Serological and molecular diagnosis of paratuberculosis in dairy cattle
In this study, the presence of paratuberculosis was investigated by serological and molecular methods in herds of dairy cattle. Blood, milk, and stool samples of 147 cows aged 2 years old or older with chronic diarrhea were collected. A California mastitis test (CMT) was performed on milk samples. Indirect paratuberculosis enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) test was used for serological investigation. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was utilized for molecular identification of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis (MAP) from milk and stool samples. Immunomagnetic separation (IMS) method was used for milk and fecal samples. Eighteen (12.24%), 44 (29.93%), 36 (24.49%), 28 (19.05%), and 21 (14.29%) of 147 milk samples were negative, suspicious, CMT (+), CMT (++), and CMT (+++) by CMT, respectively. According to ELISA results, 18 (12.24%) serum samples were positive. In PCR of milk and stool samples, MAP DNA was detected in 20 (13.61%) and 42 (28.57%) of samples, respectively. In IMS PCR assays of the same samples, positivity was not detected. In this study, paratuberculosis was found at high rates in Kayseri. In conclusion, it was detected that mastitis symptoms in paratuberculosis were subclinical and not always observed, and the use of diagnostic laboratory methods may be an important aid in revealing diseases.
Serological and molecular diagnosis of paratuberculosis in dairy cattle
In this study, the presence of paratuberculosis was investigated by serological and molecular methods in herds of dairy cattle. Blood, milk, and stool samples of 147 cows aged 2 years old or older with chronic diarrhea were collected. A California mastitis test (CMT) was performed on milk samples. Indirect paratuberculosis enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) test was used for serological investigation. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was utilized for molecular identification of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis (MAP) from milk and stool samples. Immunomagnetic separation (IMS) method was used for milk and fecal samples. Eighteen (12.24%), 44 (29.93%), 36 (24.49%), 28 (19.05%), and 21 (14.29%) of 147 milk samples were negative, suspicious, CMT (+), CMT (++), and CMT (+++) by CMT, respectively. According to ELISA results, 18 (12.24%) serum samples were positive. In PCR of milk and stool samples, MAP DNA was detected in 20 (13.61%) and 42 (28.57%) of samples, respectively. In IMS PCR assays of the same samples, positivity was not detected. In this study, paratuberculosis was found at high rates in Kayseri. In conclusion, it was detected that mastitis symptoms in paratuberculosis were subclinical and not always observed, and the use of diagnostic laboratory methods may be an important aid in revealing diseases.
___
- Romano MI, Amadio A, Bigi F, Klepp L, Etchechoury I, Llana
- MN, Morsella C, Paolicchi F, Pavlik I, Bartos M et al. Further
- analysis of VNTR and MIRU in the genome of Mycobacterium
- avium complex, and application to molecular epidemiology of
- isolates from South America. Vet Microbiol 2005; 110: 221– 237.
- Middleton JR, Hardin D, Steevens B, Randle R, Tyler JW. Use of somatic cell counts and California mastitis test results from individual quarter milk samples to detect subclinical intramammary infection in dairy cattle from a herd with a high bulk tank somatic cell count. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2004; 224: 419–423.
- Khare S, Ficht TA, Santos RL, Romano J, Ficht AR, Zhang S, Grant IR, Libal M, Hunter D, Adams LG. Rapid and sensitive detection of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis in bovine milk and feces by a combination of immunomagnetic bead separation-conventional PCR and real-time PCR. J Clin Microbiol 2004; 42: 1075–1081.
- Çetinkaya B, Muz A, Ertaş HB, Öngör H, Sezen İY, Gülcü HB. Süt ineklerinde paratüberküloz prevalansının polimeraz zincir reaksiyonu (PZR) ile saptanması. Turk J Vet Anim Sci 2000; 24: 371–379 (in Turkish).
- Koepsell TD, Weiss NS. Epidemiologic Methods: Studying the Occurrence of Illness. 1st ed. New York, NY, USA: Oxford University Press; 2003.
- McKenna SL, Keefe GP, Tiwari A, VanLeeuwen J, Barkema HW. Johne’s disease in Canada Part II: Disease impacts, risk factors, and control programs for dairy producers. Can Vet J 2006; 47: 1089–1099.
- Raizman EA, Wells SJ, Godden SM, Fetrow J, Oakes JM. The associations between culling due to clinical Johne’s disease or the detection of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis fecal shedding and the diagnosis of clinical or subclinical diseases in two dairy herds in Minnesota, USA. Prev Vet Med 2007; 80: 166–178.
- McNab WB, Meek AH, Martin SW, Duncan JR. Associations between dairy production indices and lipoarabinomannan enzyme-immunoassay results for paratuberculosis. Can J Vet Res 1991; 55: 356–361.
- DeLisle GW, Milestone BA. The economic impact of Johne’s disease in New Zealand. In: Milner A, Wood P, editors. Johne’s Disease. East Melbourne, New Zealand: CSIRO Publishing; 1989. pp. 41–45.
- Donat K, Schlotter K, Erhardt G, Brandt HR. Prevalence and control measures within the herd influence the performance of ELISA tests. Vet Rec 2014; 174: 119.
- Nielsen SS, Toft N. A review of prevalences of paratuberculosis in farmed animals in Europe. Prev Vet Med 2009; 88: 1–14.
- Hirst HL, Garry FB, Morley PS, Salman MD, Dinsmore RP, Wagner BA, McSweeney KD, Goodell GM. Seroprevalence of Mycobacterium avium subsp paratuberculosis infection among dairy cows in Colorado and herd-level risk factors for seropositivity. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2004; 225: 97–101.
- Szteyn J, Wiszniewska-Laszczych A. Seroprevalence of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis infection in dairy herds in Zuławy, Poland. Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr 2012; 125: 397–400.
- Fernandez-Silva JA, Abdulmawjood A, Akineden O, Bülte M. Serological and molecular detection of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis in cattle of dairy herds in Colombia. Trop Anim Health Prod 2011; 43: 1501–1507.
- Makav V, Gokce E. Seroprevalence of subclinical paratuberculosis in cattle in Kars region. Kafkas Univ Vet Fak Derg 2013; 19: 913–916.
- Ozturk D, Pehlivanoglu F, Tok AA, Gunlu S, Guldali Y, Turutoglu H. Seroprevalence of paratuberculosis in the Burdur province (Turkey), in dairy cattle using the enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Israel J Vet Med 2010; 65: 53–57.
- Woodbine KA, Schukken YH, Green LE, Ramirez-Villaescusa A, Mason S, Moore SJ, Bilbao C, Swann N, Medley GF. Seroprevalence and epidemiological characteristics of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis on 114 cattle farms in South West England. Prev Vet Med 2009; 89: 102–109.
- Gasteiner J, Awad-Masalmeh M, Baumgartner W. Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis infection in cattle in Austria, diagnosis with culture, PCR and ELISA. Vet Microbiol 2000; 77: 339–349.
- Chevallier B, Versmisse Y, Blanchard B. Development of a PCR test to detect Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis in bovine feces. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Colloquium on Paratuberculosis. Madison, WI, USA: IAP; 2003. pp. 247–250.
- Soumya MP, Pillai RM, Antony PX, Mukhopadhyay HK, Rao VN. Comparison of faecal culture and IS900 PCR assay for the detection of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis in bovine faecal samples. Vet Res Commun 2009; 33: 781–791.
- Ayele WY, Svastova P, Roubal P, Bartos M, Pavlik I. Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis cultured from locally and commercially pasteurized cow’s milk in the Czech Republic. Appl Environ Microbiol 2005; 71: 1210–1214.
- Slana I, Paolicchi F, Janstova B, Navratilova P, Pavlik I. Detection methods for Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis in milk and milk products: a review. Vet Med 2008; 53: 283–306.