Trina Jorre De St JORRE, Penny Alison Rhian HAWKEN, Graeme Bruce MARTIN

New understanding of an old phenomenon: uncontrolled factors and misconceptions that cast a shadow over studies of the ‘male effect’ on reproduction in small ruminants

In female sheep and goats, exposure to males can be used to induce ovulation and thus control and synchronise fertility. This 'male effect' offers simple, cost-effective, and hormone-free management of reproduction in flocks and herds but, despite decades of research, significant gaps in our knowledge impede commercial application. Many of these gaps can be traced back to misconceptions in the early documentation of the male effect, and others are the result of uncontrolled factors in experimental design. Consequently, it is often difficult to draw conclusions from past research, to further our understanding of the phenomenon, and to make recommendations for industry application. Here, we describe 2 aspects of the male stimulus used to elicit the male effect that are often uncontrolled - the novelty of the stimulus males and factors that contribute to variability in the potency of the male stimulus. We discuss the physiology that underpins novelty, including the individual specificity of the sociosexual signals emitted by the male, and the concomitant ability of females to distinguish among individual males and remember them. Importantly, an understanding of the issue of novelty can make it easier to use the male effect in commercial practice. We also discuss difficulties in interpretation caused by variation in endpoints of the male effect (from neuroendocrine reaction to birth). We conclude that more rigour is needed in the control and reporting of male novelty, in preexperimentation separation of the sexes, and in extrapolation from detection of early responses to the male stimulus to reproductive outcomes.

New understanding of an old phenomenon: uncontrolled factors and misconceptions that cast a shadow over studies of the ‘male effect’ on reproduction in small ruminants

Keywords:

Male effect, sheep, goat behaviour, industry, pheromone,

PDF

___

Cushwa WT, Bradford GE, Stabenfeldt GH, Berger YM, Dally MR. Ram influence on ovarian and sexual activity in anestrous ewes: effects of isolation of ewes from rams before joining and date of ram introduction. J Anim Sci 1992; 70: 1195–1200.

Véliz FG, Poindron P, Malpaux B, Delgadillo JA. Maintaining contact with bucks does not induce refractoriness to the male effect in seasonally anestrous female goats. Anim Reprod Sci 2006; 92: 300–309.

Hawken PAR, Beard AP. Ram novelty and the duration of ram exposure affects the distribution of mating in ewes exposed to rams during the transition into the breeding season. Anim Reprod Sci 2009; 111: 249–260.

Jorre de St Jorre T, Hawken PAR, Martin GB. Role of male novelty and familiarity in male-induced LH secretion in female sheep. Reprod Fertil Dev 2012; 24: 523–530.

Hawken PAR, Jorre de St Jorre T, Rodger J, Esmaili T, Blache D, Martin GB. Rapid induction of cell proliferation in the adult female ungulate brain (Ovis aries) associated with activation of the reproductive axis by exposure to unfamiliar males. Biol Reprod 2009; 80: 1146–1151.

Riches JH, Watson RH. The influence of the introduction of rams on the incidence of oestrus in Merino ewes Aust J Agric Res 1954; 5: 141–147.

Schinckel PG. The effect of the ram on the incidence and occurrence of oestrus in ewes. Aust Vet J 1954; 30: 189–195.

Pearce DT, Oldham CM. Ovulation in the Merino ewe in the breeding and anoestrous seasons. Aust J Biol Sci 1988; 41: 23–26.

Pearce GP. The ram effect: is isolation required? Wool Tech Sheep Breed 1988; 36: 81–86.

Scaramuzzi RJ, Oujagir L, Menassol JB, Freret S, Piezel A, Brown HM, Cognié J, Fabre Nys C. The pattern of LH secretion and the ovarian response to the ‘ram effect’ in the anoestrous ewe is influenced by body condition but not by short-term nutritional supplementation. Reprod Fertil Dev 2013; http:// dxdoiorg/101071/RD13139.

Oldham CM. A study of sexual and ovarian activity in Merino sheep. PhD, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia, 1980.

Oldham CM, Cognié Y. Do ewes continue to cycle after teasing? Proc Aust Soc Anim Prod 1980; 13: 82–85.

Cohen-Tannoudji J, Signoret JP. Effect of short exposure to the ram on later reactivity of anoestrous ewes to the male effect. Anim Reprod Sci 1987; 13: 263–268.

Knight TW. Are rams necessary for the stimulation of anoestrous ewes with oestrous ewes? Proc New Zeal Soc Anim Prod 1985; 45: 49–50.

Walkden-Brown SW, Restall BJ, Henniawati. The male effect in the Australian cashmere goat. 3. Enhancement with buck nutrition and use of oestrous females. Anim Reprod Sci 1993; 32: 69–84.

Walkden-Brown SW, Restall BJ, Henniawati. The male effect in Australian cashmere goats. 1. Ovarian and behavioural response of seasonally anovulatory does following the introduction of bucks. Anim Reprod Sci 1993; 32: 41–53.

Ungerfeld R, Ramos MA, González-Pensado SP. Ram effect: adult rams induce a greater reproductive response in anestrous ewes than yearling rams. Anim Reprod Sci 2008; 103: 271–277.

Borg KE, Esbenshade KL, Johnson BH, Lunstra DD, Ford JJ. Effects of sexual experience season and mating stimuli on endocrine concentrations in the adult ram. Horm Behav 1992; 26: 87–109.

Oldham CM, Lindsay DR, Martin GB. Effects of seasonal variation of live weight on the breeding activity of Merino ewes In: Oldham CM, Martin GB, Purvis IW, editors. Reproductive Physiology of Merino Sheep: Concepts and Consequences. Perth, Australia: School of Agriculture (Animal Science), The University of Western Australia; 1990. pp. 41–58.

Ungerfeld R, Forsberg M, Rubianes E. Overview of the response of anoestrous ewes to the ram effect. Reprod Fertil Dev 2004; 16: 479–490.

Martin GB, Oldham CM, Lindsay DR. Increased plasma LH levels in seasonally anovular Merino ewes following the introduction of rams. Anim Reprod Sci 1980; 3: 125–132.

Knight TW, Hall DRH, Wilson LD. Effects of teasing and nutrition on the duration of the breeding season in Romney ewes. Proc New Zeal Soc Anim Prod 1983; 43: 17–20.

Atkinson S, Williamson P. Ram-induced growth of ovarian follicles and gonadotrophin inhibition in anoestrous ewes. J Reprod Fertil 1985; 73: 185–189.

Rosa HJD, Silva CC, Bryant MJ. The effect of ram replacement and sex ratio on the sexual response of anoestrous ewes. Small Rumin Res 2006; 65: 223–229.

Martin GB. Ram-induced ovulation in seasonally anovular Merino ewes: effect of oestradiol on the frequency of ovulation oestrus and short cycles. Theriogenology 1979; 12: 283–287.

Claus R, Over R, Dehnhard M. Effect of male odour on LH secretion and the induction of ovulation in seasonally anoestrous goats. Anim Reprod Sci 1990; 22: 27–38.

Walkden-Brown SW, Restall BJ, Henniawati. The male effect in Australian cashmere goats. 2. Role of olfactory cues from the male. Anim Reprod Sci 1993; 32: 55–67.

Cohen-Tannoudji J, Einhorn J, Signoret JP. Ram sexual pheromone: first approach of chemical identification. Physiol Behav 1994; 56: 955–961.

Gelez H, Archer E, Chesneau D, Campan R, Fabre-Nys C. Importance of learning in the response of ewes to male odor. Chem Senses 2004; 29: 555–563.

Perkins A, Fitzgerald JA. The behavioral component of the ram effect: the influence of ram sexual behavior on the induction of estrus in anovulatory ewes. J Anim Sci 1994; 72: 51–55.

Poindron P, Lévy F, Keller M. Maternal responsiveness and maternal selectivity in domestic sheep and goats: the two facets of maternal attachment. Dev Psychobiol 2007; 49: 54–70.

Boissy A, Dumont B. Interactions between social and feeding motivations on the grazing behaviour of herbivores: sheep more easily split into subgroups with familiar peers. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2002; 79: 233–245.

Kendrick KM, Da Costa AP, Leigh AE, Hinton MR, Peirce JW. Sheep don’t forget a face. Nature (Lond) 2001; 414: 165–166.

Winfield CG, Syme GJ, Pearson AJ. Effect of familiarity with each other and breed on the spatial behaviour of sheep in an open field. Appl Anim Ethol 1981; 7: 67–75.

Morgan PD, Arnold GW, Lindsay DR. A note on the mating behaviour of ewes with various senses impaired. J Reprod Fertil 1972; 30: 151–152.

Knight TW, Lynch PR. Source of ram pheromones that stimulate ovulation in the ewe. Anim Reprod Sci 1980; 3: 133–136.

Knight TW, Tervit HR, Lynch PR. Effect of boar pheromones, ram’s wool and presence of bucks on ovarian activity in anovular ewes early in the breeding season. Anim Reprod Sci 1983; 6: 129–134.

Rosa HJD, Bryant MJ. The ‘ram effect’ as a way of modifying the reproductive activity in the ewe. Small Rumin Res 2002; 45: 1–16.

Gelez H, Fabre-Nys C. The “male effect” in sheep and goats: a review of the respective roles of the two olfactory systems. Horm Behav 2004; 46: 257–271.

Delgadillo JA, Flores JA, Veliz FG, Duarte G, Vielma J, Hernández H, Fernández IG. Importance of the signals provided by the buck for the success of the male effect in goats. Reprod Nutr Dev 2006; 46: 391–400.

Hawken PAR, Esmaili T, Scanlan V, Blache D, Martin GB. Can audio-visual or visual stimuli from a prospective mate stimulate a reproductive neuroendocrine response in sheep? Animal 2009; 3: 690–696.

Hurst JL. Female recognition and assessment of males through scent. Behav Brain Res 2009; 200: 295–303.

Sanchez-Andrade G, Kendrick KM. The main olfactory system and social learning in mammals. Behav Brain Res 2009; 200: 323–335.

Uriarte N, Agrati D, Banchero G, González A, Zuluaga MJ, Cawen E, Olivera V, Alsina M, Poindron P, Ferreira A. Different chemical fractions of fetal fluids account for their attractiveness at parturition and their repulsiveness during late-gestation in the ewe. Physiol Behav 2012; 107: 45–49.

Murata K, Tamogami S, Itou M, Ohkubo Y, Wakabayashi Y, Watanabe H, Okamura H, Takeuchi Y, Mori Y. Identification of an olfactory signal molecule that activates the central regulator of reproduction in goats. Curr Biol 2014; 24: 681–686.

Iwata K, Kikusui T, Takeuchi T, Mori Y. Substances derived from 4-ethyl octanoic acid account for primer pheromone activity for the “male effect” in goats. J Vet Med Sci 2003; 65: 1019–1021.

Kendrick KM. How the sheep’s brain controls the visual recognition of animals and humans. J Anim Sci 1991; 69: 5008–5016.

Kendrick KM, Atkins K, Hinton MR, Broad KD, Fabre-Nys C, Keverne B. Facial and vocal discrimination in sheep. Anim Behav 1995; 49: 1665–1676.

Peirce JW, Leigh AE, Kendrick KM. Configurational coding familiarity and the right hemisphere advantage for face recognition in sheep. Neuropsychologia 2000; 38: 475–483.

Peirce JW, Leigh AE, Da Costa APC, Kendrick KM. Human face recognition in sheep: lack of configurational coding and right hemisphere advantage. Behav Process 2001; 55: 13–26.

Poindron P, Carrick MJ. Hearing recognition of the lamb by its mother. Anim Behav 1976; 24: 600–602.

Mak GK, Enwere EK, Gregg C, Pakarainen T, Poutanen M, Huhtaniemi I, Weiss S. Male pheromone–stimulated neurogenesis in the adult female brain: possible role in mating behavior. Nature Neurosci 2007; 10: 1003–1011.

Brus M, Meurisse M, Franceschini I, Keller M, Lévy F. Evidence for cell proliferation in the sheep brain and its down-regulation by parturition and interactions with the young. Horm Behav 2010; 58: 737–746.

Cohen-Tannoudji J, Lavenet C, Locatelli A, Tillet Y, Signoret JP. Non-involvement of the accessory olfactory system in the LH response of anoestrous ewes to male odour. J Reprod Fertil

Gelez H, Archer E, Chesneau D, Magallon T, Fabre-Nys C. Inactivation of the olfactory amygdala prevents endocrine response to male odour in anestrus ewes. Eur J Neurosci 2004; 19: 1581–1590.

Gelez H, Fabre-Nys C. Neural pathways involved in the endocrine response of anestrous ewes to the male or its odor. Neuroscience 2006; 140: 791–800.

Da Costa AP, Broad KD, Kendrick KM. Olfactory memory and maternal behaviour-induced changes in c-fos and zif/268 mRNA expression in the sheep brain. Molec Brain Res 1997; 46: 63–76.

Demas GE, Williams JM, Nelson RJ. Amygdala but not hippocampal lesions impair olfactory memory for mate in prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster). Am J Physiol (Regul Integr Comp Physiol) 1997; 273 R1683–R1689.

Kippin TE, Cain SW, Pfaus JG. Estrous odors and sexually conditioned neutral odors activate separate neural pathways in the male rat. Neuroscience 2003; 117: 971–979.

Litaudon P, Mouly AM, Sullivan R, Gervais R, Cattarelli M. Learning-induced changes in rat piriform cortex activity mapped using multisite recording with voltage sensitive dye. Eur J Neurosci 1997; 9: 1593–1602.

Petrulis A, Eichenbaum H. The perirhinal-entorhinal cortex but not the hippocampus is critical for expression of individual recognition in the context of the Coolidge effect. Neuroscience 2003; 122: 599–607.

Keller M, Meurisse M, Lévy F. Mapping of brain networks involved in consolidation of lamb recognition memory. Neuroscience 2005; 133: 359–369.

Fulkerson WJ, Adams NR, Gherardi PB. Ability of castrate male sheep treated with oestrogen or testosterone to induce and detect oestrus in ewes. Appl Anim Ethol 1981; 7: 57–66.

Croker KP, Butler LG, Johns MA, McColm SC. Induction of ovulation and cyclic activity in anoestrous ewes with testosterone treated wethers and ewes. Theriogenology 1982; 17: 349–354.

Signoret JP, Fulkerson WJ, Lindsay DR. Effectiveness of testosterone-treated wethers and ewes as teasers. Appl Anim Ethol 1982; 9: 37–45.

Mellado M, Hernández JR. Ability of androgenized goat wethers and does to induce estrus in goats under extensive conditions during anestrus and breeding seasons. Small Rumin Res 1996; 23: 37–42.

Fabre-Nys C. Hormonal control of male and female sexual behavior in ewes: role of interactions between progesterone and estradiol. C R Acad Sci (Paris) 1983; 296: 961–964 (article in French with an abstract in English).

Sharma TP, Blache D, Blackberry MA, Martin GB. Role of peripheral and central aromatization in the control of gonadotrophin secretion in the male sheep. Reprod Fertil Dev 1999; 11: 293–302.

Sharma TP, Blache D, Roselli CE, Martin GB. Distribution of aromatase activity in brain and peripheral tissues of male sheep: effect of nutrition. Reprod Fertil Dev 2004; 16: 709–715.

Vielma J, Chemineau P, Poindron P, Malpaux B, Delgadillo JA. Male sexual behavior contributes to the maintenance of high LH pulsatility in anestrous female goats. Horm Behav 2009; 56: 444–449.

Martin GB, Oldham CM, Cognié Y, Pearce DT. The physiological responses of anovulatory ewes to the introduction of rams – a review. Livest Prod Sci 1986; 15: 219–247.

Sanford LM, Palmer WM, Howland BE. Influence of sexual activity on serum levels of LH and testosterone in the ram. Can J Anim Sci 1974; 54: 579–585.

Schanbacher BD, Lunstra DD. Seasonal changes in sexual activity and serum levels of LH and testosterone in Finnish Landrace and Suffolk rams. J Anim Sci 1976; 43: 644–650.

Lincoln GA, Davidson W. The relationship between sexual and aggressive behaviour and pituitary and testicular activity during the seasonal sexual cycle of rams and the influence of photoperiod. 1977; 49: 267–276.

Pelletier J, Garnier DH, de Reviers MM, Terqui M, Ortavant R. Seasonal variation in LH and testosterone release in rams of two breeds. J Reprod Fertil 1982; 64: 341–346.

Hötzel MJ, Walkden-Brown SW, Fisher JS, Martin GB. Determinants of the annual pattern of reproduction in mature male Merino and Suffolk sheep: responses to a nutritional stimulus in the breeding and non-breeding seasons. Reprod Fertil Dev 2003; 15: 1–9.

Meyer HH. Ewe and teaser breed effects on reproductive behaviour and performance. Proc New Zeal Soc Anim Prod 1979; 39: 68–76.

Tervit HR, Havik PG, Smith JF. Effect of breed of ram on the onset of the breeding season in Romney ewes. Proc New Zeal Soc Anim Prod 1977; 37: 142–148.

Knight TW, Lynch PR. The pheromone from rams that stimulates ovulation in the ewe. Proc Aust Soc Anim Prod 1980; 13: 74–76.

Nugent RA 3rd, Notter DR, McClure WH. Effects of ram preexposure and ram breed on fertility of ewes in summer breeding. J Anim Sci 1988; 66: 1622–1626.

Scott IC, Johnstone PD. Variation between years in the ram effect when Coopworth or Poll Dorset rams are introduced to seasonally anovular Coopworth ewes. New Zeal J agric Res 1994; 37: 187–193.

Delgadillo JA, Flores JA, Véliz FG, Hernández HF, Duarte G, Vielma J, Poindron P, Chemineau P, Malpaux B. Induction of sexual activity of lactating anovulatory female goats using male goats treated only with artificial long days. J Anim Sci 2002; 80: 2780–2786.

Rosa HJD, Juniper DT, Bryant MJ. Effects of recent sexual experience and melatonin treatment of rams on plasma testosterone concentration sexual behaviour and ability to induce ovulation in seasonally anoestrous ewes. J Reprod Fertil

Flores JA, Véliz FG, Pérez-Villanueva JA, Martínez de la Escalera G, Chemineau P, Poindron P, Malpaux B, Delgadillo JA. Male reproductive condition is the limiting factor of efficiency in the male effect during seasonal anestrus in female goats. Biol Reprod 2000; 62: 1409–1414.

Rosa HJD, Juniper DT, Bryant MJ. The effect of exposure to oestrous ewes on rams’ sexual behaviour plasma testosterone concentration and ability to stimulate ovulation in seasonally anoestrous ewes. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2000; 67: 293–305.

Hillbrick GC, Tucker DJ. Effect of nutrition on lipid production and composition of Cashmere buck fleece. Small Rumin Res 1996; 22: 225–230.

Blache D, Zhang S, Martin GB. Fertility in male sheep: modulators of the acute effects of nutrition on the reproductive axis of male sheep. Reproduction Suppl 2003; 61: 387–402.

Estep DQ, Price EO, Wallach SJR, Dally MR. Social preferences of domestic ewes for rams (Ovis aries). Appl Anim Behav Sci 1989; 24: 287–300.

Chanvallon A, Sagot L, Pottier E, Debus N, François D, Fassier T, Scaramuzzi RJ, Fabre-Nys C. New insights into the influence of breed and time of the year on the response of ewes to the ‘ram effect’. Animal 2011; 5: 1594–1604.

Bedos M, Flores JA, Fitz-Rodríguez G, Keller M, Malpaux B, Poindron P, Delgadillo JA. Four hours of daily contact with sexually active males is sufficient to induce fertile ovulation in anestrous goats. Horm Behav 2010; 58: 473–477.