EXAMINING UNIVERSITY STUDENTS’ BEHAVIOURAL INTENTION TO DISTANCE LEARNING DURING COVID-19: AN EXTENDED TAM MODEL

EXAMINING UNIVERSITY STUDENTS’ BEHAVIOURAL INTENTION TO DISTANCE LEARNING DURING COVID-19: AN EXTENDED TAM MODEL

Learning was obliged to be transformed to distance learning due to the long-lasting COVID-19 lockdown period. This situation has brought to investigate the critical factors influencing students’ intention and actual use of distance learning tools. In this context, this study aims to evaluate the effects of distance learning, deriving independent variables adopted from ETAM. Data was gathered from 92 undergraduate students enrolled in five and other courses in Turkiye. Data were investigated via SmartPLS 3.0 through Structural Equation Modelling (SEM). Results indicate that Computer Anxiety had a negative impact on Self-efficacy. Self-efficacy had a positive influence on Experience. Experience and Enjoyment had positive effects on Perceived Ease of Use. Enjoyment had a positive influence on Perceived Usefulness. The proposed model explained 87.7% of the variance of the actual use of distance learning tools. Computer anxiety and selfefficacy, which were proposed to measure experience, made this study unique and valuable. This contributes to acknowledging higher education institutions and lecturers to understand the benefits and barriers of distance learning tools for students used during the unpredicted pandemics in the future.

___

  • Achim, N., & Al Kassim, A. (2015). Computer usage: the impact of computer anxiety and computer self-efficacy. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 172, 701-708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.422
  • Anadolu University. (2021). 2021-2022-Academic Year. Retrieved April 30, 2020 from https://anadolu.edu.tr/universitemiz/sayilarla-universitemiz/ogrenci-sayilari/2021-2022/2021-ekim
  • Bahcesehir University. (2021). Bahcesehi̇r University Starts The Online Classes. Retrieved March 05, 2022, from https://bau.edu.tr/news/15488-bahcesehir-university-starts-the-online-classes
  • Cacault, M. P., Hildebrand, C., Laurent-Lucchetti, J., & Pellizzari, M. (2021). Distance learning in higher education: Evidence from a randomized experiment. Journal of the European Economic Association, 19(4), 2322-2372. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeea/jvaa060
  • Chua, S. L., Chen, D.-T., & Wong, A. F. (1999). Computer anxiety and its correlates: A meta-analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 15(5), 609-623. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0747-5632(99)00039-4
  • Compeau, D. R., & Higgins, C. A. (1995). Computer self-efficacy: Development of a measure and initial test. MIS Quarterly, 189-211. https://doi.org/10.2307/249688
  • Crawford, J., Butler-Henderson, K., Rudolph, J., Malkawi, B., Glowatz, M., Burton, R., & Lam, S. (2020). COVID-19: 20 countries' higher education intra-period digital pedagogy responses. Journal of Applied Learning &Teaching, 3(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2020.3.1.7
  • Da Costa Barreto, L. S., Marañón-Vásquez, G. A., Lopes, R., de Lima, A. M. B., & de Souza, M. M. G. (2020). Distance learning approach in interprofessional higher education, International Journal of Education, 12(4). https://doi.org/10.5296/ije.v12i4.17821
  • Mundfrom, D. J., Shaw, D. G., & Ke, T. (2005). Minimum sample size recommendations for conducting factor analyses. International Journal of Testing, 5(2), 159-168, https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327574ijt0502_4
  • Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
  • El Said, G. R. (2021). How did the COVID-19 pandemic affect higher education learning experience? An empirical investigation of learners’ academic performance at a university in a developing country. Advances in Human-Computer Interaction, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6649524
  • Ferran, F. M. (2021). Extended technology acceptance model to examine the use of Google Forms–based lesson playlist in online distance learning. Recoletos Multidisciplinary Research Journal, 9(1), 147-161. https://doi.org/10.32871/rmrj2109.01.13
  • Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  • Hair, J. F., Black, W.C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010), Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective (7th EDİTİON). Pearson Education, Upper Saddle River.
  • Hair Jr, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Gudergan, S. P. (2017). Advanced issues in partial least squares structural equation modelling. Sage publications Inc.
  • Kaçan, A., & Gelen, İ. (2020). An overview of the distance education program in Turkey. International Journal of Education Science and Technology, 6(1), 1-21. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/uebt/issue/53891/713456
  • Kazakova, O. P., & Murzich, A. N. (2020). Teaching and learning skills in the organization of distance learning in higher education institutions. Proceedings of the Research Technologies of Pandemic Coronavirus Impact (RTCOV 2020), Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, (pp. 380-387). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.201105.069
  • MacCallum, R. C., Browne, M. W., & Sugawara, H. M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1(2), 130-149. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.1.2.130
  • Özbay, Ö. (2015). The current status of distance education in the world and Turkey. The Journal of International Education Science, INES Journal, 5, 376-394. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/inesj/issue/40015/475774
  • Park, E. S., & Park, M. S. (2020). Factors of the technology acceptance model for construction IT. Applied Sciences, 10(22), 8299. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10228299
  • Rahmadi, I. F. (2021). Teachers’ technology integration and distance learning adoption amidst the Covid-19 crisis: A reflection for the optimistic future. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 22(2), 26-41. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.906472
  • Rahmi, B., Birgoren, B., & Aktepe, A. (2021). Identifying factors affecting intention to use in distance learning systems. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 22(2), 58-80. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.906545
  • Salloum, S. A. (2018). Investigating students’acceptance of e-learning system in higher educational environments in the UAE: Applying the extended Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). (Master’s thesis). The British University in Dubai. The British in Dubai Digital Repository. https://bspace.buid.ac.ae/handle/1234/1150
  • Santos, J., De Jesus, L. F., Sealmoy, R. R., & Fajardo, R. R. C. (2021). Online distance learning amidst COVID-19. IJERI: International Journal of Educational Research and Innovation, (15), 291-304. https://doi.org/10.46661/ijeri.5271
  • Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982-1003. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2632151
  • The World Bank (2020). How countries are using EdTech (including online learning, radio, television, texting) to support access to remote learning during the Covid-19 Pandemic. Retrieved April 30, 2022 from https://reliefweb.int/report/austria/how-countries-are-using-edtech-including-online-learning-radio-television-texting
  • Venkatesh, V. (2000). Determinants of perceived ease of use: Integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model. Information Systems Research, 11(4), 342-365. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23011042
  • Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., and Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
  • Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186–204. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926
  • Venkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2008). Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decision Sciences, 39(2), 273-315. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.2008.00192.x
Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education-Cover
  • ISSN: 1302-6488
  • Başlangıç: 2000
  • Yayıncı: Anadolu Üniversitesi
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

DISTANCE LEARNERS’ EMOTIONAL INTELLIGENCE AND PERCEPTIONS OF THEIR SITUATIONAL BARRIERS IN LEARNING ENGLISH

George Boon Sai TEOH, Agnes Wei Lin LIAU

ANALYZING DIGITAL DIVIDE AMONG UNIVERSITY STUDENTS OF PAKISTAN

Aatif IFTIKHAR, Naeem AHMED, Dr. Saif Ul Mujahid SHAH

FACTORS CONTRIBUTING TO VIETNAMESE UNIVERSITY LECTURERS’ BURNOUT IN ONLINE EMERGENCY CLASSROOMS AMIDST THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC

Thuan Minh Hoang NGUYEN, Thu Hoai Thi DO, Quang Nhat NGUYEN

THE EFFECT OF KNOWLEDGE SHARING, ATTITUDE, AND SATISFACTION ON NOVICE UNIVERSITY STUDENTS’ ONLINE LEARNING ACHIEVEMENT

Sinan KESKIN, Mustafa Serkan GUNBATAR, Hayati CAVUS

THE WHATSAPP APPLICATION USE AS A SUPPORT SERVICE IN DISTANCE EDUCATION: A CASE ANALYSIS

Gaye TOPA CIFTCI, Murat Ertan DOGAN, Burcin UNAL

EXAMINING UNIVERSITY STUDENTS’ BEHAVIOURAL INTENTION TO DISTANCE LEARNING DURING COVID-19: AN EXTENDED TAM MODEL

Can SAYGINER

CONDUCTING REMOTE ELECTRONIC EXAMINATIONS IN DISTANCE HIGHER EDUCATION: STUDENTS’ PERCEPTIONS

George VORVILAS, Alexandros LIAPIS, Alkis KOROVESIS, Dimitra AGGELOPOULOU, Nikos KAROUSOS, Efstathios EFSTATHOPOULOS

CONTINUOUS INTENTION TO USE ONLINE LEARNING DURING COVID-19 PANDEMIC BASED ON THREE DIFEERENT THEORITICAL MODELS (TAM, SVT, TOE)

Shaden MASADEH, Rabab ABUMALLOH, Noha LABANI

LIFE SATISFACTION OF OPEN EDUCATION HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS REGARDING VARIOUS DEMOGRAPHIC

Mesut DEMIRBILEK, Sitar KESER

DISHONESTY IN ONLINE LEARNING: DISTANCE LEARNING PERSPECTIVES DURING PANDEMIC

Pasca Dwi PUTRA, Andri ZAINAL, Roza THOHIRI