The forage quality and the in vitro ruminal digestibility, gas production, organic acids, and some estimated digestion parameters of tomato herbage silage with molasses and barley
The forage quality and the in vitro ruminal digestibility, gas production, organic acids, and some estimated digestion parameters of tomato herbage silage with molasses and barley
In this study, nutrient composition and use of silage after harvest of waste green parts (herbage) of tomato (Licopersiconesculentum L.) were researched as a wet forage source for ruminants. Three different silages of tomato herbage: without additive (TS),with 5% sugar beet molasses (TSm), or 5% crushed barley grain (TSb) were prepared. The forage quality and the in vitro ruminaldigestibility, gas production, organic acids, and some estimated digestion parameters for different silages of tomato herbage weredetermined. Besides, the in vitro digestion values of using at 25%, 50%, 75%, and 100% rates instead of corn silage in the dairy cattletotal mix ration (TMR) were researched. The lactic acid content of TSb silage was higher than those of the TS and TSm silages (P 0.05). Consequently, results have shown that tomato herbage should be ensiled with 5% molasses. However, ithas been concluded that using tomato herbage silage with barley up to 75% or sugar beet molasses up to 100% instead of corn silage indairy cattle ration did not have a negative effect in vitro.
___
- 1. Rodriguez F, Wu F, Ane C, Tanksley S, Spooner DM. Do
potatoes and tomatoes have a single evolutionary history, and
what proportion of the genome supports this history? BMC
Evolutionary Biology 2010; 9 (191): 1-16. doi: 10.1186/1471-
2148-9-191
- 2. Arab M, Bahramian B, Schindeler A, Valtchev P, Dehghani
F, McConchie R. Extraction of phytochemicals from tomato
leaf waste using subcritical carbon dioxide. Innovative
Food Science Emerging Technologies 2019; 57: 102204. doi:
10.1016/j.ifset.2019.102204
- 3. Fernandez-Gomez MJ, Diaz-Ravina M, Romero E,
Nogales R. Recycling of environmentally problematic plant
wastes generated from greenhouse tomato crops through
vermicomposting. International Journal of Environmental
Science and Technology 2013; 10 (4): 697-708. doi: 10.1007/
s13762-013-0239-7
- 4. Friedman M, Levin CE. α-tomatine content in tomatoes
and tomato products determined by HPLC with pulsed
amperometric detection. Journal of Agricultural and Food
Chemistry 1995; 43 (6): 1507-1511. doi: 10.1021/jf00054a017
- 5. Barceloux DG. Medical Toxicology of Natural Substances:
Foods, Fungi, Medicinal Herbs, Toxic Plants, and Venomous
Animals. 1st ed. Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons Inc;
2008. pp. 77-83.
- 6. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 2017.
FAO. http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC. (02.03.2017)
- 7. Ercolano MR, Gomez LD, Andolfi A, Simister R, Troise C et
al. Residual biomass saccharification in processing tomato
is affected by cultivar and nitrogen fertilization. Biomass
and Bioenergy 2015; 72 (1): 242-250. doi: 10.1016/j.
biombioe.2014.10.030
- 8. Kulcu R. Composting of greenhouse tomato plant residues,
wheat straw, and separated dairy manure, and the effect of
free air space on the process. Polish Journal of Environmental
Studies 2014; 23 (4): 1341-1346
- 9. Bicheldey TK, Latushkina EN. Biogas emission prognosis at
the landfills. International Journal of Environmental Science &
Technology 2010; 7 (4): 623-628. doi:10.1007/BF03326172
- 10. Haile E, Njonge FK, Asgedom G, Gicheha M. Chemical
composition and nutritive value of agro-industrial by-products
in ruminant nutrition. Open Journal of Animal Sciences 2017; 7
(1): 8-18. doi: 10.4236/ojas.2017.71002
- 11. Tayengwa T, Mapiye C. Citrus and winery wastes: promising
dietary supplements for sustainable ruminant animal nutrition,
health, production, and meat quality. Sustainability 2018; 10 (1):
1-22. doi: 10.3390/su10103718
- 12. Shaver R. Nutritional risk factors in the etiology of left displaced
abomasum in dairy cows: a review. Journal of Dairy Science 1997;
80 (10): 2449-2453. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(97)76197-6
- 13. IPCC. Summary for Policymakers. In: Climate Change 2014:
Mitigation of climate change. contribution of working group
iii to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel
on climate change. Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York,
NY, USA: Cambridge University Press: 2014
- 14. Cook BI, Anchukaitis KJ, Touchan R, Meko DM, Cook ER.
Spatiotemporal drought variability in the Mediterranean over
the last 900 years. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
2016; 121 (5): 2060-2074. doi: 10.1002/2015JD023929
- 15. Altin TB, Barak B, Altin BN. Change in precipitation and
temperature amounts over three decades in central Anatolia,
Turkey. Atmospheric Climate Sciences 2012; 2 (1): 107-125. doi:
10.4236/acs.2012.21013
- 16. Kara K, Guclu BK, Baytok E. Comparison of nutrient
composition and anti-methanogenic properties of different
Rosaceae species. Journal of Animal and Feed Sciences 2015; 24
(4): 308-314. doi: 10.22358/jafs/65613/2015
- 17. Kara K, Ozkaya S, Baytok E, et al. Effect of phenological stage on
nutrient composition, in vitro fermentation and gas production
kinetics of Plantago lanceolata herbage. Veterinarni Medicina
2018; 63 (6): 251-260. doi: 10.17221/2/2017-VETMED
- 18. Demirel M, Bolat D, Çelik S, Bakici Y, Çelik S. Quality of
silages from sunflower harvested at different vegetational
stages. Journal of Applied Animal Research 2006; 30 (2): 161-
165. doi: 10.1080/09712119.2006.9706610
- 19. Makkar HPS,Wadhwa M, Bakshi MPS. Utilization of fruit
and vegetable wastes as livestock feed and as substrates for
generation of other value-added products. Bangkok, Thailand.
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
FAO Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific; 2013. pp.1-56.
- 20. Bittman S, Kowalenko C. Advanced Silage Corn Management:
A Production guide for coastal British Columbia and the
Pacific Northwest. 1st ed. Agassiz, British Columbia. Pacific
Field Corn Association: 2004.
- 21. AOAC. Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Official
methods of analysis of AOAC International. Washington, DC,
USA. 1995.
- 22. Van-Soest PJ, Robertson JB, Lewis BA. Methods for dietary
fibre, neutral detergent fibre and non-starch polysaccharides in
relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science 1991; 74
(10): 3583-3597. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78551-2
- 23. NRC. National Research Council. Nutrient Requirements of
Dairy Cattle.7th Revised Edition.
National Academy Press,
Washington, DC, USA: 2001
- 24. Makkar HPS, Blummel M, Becker K. Formation of complexes
between polyvinyl pyrrolidones or polyethylene glycols and
their implication in gas production and true digestibility in
vitro techniques. British Journal of Nutrition 1995; 73 (6): 897-
913. doi: 10.1079/bjn19950095
- 25. Bernardes TF, Gervasio JRS, De Morais G, Casagrande DR.
Technical note: A comparison of methods to determine pH
in silages. Journal of Dairy Science 2019; 102 (10): 9039-9042.
doi: 10.3168/jds.2019-16553
- 26. Barnett AJ. The colorimetric determination of lactic acid in
silage. Biochemical Journal 1951; 49 (4): 527-529. doi: 10.1042/
bj0490527
- 27. Ersahince AC, Kara K. Nutrient composition and in
vitro digestion parameters of Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus
tuberosus L.) herbage at different maturity stages in horse and
ruminant. Journal of Animal and Feed Sciences 2017; 26 (3):
213-225. doi: 10.22358/jafs/76477/2017
- 28. Menke KH, Raab L, Salewski A, Steingass H. The estimation of
the digestibility and metabolizable energy content of ruminant
feedstuffs from the gas production when they are incubated
with rumen liquor. Journal of Agriculture Science 1979; 93 (1):
217-222. doi: 10.1017/S0021859600086305
- 29. Menke HH, Steingass H. Estimation of the energetic feed value
obtained from chemical analysis and in vitro gas production
using rumen fluid. Animal Research and Development 1988;
28 (1): 7-55.
- 30. Borreani G, Tabacco E, Schmidt RJ, Holmes BJ, Muck RE.
Silage review: Factors affecting dry matter and quality losses in
silages. Journal of Dairy Science 2018; 101 (5): 3952-3979. doi:
0.3168/jds.2017-13837
- 31. Podkowka Z, Podkowka L. Chemical composition and quality
of sweet sorghum and maize silages. Journal of Central
European Agriculture 2011; 12 (2): 294-303.
- 32. Kara K, Aktug E, Ozkaya S. Ruminal digestibility, microbial
count, volatile fatty acids and gas kinetics of alternative
forage sources for arid and semi-arid areas as in vitro.
Italian Journal of Animal Science 2016; 15 (4): 673-680. doi:
10.1080/1828051X.2016.1249420
- 33. Min BR, Pinchak WE, Anderson RC, Fulford JD, Puchala R.
Effects of condensed tannins supplementation level on weight
gain and in vitro and in vivo bloat precursors in steers grazing
winter wheat. Journal of Animal Science 2006; 84 (9): 2546-
2554. doi: 10.2527/jas.2005-590
- 33. Woolford MK, Pahlow G. The silage fermentation. In: Wood
BJB (editor). Microbiology of Fermented Foods, 2nd ed.
Boston, MA, USA: Springer, 1998.
- 34. Beana BW, Baumhardt RL, McCollum FT, McCuistiona KC.
Comparison of sorghum classes for grain and forage yield and
forage nutritive value. Field Crops Research 2013; 142 (1): 20-
26. doi: 0.1016/j.fcr.2012.11.014