The Prevalence of Campylobacter jejuni in Various Sources in Kayseri, Turkey, and Molecular Analysis of Isolated Strains by PCR-RFLP

The objective of this study was to isolate, identify, and genotype Campylobacter jejuni from various sources in the province of Kayseri, Turkey. A total of 6667 samples consisting of 5167 human fecal swabs, 600 dog rectal swabs, 600 cattle gallbladders, and 300 chicken carcasses were examined. The samples were plated onto mCCDA (cefoperazone charcoal desoxycholate agar) agar. In order to identify C. jejuni, phenotypic tests and PCR (polymerase chain reaction) were performed. C. jejuni was isolated in 1.43%, 43.50%, 31.16%, and 56% of the human, dog, cattle, and chicken samples, respectively. Among the 690 C. jejuni strains that were isolated during the study period, 200 C. jejuni strains (50 strains from each species) were randomly selected. The selected strains were typed by using PCR-RFLP (polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism) fla-typing. DdeI and HinfI restriction enzymes were used for molecular typing. Following the DdeI enzyme application, the strains produced various numbers of bands between 4 and 7, with a total of 20 different band profiles. No similar band profiles were seen among the strains isolated from different sources. It was found that HinfI was not a more discriminative enzyme for fla-typing of C. jejuni isolates.

The Prevalence of Campylobacter jejuni in Various Sources in Kayseri, Turkey, and Molecular Analysis of Isolated Strains by PCR-RFLP

The objective of this study was to isolate, identify, and genotype Campylobacter jejuni from various sources in the province of Kayseri, Turkey. A total of 6667 samples consisting of 5167 human fecal swabs, 600 dog rectal swabs, 600 cattle gallbladders, and 300 chicken carcasses were examined. The samples were plated onto mCCDA (cefoperazone charcoal desoxycholate agar) agar. In order to identify C. jejuni, phenotypic tests and PCR (polymerase chain reaction) were performed. C. jejuni was isolated in 1.43%, 43.50%, 31.16%, and 56% of the human, dog, cattle, and chicken samples, respectively. Among the 690 C. jejuni strains that were isolated during the study period, 200 C. jejuni strains (50 strains from each species) were randomly selected. The selected strains were typed by using PCR-RFLP (polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism) fla-typing. DdeI and HinfI restriction enzymes were used for molecular typing. Following the DdeI enzyme application, the strains produced various numbers of bands between 4 and 7, with a total of 20 different band profiles. No similar band profiles were seen among the strains isolated from different sources. It was found that HinfI was not a more discriminative enzyme for fla-typing of C. jejuni isolates.

___

  • 1.Yogasundram. K., Shane S.M., Harrington, K.5.: Prevalence of Campylobacter jejuni in selected domestic and wild birds in Louisiana. Avian Dis., 1989: 33: 664-667.
  • 2.Aydın, F., Atabay. H.I.. Akan. M.: The isolation and characterization of Campylobacter jejuni subsp. jejuni from domestic geese (Anser anset). J. Appl, Microbiol, 2001; 90: 637-642.
  • 3.Biitzler, P.J.: Campylobacter, from obscurity to celebrity. Clin. Microbiol. Infect.. 2004: 10: 868-876.
  • 4.Wassenaar. T.M.. Newell, D.G.: Genotyping of Campylobacter spp. Appl. Environ, Microbiol,, 2000; 66: 1-9.
  • 5 Nielsen, E.M.. Engberg, J., Fussing, V., Petersen, L., Brogren, C.H., On, SI.W.: Evaluation of phenotypic and genotypic methods for subtyping Campylobacter jejuni isolates from humans, poultry and cattle. J. Clin. Microbiol.. 2000; 38: 3800-3810.
  • 6.Diker, K.S.: Koyun ve sığırlardan izole edilen Campylobacter türlerinin identıfıkasyonu üzerine çalışmalar. Doğa Bilim Derg, 1985;9:232-240,
  • 7.Diker, K.S., Yardıma, H.: Tavuklardan Campylobacter türlerinin izolasyon ve identifikasyonu üzerinde çalışmalar. TÜBİTAK-VHAG, 671 nolu proje. 1987.
  • 8.Gonzalez, l„ Grant, K.A., Richardson, P.T.. Park, S.F., Collins, M. D.: Specific identification of the e ntero pathogens Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli by using a PCR test based on the ceuE gene encoding a putative virulence determinant. J. Clin. Microbiol, 1997: 35: 759-763.
  • 9.CAMPYNET Website, http://www.svs.dk/campynet/
  • 10.Sokal, R.R., Sneath. P.H.A.: Principles of Numerical Taxonomy. W.H. Freeman. San Francisco, 1963; 359 pp.
  • 11.Harrington, C.S., Moran, L, Ridley, A.M.. Newell, D.G.. Madden, R.H: Inter-laboratory evaluation of three flagellin PCR/RFLP methods for typing Campylobacter jejuni and C. coli: the CAMPYNET experience. J. Appl. Microbiol.. 2003: 95: 1321-1333,
  • 12.Cony. J.E.L., Atabay, H.İ.: Poultry as a source of Campylobacter and related organisms. J. Appl. Microbiol., 2001; 90: 965-1145,
  • 13.Yıldız, A., Diker, K.S.: Campylobacter contamination in chicken carcasses. Doğa-Turk J. Vet. Anim. Sci., 1992; 16: 433-439.
  • 14.Kwiatek. K., Wojton, B., Stern, N.J.: Prevalence and distribution of Campylobacter spp. on poultry and selected red meat carcasses in Poland. J. Food Prot., 1990: 53: 127-130.
  • 15.Shih. D.Y.: Isolation and identification of enteropathogenic Campylobacter spp. from chicken samples in Taipei. J. Food Prot, 2000; 63: 304-308.
  • 16.Qui nones-Ramirez. E.I,, Vazquez-Salinas, C„ Rodas-Suarez, O.R., Ramos-Flores, M.O.. Rodriguez-Montano. R.: Frequency of isolation of Campylobacter from roasted chicken samples from Mexico city. J. Food. Prot, 2000; 63: 117-119.
  • 17.Özer, D., Ergün, O.: İstanbul piyasasında satışa sunulan çeşitli kanatlı eti ve ürünlerinde Campylobacter jejuni'nin varlığı üzerine araştırmalar. İstanbul Üniv. Vet. Fak. Derg., 1999; 25. 81-88.
  • 18.Inglis, G.D., Kalischuk. L.D., Busz, H.W.: A survey of Campylobacter species shed in faeces of beef cattle using polymerase chain reaction. Can. J. Microbiol, 2003; 49: 655-661.
  • 19.Nielsen, E.M.: Occurrence and strain diversity of thermophilic Campylobacters in cattle of different age groups in dairy herds. Lett. Appl. Microbiol., 2002; 35: 85-89.
  • 20.Torre, E,. Tello. M.: Factors influencing fecal shedding of Campylobacter jejuni in dogs without diarrhea. Am. J. Vet Res., 1993:54:260-262.
  • 21.Sandberg, M., Bergsjo. B., Hofshagen, M., Skjerve. E., Kruse, H.r Risk factors for Campylobacter infection in Norwegian cats and dogs. Prev. Vet Med.. 2002; 55: 241-253.
  • 22.Diker, K.S., Lstanbulluoğlu. E.: Sağlıklı ve sürgünlü hayvanlarda Campylobacter fetus subsp. jejuni izolasyonu üzerinde çalışmalar. Ankara Üniv. Vet. Fak Derg , 1983; 3D: 28-34.
  • 23.Cetın, C, Aytug", N., Kennerman, E.: İshalli ve sağlıklı buzağılarda Campylobacter jejuni ve Campylobacter coli prevalansı. Uludağ Üniv. Vet Fak. Derg., 2000; 19: 9-13.
  • 24.Işık, K., Köse, Ş., Esen, N,: Gastroenteritlerde Campylobacter jejuni araşbrması. İnfeksiyon Derg., 1996; 10: 337-338.
  • 25.Yıldırım, M.S., Sıjmerkan. B.. Fazlı, Ş.A.: Dışkı kültürlerinden izole edilen Campylobacter türlerinin antimikrobiyal ajanlara duyarlılıkları. ANKEM Derg., 1996; 10: 393-398.
  • 26.Aktaş. 0.. Tuncel. E.: Diyareli hastalarda Campylobacter jejuni yönünden bir araştırma. Mikrobiyol. Bült, 1987; 21: 79-85,
  • 27.Kıuchı. A.. Hara, M.. Pham, H.S., Takikawa. K., Itoh, R„ Tabuchi, K.: Detection and investigation of Campylobacter jejuni by polymerase chain react i on-restrict ion fragment length polymorphism analysis. Microbios.. 2000; 102: 159-164.
  • 28.Lindstedt. A.B.. Heir, E,, Vardund, T„ Melby. K.K.: Kapperud, G-: Comparative fingerprinting analysis of Campylobacter jejuni subsp. jejuni strains by amplified-fragment length polymorphism genotyping. J. Clin. Microbiol., 2000; 38: 3379-3387.
  • 29.Petersen, L. Newell, D.G.: The ability of fla-typing schemes to discriminate between strains of Campylobacter jejuni. J. Appl. Microbiol., 2001:91. 217-224.
  • 30.Ertaş, H.B.. Çetinkaya, B., Muz, A., Öngör, H.: Genotyping of broiler-originated Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli isolates using fla-typing and random amplified polymorphic DNA methods. Int. J. Food Microbiol., 2004; 94: 203-209.
  • 31.Owen, R.J., Leeton, S.; Restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis of the flaA gene of Campylobacter jejuni for subtyping human, animal and poultry isolates, FEMS Microbiol. Lett, 1999: 176: 345-350.
Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-0128
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 6 Sayı
  • Yayıncı: TÜBİTAK
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Chondroma in a Dog

Rıfkı HAZIROĞLU, Hasan BILGILI, Kübra A. TERIM KAPAKIN

Acid adaptation effect on survival of Escherichia coli 0157:H7 in fermented milk products

Aktuğ Şahika GÖNÜL, A. Kemal SEÇKİN, Halil TOSUN

Karbaril, Metiyokarb ve Karbosülfan’ın Gökkuşağı Alabalığı (Oncorhynchus mykiss) ve Lepistes (Poecilia reticulata) Balıkları Üzerine Akut Toksik Etkileri

Muhammet BORAN, İlhan ALTINOK, Erol ÇAPKIN, Hikmet KARAÇAM, Veysel BİÇER

Zoometrical Body Measurements and Their Relation with Liveweight in Native Turkish Geese

Mustafa SAATCI, Muammer TİLKİ

Acid Adaptation Effect on Survival of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in Fermented Milk Products

Halil TOSUN, A. Kemal SEÇKİN, Şahika AKTUĞ GÖNÜL

Kırıkkale (Türkiye)’de İnsan, Koyun ve Sığır Topluluklarında Bruselloz Seroprevalansı

Teoman Zafer APAN, Murat YILDIRIM, Ersin İSTANBULLUOĞLU

Isolation of Salmonella spp. in Camel sausages from retail markets in Aydın, Turkey, and polymerase Chain reaction (PCR) confirmation

Filiz KÖK, Gökben ÖZBEY, Adile MUZ

Pigmentation of rainbow (Oncorhynchus mykiss) with carotenoids from marigold flower (Tegates arecta) and red pepper (Capsicum annum)

Mahmut YANAR, Hakan Murat BÜYÜKÇAPAR, Yasemin YANAR

The Prevalence of Campylobacter jejuni in Various Sources in Kayseri, Turkey, and Molecular Analysis of Isolated Strains by PCR-RFLP

Fuat AYDIN, K. Semih GÜMÜŞSOY, Tuba İÇA, Bülent SÜMERKAN, Duygu EŞEL, Mehmet AKAN

Seroprevalence of brucellosis in human, sheep, and cattle populations in Kırıkkale (Turkey)

Teoman Zafer APAN, Ersin İSTANBULLUUOĞLU, Murat YILDIRIM