Sheep welfare during transport and slaughter in Bulgaria – Impact of welfare on slaughter carcass and meat quality: a review
Sheep welfare during transport and slaughter in Bulgaria – Impact of welfare on slaughter carcass and meat quality: a review
The present work aimed to review the state of sheep welfare in Bulgaria during transportation and slaughter and to evaluateits relationship with slaughter carcass and meat quality. Over the last few years, animal welfare has become increasingly important.Normative documents related to welfare during rearing, transport, and slaughter of animals have been developed and promulgated.A major percentage of these animals are reared for meat production, but attempts to minimize stress and pain during transport andslaughter should be made. Stress reduction and pain control improve animal welfare and also impact carcass and meat quality. Thisoverview demonstrates that improper preslaughter handling deteriorates meat quality and increases stress levels in animals. Consumersare increasingly concerned about meat quality and are even ready to pay more to purchase products of higher quality. One of the mainways for improvement of meat quality is to comply with animal welfare standards. This review focuses on some EU countries such asBulgaria, taking interest in proper preslaughter handling of sheep due to its beneficial effects on meat and carcass qualities. In addition,this review highlights the factors to consider in sheep handling and their effect on meat and carcass quality.
___
- 1. Gregory N, Grandin T. Animal Welfare and Meat Science. New
York, NY, USA: CABI Publishing; 1998.
- 2. Dawkins MS. The science of animal suffering. Ethology 2008;
114: 937-945. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0310.2008.01557.x
- 3. Dawkins MS. Animal welfare and efficient farming: is conflict
inevitable? Animal Production Science 2017; 57: 201-208.
- 4. Ohl F, van der Staay FJ. Animal welfare: At the interface
between science and society. The Veterinary Journal 2012; 192:
13-19. doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2011.05.019
- 5. Botreau R, Veissier I, Butterworth A, Bracke MBM, Keeling LJ.
Definition of criteria for overall assessment of animal welfare.
Animal Welfare 2007; 16: 225-228.
- 6. Grandin T. Animal welfare in slaughter plants. In: 29th Annual
Conference of American Association of Bovine Practitioners;
1996. pp. 22-26.
- 7. Animal Protection Act, Effective from 31.01.2008; Prom. State
Gazette Issue 13 of February 8, 2008, Amend. State Gazette
Issue 80 of 9 October 2009, Amend. State Gazette Issue 8 of 25
January 2011, Amend. State Gazette No. 92 of November 22,
2011, Amend. State Gazette Issue 53 of June 27, 2014, Amend.
State Gazette Issue 34 of 3 May 2016, Amend. State Gazette
Issue 58 of July 18, 2017, Amend. State Gazette Issue 17 of 23
February 2018 (in Bulgarian).
- 8. Ordinance No. 22 of 14 December 2005 to Minimize Animal
Suffering During Slaughter or Killing (Prom. State Gazette No.
42 of May 25, 2006) (in Bulgarian).
- 9. Ordinance No. 16 of 3 February 2006 on the Protection and
Welfare of Farm Animals during Breeding and Use (Prom.
State Gazette, Issue 18 of 28 February 2006) (in Bulgarian).
- 10. Ordinance No. 26 of 28 February 2006 on Conditions for the
Protection and Welfare of Animals During Transport (Publ.
State Gazette No. 23 of 17 May 2006) (in Bulgarian).
- 11. Council Regulation (EC) No. 1/2005 of 22 December 2004
on the Protection of Animals During Transport and Related
Operations and Amending Directives 64/432/EEC and 93/119/
EC and Regulation (EC) No. 1255/97 (in Bulgarian).
- 12. Chulayo AY, Tada O, Muchenje V. Research on pre-slaughter
stress and meat quality: a review of challenges faced under
practical conditions. Applied Animal Husbandry & Rural
Development 2013; 43 (Suppl. 1): 64-68.
- 13. Costa LN. Short-term stress: the case of transport and slaughter.
Italian Journal of Animal Science 2009; 8 (Suppl. 1): 241-252.
doi: 10.4081/ijas.2009.s1.241
- 14. Adenkola AY, Ayo JO. Physiological and behavioural responses
of livestock to road transportation stress: a review. African
Journal of Biotechnology 2010; 9 (31): 4845-4856.
- 15. Hemsworth PH, Rice M, Karlen MG, Calleja L, Barnett JL et al.
Human–animal interactions at abattoirs: relationships between
handling and animal stress in sheep and cattle. Applied Animal
Behaviour Science 2011; 135 (1-2): 24-33.
- 16. Liste G, Miranda-de la Lama GC, Campo MM, Villarroel
M, Muela E et al. Effect of lairage on lamb welfare and meat
quality. Animal Production Science 2011; 51: 952-958.
- 17. Zivotofsky AZ, Strous RD. A perspective on the electrical
stunning of animals: are there lessons to be learned from
human electro-convulsive therapy (ECT)? Meat Science 2012;
90 (4): 956-961. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2011.11.039
- 18. Ouali A. Proteolytic and physicochemical mechanisms
involved in meat texture development. Biochimie 1992; 74 (3):
251-265.
- 19. Koohmaraie M. Biochemical factors regulating the toughening
and tenderization processes of meat. Meat Science 1996; 43
(Suppl. 1) 193-201. doi: 10.1016/0309-1740(96)00065-4
- 20. Santos A, Giráldez F, Mateo J, Frutos J, Andrés S. Programming
Merino lambs by early feed restriction reduces growth rates
and increases fat accretion during the fattening period with
no effect on meat quality traits. Meat Science 2018; 135: 20-26.
doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2017.08.007
- 21. Botha SSC, Hoffman LC, Britz TJ. Effects of post mortem
temperature on rigor tension, shortening and pH in ostrich
muscle. South African Journal of Animal Science 2008; 38 (3):
184-192.
- 22. Ouali A, Herrera-Mendez CN, Coulis G, Becila S, Boudjellal
A et al. Revisiting the conversion of muscle into meat and the
underlying mechanisms. Meat Science 2006; 74: 44-58. doi:
10.1016/j.meatsci.2006.05.010
- 23. Vasilev K. Technology of Meat Products. Sofia, Bulgaria:
Matkom Publishing House; 2003 (in Bulgarian).
- 24. Feiner G. Meat Products Handbook. Practical Science and
Technology. Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press; 2006.
- 25. Kaić A, Žgur S. The effect of structural and biochemical changes
of muscles during post-mortem process on meat tenderness.
Journal of Central European Agriculture 2017; 18 (4): 929-941.
doi: 10.5513/JCEA01/18.4.1987
- 26. Kosowska M, Majcher MA, Fortuna T. Volatile compounds in
meat and meat products. Food Science and Technology 2017;
37 (1): 1-7. doi: 10.1590/1678-457X.08416
- 27. Koohmaraie M, Babiker AS, Schroeder AL, Merkel RA,
Dutson TR. Acceleration of postmortem tenderization in ovine
carcasses through activation of Ca2+ dependent proteases.
Journal of Food Science 1988; 53 (6): 1638-1641.
- 28. Koohmaraie M. The role of Ca2+-dependent proteases (calpains)
in post mortem proteolysis and meat tenderness. Biochimie
1992; 74 (3): 239-245. doi: 10.1016/0300-9084(92)90122-U
- 29. Immonen K, Puolanne E. Variation of residual glycogenglucose
concentration at ultimate pH values below 5.75.
Meat Science 2000; 55 (3): 279-283. doi: 10.1016/S0309-
1740(99)00152-7
- 30. Adegoke GO, Falade KO. Quality of meat. Journal of Food,
Agriculture & Environment 2005; 3 (1): 87-90.
- 31. Marsh BB, Leet NG. Studies in meat tenderness. III. The effects
of cold shortening on tenderness. Journal of Food Science
1966; 31 (3): 450-459. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2621.1966.tb00520.x
- 32. Tornberg E. Biophysical aspects of meat tenderness.
Meat Science 1996; 43 (S): 175-191. doi: 10.1016/0309-
1740(96)00064-2
- 33. Toohey ES, Hopkins DL, McLeod BM, Nielsen SG. Quantifying
the rate of pH and temperature decline in lamb carcasses at
three abattoirs in New South Wales. Australian Journal of
Experimental Agriculture 2006; 46: 875-878.
- 34. Jaime I, Beltrán JA, Ceña P, López-Lorenzo P, Roncalés P.
Tenderisation of lamb meat: effect of rapid postmortem
temperature drop on muscle conditioning and aging. Meat
Science 1992; 32 (4): 357-366.
- 35. Bellés M, Alonso V, Roncalés P, Beltrán JA. A review of fresh
lamb chilling and preservation. Small Ruminant Research
2017; 146: 41-47. doi: 10.1016/j.smallrumres.2016.12.003
- 36. Brewer P, Calkins C. Quality Traits of Grain- and Grass-Fed
Beef: a Review. Nebraska Beef Cattle Reports. Lincoln, NE,
USA: Animal Science Department, University of Nebraska;
2003.
- 37. Eriksen MS, Rødbotten R, Grøndahl AM, Friestad M, Andersen
IL et al. Mobile abattoir versus conventional slaughterhouse-
Impact on stress parameters and meat quality characteristics
in Norwegian lambs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 2013;
149 (1-4): 21-29. doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2013.09.007
- 38. Ferguson DM, Warner RD. Have we underestimated the impact
of pre-slaughter stress on meat quality in ruminants? Meat
Science 2008; 80 (1): 12-19. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2008.05.004
- 39. Dokmanović M, Velarde A, Tomović V, Glamočlija N,
Marković R et al. The effects of lairage time and handling
procedure prior to slaughter on stress and meat quality
parameters in pigs. Meat Science 2014; 98 (2): 220-226. doi:
10.1016/j.meatsci.2014.06.003
- 40. Ferguson DM, Bruce HL, Thompson JM, Egan AF, Perry D
et al. Factors affecting beef palatability – farm gate to chilled
carcass. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 2001;
41 (7): 879-891. doi: 10.1071/EA00022
- 41. Ribarski S, Ivanov N, Miteva D. Effects of transportation and
pre-slaughter rest pig welfare and carcass quality. Journal of
Animal Science (BG) 2015; 6: 65-71 (in Bulgarian with an
abstract in English).
- 42. Kadim IT, Mahgoub O, AlKindi, AY, Al-Marzooqi1 W,
Al-Saqri NM. Effect of transportation at high ambient
temperatures on physiological responses, carcass and meat
quality characteristics in two age groups of Omani sheep.
Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences 2007; 20 (3):
424-431.
- 43. Ekiz B, Ekiz EE, Kocak O, Yalcintan H, Yilmaz A. Effect of preslaughter
management regarding transportation and time in
lairage on certain stress parameters, carcass and meat quality
characteristics in Kivircik lambs. Meat Science 2012; 90 (4):
967-976. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2011.11.042
- 44. Kadim IT, Mahgoub O, Al-Kindi A, Al-Marzooqi W, Al-Saqri
NM. Effects of transportation at high ambient temperatures
on physiological responses, carcass and meat quality
characteristics of three breeds of Omani goats. Meat Science
2006; 73 (4): 626-634. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2006.03.003
- 45. De la Fuente J, Sanchez M, Perez C, Lauzuricа S, Vieira C et al.
Physiological response and carcass and meat quality of suckling
lambs in relation to transport time and stocking density during
transport by road. Animal 2010; 4 (3): 250-258. doi: 10.1017/
S1751731109991108
- 46. Miranda-de la Lama GC, Monge P, Villarroel M, Olleta JL,
García-Belenguer S et al. Effects of road type during transport
on lamb welfare and meat quality in dry hot climates. Tropical
Animal Health and Production 2011; 43 (5): 915-922. doi:
10.1007/s11250-011-9783-7
- 47. Ruiz-De-La-Torre JL, Velarde A, Diestre A, Gispert M, Hall
SJG et al. Effects of vehicle movements during transport on the
stress responses and meat quality of sheep. Veterinary Record
2001; 148 (8): 227-229. doi: 10.1136/vr.148.8.227
- 48. Díaz MT, Vieira C, Pérez C, Lauzurica S, Chávarri EG et al.
Effect of lairage time (0 h, 3 h, 6 h or 12 h) on glycogen content
and meat quality parameters in suckling lambs. Meat Science
2014; 96 (2): 653-660. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2013.10.013
- 49. Vergara H, Linares MB, Berruga MI, Gallego L. Meat quality in
suckling lambs: effect of pre-slaughter handling. Meat Science
2005; 69 (3): 473-478. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2004.09.002
- 50. Linares MB, Bórnez R, Vergara H. Effect of different stunning
systems on meat quality of light lamb. Meat Science 2007; 76
(4): 675-681. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2007.02.007