ÖĞRETMEN ADAYLARI E-ÖĞRENMEYE HAZIR MI? ARTVİN ÇORUH ÜNİVERSİTESİ ÖRNEĞİ

E-öğrenmenin eğitim ve öğretime entegrasyonu bazı engellere rağmen çeşitli faydaları nedeniyle teşvik edilmektedir. Ancak bugüne kadar yapılan çalışmalar göstermektedir ki gelişmekte olan ülkelerde öğretmen adaylarının e-öğrenmeyi kendi çalışmalarına nasıl adapte edecekleri konusunda araştırma eksikliği bulunmaktadır. Bu nedenle, bu çalışma öğretmen adaylarının e-öğrenmeyi çalışmalarında uygulamaya ne derecede hazır olduklarını tespit etmeyi amaçlamıştır. Bu amaç doğrultusunda, öğretmen adaylarının e-öğrenmeye hazırbulunuşluğunu etkileyen teknoloji, deneyim ve güven gibi birçok faktör incelenmiştir. Bu araştırmada Artvin Çoruh Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi farklı bölümlerde farklı sınıflarda öğrenim gören öğretmen adaylarına web-tabanlı bir anket uygulanmıştır. Bu davete yanıt olarak 233 öğretmen adayı ankete katılım için ilgi göstermesine rağmen 174 öğretmen adayı tüm soruları yanıtlamıştır. Öğretmen adaylarının hazırlık durumlarını analiz etmek için betimsel ve çıkarımsal istatistikler kullanılmıştır. Bulgular ortaya çıkarmaktadır ki Türk üniversitelerinin ilgili paydaşları e-öğrenmeyi öğretmenlik programlarına entegre etmeden önce çeşitli faktörleri dikkate alması gerekmektedir. Özellikle, internete erişimi etkileyen sorunlar, öğretmen adaylarının çeşitli bilişim teknolojileri ile ilgili daha önceki deneyimleri ve kişileştirilmiş öğrenme materyallerinin kullanımı göz önünde bulundurulmalıdır. Genel olarak, e-öğrenmenin gittikçe yaygınlaşması nedeni ile öğretmen adaylarının eöğrenmeye hazırbulunuşluk durumları gelecekteki sınıflarında yapacakları etkinliklere ve öğretimlerine önemli bir etkisi olabilecektir.

ARE PRE-SERVICE TEACHERS READY FOR E-LEARNING? A CASE OF ARTVIN CORUH UNIVERSITY

The integration of electronic learning into education and training has been promoted by a variety of benefits, despite some obstacles. However, to date, there is a lack of research examining the understanding of the practices of pre-service teachers in developing countries to adopt e-learning. Therefore, the authors of this paper investigated the extent to which pre-service teachers are prepared to embark on e-learning. With this aim in mind, the authors examine several factors that affect elearning, such as technology, experience, and confidence. To deal with these issues, the announcement of an Internet-based survey was made through the notice-board of programs related to pre-service teachers in Artvin Coruh University in Turkey. In response to this invitation, 233 preservice teachers expressed an interest in being involved in the survey with 174 answering all questions. The readiness of pre-service teachers was analyzed through the computation of descriptive and inferential statistics. The findings revealed that several factors need to be considered by the stakeholders of Turkish universities before integrating electronic learning into primary teacher education programs. In particular, issues affecting the access to the Internet, the prior experiences of pre-service teachers with various ICT and personalized learning materials should be evaluated. Overall, we believe the study indicates that the preparedness of pre-service teachers for e-learning may have a significant impact on the education and training of students in the future, as e-learning becomes increasingly prevalent.

___

  • Agboola, A. K. (2006). Assessing the awareness and perceptions of academic staff in using elearning tools for instructional delivery in a post-secondary institution. The Innovation Journal, 11(3).
  • Akaslan, D., & Law, E. L.-C. (2011a). Measuring teachers' readiness for e-learning in HEIs associated with the subject of electricity in Turkey. The Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference. Amman, Jordan.
  • Akaslan, D., & Law, E. L.-C. (2011b). Measuring Student E-Learning Readiness: A Case about the Subject of Electricity in Higher Education Institutions in Turkey. Advances in Web-based Learning: 10th International Conference, ICWL 2011, December 8-10 (pp. 209-218). Hong Kong, China: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-25813-8_22
  • Akaslan, D., Law, E. L.-C., & Taşkın, S. (2011). Analysing issues for applying e-learning to the subject of electricity in higher education in Turkey. The Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering Education. Belfast, Northern Ireland.
  • Andersson, A., & Grönlund, Å. (2009). A Conceptual Framework for E-Learning in Developing Countries: A Critical Review of Research Challenges. Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 38, 1-16.
  • Anter, S. A., Abualkishik, A. M., & Mashhadany, Y. I. (2014). Proposed e-Learning System for Iraqi Universities. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 4(5), 1-7.
  • Awidi, T. (2008). Developing an e-learning strategy for public universities in Ghana. Quarterly Magazine, 31(2).
  • Aydın, C. H., & Tasci, D. (2005). Measuring Readiness for e-Learning: Reflections from an Emerging Country. Educational Technology & Society, 8(4), 244-257
  • Ayebi-Arthur, K. (2015). Resilience, e-Learning and Change in Tertiary Education. The Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Education, University of Canterbury.
  • Bass, J., & Heeks, R. (2011). Changing computing curricula in African universities: evaluating progress and challenges via design-reality gap analysis. Electronic Journal on Information Systems in Developing Countries, 48, 1-39.
  • Borotis, S., & Poulymenakou, A. (2004). E-Learning Readiness Components: Key Issues to Consider
  • Before Adopting e-Learning Interventions. World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education. Washington, DC, USA: 1622-1629.
  • Buabeng-Andoh, C. (2012). Factors influencing teachers' adoption and integration of information and communication technology into teaching: a review of literature. International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology, 8(1), 136-155.
  • Buhari, T. A., & Halim, F. S. (2014). Lecturers' Perceptions of Blended Learning Readiness. Journal of Creative Practices in Language Learning and Teaching, 2(2), 50-63.
  • Chapnick, S. (2000). Are you ready for e-learning? Learning Circuits: ASTD's Online Magazine All About E-Learning.
  • Çoklar, N., Kılıçer, K., & Odabaşı, F. (2007). Eğitimde Teknoloji Kullanımına Eleştirel Bir Bakış: Teknopedagoji. The Proceedings of the 7th International Educational Technology Conference. North Cyprus: Near East University.
  • Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 319-340. Demir, Ö., & Yurdugül, H. (2014). The Examination of Prospective Teachers' Information and Communication Technology Usage and online Communication Self-efficacy Levels in Turkey. International Educational Technology Conference, IETC 2014, (pp. 371-377). Chicago, IL, USA.
  • Demir, Ö., & Yurdugül, H. (2015a). Investigation of Effect of E-Learning Readiness Levels of Academic Staff on Those of Universities. International Business and Education Conferences. New York City, NY, USA.
  • Demir, Ö., & Yurdugül, H. (2015b). The Exploration of Models Regarding E-learning Readiness: Reference Model Suggestions. International Journal of Progressive Education, 11(1), 173- 194.
  • DeVellis, R. F. (2003). Scale development: Theory and application. In Applied Social Research Methods Series. Thousand Oaks, CA:: Sage.
  • Elmas, R., & Geban, Ö. (2012). Tools for 21st Century Teachers. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 4(1), 243-254.
  • Erdemir, N., Bakırcı, H., & Eyduran, E. (2009). Öğretmen adaylarının eğitimde teknolojiyi kullanabilme özgüvenlerinin tespiti. Türk Fen Eg?itimi Dergisi, 6(3), 99-108.
  • Gay, G. H. (2016). An assessment of online instructor e-learning readiness before, during, and after course delivery. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, (pp. 199-220).
  • Gulbahar, Y., & Guven, I. (2008). A Survey on ICT Usage and the Perceptions of Social Studies Teachers in Turkey. Educational Technology & Society, 11(3), 37-51
  • Huey, C. S., Foong, N. S., & Mat, S. C. (2007). An Investigation on e-Learning Readiness of Engineering Students. Journal - The Institution of Engineers, Malaysia, 68(4), 56-64.
  • Kaur, K., & Abas, Z. W. (2004). An assessment of e-learning readiness at Open University Malaysia. International Conference on Computers in Education.
  • Khan, S., Hasan, M., & Clement, C. (2012). Barriers to the introduction of ICT into education in developing countries: The example of Bangladesh. International Journal of Instruction, 5(2), 61-80.
  • Liaw, S.-S. (2008). Investigating students' perceived satisfaction, behavioral intention, and effectiveness of e-learning: A case study of the Blackboard system. Computers and Education, 864-873.
  • Lopes, C. T. (2007). Evaluating e-learning readiness in a health sciences higher education institution. IADIS International Conference e-Learning. Porto.
  • Moftakhari, M. M. (2013). Evaluating e-Learning Readiness of Faculty of Letters of Hacettepe. Master's Thesis, Hacettepe University, Ankara.
  • Moore, J. L., Dickson-Deane, C., & Galyen, K. (2011). e-Learning, and distance learning environments: Are they the same?e-. Internet and Higher Education, 129-135.
  • Mosa, A. A., Mahrin, M. N., & Ibrrahim, R. (2016). Technological Aspects of E-Learning Readiness in Higher Education: A Review of the Literature. Computer and Information Science, 9(1), 113-127.
  • Muhirwa, J.-M. (2009). Teaching and learning against all odds: A video-based study of learner-toinstructor interaction in international distance education. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 10(4), 1-24.
  • Nisperos, L. S. (2014). Assessing the E-Learning Readiness of Selected Sudanese Universities. Asian Journal of Management Sciences and Education, 3(4), 45-59. Odabaşı, H. F., & Kabakçı, I. (2007). Öğretmenlerin Mesleki Gelişimlerinde Bilgi ve İletişim Teknolojileri. Uluslararası Ög?retmen Yetiştirme Politikaları ve Sorunları Sempozyumu. Bakü, Azerbaycan.
  • Omoda-Onyait G., L. J. (2011). E-learning Readiness Assessment Model: A Case Study of Higher Institutions of Learning in Uganda. International Conference on Hybrid Learning, (pp. 200- 211). Hong Kong
  • Ouma, G. O., Awuor, F. M., & Kyambo, B. (2013). E-Learning Readiness in Public Secondary Schools in Kenya. European Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 16(2), 97-110.
  • Park, N., Roman, R., Lee, S., & Chung, J. E. (2009). User acceptance of a digital library system in developing countries. International Journal of Information Management, 196-209.
  • Pathiratne, S. (2014). e-Learning Readiness in Central Colleges in Sri Lanka. 3rd Anual Research Conference, ARCH 2014. Oluvil, Sri Lanka.
  • ROgers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5. ed.). New York: Free Press.
  • Schneiderheinze, D. D. (2005). Model For E-Learning Curriculum: Differences from Traditional Classroom Curriculum Models. Online Journal for Workforce Education and Development, 1(3).
  • Setati, P. P. (2012). Assessment of Teachers' e-Learning Readiness in Rural South African Schools. Master's Thesis, Tshwane University of Technology.
  • Soydal, İ., Alır, G., & Ünal, Y. (2011). Are Turkish universities ready for e-learning: A case of Hacettepe University Faculty of Letters. Journal of Information Services and Use, 31, 281- 291.
  • Tarus, J. K., Gichoya, D., & Muumbo, A. (2015). Challenges of Implementing E-Learning in Kenya: A Case of Kenyan Public Universities. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(1), 120-141.
  • Ünal, Y., Alır, G., & Soydal, İ. (2013). Students Readiness for e-Learning: An Assessment on Hacettepe University Department of Information Management. 4th International Symposium on Information Management in a Changing World, IMCW 2013. Limerick, Ireland.
  • Yakın, İ., & Tınmaz, H. (2013). Uzaktan Eğitimde Önemli Bir Boyut: Öğretmen Adaylarının EHazırbulunuşlukları. Akademik Bilişim. Antalya: Akdeniz Üniversitesi.