Can montane and cave centipedes inhabit soil?

Can montane and cave centipedes inhabit soil?

Communities of centipedes (Chilopoda) were studied at three localities in eastern Bohemia (Czech Republic) near the townof Skuteč using modified subterranean traps. Centipedes were trapped separately from depths of 5, 15, 25, 35, 45, 55, 65, 75, 85, and95 cm to allow evaluation of the vertical distribution in the soil. Presence of centipedes in deeper soil profiles is related to their abilityto colonize the subterranean environment.Lithobius tenebrosus fennoscandius ,L. lucifugus ,L. macilentus ,Cryptops parisi ,Strigamiaacuminata , andS. transsilvanicainhabited deeper soil layers preferentially. This study shows that soil can be inhabited by cave centipedesor centipedes with montane distribution.

___

  • Andersson G (2006). Habitat preferences and seasonal distribution of developmental stadia in Lamyctes emarginatus (Newport, 1844) ( L. fulvicornis Meinert, 1868) and comparisons with some Lithobius species. Norw J Entomol 53: 311-320.
  • Biteniekytė M, Rėlys V (2006). Investigation of activity and vertical distribution of spiders in Sphagnum tussocks of peat bogs. Biologija 2006: 77-82.
  • Christiansen K (1992). Biological processes in space and time. Cave life in the light of modern evolutionary theory. In: Camacho AI, editor. The Natural History of Biospeleology. Madrid, Spain: Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales, pp. 453-478.
  • Culver DC, Pipan T (2009). Superficial subterranean habitats – gateway to the subterranean realm? Cave Karst Sci 35: 5-12.
  • Deltshev C, Lazarov S, Naumova M, Stoev P (2011). A survey of spiders (Araneae) inhabiting the euedaphic soil stratum and the superficial underground compartment in Bulgaria. Arachnol Mitt 40: 33-46.
  • Dvořák L, Dvořáková K (2015). Some invertebrates found in underground shelters of the Dyleňský Kras karst. In: Bartoš J, Dvořák L, editors. Dyleňský Kras. Mariánské Lázně, Czech Republic: Městské Muzeum ML, pp. 145–156 (in Czech with English abstract).
  • Folkmanová B (1951). About some Chilopods new for Morava. Sborn Kl Přír Brno 29: 98-104 (in Czech).
  • Gulička J (1985). Soil and cave macrofauna of karst mountains of Western Carpathians (1). Slovenský kras 23: 89-129 (in Slovak).
  • Ilie V (2003). Chilopoda species from the edaphic and subterranean environments of the Cloşani karstic area (Romania). Trav Mus Nat Hist Nat “Grigore Antipa” 45: 129-137.
  • Ilie V (2004). Data on the Chilopoda species from the western Bihor Mountains (Romania). Trav Mus Nat Hist Nat “Grigore Antipa” 46: 67-73.
  • Ilie V, Negrea S, Mitič B (2003). The diversity of the Chilopoda species from the karstic area of the Anina mountains (Banat, Romania). Arch Biol Sci Belgrade 55: 93-99.
  • Laška V, Kopecký O, Růžička V, Mikula J, Véle A, Šarapatka B, Tuf IH (2011). Vertical distribution of spiders in soil. J Arachnol 39: 393-398.
  • López H, Oromí P (2010). A pitfall trap for sampling the mesovoid shallow substratum (MSS) fauna. Speleobiology Notes 2: 7-11.
  • Minelli A, Chagas A Jr, Edgecombe GD (2009). Saltational evolution of trunk segment number in centipedes. Evol Dev 11: 318-322.
  • Nitzu E, Giurginca A, Ilie V, Vặnoaica L (1999). First note on the edaphic and subterranean fauna from the evaporitic karstic regions of Romania. Trav Inst Speol Emil Racovita 37-38: 143- 157.
  • Novák J, Dányi L (2011). A Lithobius stygius infernus Loksa, 1948 taxonómiai helyzetének tisztázása. Állattani Közlemények 96: 15-22.
  • Ortuño VM, Gilgado JD, Jiménez-Valverde A, Sendra A, Pérez- Suárez G, Herrero-Borgoñón JJ (2013). The “Alluvial Mesovoid Shallow Substratum”, a new subterranean habitat. PLoS One 8: e76311.
  • Pipan T, López H, Oromí P, Polak S, Culver DC (2011). Temperature variation and the presence of troglobionts in terrestrial shallow subterranean habitats. J Nat Hist 45: 253-273.
  • Rendoš M, Mock A, Jászay T (2012). Spatial and temporal dynamics of invertebrates dwelling karstic mesovoid shallow substratum of Sivec National Nature Reserve (Slovakia), with emphasis on Coleoptera. Biologia 67: 1143-1151.
  • Rendoš M, Mock A, Miklisová D (2016). Terrestrial isopods and myriapods in a forested scree slope: subterranean biodiversity, depth gradient and annual dynamics. J Nat Hist 50: 2129-2142.
  • Růžička V (1999). The first steps in subterranean evolution of spiders (Araneae) in Central Europe. J Nat Hist 33: 255-265.
  • Růžička V, Laška V, Mikula J, Tuf IH (2011). Morphological adaptations of Porrhomma spiders inhabiting soil. J Arachnol 39: 355-357.
  • Růžička V, Mlejnek R, Juřičková L, Tajovský K, Šmilauer P, Zajíček P (2016). Invertebrates of the Macocha Abyss (Moravian Karst, Czech Republic). Acta Carsologica 45: 71-84.
  • Růžička V, Zacharda M, Šmilauer P, Kučera T (2015). Can paleorefugia of cold-adapted species in talus slopes resist global warming? Boreal Env Res 20: 403-412.
  • Schlick-Steiner BC, Steiner FM (2000). Eine neue Subterranfalle und Fänge aus Kärnten. Carinthia II 190: 475-482 (in German).
  • Tajovský K (1998). Terrestrial arthropods (Oniscidea, Diplopoda, Chilopoda) of Labské pískovce Protected Landscape Area (North Bohemia, Czech Republic). In: Pižl V, Tajovský K, editors. Soil Zoological Problems in Central Europe. České Budějovice, Czech Republic: Institute of Soil Biology ASCR, pp. 235-242.
  • Tajovský K (2000). Centipedes (Chilopoda) of Giant Mountains. Opera Concortica 36: 385-389 (in Czech).
  • Tuf IH (2002). Contribution to the knowledge of vertical distribution of soil macrofauna (Chilopoda, Oniscidea). In: Tajovský K, Balík V, Pižl V, editors. Studies on Soil Fauna in Central Europe. České Budějovice, Czech Republic: Institute of Soil Biology ASCR, pp. 241-246.
  • Tuf IH (2015). Different collecting methods reveal different ecological groups of centipedes. Zoologia (Curitiba) 32: 345-350.
  • Vališ J (1904). Preliminary check-list of Moravian myriapods. Věst Král Čes Spol náuk tř 2 28: 1-12 (in Czech).
  • Vandel A (1965). Biospeleology. The Biology of Cavernicolous Animals. Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press.