KADINA YÖNELİK ŞİDDETİN KURAMSAL TEMELLERİ VE ÇÖZÜM ÖNERİLERİ

İnsanlık tarihi ile paralellik arz ettiği gözlemlenen şiddetin nedenleri ve sonuçları günümüzde sosyolojik yazının önemli konularından biri olmaya devam etmektedir. Çoğunlukla ampirik çalışmalara konu olan şiddet konusu, ortaya çıkış nedenlerinin ve faillerinin tespitini içeren ikili bir odaktan sürdürülmektedir. Söz konusu çalışmaların birçoğu nicel yöntemlerle gerçekleştirilmesine rağmen, çalışmaların çoğunda kurama yer verilmediği ve disiplinler arası yaklaşımlara başvurulmadığı görülmektedir. Diğer taraftan, konuya ilişkin yapılan çalışmaların çoğunun sorunun durumsal tespitine yönelik olarak gerçekleştirildiği görülmektedir. Bu nedenle bu çalışmada yaygın bir toplumsal sorun olan kadına yönelik şiddet farklı sosyolojik yaklaşımlar ve kuramlar bağlamında ele alınmakta ve şiddetin ortaya çıkışında etkili olan bireysel ve toplumsal faktörlere yer verilmektedir. Sosyalleştirme teorileri arasında yer alan; psikanalitik kuram, sosyal öğrenme kuramı, kültürel aktarım kuramı ve ekolojik kuram ve toplumsal cinsiyet kuramları arasında yer alan; feminizm, ataerkillik, erkeklik ve annelik kuramları şiddetin mikro ve makro nedenlerinin tespit edilmesinde kullanılmaktadır. Bu çalışmanın kadına yönelik şiddet başta olmak üzere şiddetin neden evrensel bir sorun olduğu, yüz yıllardır devam ettiği ve ortadan kaldırılamadığı sorularına ve nasıl ortadan kaldırılabileceğine ilişkin ortaya çıkan tartışmalara katkı sağlaması hedeflenmektedir. Bununla birlikte, kuramsal yaklaşımlardan yoksun olan çalışmalarda şiddetin tüm boyutlarının tespit edilemediği ve sorunun çözümü için yeterince öneri geliştirilemediği gözlemlenmektedir. Bu çalışmanın bu bağlamada ileride yapılacak çalışmaların tasarlanmasına ve elde edilen verilerin yorumlanmasına katkı sağlayacağı düşünülmektedir

THEORETICAL BASES OF VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN AND SOLUTION PROPOSALS

The concept of violence’s which is parallel with history of mankind causes and consequences continue to be one of the significant issues of sociological literature. The issue of violence is subject to experimental work, is continuing a dual focus, including the determination of emergence of causes and perpetrators. Although many of these studies performed with quantitative methods, the theory is not included in most of the studies and an interdisciplinary approach does not appear to apply. On the other hand, it is seen that most of the conducted studies on the subject are only made up of situational detection of the problem. Therefore, in this study as a broad social problem, violence against women is being addressed in the context of different sociological approaches and theories and individual and social factors that influence the emergence of violence are included. Located between socialization theories; psychoanalytic theory, social learning theory, cultural transmission theory and ecological theory and gender theories among; feminism, patriarchy, masculinity and motherhood theory is used to determine the micro and macro causes of violence. In this study it is aimed to contribute emerging discussions regarding violence against women, why violence against women is a universal problem and why it pursues for centuries and cannot be eliminated, and how it can be eliminated. Besides, it is observed that in the studies without theoretical approaches all the aspects of violence cannot be identified and satisfactory proposals have not been developed to solve the problem. In that context, it is thought that current study will contribute design of conducted studies in the future and interpretation of obtained data The sensitivity of the issue of violence against women and the efforts try to make the issue invisible in the society, especially in everyday discourse that legitimizes violence makes it difficult to determine the extent of violence against women. Despite these, in recent years the visibility of violence against women in the media increased and awareness against the problem has begun. In particular, fatal incidents of violence against women have been a major reason for the understanding of the seriousness of the problem. However, it is observed that with each passing day research about violence against women has increased and female-oriented non-governmental organizations start to inform the public and this organization initiative is supported by many sectors. In this study, the question of how violence against women is structurally built has been searched in the framework of cognitive and socio-cultural theories. In the study, it is tried to be presented that violence and abuse have biological, psychological, cognitive, and sociological theoretical bases, but in empirical studies carried out in Turkey these theories have not been provided adequately. This gap observed in empirical studies also is leading to methodological shortcomings and makes it difficult to see the reasons and consequences of the problem as a whole. With the study it also aimed to contribute researchers as well as organizations dealing with women's issues, the commission established to ensure gender equality, law makers, and social workers to solve the problem. In theory, focusing on structure, family structure, the interaction between family members, the functions of family, in family role sharing, description of cultural structures and institutions that legitimize violence are given. Functional perspective especially focuses on how role differentiation in the family set the relationship between sexes. According to structural theories for the remaining of domestic violence, reasons of the violence have to be identified; family’s access to the social services has to be provided, compatibilizer strategies have to be used to balance in family relations, problem solving skills are brought, and anger should be taught. Gender theories focusing on the cultural construction say that women encounter violence when they do not fulfill or neglect their responsibilities within the family and domestic workload. According to those theories, if female does not comply with the female identity and roles, it is inevitable to experience violence. According to feminist theory, violence against women takes place to preserve male’s power in the family. According to feminist theory, violence emerges as a result of the male dominated social structure and gender identities shape with the discourse of man can be violent. In particular, according to the radical feminists, media and the mass media justify violence against women. Cultural acceptance of violence in certain areas of life, such as movies and sporting activities can be moved to other areas of interpersonal interaction and can lead to the use of violence against women. Social learning theory, ecological theory, psychoanalytic theory, and cultural theory which are located between socialization theories present a viewpoint to identify the relationship between the individual and members of the communication for the emergence of violence. According to these theories, individuals learn how to behave through both experience and exposure to violence and violence is transferred between intergenerational. In particular, social learning theory also explains the relationship between the victim and the offender, and the situation of victim’s revenge by using violence. On the other hand, psychoanalytic perspective indicates that individuals who use violence against women may have some personal problems and psychological disorders. For example, according to psychoanalytic theory, individuals who use violence are widely accepted as the patient and different from other people in the community. It carries the trend to understate and to reduce criminal responsibility of those who use violence. According to biological approach which is situated on the basis of psychoanalytic theory, violence against women is associated with natural selection process. Biological and neurological factors, such as thyroid gland problems, abnormal brain dimensions,hormonal problems, attention deficit disorders and head injuries are risk factors for violence. As a result, theories make it easier to identify the status of women who are subjected to violence, psychologically assaulted or victims of sexual abuse. Socio-cognitive theory states that violence against women is associated with mental illness and this problem can be solved easily with individual therapy and counseling. On the other hand, sociological explanations on the issue are not common in the general population. According to a sociological theories, to solve the problem of violence against women in the community, social, political, economic and cultural transformations must be ensured. On the other hand, theoretical perspectives showing both causes and prevention methods of the violence make it easy to see the extent of violence against women. Without taking into account theories, researchers’ definitions of violence and field studies are observed to be extremely poor. Although the experiences of women subjected to violence are very important for researchers, who carry out studies on violence against women, studies’ deprivation of theoretical perspectives make it difficult to the determination of micro and macro levels of factors and to see the issue as a whole

___

  • Aktaş, G. (2013). Yoksulluğu Ev İçinden Tanımlamak: Kadın Bakış Açısından Yoksulluk.
  • Uluslararası Katılımlı 7. Ulusal Sosyoloji Kongresi Bildiriler Kitabı (3 Kitaplık Set) / Edi. Muammer Tuna; Yardımcı Edi. Ünal Bozyer-Ebru Açık Turguter. Muğla: Muğla Sıtkı Koçman Üniversitesi, 1-11.
  • Arendt, H. (1969). On Violence, New York, Harcourt, Brace & World Inc. Aşan, N. ve Demir, T. (2015). Kadına Şiddetin Arka Planı: Atasözleri ve Deyimlerimiz. Turkish
  • Studies International Periodical For The Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic,Volume 10/6 Spring 2015, p. 179-196
  • Avcı, R. & Güçray, S.S. (2010). An investigation of violent and nonviolent adolescents' family
  • functioning, problems concerning family members, anger and anger expression, Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 10: 65-76.
  • Bancroft, L.,& Silverman, J. G. (2002). The batterer as parent: Addressing the impact of domestic violence on family dynamics. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Bandura, A. (2004). Social Learning and Self-Efficacy – Lecture Notes.
  • Bandura, A. (2001). Social Cognitive Theory: An Agentic Perspective. Annual Review ofPsychology, 52, 1-26
  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W.H. Freeman. Bandura, A. (1977). Social Learning Theory. New York: General Learning Press.
  • Bandura, A. & Walters, R. (1963). Social Learning and Personality Development. New York: Holt,
  • Rinehart & Winston. Başbakanlık Sosyal Hizmetler ve Çocuk Esirgeme Kurumu- UNICEF (2010). Türkiye’ de Çocuk İstismarı ve Aile İçi Şiddet Araştırması.http://www.unicef.org.tr/files/bilgimerkezi/doc/cocuk-istismari-raporutr.pdf (Erişim tarihi: 15 Şubat 2016).
  • Bogard, M. (1998). Power, gender, and the family: feminist perspectives on family systems therapy. İçinde: Feminist Psychoterapies: Integration of Therapeutic and Feminist Systems 470 Maide GÖK
  • Turkish Studies International Periodical for the Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic Volume 11/2 Winter 2016 Dockrell, J. & Messer, D. (1999). Children's Language and Communication Difficulties. London: Cassell.
  • Doğan İ. (2007). Sosyoloji: Kavramlar ve Sorunlar, Sistem Yayıncılık: Ankara. Donovan, J. (2013). Feminist Teori. (Çev. A. Bora, M. Gevrek, & F. Sayılan), İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları. Dutton, D. G., Starzomski, A. J., & Ryan, L. (1996). Antecedents of abusive personality and
  • abusive behavior in wife assaulters. Journal of Family Violence, 11, 113-132. Edelson, J.L. (2000). Primary Prevention and Domestic Violence. Collaborative Violence
  • Prevention Initiative toplantısında sunulan bildiri, San Francisco, CA. Elliott, D.S., Hamburg, B., & Williams, K.R. (1998). Violence in American schools: An overview.
  • İçinde D. Elliott, B. Hamburg, and K.R. Williams (Eds.), Violence in American Schools(ss. 3- 30). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. Fromm, E. (1981). FreudDüşüncesinin Büyüklüğü ve Sınırları,(çev. A.Artan),Dilek Matbaası, İstanbul.
  • Gençoğlu, C., Kumcağız, H. ve Ersanlı, K. (2014). Ergenlerin şiddet eğilimine etki eden ailevi faktörler, International Periodical For The Languages, Literature and History of Turkish
  • or Turkic, Volume 9/2: 639-652
  • Gold, M. (1987). Social ecology. M.C. Quay (Ed.) Handbook of Juvenile Delinquency (62-105). New York: Harper and Row Publislıcrs. Gökkaya, V.B. (2015). Çaresizliği Öğrenen Kadın: Öğrenilmiş Çaresizlik, Turkish StudiesInternational Periodical for the Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic, Volume 10/14 Fall 2015, p. 53-70. Gökkaya, V.B. (2015). Ahtapot Kadınlar: Aile ve İş Yaşamı Kıskacındaki Kadınlar ve Karşılaştıkları Sorunlar, International Periodical for the Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic,Volume 10/10 Summer 2015, p. 233-248 Gökulu, G., Uluocak, Ş. ve Bilir, O. (2014). Kadına Yönelik Şiddetin Yaygınlığı ve Risk
  • Faktörleri: Çanakkale, Türkiye’de Bir Saha Araştırması, Turkish Studies - International
  • Periodical For The Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic, Volume 9/8 Summer 2014, p. 499-516.
  • Görgün Baran, A. (2012). Toplumsal cinsiyet. İçinde Davranış Bilimleri N. Güngör-Ergan,
  • B.Kütük ve R. Coştur (Ed.), s. 409-436. Ankara: Siyasal Kitabevi. Güngör Ergan, N., Şahin Kütük, B. ve Coştur, R. (2012). Davranış Bilimleri. Ankara: Siyasal Kitabevi. Herman, J. (1992). Trauma and Recover: The Aftermath Violence- From Domestic Abuse to Political Terror, Basic Books . Holtzworth-Munroe, A.,& St uart, G.L. (1994). Typologies of male batterers: Three subtypes andthe differences among them. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 476–497.
  • Hyde-Nolan, M.E. ve T. Juliao. (2011). Theoretical basis for family violence. R. Fife & S. Schrager
  • (Eds). İçinde Family Violence: What Health Care Providers Need to Know. 1st Edn., Sudbury, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning, ss. 5-21. Kadına Yönelik Şiddetin Kuramsal Temelleri ve Çözüm Önerileri 471 Turkish Studies
  • International Periodical for the Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic Volume 11/2 Winter 2016 İçli, T. G. (1994). Aile içi şiddet: Ankara, İstanbul ve İzmir örneği. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, 11, 7-20 İçli, T.G., Öğün, A. ve Nilüfer Özcan (1995). Ailede Kadına Karşı Şiddet ve Kadın Suçluluğu,Devlet Bakanlığı Kadının Statüsü ve Sorunları Genel Müdürlüğü Yayınları, Ankara.
  • Kaner, S. (2001). Ana Baba Denetimi İle Ergenlerin Suç Kabul Edilen Davranışlar Arasındaki
  • İlişkinin İncelenmesi, Ankara: 1. Ulusal Çocuk ve Suç: Nedenler ve Önleme Çalışmaları Sempozyumu, 229–255.
  • Kantor, G.,& Straus, M.A. (1987). The drunken bum theory of wife beating. Social Problems, 34, 213-230.
  • Kelly, L. (1999). Domestic Violence Matters: an evaluation of a development project. London: Home Office. Korkmaz, İ. (2003). Sosyal Öğrenme Kuramı. (Ed. Yeşilyaprak, Binnur) İçinde Gelişim ve Öğrenme Psikolojisi. Ankara: Pegema Yayıncılık Michaud, Y. (1978). Violence et politique, Paris, Gallimard.
  • Miller, P.H. (2008). Gelişim Psikolojisi Kuramları. Ankara: İmge Kitabevi.
  • Neuman, W.L. (2012). Toplumsal Araştırma Yöntemleri. Yayınodası Yayıncılık: Ankara.
  • Nieburg, H. L. (1969). Political Violence. The Behavioral Process. New York: St. Martin’s Press. Schechter, S. (1982). Women and Male Violence: the Vision and Struggles of the Battered Women’s Movement. Cambridge, MA: South End Press. Shaw, C. & H. McKay. (1942). Juvenile Delinquency and Urban Areas. Chicago: Univ. Press.
  • Siegel, L. J. & Senna J.J (1981). Junenile Delinquency. New York: West Publication Company.
  • Tahiroğlu, A., Bahalı, K., Avcı, A., Seydaoğlu, G. ve Uzel, M. (2009). Ailedeki disiplin yöntemleri, demografik özellikler ve çocuklardaki davranış sorunları arasındaki ilişki, Çocuk ve Gençlik Ruh Sağlığı Dergisi, 16 (2): 67-81 Theories used to explain male violence against women partners and expartners, Scottish Women's
  • Aid Raporu. http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Resource/Doc/925/0063072.pdf (Erişim tarihi: 08 Ocak 2016).
  • Toffanin, A. (2011). Research on violence against women: A sociological perspective.Interdisciplinary Journal of Family Studies, XVII., 15-30. Ulusoy, D. (2012). Sosyalleşme. İçinde Davranış Bilimleri. Ed. Güngör-Ergan, N, Kütük, B. ve Coştur, R., ss. 365-378, Siyasal Kitabevi: Ankara.
  • Wallace, R. & Wolf, A. (2013). Çağdaş Sosyoloji Kuramları: Klasik Geleneğin Genişletilmesi, Çev. L. Elburuz ve M. R. Ayas, Punto Yayıncılık, İzmir. World Health Organisation (WHO) (2002). World Report on Violence and Health. http://www.who.int/violence_injury_prevention/violence/world_report/en/full_en.pdf?ua= 1(Erişim tarihi: 04 Ocak 2016).
  • Yanık, A., Hanbaba, Z., Soygur, S., Ayalti, B. ve Doğan, M. (2014). Kadına Yönelik Şiddet
  • Davranışlarının Değerlendirilmesi: Türkiye’den Kanıt. Electronic Journal of Vocational Colleges, 4 (14), 104-111. 472 Maide GÖK
  • Turkish Studies International Periodical for the Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic Volume 11/2 Winter 2016
  • Yücel, C. (2014). Türk ailesinde aile içi şiddetin kültürel dinamikleri, Turkish Studies – International Periodical For The Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic,Volume 9/8: 13-19,
  • Yvnes, M. (2005). Şiddet, Çev: Cem Muhtaroğlu, İletişim Yayınlar