Nurhayat ÖZDEMİR, Nazan ÜZÜM, Bilal KUTRUP, Cantekin DURSUN, Serkan GÜL

Interspecific and intraspecific size and shape variation in skull of two closely related species Bufo bufo (Linnaeus, 1758) and Bufo verrucosissimus (Pallas, 1814) from Turkey

Anurans are the most suitable vertebrate group to see the development and also evolution in the skull, compared to other terrestrial vertebrates as they show highly derived morphology. For this reason, the cranium of anurans has been widely used for analyzing e.g., development and integration, evolutionary history, phylogenetic relationships, sexual dimorphism; and for taxon determination. We applied geometric morphometric techniques and then multivariate statistical analyses to see the skull size and shape variations in closely related Bufo species (B. bufo and B. verrucosissimus) inhabiting Turkey. Females have larger skull than males for both species. Ventral skull size of males differed between species and within species (among populations) whereas dorsal skulls differed only among populations. In females, only size of ventral skull side differs only among populations. Dorsal skull shape differs between the species in male individuals, while in females both dorsal and ventral skulls show a significant variation among populations. Bufo bufo had larger squamousal than B. verrucosissimus, whereas B. verrucosissimus had longer maxilla but shorter occipital region than B. bufo for both males and females. Under the control of size, the shape of skull does not differ between species for both males and females. Due to structural and functional constraints because of having similar biological and physical properties of skeletal and muscle tissues, living in similar environments or shared evolutionary history, the size and shape of skulls are found to be similar between B. bufo and B. verrucosissimus in present study. However, in order to better reveal the skull variations between these two closely related species, more detailed studies with more samples on their morphology and ecology are required.

PDF

___

Adams DC, Rohlf FJ, Slice DE (2004). Geometric morphometrics: ten years of progress following the ‘revolution’. Italian Journal of Zoology 71: 5-16. doi: 10.1080/1125000040935654
Arntzen JW, Recuero E, Canestrelli, D, Martínez-Solano I (2013). How complex is the Bufo bufo species group? Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 69: 1203-1208. doi: 10.1016/j. ympev.2013.07.012
Arntzen JW, Trujillo T, Butôt R, Vrieling K, Schaap O et al. (2016). Concordant morphological and molecular clines in a contact zone of the common and spined toad (Bufo bufo and B.spinosus) in the northwest of France. Frontiers in Zoology 13: 52. doi: 10.1186/s12983-016-0184-7
Arntzen JW, De Vries W, Canestrelli D, Solano IM (2017). Hybrid Zone formation and contrasting outcomes of secondary contact over transect in Common Toads. Molecular Ecology 26: 5663-5675. doi: 10.1111/mec.14273
Arntzen JW, McAtear J, Butot R, Solano IM (2018). A common toad hybrid zone that runs from the Atlantic to the Mediterranean. Amphibia-Reptilia 9 (2018): 41-50. doi: 10.1163/15685381- 00003145
Arntzen JW, Canestrelli D, Solano I (2020). Environmental correlates of the European common toad hybrid zone. Contributions to Zoology 89 (3): 270-281. doi: 10.1163/18759866-bja10001
Baran İ, Ilgaz Ç, Avcı A, Kumlutaş Y, Olgun K (2012). Türkiye Amfibi ve Sürüngenleri. TÜBİTAK Popüler Bilim Kitapları 207. Ankara, Türkiye: Semih Ofset Matbaacılık.
Bardua C, Evans SE, Goswami A (2018). Phylogeny, ecology and deep time: 2D outline analysis of anuran skulls from the early cretaceous to the recent. Palaeontology 2018: 1-15. doi: 10.1111/pala.12405
Bastir M, Rosas A (2005). Hierarchical nature of morphological integration and modularity in the human posterior face. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 128: 26-34. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.20191
Blomberg SP, Garland T, Ives AR (2003). Testing for phylogenetic signal in comparative data: behavioral traits are more labile. Evolution 57: 717-745. doi: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2003. tb00285.x
Bookstein FL (1989). Principal warps: thin-plate splines and the decomposition of deformations. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 11 (6): 567-585. doi: 10.1109/34.24792
Bookstein FL (1992). Morphometric Tools for Landmark Data: Geometry and Biology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511573064
Cadjenović N, Vukov T, Popović E, Ljubisavljević K (2013). Morphological differentiation of the Common Toad Bufo bufo (Linnaeus, 1758) in the Central Part of the Balkan Peninsula. Archieves of Biological Sciences 65 (2): 685-695. doi: 10.2298/ ABS1302685C
Caumul R, Polly PD (2005). Phylogenetic and environmental components of morphological variation: skull, mandible, and molar shape in marmots (Marmota, Rodentia). Evolution 59: 2460–2472. doi: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2005.tb00955.x
Cvetković D, Tomašević N, Aleksić I, Crnobrnja-Isailović J (2007). Phenotypic selection in common toad (Bufo bufo). Archives of Biological Sciences Belgrade 59: 327-333. doi: 10.2298/ ABS0704327C
Cvijanović M, Üzüm N, Ivanović A, Avci A, Gümüş Özcan Ç et al. (2017). Variation in skull size and shape in a newt species with male-biased sexual dimorphism. Herpetological Journal 27 (1): 41-46.
Dingerkus G, Uhler LD (1977). Enzyme clearing of alcian blue stained whole small vertebrates for demonstration of cartilage. Stain Technology 52: 229-232. doi: 10.3109/10520297709116780
Dryden IL, Mardia KV (1998). Statistical Shape Analysis. New York, NY, USA: Wiley.
Fabrezi M (2006). Morphological evolution of Ceratophryinae (Anura, Neobatrachia). Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research 44: 153-166. doi: 10.1111/j.1439- 0469.2005.00349.x
Fairbairn DJ (1997). Allometry for sexual size dimorphism: Pattern and process in the coevolution of body size in males and females. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 28 (1): 659-687. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.28.1.659
Garcia-Porta J, Litvinchuk SN, Crochet PA, Romano A, Geniez PH et al. (2012). Molecular phylogenetics and historical biogeography of the west-palearctic common toads (Bufo bufo species complex). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 63: 113-130. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2011.12.019
Gould SJ (2002). The Structure of Evolutionary Theory. Cambridge, MA, USA: Harvard University Press. doi: 10.2307/j.ctvjsf433
Gvoždík V, Moravec J, Kratochvíl L (2008). Geographic morphological variatio in parapatric Western Palearctic tree frogs, Hyla arborea and Hyla savignyi: are related species similarly affected by climatic conditions? Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 95: 539-556. doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2008.01056.x
Hall BK (2008). Fins into limbs: evolution, development, and transformation. Chicago, IL, USA: Chicago University Press. Halliday TR, Verrell PA (1986). Sexual selection and body size in amphibians. Herpetological Journal 1: 86-92.
Hanken J, Summers CH (1988). Skull development during anuran metamorphosis: III. Role of thyroid hormone in chondrogenesis. Journal of Experimental Zoology 246: 156- 170. doi: 10.1002/jez.1402460208
Hanken J, Hall BK (1993). Mechanisms of skull diversity and evolution. In: Hanken J, Hall BK (editors). The Skull. Vol. 3. Functional and Evolutionary Mechanisms. Chicago, IL, USA: The University of Chicago Press, pp 1-36.
Harrington SM, Harrison LB, Sheil CA (2013). Ossification sequence heterochrony among amphibians. Evolution & Development 15: 344-364. doi: 10.1111/ede.12043
Hendry CR, Guiher TJ, Pyron R A (2014). Ecological divergence and sexual selection drive sexual size dimorphism in new world pitvipers (Serpentes: Viperidae). Journal of Evolutionary Biology 27 (4): 760-771. doi: 10.1111/jeb.12349
Ivanović A, Sotiropoulos K, Vukov TD, Eleftherakos K, Džukić G et al (2008). Cranial shape variation and molecular phylogenetic structure of crested newts (Triturus cristatus superspecies: Caudata, Salamandridae) in the Balkans. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 95: 348–360. doi: 10.1111/j.1095- 8312.2008.01045.x
Ivanović A, Sotiropoulos K, Üzüm N, Džukić G, Olgun K et al. (2012). A phylogenetic view on skull size and shape variation in the smooth newt (Lissotriton vulgaris, Caudata, Salamandridae). Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research 50: 116-124. doi: 10.1016/j.jcz.2012.08.005
Ivanović A, Üzüm N, Wielstra B, Olgun K, Litvinchuk SN et al. (2013). Is mitochondrial DNA divergence of Near Eastern crested newts (Triturus karelinii group) reflected by differentiation of skull shape? Zoologischer Anzeiger 252: 269-277. doi: 10.1016/j.jcz.2012.08.005
Jandzik D, Avcı A, Gvoždik V (2013). Incongruence between taxonomy and genetics: three divergent lineages within two subspecies of the rare Transcaucasian rat snake (Zamenis hohenackeri). Amphibia-Reptilia 34: 579-584. doi: 10.1163/15685381-00002911
Jared C, Antoniazzi MM, Navas CA, Katchburian E, Freymüller E et al. (2005). Head coossification, phragmosis and defence in the casque-headed tree frog Corythomantis greeningi. Journal of Zoology 265: 1-8. doi: 10.1017/S0952836904005953
Klingenberg CP (2011). MorphoJ: an integrated software package for geometric morphometrics. Molecular Ecology Resources 11: 353-357. doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-0998.2010.02924.x
Krstičić Račković J, Tomašević Kolarov N, Labus N, Vukov T (2019). Interspecific size-and sex-related variation in the cranium of European brown frogs (Genus Rana). Zoomorphology 138 (2): 277-286. doi: 10.1007/s00435-019-00441-9
Larson PM (2000). Chondrocranial development in larval Rana sylvatica (Anura: Ranidae): morphometric analysis of cranial allometry and ontogenetic shape change. Journal of Morphology 252: 131-144. doi: 10.1002/jmor.1095
Losos JB (2011). Seeing the forest for the trees: the limitations of phylogenies in comparative biology. The American Naturalist 177: 709-727. doi: 10.1086/660020
Loy A (1996). An introduction to geometric morphometrics and intraspecific variation. In: Marcus L F, Corti M, Loy, A, Naylor GJP, Slice DE (editors). Advances in Morphometrics. NATO ASI Series. New York, NY, USA: Plenum Press, pp. 271-273.
Malekian M, Khoshnamvand H, Keivany Y (2019). Morphological assessment raises the possibility of cryptic species within the Luristan newt, Neurergus kaiseri (Amphibia: Salamandridae). Herpetological Journal 29: 237-244. doi: 10.33256/ hj29.4.237244
Mendelson JR, Silva HR, Maglia AM (2000). Phylogenetic relationships among marsupial frog genera (Anura: Hylidae: Hemiphractinae) based on evidence from morphology and natural history. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 128: 125-148. doi: 10.1006/zjls.1998.0229
Nolte AW, Sheets HD (2005). Shape based assignment tests suggest transgressive phenotypes in natural sculpin hybrids. Frontiers in Zoology 2: 11. doi: 10.1186/1742-9994-2-11
Özdemir N, Dursun C, Üzüm N, Kutrup B, Gül S. (2020). Taxonomic assessment and distribution of common toads (Bufo bufo and B. verrucosissimus) in Turkey based on morphological and molecular data. Amphibia-Reptilia 41: 399-411. doi: 10.1163/15685381-bja10009
Padial JM, Miralles A, De la Riva I, Vences M (2010). The integrative future of taxonomy. Frontiers in Zoology 7: 16. doi: 10.1186/1742-9994-7-16
Raff RA (1996). The Shape of Life: Genes, Development, and the Evolution of Animal Form. Chicago, IL, USA: University of Chicago Press.
Recuero E, Canestrelli D, Vörös J, Szabó K, Poyarkov NA et al. (2012). Multilocus species tree analyses resolve the radiation of the widespread Bufo bufo species group (Anura, Bufonidae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 62: 71-86. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2011.09.008.
Rohlf FJ (2008). tpsDig version 2.11. Stony Brook, NY, USA: SUNY.
Rohlf FJ, Marcus LF (1993). A revolution in morphometrics. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 8: 129-132. doi: 10.1016/0169- 5347(93)90024-J
Rose CS, Reis JO (1993). Metamorphosis and the vertebrate skull: ontogenetic patterns and developmental mechanisms. In: Hanken J, Hall BK (editors). The skull, Vol 1. Chicago, IL, USA: Chicago University Press, pp 289-346.
Sanna G (2019). Ontogenetic and interspecific variation in skull morphology of two closely related species of toad, Bufo bufo and B. spinosus (Anura: Bufonidae). Acta Herpetologica 14 (2): 117-122. doi: 10.13128/a_h-7749
Senevirathne G, Thomas A, Kerney R, Hanken J, Bi Ju SD et al. (2016). From clinging to digging: the postembryonic skeletal ontogeny of the Indian Purple Frog, Nasikabatrachus sahyadrensis (Anura: Nasikabatrachidae). PLoS One, 11: e0151114. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0151114
Simon MN, Machado FA, Marroig G (2016). High evolutionary constraints limited adaptive responses to past climate changes in toad skulls. Proceeding of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 283: 20161783. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2016.1783
Trueb L (1993). Patterns of cranial diversity among the Lissamphibia. In: Hanken J, Hall BK (editors). The Skull: Patterns of Structural and Systematic Diversity. Chicago, IL, USA: University of Chicago Press, pp. 255-343.
Üzüm N, Ivanović A, Gümüş Ç, Avcı A, Olgun K (2015). Divergence in size, but not in shape: variation in skull size and shape within Ommatotriton newts. Acta Zoologica 96 (4): 478-486. doi: 10.1111/azo.12092
Veith M, Schmidtler JF, Kosuch J, Baran I, Seitz A (2003). Palaeoclimatic changes explain Anatolian mountain frog evolution: a test for alternating vicariance and dispersal events. Molecular Ecology 12 (1): 185-199. doi: 10.1046/j.1365- 294X.2003.01714.x
Vera MC, Ponssa ML (2014). Skeletogenesis in anurans: cranial and postcranial development in metamorphic and postmetamorphic stages of Leptodactylus bufonius (Anura: Leptodactylidae). Acta Zoologica 95: 44-62. doi: 10.1111/ azo.12007
Vidal-García M, Keogh JS (2017). Phylogenetic conservatism in skulls and evolutionary lability in limbs-morphological evolution across an ancient frog radiation is shaped by diet, locomotion and burrowing. BMC Evolutionary Biology 17: 165. doi: 10.1186/s12862-017-0993-0
Vukov T, Krstičić J, Petrović T, Tomašević Kolarov N (2018). Patterns of cranial sexual dimorphism in the yellow-bellied toad (Bombina variegata, Bombinatoridae). North-Western Journal of Zoology 14 (1): 44-49.
Yıldırım E, Kaya U (2017). Chondrocranial differences in Bufotes variabilis (Anura: Bufonidae): geometric morphometric comparison with 2 two anuran species. Turkish Journal of Zooology 41: 241-249. doi: 10.3906/zoo-1510-12
Zelditch ML, Carmichael AC (1989). Ontogenetic variation in patterns of developmental and functional integration in skulls of Sigmodon fulviventer. Evolution 43 (4): 814-824. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1989.tb05179.x
Zelditch ML, Swiderski DL, Sheets DH (2012). Geometric Morphometrics for Biologists: A Primer. 2nd ed. San Diego, CA, USA: Elsevier Academic Press.