Prevalence and Antibiotic Susceptibility of Thermophilic Campylobacter Species in Broiler Chickens

The aim of the present study was to investigate the prevalence of thermophilic Campylobacter species in broiler chicken faecal samples and on their carcasses. The possible routes of carcass contamination were assessed from slaughterhouse to market. Furthermore, the study aimed to determine the antibiotic susceptibility of Campylobacter isolates from broilers. Thermophilic Campylobacter spp. was isolated from 393 (91.8%) of 428 samples examined. A total of 53 out of 57 rectal swab samples was positive for thermophilic Campylobacter spp. Thermophilic Campylobacter spp. were isolated from 93.6%, 92.9% and 91.3% of broiler carcass, faecal and caecal samples, respectively. No Campylobacter was isolated from scalding tank water samples. However, all samples collected from cold water tanks were found to be contaminated with thermophilic Campylobacter spp. Overall, 92.2% and 7.8% of the isolates were identified as Campylobacter jejuni and C. coli. Of the C. jejuni isolates from broiler chickens, 30.6% were resistant to b-lactam antibiotics and 31.3% were resistant to quinolone group antibiotics. Of the C. coli isolates from broiler chickens, 30.7% were resistant to b-lactam antibiotics and 31.2% were resistant to quinolone group antibiotics. With these results we conclude that the widespread faecal contamination of broiler carcasses in broiler farms in Kırıkkale with thermophilic Campylobacter spp. constitutes a risk for public health. This study once more indicates the application of a preventive system such as HACCP (Hazard Analysis of Critical Control Points) is strongly required in the contamination control of campylobacters in broiler farms and slaughterhouses.

Prevalence and Antibiotic Susceptibility of Thermophilic Campylobacter Species in Broiler Chickens

The aim of the present study was to investigate the prevalence of thermophilic Campylobacter species in broiler chicken faecal samples and on their carcasses. The possible routes of carcass contamination were assessed from slaughterhouse to market. Furthermore, the study aimed to determine the antibiotic susceptibility of Campylobacter isolates from broilers. Thermophilic Campylobacter spp. was isolated from 393 (91.8%) of 428 samples examined. A total of 53 out of 57 rectal swab samples was positive for thermophilic Campylobacter spp. Thermophilic Campylobacter spp. were isolated from 93.6%, 92.9% and 91.3% of broiler carcass, faecal and caecal samples, respectively. No Campylobacter was isolated from scalding tank water samples. However, all samples collected from cold water tanks were found to be contaminated with thermophilic Campylobacter spp. Overall, 92.2% and 7.8% of the isolates were identified as Campylobacter jejuni and C. coli. Of the C. jejuni isolates from broiler chickens, 30.6% were resistant to b-lactam antibiotics and 31.3% were resistant to quinolone group antibiotics. Of the C. coli isolates from broiler chickens, 30.7% were resistant to b-lactam antibiotics and 31.2% were resistant to quinolone group antibiotics. With these results we conclude that the widespread faecal contamination of broiler carcasses in broiler farms in Kırıkkale with thermophilic Campylobacter spp. constitutes a risk for public health. This study once more indicates the application of a preventive system such as HACCP (Hazard Analysis of Critical Control Points) is strongly required in the contamination control of campylobacters in broiler farms and slaughterhouses.

___

  • Berrang, M.E., Buhr, R.J., Cason, J.A.: Campylobacter recovery from external and internal organs of commercial broiler carcass prior to scalding. Poult. Sci., 2000; 79: 286-290.
  • Evans, S.J., Sayers, A.R.: A longitudinal study of campylobacter infection of broiler flocks in Great Britain. Prev. Vet. Med., 2000; 46: 209-223.
  • Nielsen, E.M., Engberg, J., Fussing, V., Petersen, L., Brogren, C.H., On, S.L.W.: Evaluation of phenotypic and genotypic methods for subtyping Campylobacter jejuni isolates from humans, poultry, and cattle. J. Clin. Microbiol., 2000; 38: 3800-3810.
  • Engberg, J., On, S.L.W., Harrington, C.S., Gerner-Smidt, P.: Prevalence of Campylobacter, Arcobacter, Helicobacter, and Sutterella spp. in human fecal samples as estimated by a reevaluation of isolation methods for Campylobacters. J. Clin. Microbiol., 2000; 38: 286-291.
  • Kramer, J.M., Frost, J.A., Bolton, F.J., Wareing, D.R.A.: Campylobacter contamination of raw meat and poultry at retail sale: Identification of multiple types and comparison with isolates from human infection. J. Food. Protect., 2000; 63: 1654-1659. 6. Prescott, J.F., Gellner, O.S.: Intestinal carriage of Campylobacter jejuni and Salmonella by chicken flocks at slaughter. Can. J. Comp. Med., 1984; 48: 329-331. 7. Neil, S.D., Cambell, J.N., Greene, J.A.: Campylobacter species in broiler chickens. Avian Pathol., 1984; 13: 777-785.
  • Diker, K.S., Yardımcı, H.: Isolation and characterization of Campylobacter species from chickens. Turk. J. Vet. Anim. Sci., 1989; 13: 257-264.
  • Baysal, T., Güler, L.: The isolation of Campylobacter spp. from poultry in areas of Konya. Veterinarium, 1992; 3: 6-11.
  • Yıldız, A., Diker, K.S.: The studies on the isolation of Campylobacter species from chicken carcasses and waste water in slaughterhouse. Master thesis. Ankara University, Inst. Health Sci. Ankara, Turkey. 1992.
  • Akan, M., Diker, K.S., Yıldırım, M.: Molecular Epidemiology of Campylobacter Infections in Poultry. TÜBİTAK-VHAG-1234. 1998.
  • Endtz, H.P., Ruijs, G.J., van Klingeren, B., Jansen, W.H., van der Reyden, T., Mouton, R.P.: Quinolone resistance in campylobacter isolated from man and poultry following the introduction of fluoroquinolones in veterinary medicine. J. Antimicrob. Chemother., 1991; 27: 199-208.
  • Reina, J.: Resistance to fluoroquinolones in salmonella non-typhi and campylobacter spp. Lancet., 1992; 340: 1035-1036.
  • Gaudreau, C., Gilbert, H.: Comparison of disc diffusion and agar dilution methods for antibiotic susceptibility testing of Campylobacter jejuni subsp. jejuni and Campylobacter coli. J. Antimicrob. Chemother., 1997; 39: 707-712.
  • Steele, T.W., McDermott, S.N.: The use of membrane filters applied directly to the surface of agar plates for the isolation of Campylobacter jejuni from feces. Pathology., 1984; 16: 263- 265.
  • On, S.L.W., Holmes, B., Sackin, M.J.: A probability matrix for the identification of campylobacters, helicobacters and allied taxa. J. Appl. Bacteriol., 1996; 81: 425-432.
  • Navarro, F., Miro, E., Mirelis, B., Prats, G.: Campylobacter spp antibiotic susceptibility. J. Antimicrob. Chemother., 1993; 32: 906-907.
  • Humphrey, T.J., Lanning, D.G.: Salmonella and campylobacter contamination of broiler chicken carcases and scald tank water: the influence of water pH. J. Appl. Bacteriol., 1987; 63: 21-25.
  • Jacobs-Reitsma W.F.: Campylobacter bacteria in breeder flocks. Avian. Dis., 1995; 39: 355-359.
  • Smeltzer, T.I.: Isolation of Campylobacter jejuni from poultry carcases. Aust. Vet. J., 1981; 57: 511- 512.
  • Stern, N.J., Green, S.S., Thaker, N., Krout, D.J., Chiu, J.: Recovery of Campylobacter jejuni from fresh and frozen meat and poultry collected at slaughter. J. Food. Protect., 1984; 47: 372- 374.
  • Shanker, S., Lee, A., Sorrell, T.C.: Campylobacter jejuni in broilers: the role of vertical transmission. J. Hyg., 1986; 96: 153-159.
  • Lammerding, A.M., Garcia, M.M., Mann, E.D., Robinson, Y., Dorward, W.J., Truscott, R.B., Tittiger, F. : Prevalence of salmonella and thermophilic campylobacter in fresh pork, beef, veal and poultry in Canada. J. Food. Protect., 1988; 51: 47-52.
  • Wempe, J.M., Genigeorgis, C.A., Farver, T.B., Yusufu, H.I.: Prevalence of Campylobacter jejuni in two California chicken processing plants. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 1983; 45: 355-359.
  • Baker, R.C., Paredes, M.D.C., Qureshi, R.A.: Prevalence of Campylobacter jejuni in poultry meat in New York State. Poult. Sci., 1987; 66: 1766-1770.
  • Bryan, F.L., Doyle, M.P.: Health risks and consequences of Salmonella and Campylobacter jejuni in raw poultry. J. Food. Protect., 1995; 58: 326-344.
  • Buhr, R.J., Cason, J.A., Dickens, J.A., Hinton, A., Ingram, K.D.: Influence of flooring type during transport and holding on bacteria recovery from broiler carcass rinses before and after defeathering. Poult. Sci., 2000; 79: 436-441.
Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-0128
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 6 Sayı
  • Yayıncı: TÜBİTAK