Who Takes a MOOC? Profile of Students in the Framework of a European Project
This research analyzes the profile of students on MOOC (massive open online courses) courses within the framework of the ECO project (E-learning, Communication and Open-Data: Massive Mobile, Ubiquitous and Open Learning) promoted by the European Union. An analysis of the profile of students enrolled in the five editions of the course entitled “Educational innovation and professional development. Possibilities and limits of technology” has been conducted based on the following objectives: (a) gain knowledge about the profile of students; (b) identify the students’ perception of their level of digital competence for participating in the course; (c) find out what their real expectations were when they enrolled on the course; and (d) suggest proposals for improving the design of the course based on the study carried out on the student profile. This research shows the tendencies of students enrolled on these types of training processes and suggests improvements in the design of the course in order to satisfy the participants’ motivations and expectations. In this regard, the results suggest that the design of MOOCs should be based on a sustainable, social and communicative curricular approach while at the same time greatly enhancing interaction and collaborative work.
___
- Adamopoulos, P. (2013). What makes a great MOOC? An interdisciplinary analysis of student retention
in online courses. Paper presented at the International Conference on Information Systems, ICIS
2013, Milan. Retrieved from http://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~padamopo/What%20makes%20a%20
great%20MOOC.pdf
Aguado Franco, J. C. (2017). MOOC from a practical perspective. RIED, Revista Iberoamericana de
Educacion a Distancia, 20(1), 31-38. https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.20.1
Alarios-Hoyos, C., Estevez-Ayres, I., Perez-Sanagustin, M., Delgado Kloos, C., & Fernandez-Panadero,
C. (2017). Understanding learners’ motivation and learning strategies in MOOC. International
Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(3). http://dx.doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.
v18i3.2996
Armstrong, L. (2014). 2013-The Year of Ups and Downs for the MOOCs. Changing Higher Education.
Retrieved from http://goo.gl/SqwGWn
Barcena, E., Martin-Monje, E., & Read, T. (2015). Potentiating the human dimension in Language
MOOCs. Proceedings of the European Stakeholder Summit on experiences and best practices
in and around MOOCs, EMOOCs 2015, Mons, Belgium, 46-54. Retrieved from http://www.
emoocs2015.eu/sites/default/files/Papers.pdf
Barcena, E., & Read, T. (2015). The role of modularity and mobility in language MOOCS. Verbeia, 1, 28-
35. Retrieved from http://www.ucjc.edu/book/verbeia-revista-de-estudios-filologicos-no-0/
Belanger, Y., & Thornton, J. (2013). Biolectricity: A Quantitative Approach. Duke‘s University‘s First
MOOC. Retrieved from: http://dukespace.lib.duke.edu/dspace/bitstream/handle/10161/6216/
Duke_Bioelectricity_MOO C_Fall2012.pdf
Bentley, P., Crump, H., Cuffe, P., Gniadek, B. J., MacNeill, S., & Mor, Y. (2014). Signals of Success and
Self-Directed Learning. Proceedings of EMOOC 2014: European MOOC Stakeholder Summit,
Lausanne, Switzerland, pp. 5-10. Retrieved from http://goo.gl/jkHP4q
Bernal Gonzalez, M. (2015). Abandono de los estudiantes en los MOOC [Student dropouts in MOOCs].
(Master Dissertation). University of Murcia. Retrieved from https://digitum.um.es/xmlui/
handle/10201/46706
Bernal Gonzalez, M., Sanchez Vera, M., & Prendes Espinosa, M. (2016). Intereses y expectativas de
los participantes en MOOC: un estudio de caso. [Motivations and expectations of MOOC
participants: a case study]. In-Red Conference 2018. Valencia, Spain. http://dx.doi.org/10.4995/
INRED2016.2016.4363
Birnbaum, M. H. (2004). Human research and data collection via the Internet. Annual Review of Psychology,
55, 803-832. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.141601
13
Brazuelo Grund, F., & Cacheiro Gonzalez, M. L. (2015). Study of adaptability of MOOC platforms to
mobile device. RED-Revista de Educacion a Distancia, 48(7). http://dx.doi.org/10.6018/red/47/1
Brown, S. (2013). Back to the future with MOOCs? Proceedings of ICICTE, Crete, Greece. Retrieved from
http://www.icicte.org/Proceedings2013/Papers%202013/06-3-Brown.pdf
Caballo, M. B., Caride, J. A., Gradaille, R., & Pose, H. M. (2014). Massive open on line courses (MOOCs)
like university spread. Profesorado. Revista de Curriculum y Formacion Del Profesorado, 18(1),
43-61. Retrieved from http://www.ugr.es/local/recfpro/rev181ART
Castano Garrido, C. M., Maiz Olazalabaga, I., & Garay Ruiz, U. (2015). Students’ perceptions of a university
MOOC. RIED. Revista Iberoamericana de Educacion a Distancia, 15(2), 197-221. https://doi.
org/10.5944/ried.18.2
Chang, J. W., & Wei, H. Y. (2016). Exploring engaging gamification mechanics in massive online open
courses. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 19(2), 177–203. Retrieved from https://
www.j-ets.net/ETS/journals/19_2/14.pdf
Chauhan, A. (2014). Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCS): Emerging trends in assessment and
accreditation. Digital Education Review, 25, 7-17. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/ fulltext/
EJ1039698.pdf
Christensen, G., Steinmetz, A., Alcorn, B., Bennett A., Woods, D., & Emanuel, E. J. (2013). The MOOC
phenomenon: Who takes massive open online courses and why? Working Paper. University of
Pennsylvania. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2350964
Colpaert, J. (2016). Foreword. In E. Martin-Monje, I. Elorza, & B. Garcia Riaza (Eds.), Technologyenhanced language learning for specialized domains (pp. 9-22). London: Routledge.
Cooperman, L. (2014). From elite to mass to universal higher education: from distance to open education.
RIED. Revista Iberoamericana de Educacion a Distancia, 17(1), 111-130. https://doi.org/10.5944/
ried.17.1.11576
Daniel, J. (2012). Making Sense of MOOCs: Musings in a maze of myth, paradox and possibility. Journal of
Interactive Media in Education, 18(3). Retriewed from http://jime.open.ac.uk/2012/18
Daniel, J., Vazquez Cano, E., & Gisbert, M. (2015). The future of MOOCs: Adaptive learning or business
model? RUSC, Universities and Knowledge Society Journal, 12(1), 64-74. http://dx.doi.
org/10.7238/rusc.v12i1.2475
De Waard, I., Abajian, S., Sean Gallagher, M., Hogue, R., Keskin, N., Koutropoulos, A., & Rodriguez,
O. (2011). Using mLearning and MOOCs to understand chaos, emergence, and complexity in
education. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12(7), 95-115.
http://dx.doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v12i7.1046
Dillahunt, T., Wang, Z., & Teasley, S. D. (2015). Democratizing Higher Education: Exploring MOOC use
among those who cannot afford a higher education. International Review of Research in Open
and Distance Learning, 15(5), 177-196. http://dx.doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v15i5.1841
Downes, S. (2012). Connectivism and Connective Knowledge: Essays on meaning and learning networks.
Stephen Downes Web. Retrieved from http://www.downes.ca/post/58207
Fidalgo-Blanco, A., Sein-Echaluce, M. L., & Garcia-Penalvo, F. (2015). Methodological approach and
technological framework to break the current limitations of MOOC model. Journal of Universal
Computer Science, 21, 712-734. http://dx.doi.org/10.3217/jucs-021-05-0712
Fini, A. (2009). The technological dimension of a massive open online course: The case of the CCK08
course tools. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 10(5). Retrieved
from http://goo.gl/BhVhbX.
Garcia, B. J., Tenorio, G. C., & Ramirez, M. S. (2015). Self-motivation challenges for student involvement
in the Open Educational Movement with MOOC. RUSC. Universities and Knowledge Society
Journal, 12(1), 91-104. http://dx.doi.org/10.7238/rusc.v12i1.2185.
Gillani, N. (2013). Learner Communications in Massively Open Online Courses. (OxCHEPS Occasional
Paper 53). Oxford Centre for Higher Education Policy Studies. Retrieved from http://oxcheps.
new.ox.ac.uk
14
Godwin-Jones, R. (2014). Global reach and local practice: The promise of MOOCS. Language Learning &
Technology, 18(3), 5–15. http://dx.doi.org/10125/44377
Gonzalez, C., Collazos, C., & Garcia, R. (2016). MOOC design challenges: incorporating collaboration and
gamification aspects. RED-Revista de Educacion a Distancia, 48. http://dx.doi.org/10.6018/red/48/7
Gonzalez de la Fuente, A., & Carabantes Alarcon, D. (2017). MOOCs: measuring satisfaction, loyalty,
success and certification of digital education. RIED. Revista Iberoamericana de Educacion a
Distancia, 20(1), 105-123. http://dx.doi.org/10.5944/ried.20.1.16820
Hill, P. (2013a). The four student archetypes emerging in MOOCs. e-Literate. Retrieved from http://
mfeldstein.com/the-four-student-archetypes-emerging-in-moocs/7.
Hill, P. (2013b). Emerging student patterns in MOOCs: A (revised) graphical view. e-Literate. Retrieved
from http://mfeldstein.com/emerging-student-patterns-in-moocs-a-revised-graphical-view
Jagannathan, S. (2015). Harnessing the power of open learning to share global prosperity and eradicate
poverty. In C. J. Bonk, M. M. Lee, T. C. Reeves, & T. H. Reynolds (Eds.), MOOCs and open
education around the world (pp. 219-231). New York: Routledge.
Jordan, K. (2014). Initial trends in enrolment and completion of massive open online courses. The International
Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 15(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.
v15i1.1651
Kim, J-I. (2015). A Study on the K-MOOC plataform standarization measures. International Journal
of Software Engineering and Its Applications, 9(1), 221-236. http://dx.doi.org/10.14257/
ijseia.2015.9.1.20
Kizilcec, R. F., Piech, C., & Schneider, E. (2013). Deconstructing disengagement: analyzing learner
subpopulations in massive open online courses. Proceedings of the Third International
Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, Leuven, Belgium. http://dx.doi.
org/10.1145/2460296.2460330
Koller, D., Ng, A., Do, C., & Chen, Z. (2013). Retention and intention in massive open online courses: In
depth. Educause Review. Retrieved from http://goo.gl/DEJzxZ
Kolowich, S. (2012). The MOOC Survivors. Inside Higher Education. Retrieved from http://www.
insidehighered.com/news/2012/09/12/edx-explores-demographics-most-persistent-moocstudents
Kop, R. (2011). The challenges to connectivist learning on open online networks: Learning experiences
during a massive open online course. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance
Learning, 12(3). http://dx.doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v12i3.882
Kravvaris, D., Ntanis, G., & Kermanidis, K. L. (2013). Studying massive open online courses:
Recommendation in social media. Proceedings of the 17th Panhellenic Conference on Informatics,
PCI 2013, Thessaloniki, Greece. Retrieved from https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2491845
Lemos de Carvalho, D., Cebrian Robles, D., Cebrian De la Serna, M., & Raposo, M. (2019). Comparative
Study SPOC vs. MOOC for Socio-Technical Contents from Usability and User Satisfaction.
TOJDE, The Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 20(2), 4-20.
Liyanagunawardena, T. R., Adams, A. A., & Williams, S. A. (2013). MOOCs: A systematic study of the
published literature 2008-2012. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning,
14(3), 202-227. http://dx.doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v14i3.1455
Mackness, J., Bell, F., & Funes, M. (2016). The rhizome: A problematic metaphor for teaching and learning
in a MOOC. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 32(1). https://doi.org/10.14742/
ajet.2486
Mackness, J., Mak, S., & Williams, R. (2010). The ideals and reality of participating in a MOOC. In L.
Dirckinck-Holmfeld, V. Hodgson, C. Jones, M. De Laat, D. McConnell, & T. Ryberg (Eds),
Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Networked Learning 2010. University of
Lancaster, Lancaster, 266-275. Retrieved from http://eprints.port.ac.uk/5605/
Martin-Monje, E., & Castrillo, M. D. (2016). A redefinition of the teacher and student roles in language
MOOCs: The example of “How to succeed in the English-B1 level exam”. Paper presented at the
LLAS 11th annual e-learning Symposium 2016. Southampton, United Kingdom.
15
McLoughlin, C. E. (2013). The pedagogy of personalized learning: exemplars, MOOCS and related learning
theories. In J. Herrington, A. Couros, & V. Irvine (Eds.), Proceedings of EdMedia 2013-World
Conference on Educational Media and Technology, Victoria, Canada, 266-270. Retrieved from
https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/111968/.
McMillan, J.H., & Schumacher, S. (2001). Research in education: A conceptual introduction. New York:
Longman.
Medina-Salguero, R., & Aguaded, I. (2014). The MOOC in the educational platform MiriadaX. Profesorado.
Revista de curriculum y formacion del profesorado, 18(1), 137-153. Retrieved from http://www.
ugr.es/local/recfpro/rev181ART8.pdf
Milligan, C., Littlejohn, A., & Margaryan, A. (2013). Patterns of engagement in connectivist MOOCs.
Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 9(2), 149-159. Retrieved from http://goo.gl/YKlINA.
Osuna-Acedo, S., & Gil-Quintana, J. (2018). The European project ECO. Breaking down barriers to access
knowledge. Educacion XX1, 20(2), 189-213. https://doi.org/10.5944/educXX1.15852.
Perifanou, M. (2015). Personalized MOOCs for language learning: A challenging proposal. ELearning
Papers, 45. Retrieved from goo.gl/ZKcSHg
Poy, R., & Gonzales-Aguilar, A. (2014). MOOC success factors: some critical considerations. RISTI. Revista
Iberica de Sistemas de Tecnologia de la Informacion, 1(3), 95-118. Retrieved from http://www.
academypublisher.com/risti/no13/risti13.pdf
Radford, A. W., Robles, J., Cataylo, S., Horn, L., Thornton, J., &Whitfield, K. (2014). The employer
potential of MOOCs: a survey of human resource professionals’ thinking on MOOCs. RTI
International. Retrieved from http://www.rti.org/pubs/duke_handbook-final-03252014.pdf
Ramirez, M. (2013). Competencias Docentes y Practicas Educativas Abiertas en la Educacion a Distancia
[Teachers competencies and open educational practices in Distance Education]. Monterrey:
LULU editorial digital. Retrieved from https://goo.gl/y8Yp1m
Read, T. (2014). The architectonics of MOOCs. In E. Martin-Monje, & E. Barcena (Eds.), Language
MOOCs: providing learning, transcending boundaries (pp. 91-105). Berlin: De Gruyter Open.
Retrieved from http://www.degruyter.com/viewbooktoc/product/455678
Rodriguez-Ascaso, A., & Boticario, J. G. (2015). Accesibility and MOOC: towards a holistic perspective.
RIED. Revista Iberoamericana de Educacion a Distancia, 18(2), 61-85. https://doi.org/10.5944/
ried.18.2.1367
Rohs, M., & Ganz, M. (2015). MOOCs and the claim of education for all: A disillusion by empirical
data. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(6). http://dx.doi.
org/10.19173/irrodl.v16i6.2033
Rubio, F., Fuchs, C., & Dixon, E. (2016). MOOCs better by design. In E. Martin-Monje, I. Elorza, & B.
Garcia Riaza (Eds.), Technology-enhanced language learning for specialized domains (pp. 177-
188). London, United Kingdom: Routledge.
Sanchez-Gordon, S., & Lujan-Mora, S. (2013). Web accessibility of MOOCs for elderly students. Paper
presented at the 2013 12th International Conference on Information Technology Based Higher
Education and Training, Antalya, Turkey. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ITHET.2013.6671024
Sanchez-Vera, M. M., Leon-Urrutia, M., & Huge, D. (2015). Challenges in the creation, development and
implementation of MOOCs: Web Science Course at the University of Southampton. Comunicar,
44(22). https://doi.org/10.3916/C44-2015-04
Sedano Cuevas, B. (2017). Attending to the specific needs and demands of students in a globalised world:
the case of a ‘Spanish for travelling MOOC’. RIED. Revista Iberoamericana de Educacion a
Distancia, 20(1), 161-182. http://dx.doi.org/10.5944/ried.20.1.16692
Sharples, M., Delgado C., Dimitriadis, Y., Garlatti, S., & Specht, M. (2015). Mobile and accessible
learning for MOOCs. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2015(1), p. Art. 4. http://doi.
org/10.5334/jime.ai
Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. Journal of Instructional
Technology and Distance Learning, 1(2). Retrieved from http://www.ingedewaard.net/papers/
connectivism/2005_siemens_ALearningTheoryForTheDigitalAge.pdf
16
Teixeira, A., Garcia-Cabot, A., Garcia-Lopez, E., Mota, J., & De-Marcos, L. (2016). A new competencebased approach for personalizing MOOCs in a mobile collaborative and networked environment.
RIED. Revista Iberoamericana de Educacion a Distancia, 19(1), 143-160. http://dx.doi.
org/10.5944/ried.19.1.14578
Teixeira, A., & Mota, J. (2014). A proposal for the methodological design of collaborative language MOOCs.
In E. Martin-Monje, & E. Barcena (Eds.), Language MOOCs: providing learning, transcending
boundaries (pp. 33-47). Berlin: De Gruyter Open. Retrieved from http://www.degruyter.com/
viewbooktoc/product/455678
Telefonica Foundation (2015). MOOCs in the Education of the Future: Digitizing Training. Retrieved
from https://www.fundaciontelefonica.com/arte_cultura/publicaciones-listado/pagina-itempublicaciones/itempubli/324/
Torres, D., & Gago, D. (2014). The role of MOOCS in the creation of learning and participation
communities. RIED. Revista Iberoamericana de Educacion a Distancia, 17(1), 13-34. Retrieved
from http://revistas.uned.es/index.php/ried/article/view/11570
UNESCO (2013). Policy guidelines for mobile learning. Paris: United Nations Educational, Scientific and
Cultural Organization.
University of Edinburgh (2013). MOOCs @ Edinburgh 2013: report #1.The University of Edinburgh.
Retrieved from https://www.era.lib.ed.ac.uk/handle/1842/6683>
Vazquez-Cano, E., & Lopez-Meneses, E. (2015). The educational philosophy of MOOCs and University
education. RIED. Revista Iberoamericana de Educacion a Distancia, 15(2), 25-37. https://doi.
org/10.5944/ried.18.2
Wang, Y., & Baker, R. (2018). Grit and intention: Why do learners complete MOOCs? International
Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 19(3). http://dx.doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.
v19i3.3393
White, S., Davis, H., Dickens, K. P., Leon, M., & Sanchez Vera, M. (2015). MOOCs: What motivates
producers and participants? In S. Zvacek, M.T. Restivo, J. Uhomoibhi, & M. Helfert (Eds.),
Proceedings of the 6th international conference on computer supported education, Barcelona,
Spain (pp. 99–114). Heidelberg, DE: Springer.
Wiley, D. (2007). On the Sustainability of Open Educational Resource. Initiatives in Higher Education.
OECD’s Centre for Educational Research and Innovation (CERI). OECD Publishing. Retrieved
from http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/33/9/38645447.pdf
Yang, D., Shina, T., Adamson, D., & Rosa, C. P. (2013). Turn on, tune in, drop out: Anticipating students’
dropouts in massive open online courses. Proceedings of the 2013 NIPS Data-Driven Education
Workshop, Lake Tahoe, Nevada, USA. Retrieved from http://goo.gl/t2qtIm
Yousef, A. M. F., Chatti, M. A., Schroeder, U., Wosnitza, M., & Jakobs, H. (2014). MOOCs a review of
the state-of-the-art. Paper presented at the 6th International Conference on Computer Supported
Education, CSEDU 2014, Barcelona, Spain.
Yousef, A. M. F., Chatti, M. A., Wosnitza, M., & Schroeder, U. (2015). A cluster analysis of MOOC
stakeholder perspectives. RUSC, Universities and Knowledge Society Journal, 12(1), 74-91.
http://dx.doi.org/10.7238/rusc.v12i1.2253
Zancanaro, A., & Domingues, M. J. (2017). Analysis of the scientific literature on Massive Open Online
Courses (MOOCs). Revista Iberoamericana de Educacion a Distancia, RIED, 20(1), 59-80.
https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.20.1.15910
Zawacki-Richter, O., & Anderson, T. (2014). Online distance education - towards a research agenda. Edmonton,
Canada: Athabasca University Press. https://doi.org/10.15215/aupress/9781927356623.01
Zawacki-Richter, O., Bozkurt, A., Alturkim, U., & Aldraiweesh, A. (2018). What research says about
MOOCS– an explorative content analysis. International Review of Research in Open and
Distributed Learning, 19(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v19i1.3356
Zhou, J. (2017). Exploring the factors affecting learners’ continuance intention of MOOCs for online
collaborative learning: An extended ECM perspective. Australasian Journal of Educational
Technology, 33(5), 123-135. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.2914