Gözde Bozkurt, Mehmetcan Suyadal, Melih Sefa Yavuz

Gelişmiş ve Gelişmekte Olan Ülkelerde Finansal ve Ekonomik Göstergeler Arasındaki İlişki: Heterojen Panel Nedensellik Analizi Örneği

The Relationship Between Financial and Economic Indicators in Developed and Developing Countries: An Example of Heterogeneous Panel Causality Analysis

There are many factors that indicate the level of development of a country. The main factors are economic and financial factors such as economic growth, inflation, CDS (Credit Default Swap) premiums, exchange rate and portfolio investments in the country. These factors are influential in the investment decisions of foreign investors as well as the determinant of economic policies. Therefore, it is important to examine the cause-effect relationships between economic and financial indicators and to determine whether these relationships differ in terms of developed and developing countries. The purpose of this study is to investigate the causality relationship between financial and economic indicators such as CDS (Credit Default Swap) premiums portfolio investments, inflation, exchange rate and economic growth rate in the context of developed and developing countries. In this context, heterogeneous panel causality anaylsis was carried out with data from a total of eighteen developed and developing countries between the periods 2009:1-2019:3. The findings obtained reveal similar and different aspects of the causality relationships between financial and economic indicators in developed and developing countries. Exchange rate, inflation and CDS premiums were determined as the reason for portfolio investments for both country groups. In addition, it was observed that the main difference between developed and developing countries was in the growth rate variable. While the growth rate variable is the cause of the portfolio and exchange rate variable in developing countries, this relationship was not found in developed countries. Furthermore a one-way causality relationship was found between inflation and growth rate in developing countries. The results of the study are expected to be beneficial to policy makers and international investors.

PDF

___

Akın, T. & Işıklı, E. (2020). The relationship between credit default swap, economic growth and current account deficit: A case of Turkey. Anemon Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 8(İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Özel Sayı), 91-98. https://doi.org/10.18506/anemon.616029.
Altınbaş, H. Kutay, N. & Akkaya, C. (2015). Makroekonomik faktörlerin hisse senedi piyasalari üzerindeki etkisi: Borsa İstanbul üzerine bir uygulama. Ekonomi ve Yönetim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 4(2): 30-49.
Andriansyah, A. & Messinis, G. (2019). Stock prices, exchange rates and portfolio equity flows: a Toda-Yamamoto panel causality test. Journal of Economic Studies, 46(2): 399-421. https://doi.org/10.1108/JES-12-2017-0361
Bai, J. & Ng, S. (2004). A panic attack on unit roots and cointegration. Econometrica, 72(4): 1127- 1177. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0262.2004.00528.
Benli, M. (2019). Yabancı portföy yatırımı-iktisadi büyüme ilişkisi: Yönlendirilmiş döngüsüz graflar analizi. Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, (53): 59- 72. https://doi.org/10.18070/erciyesiibd.459337.
Breitung, J. (2000). The local power of some unit root tests for panel data. In Advances In Econometrics. Vol. 15: Nonstationarity Panels, and Dynamic Panels, Baltagi, B.H. (ed.): 161-177, JAI Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0731-9053(00)15006-6
Breusch, T.S. & Pagan, A.R. (1980). The Lagrange Multiplier test and its applications to model specification tests in econometrics. Review of Economic Studies, Oxford University Press, vol. 47(1): 239-253. https://doi.org/10.2307/2297111
Charef, F. & Ayachi, F. (2018). Non-linear causality between exchange rates, inflation, interest rate differential and terms of trade in Tunisia. African Journal of Economic and Management Studies. Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 9(3): 274-289. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJEMS-02- 2017-0034
Çağlar Bektaş, N. & Babuşcu, Ş. (2019). VIX korku endeksi ve cds primlerinin büyüme ve döviz kuruna etkisi, Türkiye örneği. Ufuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 8 (16): 97-111.
Danacı, M. Şit, M. & Şit, A . (2017). Kredi Temerrüt Swaplarının (CDS’lerin) büyüme oranıyla ilişkilendirilmesi: Türkiye Örneği. Aksaray Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 9 (2): 67-78.
de Vita, G. & Kyaw, K. S. (2009). Growth effects of fdi and portfolio investment flows to developing countries: A disaggregated analysis by income levels. Applied economics letters, 16(3): 277-283. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504850601018437
Demir, Y. (2007). Yabancı sermaye yatırımlarının ekonomik büyümeye olan etkisinin Türkiye bağlamında test edilmesi. Muhasebe Finansman Dergisi, 34: 152-161.
Dumitrescu, E. I. & Hurlin, C. (2012). Testing for granger noncausality ın heterogeneous panels. Economic Modelling, 29(4): 1450-1460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2012.02.014
Dünya Bankası Veri Tabanı (2020). Gelir durumuna göre ülkelerin sınıflandırılması (Çevrimiçi). E.T: 29.04.2020. https://datahelpdesk.worldbank.org/378834-how-does-the-world-bankclassify- countries.
Forson, J. A. & Janrattanagul, J. (2014). Selected macroeconomic variables and stock market movements: empirical evidence from Thailand. Contemporary Economics, 8(2): 154-174.
Gan, C. Lee, M. Yong, H. H. A. & Zhang, J. (2006). Macroeconomic variables and stock market interactions: New Zealand evidence. Investment management and financial innovations, 3(4): 89-101.
Granger, C. W. J. (1969). Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica, 37(3): 424-438. https://doi.org/10.2307/1912791
Hadri, K. (2000). Testing for stationarity in heterogeneous panel data. The Econometrics Journal, 3(2), 148-161.
Hadri, K. & Kurozumi, E. (2012). A simple panel stationarity test in th e presence of seria correlation and a common factor. Economics Letter, 115: 31-34. https://doi.org/10.1111/1368-423X.00043
Hsing, Y. (2011). The stock market and macroeconomic variables in a BRICS country and policy implications. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 1(1): 12.
Im, K.S. Pesaran, M.H. & Shin, Y. (2003). Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. Journal of Econometrics, 115(1), 53-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(03)00092-7
Kahiloğulları, A. (2018). Relationship between credit default swaps, direct foreign investments and portfolio investments: time series analysis for Turkey. Prizren Social Science Journal, SHIKS, 2(3): 50-62.
Kanli, N. K. & Aydoğuş, O. (2017). Ülke risk faktörlerinin doğrudan yabancı yatırımlar üzerindeki belirleyici etkisi. Ege Academic Review, 17(2): 179-190. https://doi.org/ 10.21121/eab.2017225197
Kaya, E. (2015). Ülke riskinin yabancı portföy yatırımları üzerindeki etkisi. Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 29 (4). 611-623.
Keskin, H. İ. & Aksoy, E. (2019). OECD ve gelişmekte olan ülkelerde gelir artışı ve işgücüne katılım arasındaki ilişki: panel eşbütünleşme analizi. Üçüncü Sektör Sosyal Ekonomi Dergisi, 54(1): 1-20. https://doi.org/10.15659/3.sektor-sosyal-ekonomi.19.02.1077
Khan, R. E. A. & Sattar, R.; Rehman, H. (2012). Effectiveness of exchange rate in Pakistan: causality analysis. Pak. J. Commer. Soc. Sci, 6(1): 83-96.
Kırca, M. & Yıldız, Ü. (2020). Türkiye için kredi risk primi (cds) ve ekonomik büyüme arasındaki zamanla değişen nedensellik ilişkileri. Uluslararası Afro-Avrasya Araştırmaları Dergisi, 5 (10): 17-24.
Koulakiotis, A. Lyroudi, K. & Papasyriopoulos, N. (2012). Inflation, gdp and causality for European countries. International Advances in Economic Research, 18(1): 53-62. Korinek, Anton (2011). Foreign currency debt, risk premia and macroeconomic volatility.
Kwon, C. S. & Shin, T. S. (1999). Cointegration and causality between macroeconomic variables and stock market returns. Global Finance Journal, 10(1): 71-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1044-0283(99)00006-X
Levin, A. Lin, C.F. & Chu, C.S.J. (2002). Unit root tests in panel pata: asymptotic and finitesample properties. Journal of Econometrics, 108(1): 1- 24. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304- 4076(01)00098-7.
Longstaff, F. A. Pan, J. Pedersen, L. & H., Singleton, K.J., (2011). How sovereign is sovereign credit risk?. American Economic Journal: Mac roeconomics, 3(2): 75-103. https://doi.org/10.1257/mac.3.2.75.
Osamwonyi, I. O. & Evbayiro-Osagie, E. I. (2012). The relationship between macroeconomic variables and stock market ındex in Nigeria. Journal of Economics, 3(1): 55-63. https://doi.org/10.1080/09765239.2012.11884953.
Pesaran, M. H. (2004). General diagnostic tests for cross section dependence in panels. Cambridge Working Papers in Economics, 435: 1-42.
Pesaran, M. H. (2007). A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross section dependence. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 22: 312-365. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.951
Pesaran, M. H. & Yamagata, T. (2008). Testing slope homogeneity in large panels. Journal of Econometrics, 142: 50-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2007.05.010
Rachdi, H. & Saidi, H. (2011). The impact of foreign direct investment and portfolio investment on economic growth in developing and developed economies. Interdisciplinary Journal of Research in Business, 1(6): 10-17.
Sarıgül, H. & Şengelen, H . (2020). Ülke kredi temerrüt takas primleri ile hisse senedi fiyatları arasındaki ilişki: Borsa İstanbul’da banka hisse senetleri üzerine ampirik bir araştırma. Muhasebe ve Finansman Dergisi , (86): 205-222. https://doi.org/10.25095/mufad.710367
Sir, M. M. (2012). Impact of the macroeconomic variables on the stock market returns: the case of Germany and the United Kingdom. Global Journal of Management and Business Research, 12(16).
Swamy, P. A. (1970). Efficient inference in a random coefficient regression model. Econometrica, 38: 311-323. https://doi.org/10.2307/1913012
Şahin, E. E. & Özkan, O. (2018). Kredi temerrüt takası, döviz kuru ve BİST100 endeksi ilişkisi. Hitit Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 11(3): 1939-1945. https://doi.org/10.17218/hititsosbil.450178
Tatoğlu, F. Y. (2013). İleri Panel Veri Analizi Stata Uygulamalı. Beta Yayıncılık.
Topaloğlu, E. E. & Karakozak, Ö. (2018). Makroekonomik faktörler ve pay senedi getirisi: BİST banka endeksi firmaları üzerine panel veri analizi. Muhasebe ve Finansman Dergisi, (78): 199-216.
Tuna, S. (2009). Neoliberal İktisadi Sürecin Gelişmekte Olan Ülkeler Üzerindeki Etkilerinin Panel Nedensellik Analizi (Yayın No. 240312) [Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi]. Marmara Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.

Turkish Studies - Economics, Finance, Politics-Cover

ISSN: 2667-5625
Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
Başlangıç: 2006
Yayıncı: ASOS Eğitim Bilişim Danışmanlık Otomasyon Yayıncılık Reklam Sanayi ve Ticaret LTD ŞTİ