195131

Sheep welfare during transport and slaughter in Bulgaria - Impact of welfare on slaughter carcass and meat quality: a review

The present work aimed to review the state of sheep welfare in Bulgaria during transportation and slaughter and to evaluate its relationship with slaughter carcass and meat quality. Over the last few years, animal welfare has become increasingly important. Normative documents related to welfare during rearing, transport, and slaughter of animals have been developed and promulgated. A major percentage of these animals are reared for meat production, but attempts to minimize stress and pain during transport and slaughter should be made. Stress reduction and pain control improve animal welfare and also impact carcass and meat quality. This overview demonstrates that improper preslaughter handling deteriorates meat quality and increases stress levels in animals. Consumers are increasingly concerned about meat quality and are even ready to pay more to purchase products of higher quality. One of the main ways for improvement of meat quality is to comply with animal welfare standards. This review focuses on some EU countries such as Bulgaria, taking interest in proper preslaughter handling of sheep due to its beneficial effects on meat and carcass qualities. In addition, this review highlights the factors to consider in sheep handling and their effect on meat and carcass quality.

Keywords:

Animal welfare, animal handling, carcass and meat quality transportation,

PDF

___

1. Gregory N, Grandin T. Animal Welfare and Meat Science. New York, NY, USA: CABI Publishing; 1998.
2. Dawkins MS. The science of animal suffering. Ethology 2008; 114: 937-945. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0310.2008.01557.x
3. Dawkins MS. Animal welfare and efficient farming: is conflict inevitable? Animal Production Science 2017; 57: 201-208.
4. Ohl F, van der Staay FJ. Animal welfare: At the interface between science and society. The Veterinary Journal 2012; 192: 13-19. doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2011.05.019
5. Botreau R, Veissier I, Butterworth A, Bracke MBM, Keeling LJ. Definition of criteria for overall assessment of animal welfare. Animal Welfare 2007; 16: 225-228.
6. Grandin T. Animal welfare in slaughter plants. In: 29th Annual Conference of American Association of Bovine Practitioners; 1996. pp. 22-26.
7. Animal Protection Act, Effective from 31.01.2008; Prom. State Gazette Issue 13 of February 8, 2008, Amend. State Gazette Issue 80 of 9 October 2009, Amend. State Gazette Issue 8 of 25 January 2011, Amend. State Gazette No. 92 of November 22, 2011, Amend. State Gazette Issue 53 of June 27, 2014, Amend. State Gazette Issue 34 of 3 May 2016, Amend. State Gazette Issue 58 of July 18, 2017, Amend. State Gazette Issue 17 of 23 February 2018 (in Bulgarian).
8. Ordinance No. 22 of 14 December 2005 to Minimize Animal Suffering During Slaughter or Killing (Prom. State Gazette No. 42 of May 25, 2006) (in Bulgarian).
9. Ordinance No. 16 of 3 February 2006 on the Protection and Welfare of Farm Animals during Breeding and Use (Prom. State Gazette, Issue 18 of 28 February 2006) (in Bulgarian).
10. Ordinance No. 26 of 28 February 2006 on Conditions for the Protection and Welfare of Animals During Transport (Publ. State Gazette No. 23 of 17 May 2006) (in Bulgarian).
11. Council Regulation (EC) No. 1/2005 of 22 December 2004 on the Protection of Animals During Transport and Related Operations and Amending Directives 64/432/EEC and 93/119/ EC and Regulation (EC) No. 1255/97 (in Bulgarian).
12. Chulayo AY, Tada O, Muchenje V. Research on pre-slaughter stress and meat quality: a review of challenges faced under practical conditions. Applied Animal Husbandry & Rural Development 2013; 43 (Suppl. 1): 64-68.
17. Zivotofsky AZ, Strous RD. A perspective on the electrical stunning of animals: are there lessons to be learned from human electro-convulsive therapy (ECT)? Meat Science 2012; 90 (4): 956-961. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2011.11.039
18. Ouali A. Proteolytic and physicochemical mechanisms involved in meat texture development. Biochimie 1992; 74 (3): 251-265.
19. Koohmaraie M. Biochemical factors regulating the toughening and tenderization processes of meat. Meat Science 1996; 43 (Suppl. 1) 193-201. doi: 10.1016/0309-1740(96)00065-4
20. Santos A, Giráldez F, Mateo J, Frutos J, Andrés S. Programming Merino lambs by early feed restriction reduces growth rates and increases fat accretion during the fattening period with no effect on meat quality traits. Meat Science 2018; 135: 20-26. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2017.08.007
21. Botha SSC, Hoffman LC, Britz TJ. Effects of post mortem temperature on rigor tension, shortening and pH in ostrich muscle. South African Journal of Animal Science 2008; 38 (3): 184-192.
22. Ouali A, Herrera-Mendez CN, Coulis G, Becila S, Boudjellal A et al. Revisiting the conversion of muscle into meat and the underlying mechanisms. Meat Science 2006; 74: 44-58. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2006.05.010
23. Vasilev K. Technology of Meat Products. Sofia, Bulgaria: Matkom Publishing House; 2003 (in Bulgarian).
24. Feiner G. Meat Products Handbook. Practical Science and Technology. Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press; 2006.
25. Kaić A, Žgur S. The effect of structural and biochemical changes of muscles during post-mortem process on meat tenderness. Journal of Central European Agriculture 2017; 18 (4): 929-941. doi: 10.5513/JCEA01/18.4.1987
26. Kosowska M, Majcher MA, Fortuna T. Volatile compounds in meat and meat products. Food Science and Technology 2017; 37 (1): 1-7. doi: 10.1590/1678-457X.08416
27. Koohmaraie M, Babiker AS, Schroeder AL, Merkel RA, Dutson TR. Acceleration of postmortem tenderization in ovine carcasses through activation of Ca2+ dependent proteases. Journal of Food Science 1988; 53 (6): 1638-1641.
28. Koohmaraie M. The role of Ca2+-dependent proteases (calpains) in post mortem proteolysis and meat tenderness. Biochimie 1992; 74 (3): 239-245. doi: 10.1016/0300-9084(92)90122-U
29. Immonen K, Puolanne E. Variation of residual glycogenglucose concentration at ultimate pH values below 5.75. Meat Science 2000; 55 (3): 279-283. doi: 10.1016/S0309- 1740(99)00152-7
30. Adegoke GO, Falade KO. Quality of meat. Journal of Food, Agriculture & Environment 2005; 3 (1): 87-90.
31. Marsh BB, Leet NG. Studies in meat tenderness. III. The effects of cold shortening on tenderness. Journal of Food Science 1966; 31 (3): 450-459. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2621.1966.tb00520.x
32. Tornberg E. Biophysical aspects of meat tenderness. Meat Science 1996; 43 (S): 175-191. doi: 10.1016/0309- 1740(96)00064-2
33. Toohey ES, Hopkins DL, McLeod BM, Nielsen SG. Quantifying the rate of pH and temperature decline in lamb carcasses at three abattoirs in New South Wales. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 2006; 46: 875-878.
34. Jaime I, Beltrán JA, Ceña P, López-Lorenzo P, Roncalés P. Tenderisation of lamb meat: effect of rapid postmortem temperature drop on muscle conditioning and aging. Meat Science 1992; 32 (4): 357-366.
35. Bellés M, Alonso V, Roncalés P, Beltrán JA. A review of fresh lamb chilling and preservation. Small Ruminant Research 2017; 146: 41-47. doi: 10.1016/j.smallrumres.2016.12.003
36. Brewer P, Calkins C. Quality Traits of Grain- and Grass-Fed Beef: a Review. Nebraska Beef Cattle Reports. Lincoln, NE, USA: Animal Science Department, University of Nebraska; 2003.
37. Eriksen MS, Rødbotten R, Grøndahl AM, Friestad M, Andersen IL et al. Mobile abattoir versus conventional slaughterhouseImpact on stress parameters and meat quality characteristics in Norwegian lambs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 2013; 149 (1-4): 21-29. doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2013.09.007
38. Ferguson DM, Warner RD. Have we underestimated the impact of pre-slaughter stress on meat quality in ruminants? Meat Science 2008; 80 (1): 12-19. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2008.05.004
39. Dokmanović M, Velarde A, Tomović V, Glamočlija N, Marković R et al. The effects of lairage time and handling procedure prior to slaughter on stress and meat quality parameters in pigs. Meat Science 2014; 98 (2): 220-226. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2014.06.003
40. Ferguson DM, Bruce HL, Thompson JM, Egan AF, Perry D et al. Factors affecting beef palatability – farm gate to chilled carcass. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 2001; 41 (7): 879-891. doi: 10.1071/EA00022
41. Ribarski S, Ivanov N, Miteva D. Effects of transportation and pre-slaughter rest pig welfare and carcass quality. Journal of Animal Science (BG) 2015; 6: 65-71 (in Bulgarian with an abstract in English).
42. Kadim IT, Mahgoub O, AlKindi, AY, Al-Marzooqi1 W, Al-Saqri NM. Effect of transportation at high ambient temperatures on physiological responses, carcass and meat quality characteristics in two age groups of Omani sheep. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences 2007; 20 (3): 424-431.
43. Ekiz B, Ekiz EE, Kocak O, Yalcintan H, Yilmaz A. Effect of preslaughter management regarding transportation and time in lairage on certain stress parameters, carcass and meat quality characteristics in Kivircik lambs. Meat Science 2012; 90 (4): 967-976. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2011.11.042
44. Kadim IT, Mahgoub O, Al-Kindi A, Al-Marzooqi W, Al-Saqri NM. Effects of transportation at high ambient temperatures on physiological responses, carcass and meat quality characteristics of three breeds of Omani goats. Meat Science 2006; 73 (4): 626-634. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2006.03.003
45. De la Fuente J, Sanchez M, Perez C, Lauzuricа S, Vieira C et al. Physiological response and carcass and meat quality of suckling lambs in relation to transport time and stocking density during transport by road. Animal 2010; 4 (3): 250-258. doi: 10.1017/ S1751731109991108
46. Miranda-de la Lama GC, Monge P, Villarroel M, Olleta JL, García-Belenguer S et al. Effects of road type during transport on lamb welfare and meat quality in dry hot climates. Tropical Animal Health and Production 2011; 43 (5): 915-922. doi: 10.1007/s11250-011-9783-7
47. Ruiz-De-La-Torre JL, Velarde A, Diestre A, Gispert M, Hall SJG et al. Effects of vehicle movements during transport on the stress responses and meat quality of sheep. Veterinary Record 2001; 148 (8): 227-229. doi: 10.1136/vr.148.8.227
48. Díaz MT, Vieira C, Pérez C, Lauzurica S, Chávarri EG et al. Effect of lairage time (0 h, 3 h, 6 h or 12 h) on glycogen content and meat quality parameters in suckling lambs. Meat Science 2014; 96 (2): 653-660. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2013.10.013
49. Vergara H, Linares MB, Berruga MI, Gallego L. Meat quality in suckling lambs: effect of pre-slaughter handling. Meat Science 2005; 69 (3): 473-478. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2004.09.002
50. Linares MB, Bórnez R, Vergara H. Effect of different stunning systems on meat quality of light lamb. Meat Science 2007; 76 (4): 675-681. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2007.02.007