Evaluation of vertical and horizontal changes in community structure of zooplankton in a deep dam lake

The purpose of this study was to describe the horizontal and vertical distributions of the zooplankton community structure in Karakaya Dam Lake. Rotifers were numerically dominant (81.89%) in the community during the study period; they were followed by Copepoda (10.32%) and Cladocera (7.79%). In the metalimnetic maximum oxygen zone between 5 and 10 m, cladocerans made up 70.1% of the total number of zooplankton in June and 27.3% of the total number of zooplankton in November. Oxygen values decreased at 10 and 15 m in September and November. While the abundance of rotifers and cladocerans decreased as well, cyclopoids increased (60% of total zooplankton at 10 m). Nitrogen and soluble reactive phosphate were at low concentrations. Relationships among zooplankton, abundance, and environmental factors were analyzed using the unweighted pair-group method using arithmetic averages (UPGMA) and canonical correspondence analysis (CCA). UPGMA cluster analysis was used to illustrate unimodal species distribution by classification into 2 groups. Eigenvalues of axes clarified 42.7% of the cumulative variance in species data and 62.9% of the relationship between species and environmental data in the CCA. Many zooplankton species, rather tolerant to different environmental conditions, are good indicators for water quality and can be used for the biomonitoring of water ecosystems.

Evaluation of vertical and horizontal changes in community structure of zooplankton in a deep dam lake

The purpose of this study was to describe the horizontal and vertical distributions of the zooplankton community structure in Karakaya Dam Lake. Rotifers were numerically dominant (81.89%) in the community during the study period; they were followed by Copepoda (10.32%) and Cladocera (7.79%). In the metalimnetic maximum oxygen zone between 5 and 10 m, cladocerans made up 70.1% of the total number of zooplankton in June and 27.3% of the total number of zooplankton in November. Oxygen values decreased at 10 and 15 m in September and November. While the abundance of rotifers and cladocerans decreased as well, cyclopoids increased (60% of total zooplankton at 10 m). Nitrogen and soluble reactive phosphate were at low concentrations. Relationships among zooplankton, abundance, and environmental factors were analyzed using the unweighted pair-group method using arithmetic averages (UPGMA) and canonical correspondence analysis (CCA). UPGMA cluster analysis was used to illustrate unimodal species distribution by classification into 2 groups. Eigenvalues of axes clarified 42.7% of the cumulative variance in species data and 62.9% of the relationship between species and environmental data in the CCA. Many zooplankton species, rather tolerant to different environmental conditions, are good indicators for water quality and can be used for the biomonitoring of water ecosystems.

___

  • Altindag A, Buyurgan O, Kaya M, Ozdemir E, Dirican S (2009). A survey on some physico-chemical parameters and zooplankton structure in Karaman Stream, Antalya, Turkey. J Anim Vet Adv 8: 1710–1716.
  • Andersen V, Devey C, Gubanova A, Picheral M, Melnikov V, Tsarin S, Prieur L (2004). Vertical distributions of zooplankton across the Almeria–Oran frontal zone (Mediterranean Sea). J Plankton Res 26: 275–293.
  • Armengol X, Esparcia A, Miracle MR (1998). Rotifer vertical distribution in a strongly stratified lake: a multivariate analysis. Hydrobiologia 388: 161–170.
  • Auel H, Verheye HM (2007). Hypoxia tolerance in the copepod Calanoides carinatus and the effect of an intermediate oxygen minimum layer on copepod vertical distribution in the northern Benguela Current upwelling system and the Angola–Benguela Front. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 352: 234–243.
  • Badosa A, Boix D, Brucet S, López-Flores R, Quintana XD (2007). Short-term effects of changes in water management on the limnological characteristics and zooplankton of a eutrophic Mediterranean coastal lagoon (NE Iberian Peninsula). Mar Pollut Bull 54: 1273–1284.
  • Bottger-Schnack R (1996). Vertical structure of small metazoan plankton, especially noncalanoid copepods. I. Deep Arabian Sea. J Plankton Res 18: 1073–1101.
  • Burns CW, Mitchell SF (1980). Seasonal succession and vertical distribution of zooplankton in Lake Hayes and Lake Johnson. New Zeal J Mar Fresh 14: 189–204.
  • Eggermont H, Martens K (2011). Cladocera crustaceans: sentinels of environmental change. Hydrobiologia 676: 1–7.
  • Gokce D, Ozhan D (2011). Limno-ecological properties of deep reservoir, Karakaya HEPP, Turkey. Gazi University J Sci 24: 663–669.
  • Guevara G, Lozano P, Reinoso G, Villa F (2009). Horizontal and seasonal patterns of tropical zooplankton from the eutrophic Prado Reservoir (Colombia). Limnologica 39: 128–139.
  • Gulati RD, DeMott WR (1997). The role of food quality for zooplankton: remarks on the state-of-the-art, perspectives and priorities. Freshwater Biol 38: 753–768.
  • Hobæk A, Manca M, Anderson T (2002). Factors influencing species richness in lacustrine zooplankton. Acta Oecol 23: 121–135.
  • Hutchinson GE (1967). A Treatise on Limnology, Volume II: Introduction to Lake Biology and the Limnoplankton. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
  • Ignoffo TR, Bollensi SM, Bochdansky AB (2005). The effects of thin layers on the vertical distribution of the rotifer, Brachionus plicatilis. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 316: 167–181.
  • Jeppesen E, Nóges P, Davidson TA, Haberman J, Nóges T, Blank K, Lauridsen TL, Sİndergaard M, Sayer C, Laugaste R et al. (2011). Zooplankton as indicators in lakes: a scientific-based plea for including zooplankton in the ecological quality assessment of lakes according to the European Water Framework Directive (WFD). Hydrobiologia 676: 279–297.
  • Jongman RHG, ter Braak CFG, van Tongeren OFR (1995). Data Analysis in Community and Landscape Ecology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Kaya M, Fontaneto D, Segers H, Altındağ A (2010). Temperature and salinity as interacting drivers of species richness of planktonic rotifers in Turkish continental waters. J Limno 69: 297–304.
  • Legendre P, Gallagher ED (2001). Ecologically meaningful transformations for ordination of species data. Oecologia 129: 271–280. Liu Z, Hu Y (2001). Vertical distribution of the dominant planktonic crustaceans in a mesotrophic reservoir, Xujiahe Reservoir (Central China). Limnologica 31: 171–178.
  • Mageed AA, Heikal MT (2006). Factors affecting seasonal patterns in epilimnion zooplankton community in one of the largest man-made lakes in Africa (Lake Nasser, Egypt). Limnologica 36: 91–96.
  • Masson S, Angeli N, Guillard J, Pinel-Alloul B (2001). Diel vertical and horizontal distribution of crustacean zooplankton and young of the year fish in a sub-alpine lake: an approach based on high frequency sampling. J Plankton Res 23: 1041–1060.
  • Merck E (1974). The Testing of Water. Darmstadt: Merck and Company.
  • Morozov AY, Sergei V, Petrovskii S, Nikolay P, Nezlin NP (2007). Towards resolving the paradox of enrichment: the impact of zooplankton vertical migrations on plankton systems stability. J Theor Biol 248: 501–511.
  • Paranaguá MN, Neumann-Leitão S, Nogueira-Paranhos JD, Silva TA, Matsumura-Tundisi T (2005). Cladocerans (branchiopoda) of a tropical estuary in Brazil. Braz J Biol 65: 107–115.
  • Paterson M (1993). The distribution of microcrustacea in the littoral zone of a freshwater lake. Hydrobiologia 263: 173–183.
  • Persson J, Brett MT, Vrede T, Ravet JL (2007). Food quantity and quality regulation of trophic transfer between primary producers and a keystone grazer (Daphnia) in pelagic freshwater food webs. Oikos 116: 1152–1163.
  • Sellami I, Guermazi W, Hamza A, Aleya L, Ayadi H (2010). Seasonal dynamics of zooplankton community in four Mediterranean reservoirs in humid area (Beni Mtir: north of Tunisia) and semiarid area (Lakhmes, Nabhana, and Sidi Sâad: center of Tunisia). J Therm Biol 35: 392–400. ter Braak CFG (1989). CANOCO—an extension of DECORANA to analyse species- environment relationships. Hydrobiologia 184: 169–170.
  • Ustaoğlu MR (2004). A checklist for zooplankton of Turkish inland waters. EU J Fish Aquat Sci 21: 191–199.
  • Whitman RL, Nevers MB, Goodrich ML, Murphy PC, Davis BM (2004). Characterization of Lake Michigan coastal lakes using zooplankton assemblages. Ecol Indic 4: 277–286.
  • Wu L, Feng W (2012). Temporal heterogeneity of plankton community in Lake Dianchi and its relation to environmental factors. J Freshwater Ecol 27: 229–241.
  • Zhao J, Ramin M, Cheng V, Arhonditsis GB (2008). Plankton community patterns across a trophic gradient: the role of zooplankton functional groups. Ecol Modell 213: 417–436.