Morphometric Comparison of Cultured and Lagoon Caught Gilthead Seabream (Sparus aurata L. 1758)

Shape differences were analyzed in cultured and lagoon (Homa Lagoon in İzmir Bay, Turkey; 38°33´23´N-26°50´42´E) caught sea bream, Sparus aurata. Specimens in group A (n = 35, 19.71 ± 1.43 cm TL) were collected from nature, while cultured fish in group B (n = 32, 15.12 ± 0.44 cm TL) were propagated in a private hatchery. In order to reveal shape differences in the fish, 13 landmarks was determined in specimens of both groups and the computer programs Tpsdig, Tpsrelw, Tpssplin, and Morpheus were used to demonstrate differences in the selected landmarks. No significant differences were found in terms of geometrical morphometry between lagoon caught and cultured fish (P > 0.05). It is thought that the similar shape formation in specimens of both groups was related to similarities in conditions between culture and lagoon environments due to feeding and stocking.

Morphometric Comparison of Cultured and Lagoon Caught Gilthead Seabream (Sparus aurata L. 1758)

Shape differences were analyzed in cultured and lagoon (Homa Lagoon in İzmir Bay, Turkey; 38°33´23´N-26°50´42´E) caught sea bream, Sparus aurata. Specimens in group A (n = 35, 19.71 ± 1.43 cm TL) were collected from nature, while cultured fish in group B (n = 32, 15.12 ± 0.44 cm TL) were propagated in a private hatchery. In order to reveal shape differences in the fish, 13 landmarks was determined in specimens of both groups and the computer programs Tpsdig, Tpsrelw, Tpssplin, and Morpheus were used to demonstrate differences in the selected landmarks. No significant differences were found in terms of geometrical morphometry between lagoon caught and cultured fish (P > 0.05). It is thought that the similar shape formation in specimens of both groups was related to similarities in conditions between culture and lagoon environments due to feeding and stocking.

___

  • Bookstein, F.L. 1991. Morphometric Tools for Landmark Data. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 435 pp.
  • Cadrin, S.X. 2000. Advances in morphometric identification of fishery stock. Rev. Fish Biol. Fish. 10: 91-112.
  • D'Arcy Thompson, W. 1917. On growth and form. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
  • Divanach, P., Boglione, C., Menu, M., Koumoundouros, G., Kentouri, M. and Cataudella, S. 1996. Abnormalities in finfish mariculture: an overview of the problem, causes and solutions. Sea-bass and Sea Bream Culture: Problems and Prospects, Verona, Italy, October 16-18. European Aquaculture Society, Oostende, Belgium; pp. 45-66.
  • Favaloro, E. 1999. Analisi morfometrica e studio delle anomalie scheletriche in Diplodus puntazzo (Cetti, 1777 Pisces: Sparidae): prove comparate tra diverse tipologie di allevamento. Ph.D. Thesis XI cycle, University of Messina, Italy; 200 pp.
  • Favaloro, E. and Mazzola, A. 2003. Shape change during the growth of sharpsnout seabream reared under different conditions in a fish farm of the southern Tyrrhenian Sea. Aquaculture Research, 29: 57-63.
  • Friedland, K.D., Esteves, C., Hansen, L.P. and Lund, R.A. 1994. Discrimination of Norwegian farmed, ranched and wild-origin Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar L., by image processing. Fish. Manag. Ecol, 1: 117-128.
  • Keast, A. and Webb, D. 1966. Mouth and body form relative to feeding ecology in the fish fauna of a small lake, Lake Opinicon, Ontario. J. Fish. Res. Bd. Can., 23: 1845-1874.
  • Loy, A., Cataudella, S. and Corti, M. 1996. Shape changes during the growth of sea bass, Dicentrarchus labrax (Teleostea: Perciformes), in relation to different rearing conditions. An application of the Thin-Plate Splines regression analysis. In: Marcus, L.F, Corti, M., Loy, A., Naylor, G.J.P., Slice, D.E. (Eds.), Advances in Morphometrics, NATO ASI series A, No 284. Plenum Press, New York; 399-406.
  • Loy, A., Mariani, L., Bertelletti, M. and Tunesi, L. 1998. Visualizing allometry: geometric morphometrics in the study of shape changes in the early stages of two-banded sea bream, Diplodus vulgaris (Perciformes, Sparidae). Journal of Morphology, 237: 137-146.
  • Loy, A., Busilacchi, S., Costa, C., Ferlin, L. and Cataudella, S., 2000. Comparing geometric morphometrics and outline fitting methods to monitor fish shape variability of D. puntazzo (Teleostea: Sparidae). Aquaculture Research, 21: 271-283.
  • Marcus, L.F., Corti, M., Loy, A., Naylor, G.J.P. and Slice, D.E., 1996. Advances in Morphometrics. NATO ASI Series Plenum, New York.
  • Mariani, S., Maccaroni, A., Massa, F., Rampacci, M. and Tancioni, L. 2002. Lack of consistency between the trophic interrelationships of five sparid species in two adjacent central Mediterranean coastal lagoons. Journal of Fish Biology, 61: 138-147.
  • Rohlf, F.J. and Slice, D.E. 1990. Extensions of the Procrustes method for the optimal superimposition of landmarks. Systematic Zoology, 39: 40--59.
  • Rohlf, F.J. and Bookstein, F.L. 1990. Proceedings of the Michigan morphometric workshop, Special Publication No. 2. The University of Michigan Museum of Zoology, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA; pp. 380.
  • Rohlf, F.J., 2000. Statistical power comparisons among alternative morphometric methods. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol, 111: 463-478.
  • Rohlf, F.J. 2001. TpsRelw, ver. 1.24. Dept. of Ecology and Evolution, State Univ. of New York at Stony Brook, Stony Brook.
  • Rohlf, F.J. 2005. tpsDig, digitize landmarks and outlines, version 2.05. Department of Ecology and Evolution, State University of New York at Stony Brook.
  • Roncarati, A., Meluzzi, A., Melotti, P. and Mordenti, O. 2001. Influence of the larval rearing technique on morphological and productive traits of European sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax L.). J. Appl. Ichthyol., 17: 244-246.
  • Sara, M., Favaloro, E. and Mazzola, A. 1999, Comparative morphometrics of sharpsnout seabream (Diplodus puntazzo Cefti, 1777), reared in different conditions. Aquaculture Research, 19: 195--209.
  • Slice, D.E. 1998. Morpheus et al.: software for morphometric research. Revision 01-30-98-Beta. Department of Ecology and Evolution, State University of New York, Stony Brook, New York.
  • Warburton, K. 1979. Growth and production of some important species of fish in a Mexican coastal lagoon system. Journal of Fish Biology, 14: 449-455.
  • Whitfield, A.K. 1999. Ichthyofaunal assemblages in estuaries: a South African case study. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, 9: 151- 186.
Turkish Journal of Zoology-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-0179
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 6 Sayı
  • Yayıncı: TÜBİTAK
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Wood destroying ınsects in Düzce province

Akif KETEN, Beşir YÜKSEL, Süleyman AKBULUT

Characterization of branchial Na,K-ATPase from three freshwater fish species (Oreochromis niloticus, Cyprinus carpio, and Oncorhynchus mykis)

Mustafa CANLI, Gülizar ATLI

SEM Observations and Morphometrics of the Cabbage Cyst Nematode, Heterodera cruciferae Franklin, 1945, Collected Where Brassica spp. Are Grown in Tabriz, Iran

Habibeh JABBARI, Gholamreza NIKNAM

Gerromorpha and Leptopodomorpha (Insecta: Heteroptera) fauna of southwest Anatolia

Savaş CANBULAT, Suat KIYAK, Ali SALUR

The Fruit Fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) Fauna of Kayseri and Sivas Provinces with a New Record for Turkey

Murat KÜTÜK

Limnochemica factors influencing the seasonal population density, secondary production, and calcium-to-tissue ratio in the freshwater limpet Septaria lineata (Archaeogastropoda: Neritidae)

Manjari JAIN, Asitava CHATTERJEE, Singha Utpal ROY, Kumar Subhra MUKHOPADHYAY

Karyotypes of two ıranian bat species, Myotis biythii and Miniopterus schreibersii (chiroptera: vespertilionidae, miniopteridae)

Ahmet KARATAŞ, Mouradi Muhammed GHARAKHELOO, Toman KANKILIÇ

The Geometrid Moths (Lepidoptera) from the Middle and Eastern Black Sea Regions of Turkey

Feza CAN

Embryonic mortalitiy in loggerhead turtle (Caretta caretta) nests: A Comparative study on Fethiye and Göksu Delta Beaches

Özgür GÜÇLÜ, Oğuz TÜRKOZAN, Adem ÖZDEMİR

Morphometric Comparison of Cultured and Lagoon Caught Gilthead Seabream (Sparus aurata L. 1758)

Deniz ÇOBAN, Şahin SAKA, Kürşat FIRAT