Randall ve Makowsky, Michael (2014), Toplumun Keşfi, çev. ed. N. Oktik, Ankara, Nobel Yayınları.
  • Coser, Lewis A. (2008), Sosyolojik Düşüncenin Ustaları, çev. H. Hülür; İ. Mazman; S, Toker, Ankara, Deki Yayınları.
  • Fukuyama, Francis (1994), Tarihin Sonu ve Son İnsan, çev. Z. Dicleli, İstanbul, Simavi Yayınları.
  • Gerhardt, Uta (2002), Talcott Parsons: An Intellectual Biography, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
  • Gouldner, Alwin W. (2015), Batı Sosyolojisinin Yaklaşan Çıkmazı, çev. M. Şenol, Sakarya, Sakarya Üniversitesi Kültür Yayınları.
  • İzzetbegoviç, Aliya (1993), Doğu ve Batı Arasında İslam, çev. S. Şaban, İstanbul, Nehir Yayınları.
  • Johnson, Doyle Paul (2007), “The Theoretical Trajectory”, (In) American Sociology of Religion, ed. A. J. Blasi, Leiden, Brill, pp. 43-86.
  • Layder, Derek (2014), Sosyal Teoriye Giriş, çev. Ü. Tatlıcan, İstanbul, Küre Yayınları.
  • Lechner, Frank J. (1998), “Parsons, Talcott”, (In) Encyclopedia of Religion and Society, ed. W. H. Swatos, Altamira Press, http://hirr.hartsem.edu/ency/Parsons.htm
  • Lukes, Steven (2006), Bireycilik, çev. İ. Serin, Ankara, Bilim ve Sanat Yayınları.
  • Okumuş, Ejder (2014), “Din ve Sosyalleşme”, Turkish Studies, C. 9, S. 11, ss. 429-454.
  • Okumuş, Ejder (2015), “The Debates on Religion in The Public Sphere: The Case Of Turkey”, Turkish Studies, C. 10, S. 10, pp. 705-718.
  • Özyurt, Cevat (2015a), “Hegel’in Din Yorumunun Sosyolojik Analizi: Dinin Tin ile İmtihanı, (İç.) Sosyal Teoride Din, Ed. C. Özyurt ve İ. Mazman, Ankara, Hece Yayınları, s. 37-84.
  • Özyurt, Cevat (2015b), “Durkheim Sosyolojisinde Toplumsal Bütünleşme Aracı Olarak Din, (İç.) Sosyal Teoride Din, Ed. C. Özyurt ve İ. Mazman, Ankara, Hece Yayınları, s. 177-239.
  • Özyurt, Cevat (2016), “İki Dünya Arasında İnsan: Aliya İzzetbegoviç’in Din Kuramı ve İslâm Yorumu”, Hece Dergisi, S. 229, ss. 195-228.
  • Parsons, Talcott (1958), “The Pattern of Religious Organization in the United States”, Daedalus, Vol. 87, No. 3, pp. 65-85.
  • Parsons, Talcott (1964), “Evolutionary Universals in Society”, American Sociological Review, Vol. 29, No. 3, pp. 339-357.
  • Parsons, Talcott (1966), “Religion in a Modern Pluralistic Society”, Review of Religious Research, Vol. 7, No. 3, pp. 125-146.
  • Parsons, Talcott (1974), “Religion in Postindustrial America: The Problem of Secularization”, Social Research, Vol. 41, No. 2, pp. 193-225.
  • Parsons, Talcott (1978), Action Theory of Human Condition, New York, Free Press.
  • Parsons, Talcott (1982), Talcott Parsons on Institutions and Social Evulution: Selected Writings, ed. L. H. Mayhew, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
  • Parsons, Talcott (1991), “A Tentative Outline of American Values”, (In) Talcott Parsons Theorist of Modernity, ed. R. Robertson and B. S. Turner, London, Sage Publication, pp. 37-65.
  • Parsons, Talcott (2013), “Dayatmanın ve Bunalımın Ötesinde: Gönüllü Topluluk Çağının Gelişi”, (İç.) Kültür ve Toplum: Güncel tartışmalar, çev. N. Yavuz, İstanbul, İstanbul Üniversitesi Yayınları, ss. 344-352.
  • Parsons, Talcott (2015), Toplumsal Eylemin Yapısı-II, çev. N. Nirven, Sakarya, Sakarya Üniversitesi Kültür Yayınları.
  • Richter, Rudolf (2012), Sosyolojik Paradigmalar, çev. N. Doğan, İstanbul, Küre Yayınları.
  • Robertson, Roland (1982), “Parsons on the Evolutionary Significance of American Religion”, Sociological Analysis, Vol. 43, No. 4, pp. 307-325.
  • Sümer, Necati (2015), “Katolik Mezhebinde Yedi Ölümcül Günah Problemi”, Turkish Studies, C. 11, S. 5, ss. 481-498.
  • Tiryakian, Edward A. (1982), “Puritan America in the Modern World: Mission Impossible?” Sociological Analysis, Vol. 43, No. 4, pp. 351-367.
  • Turner, Bryan S. (1997), Max Weber ve İslâm, çev. Y. Aktay, Ankara, Vadi Yayınları.
  • Turner, Bryan S. (2005), “Talcott Parsons’s Sociology of Religion and the Expressive Revolution: The Problem of Western Individualism”, Journal of Classical Sociology, Vol, 5/6, pp. 303- 318.
  • Turner, Bryan S. (2014), Klasik Sosyoloji, çev. İ. Çetin, İstanbul, İletişim Yayınları.
  • Vanderstraeten, Raf (2013), “Talcott Parsons and the Enigma of Secularization”, European Journal of Social Theory, Vol. 16/1, pp. 69-84.
  • Vanderstraeten, Raf (2015), “Inclusion Ideals and Inclusion Promlems: Parsons and Luhmann on Religion and Secularization”, Acta Sociologica, Vol. 58/2, pp. 173-185.
  • Vanderstraeten, Raf (2016), “Parsons on Christianty”, Thesis Eleven, Vol. 132/1, pp. 50-61.
  • Weber, Max (1997), Protestan Ahlâkı ve Kapitalizmin Ruhu, çev. Z. Aruoba. İstanbul, Hil Yayınları.