Hatice Dilek ARSOY

The effect of year, month, region, and herd size on bulk tank somatic cell and standard plate count, and the determination of optimum herd size in the intensive Holstein Friesian dairy farms in the Turkish Republic of Cyprus

The objective of this study was to determine the effects of mount, year, region, and herd size on the bulk tank somatic cell count (SCC) and standard plate count (SPC) and total milk production of Holstein Friesian cows and to decide for optimum herd size in Northern Cyprus. The total number of cattle was 64,450 heads and the number of enterprises was 168 in 2016. The milk samples were collected once or twice a month from each herd. SCC and SPC were determined with the Fluoro-opto-electronic counter method. Herd sizes were described from small to extra-large enterprises for Northern Cyprus conditions and six groups were created. The least squares means were compared among the herd size, region, month, and year for the data set. From 2012 to 2016, there was a significant amount (39.49%) of increase in milk production. While the total share of the enterprises which sold chilled milk was 22.36–28.82% in 2012–2016, the chilled milk production corresponded to 71.7–79% of all the dairy market. Bulk tank SCC numbers were found to be significantly higher in herds smaller than 40 and larger than 200 heads (P < 0.05). In the medium-sized enterprises (40–150 heads, Groups 2, 3, and 4), the number of bulk tank SCC was below the threshold level (400,000 cells/mL). The number of bulk tank SPC was found to be significantly higher in flocks with

PDF

___

1. Smith JW, Guthrie LD, Ely LO. Effect of herd size on management variables in Holstein herds. Journal of Dairy Science 1995; 98 ( Suppl. 1 ): 318.
2. Bailey K, Hardin D, Spain J, Garrett J, Hoehne J et al. An economic simulation study of large-scale dairy units in the Midwest. Journal of Dairy Science1997; 80: pp. 205-214.
3. Oleggini GH, Ely LO, Smith JW. Effect of region and herd size on dairy herd performance parameters. Journal of Dairy Science 2001; 84: pp. 1044-1050
4. Hill DL, Wall E. Dairy cattle in a temperate climate: the effects of weather on milk yield and composition depend on management. Animal2015; 9(1): 138-49 doi: 10.1017/ S1751731114002456
5. Quintão LC, Cunha AF, da Bragança LJ, Coelho KS, Nunes MF et al. Evolution and factors influencing somatic cell count in raw milk from farms in Viçosa, state of Minas Gerais. Acta Science, Animal Science 2017; 39 (4) doi: 10.4025/ actascianimsci.v39i4.35364
6. Archer SC, McCoy F, Wapenaar W, Green MJ. Association of season and herd size with somatic cell count for cows in Irish, English, and Welsh dairy herds. Veterinary Journal 2013; 196: pp. 515-521.
7. Ingham SC, Hu Y, Anet C. Comparison of bulk-tank standard plate count and somatic cell count for Wisconsin dairy farms in three size categories. Journal of Dairy Science 2011; 94: 4237- 424. doi: 10.3168/jds.2011-4310.
8. Srairi MT, Benhouda H, Kuper M, Le Gal PY. Effect of cattle management practices on raw milk quality on farms operating in a two-stage dairy chain. Tropical animal health and production 2009; 41 (2): 259-272.
9. Seegers H, Fourichon C, Beaudeau F. Production effects related to mastitis and mastitis economics in dairy cattle herds. Veterinary Research 2003; 34 (5): 475-491. doi: 10.1051/ vetres:2003027
10. Murphy SC, Boor KJ. Trouble-shooting sources and causes of high bacteria counts in raw milk. Dairy Food Environment Sanitation 2000; 20: 606- 611.
11. Schukken YH, Wilson DJ, Welcome F, Garrison-Tikofsky L, Gonzalez RN. Monitoring udder health and milk quality using somatic cell counts. Veterinary Research 2003; 34 (5): 579-596. doi: 10.1051/vetres:2003028
12. Neave FK, Dodd FH, Kingwill RG, Westgarth DR. Control of mastitis in the dairy herd by hygiene and management. Journal of Dairy Science 1969; 52: pp: 696-707.
13. Reneau JK, Schukken YH, Wilson DJ, Barkema HW. Somatic cell counts: meausures of farm management and milk quaility. In: Proceedings of National Mastits Council, Regional Meeting, Syracuse, New York 2002; pp. 1-10.
14. Sharma N, Singh NK, Bhadwal MS. Relationship of somatic cell count and mastitis: an overview. Asian-Australian Journal of Animal Science 2011; 24 (3): 429-438.
15. Deshapriya RMC, Rahularaj R, Ransinghe RMSBK. Mastitis, somatic cell count and milk quality: an overview. Sri Lanka Veterinary Journal 2019; 66 (1): pp. 1-12. doi: 10.4038/slvj. v66i1.32
16. Detilleux J. Tolerance to bovine clinical mastitis: Total, direct, and indirect milk losses. Journal of Dairy Science 2018; 101(4): 334-3343. doi: 10.3168/jds.2017-13976
17. Dürr JW, Cue RI,Monardes HG, Moro-Mendez J, Wade KM. Milk losses associated with somatic cell counts per breed, parity and stage of lactation in Canadian dairy cattle. Livestock Science 2018; 117: pp. 225-232.
18. O’Connell A, McParland S, Ruegg PL, O’Brien B, Gleeson D. Seasonal trends in milk quality in Ireland between 2007 and 2011. Journal of Dairy Science 2015; 98(6):3778-90. doi: 10.3168/jds.2014-9001
19. Shook GE. Approaches to summarizing somatic cell count which improve interpretability. In: Proceedings of 21st Annual Meeting of the National Mastitis Council, Arlington, VA, USA; February 15-18, 1982. pp. 150-166.
20. Rodrigues ACO, Caraviello DZ, Ruegg PL. Management of Wisconsin dairy herds enrolled in milk quality teams. Journal of Dairy Science 2005; 88: pp. 2660-2671.
21. Schaik G, Lotem M, Schukken YH, Rodrigues ACO, Caraviello DZ et al. Management of Wisconsin dairy herds enrolled in milk quality teams. Journal of Dairy Science2005; 88: pp. 2660-2671.
22. Rhone JA, Koonawootrittriron S, Elzo MA. Factors affecting milk yield, milk fat, bacterial score, and bulk tank SCC of dairy farms in the central region of Thailand. Tropical Animal Health and Production 2008; 40: pp.147-153. doi: 10.1007/ s11250-007-9074-5
23. Nasr MAF, El-Tarabany MS. Impact of three THI levels on somatic cell count, milk yield and composition of multiparous Holstein cows in a subtropical region. Journal of Thermal Biology 2017; 64: 73-77. doi: 10.1016/j.jtherbio.2017.01.004
24. Smith DL, Smith T, Rude BJ, Ward SH. Comparison of the effects of heat stress on milk and component yields and somatic cell score in Holstein and Jersey cows. Journal of Dairy Science 2013; 96 (5): 3028-3033. doi: 10.3168/jds.2012-5737
25. Cincović MR, Belić BM, Toholj BD, Radović IV, Vidović BR. The influence of THI values at different periods of lactation on milk quality and characteristics of lactation curve. Journal of Agriculture Science (Belgrade) 2010; 55: 235-241.
26. Huijps K, Hogeveen H, Antonides G, Valeeva NI, Lam TJGM et al. Sub-optimal economic behavior with respect to mastitis management. European Review Agricultural Economics 2010; 37: pp. 553-568.
27. Nada S, Ilija D, Igor T, Jelena M, Ruzica G. Implication of food safety measures on microbiological quality of raw and pasteurized milk. Food Control 2012; 25 (2): pp. 728-731.
28. Rhoda DA, Pantoja JCF. Using mastitis records and somatic cell count data. Veterinary Clinics of North America Food Animal Practice 2012; 28: pp. 347-361.
29. Allore HG, Oltenacu PA, Erb HN. Effects of season, herd size, and geographic region on the composition and quality of milk in the Northeast. Journal of Dairy Science 1997; 80 (11): pp. 3040-3049. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(97)7627-4