Genetic relationships among four Turkish sheep breeds using microsatellites

The genetic structure of 4 Turkish breeds of sheep, Gökçeada, Kıvırcık, Karacabey Merino, and Sakız (SZ), was analyzed by genotyping with 17 microsatellite markers in 250 individuals. The microsatellites showed high levels of polymorphism, with means for total and effective number of alleles per locus of 20.71 and 7.04, respectively. The average observed and expected heterozygosity values were 0.66 and 0.87, respectively. It was found that a higher level of breed admixture existed in the 4 breeds, which was an important finding. It was also found that 7.9% of genetic variation resulted from difference between the populations, whereas 92.1% resulted from difference between individuals. Our results showed that the used microsatellite markers were adequately polymorphic and can be successfully used for investigating genetic diversity in the 4 breeds studied. The genetic variation in Turkish breeds was not significantly higher than that of European breeds, which might be a consequence of the recent sharp decrease in sheep numbers.

Genetic relationships among four Turkish sheep breeds using microsatellites

The genetic structure of 4 Turkish breeds of sheep, Gökçeada, Kıvırcık, Karacabey Merino, and Sakız (SZ), was analyzed by genotyping with 17 microsatellite markers in 250 individuals. The microsatellites showed high levels of polymorphism, with means for total and effective number of alleles per locus of 20.71 and 7.04, respectively. The average observed and expected heterozygosity values were 0.66 and 0.87, respectively. It was found that a higher level of breed admixture existed in the 4 breeds, which was an important finding. It was also found that 7.9% of genetic variation resulted from difference between the populations, whereas 92.1% resulted from difference between individuals. Our results showed that the used microsatellite markers were adequately polymorphic and can be successfully used for investigating genetic diversity in the 4 breeds studied. The genetic variation in Turkish breeds was not significantly higher than that of European breeds, which might be a consequence of the recent sharp decrease in sheep numbers.

___

  • Koban E. Genetic diversity of native and crossbreed sheep breeds in Anatolia. PhD. Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey, 2004.
  • Zeder, MA Domestication and early agriculture in the Mediterranean basin: origins, diffusion, and impact. P Natl Acad Sci 2008; 105: 11597–11604.
  • General Directorate of Agricultural Research and Policy. Domestic Animal Genetic Resources in Turkey. Ankara, Turkey: Ministry of Food, Agriculture, and Livestock; 2011.
  • Karaca O, Cemal İ, Yılmaz O, Yılmaz M. Karya koyunu. In: Türkiye Ulusal Koyunculuk Kongresi. İzmir, Turkey: Ege University; 2009. pp. 225–234 (in Turkish).
  • Bruford MW, Chessman DJ, Coote T, Gren HAA, Haines SA, O’Ryan C, Williams TR. Microsatellites and Their Application to Conservation Genetics. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 1996.
  • FAO. Molecular Genetic Characterization of Animal Genetic Resources. Rome, Italy: Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations; 2011. 7. Peakall R, Smouse PE. GENALEX 6: Genetic Analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Mol Ecol Notes 2006; 6: 288–295.
  • Excoffier L, Laval G, Schneider S. Arlequin (version 3.0): An integrated software package for population genetics data analysis. Evol Bioinform 2005; 1: 47–50.
  • Tamura K, Dudley J, Nei M, Kumar S. MEGA4: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Mol Biol Evol 2007; 24: 1596–1599.
  • Nei M. Genetic distance between populations. Am Nat 1972; 106: 283–292.
  • Weir BS, Cockerham CC. Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution 1984; 38: 1358–1370.
  • Yeh FC, Yang RC, Boyle TBJ, Ye ZH, Mao JX. POPGENE: The User-Friendly Shareware for Population Genetic Analysis. Edmonton, AB, Canada: University of Alberta; 1997.
  • Goudet J. FSTAT (Version 2.9.3.). A Program to Estimate and Test Gene Diversities and Fixation Indices. Lausanne, Switzerland: University of Lausanne; 2001.
  • Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 2000; 155: 945–959.
  • Evanno G, Regnaut S, Goudet J. Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software STRUCTURE: a simulation study. Mol Ecol 2005; 14: 2611–2620.
  • Arora RJ, Bhatia S, Mishra BP, Jain A, Prakash B. Diversity analysis of sheep breeds from Southern peninsular and Eastern regions of India. Trop Anim Health Pro 2011; 43: 401–408.
  • Arora R, Bhatia S. Genetic structure of Muzzafarnagri sheep based on microsatellite analysis. Small Ruminant Res 2004; 54: 227–230.
  • Cemal İ, Yılmaz O, Karaca O, Binbaş P, Ata N. Analysis of genetic diversity in indigenous Çine Çaparı sheep under conservation by microsatellite markers. Kafkas Univ Vet Fak Derg 2013; 19: 383–390.
  • Farid A, O’Reilly E, Kelsey JCR. Genetic analysis of ten sheep breeds using microsatellite markers. Can J Anim Sci 2000; 80: 9–17.
  • Hoda A, Marsan PA. Genetic characterization of Albanian sheep breeds by microsatellite markers, analysis of genetic variation in animals. In: Caliskan M, editor. Analysis of Genetic Variation in Animals. Rijeka, Croatia: InTech; 2012. pp. 3–26.
  • Jyotsana B, Jakhesara S, Prakash V, Rank DN, Vataliya PH. Genetic features of Patanwadi, Marwari and Dumba sheep breeds (India) inferred by microsatellite markers. Small Ruminant Res 2010; 93: 57–60.
  • Santos-Silva F, Ivo RS, Sousa MCO, Carolino MI, Ginja C, Gama LT. Assessing genetic diversity and differentiation in Portuguese coarse-wool sheep breeds with microsatellite markers. Small Ruminant Res 2008; 78: 32–40.
  • Yilmaz O, Cemal I, Karaca O, Ata N, Sevim S, Ozturk M. Genetic diversity of Karya and Çine Çapari sheep. Scientific Papers Series D Animal Science 2013; 56: 31–35.
  • Yılmaz O, Karaca O. Paternity analysis with microsatellite markers in Karya sheep. Kafkas Univ Vet Fak Derg 2012; 18: 807-813 ( in Turkish with abstract in English).
  • Agaviezor BO, Peters SO, Adefenwa MA, Yakubu A, Adebambo OA, Ozoje MO, Ikeobi CO, Wheto M, Ajayi OO, Amusan SA et al. Morphological and microsatellite DNA diversity of Nigerian indigenous sheep. J Anim Sci Biotechnol 2012; 3: 38–54.
  • Lasagna E, Bianchi M, Ceccobelli S, Landi V, Martínez Martínez A, Pla JLV, Panella F, Bermejo JVD, Sarti FM. Genetic relationships and population structure in three Italian Merino- derived sheep breeds. Small Ruminant Res 2011; 96: 111–119.
  • Quiroz J, Martinez AM, Zaragoza L, Perezgrovas R, Vega-Pla JL, Delgado JV. Genetic characterization of the autochthonous sheep populations from Chiapas, Mexico. Livest Sci 2008; 116: 156–161.
  • Álvarez I, Capote J, Traoré A, Fonseca N, Pérez K, Cuervo M, Fernández I, Goyache F. Genetic relationships of the Cuban hair sheep inferred from microsatellite polymorphism. Small Ruminant Res 2012; 104: 89–93.
  • Kusza S, Ivankovic A, Ramljak J, Nagy I, Jávor A, Kukovics S. Genetic structure of Tsigai, Ruda, Pramenka and other local sheep in Southern and Eastern Europe. Small Ruminant Res 2011; 99: 130–134.
  • Yilmaz O, Cemal I, Karaca O. Genetic diversity in nine native Turkish sheep breeds based on microsatellite analysis. Anim Genet 2014; 45: 604–608.
  • Budak Yıldıran F, Çakır Ş. Analysis of genetic polymorphism with microsatellite method in Turkey local sheep breeds. Kafkas Univ Vet Fak Derg 2012; 18: 75–79.
  • Acar H. Bioinformatic analyses in microsatellite-based genetic diversity of Turkish sheep breeds. MSc, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey, 2010.
  • Sezenler T, Özder M. Türkiye’de merinoslaştırma çalışmaları. Hasad Hayvancılık Dergisi 2009; 25: 34–41 (in Turkish).
Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-0128
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 6 Sayı
  • Yayıncı: TÜBİTAK
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

The effects of dry-off therapy on milk somatic cell count in Saanen goats

AYHAN BAŞTAN, SEÇKİN SALAR, DUYGU BAKİ ACAR, MÜRŞİDE AYŞE DEMİREL, MEHMET CENGİZ, İSFENDİYAR DARBAZ, GAYE BULUT

A novel approach for determination of chicken sexing at an early stage of development by using loop-mediated isothermal amplification method

Sung Woo KIM, Jin Seok CHOI, Neelesh SHARMA, Yeoung Gyu KO, Yoon Jung DO, Mijeong BYUN, Hwan Hoo SEONG, Soo Bong PARK, Dong Kee JEONG

Microencapsulated organic acid blend with MCFAs can be used as analternative to antibiotics for laying hens

SANG IN LEE, HYUN SOO KIM, INHO KIM

Determination of serum cardiac biomarkers and plasma D-dimer levelsin anemic sheep with babesiosis

Özlem Orunç KILINÇ, Yaşar GÖZ, Nazmi YÜKSEK, Yildiray BAŞBUĞAN, Ali Bilgin YILMAZ, Ahmet Duran ATAŞ

Effects of 16L : 8D photoperiod on growth performance, carcass characteristics,meat composition, and blood parameters of Pekin ducks

Evren ERDEM, Esin Ebru ONBAŞILAR, Özlem Gücüyener HACAN

Polymorphisms of ovine prion protein (PrP) gene in Pramenka sheepbreed population in Bosnia and Herzegovina

ERVIN ZECEVIC, ADMIR DOKSO, AMRA KAZIC, MUHAMED BRKA

Analysis of acid?base disorders in calves with lactic acidosis using aclassic model and strong ion approach

Michal BEDNARSKI, Robert KUPCZYNSKI

Heparin-induced in vitro capacitation changes of swamp buffalo spermatozoa

Dibyajyoti TALUKDAR, Kutubuddin AHMED, Sourabh DEORI, Gopal Chandra DAS

Prevalence of blaZ gene and other virulence genes in penicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolated from bovine mastitis cases in Gansu, China

Feng YANG, Qi WANG, Xurong WANG, Ling WANG, Min XIAO, Xinpu LI, Jinyin LUO, Shidong ZHANG, Hongsheng LI

Effects of hydrolyzed and live yeasts on rumen microbial fermentation in a semicontinuous culture system (Rusitec)

Hakan ÖZTÜRK, Yasemin Salgirli DEMİRBAŞ, FARAH GÖNÜL AYDIN, İlksin PİŞKİN, Ferhunde Melis ÜNLER, Mehmet Bahri EMRE