Hakan ÖZTÜRK, Yasemin Salgirli DEMİRBAŞ, FARAH GÖNÜL AYDIN, İlksin PİŞKİN, Ferhunde Melis ÜNLER, Mehmet Bahri EMRE

Effects of hydrolyzed and live yeasts on rumen microbial fermentation in a semicontinuous culture system (Rusitec)

The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of hydrolyzed and live forms of yeast products from Saccharomyces cerevisiae on in vitro fermentation of a 50:50 forage:concentrate substrate using the rumen simulation technique (Rusitec). The Rusitec system consisted of nine fermentation vessels: three of them received daily 0.5 g/L hydrolyzed yeast, three vessels received daily 0.5 g/L live yeast, and three vessels received no additives (control). After an adaptation period of 7 days, the main fermentation characteristics were evaluated for 7 consecutive days. Ruminal pH was decreased (P < 0.05) by hydrolyzed yeast, whereas no effects were observed after live yeast treatment. Both hydrolyzed and live yeasts tended to increase butyrate production (P = 0.052). Acetate to propionate ratio was significantly higher (P < 0.05) for live yeast. Both products increased NH3-N concentration, and it was significantly higher (P < 0.05) in live yeast in comparison with that in hydrolyzed yeast. Digestibility of dry matter was not significantly affected by both yeast treatments. Overall, these results showed that different types of yeast products in terms of their viability status had significant actions in ruminal microbial metabolism in different ways.

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Hydrolyzed yeast, live yeast, rumen, Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Effects of hydrolyzed and live yeasts on rumen microbial fermentation in a semicontinuous culture system (Rusitec)

Keywords:

Hydrolyzed yeast, live yeast, rumen, Saccharomyces cerevisiae,

PDF

___

European Commission. Regulation (EC) No. 1831/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2003 on Additives for Use in Animal Nutrition. Off J Eur Union 2003; 50: L268/29–L268/43.
Opsi F, Fortina R, Tassone S, Bodas R, López S. Effects of inactivated and live cells of Saccharomyces cerevisiae on in vitro ruminal fermentation of diets with different forage:concentrate ratio. J Agri Sci 2011; 150: 271–283.
Sullivan ML, Bradford BJ. Viable cell yield from active dry yeast products and effects of storage temperature and diluent on yeast cell viability. J Dairy Sci 2011; 94: 526–531.
Association of American Feed Control Officials (AAFCO). Official Publication. West Lafayette, IN, USA: AAFCO; 2012.
Czerkawski JW, Breckenridge G. Design and development of a long-term rumen simulation technique (Rusitec). Br J Nutr 1977; 38: 371–384.
Oeztuerk H, Schroeder B, Beyerbach M, Breves G. Influence of living and autoclaved yeasts of Saccharomyces boulardii on in vitro ruminal microbial metabolism. J Dairy Sci 2005; 88: 2594–2600.
Oeztuerk H, Emre B, Sagmanligil V, Piskin I, Reha Fidanci U, Pekcan M. Effects of nisin and propolis on ruminal fermentation in vitro. J Anim Vet Adv 2010; 9: 2752–2758.
Bhandari SK, Ominski KH, Wittenberg KM, Plaizier JC. Effects of chop length of alfalfa and corn silage on milk production and rumen fermentation of dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 2007; 90: 2355–2366.
Nisbet DJ, Martin SA. Effect of Saccharomyces cerevisiae culture on lactate utilization by the ruminal bacterium Selenomonas ruminantium. J Anim Sci 1991; 69: 4628–4633.
Callaway ES, Martin SA. Effects of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae culture on ruminal bacteria that utilize lactate and digest cellulose. J Dairy Sci 1997; 80: 2035–2044.
Chaucheyras-Durand F, Fonty G, Bertin G, Salmon JM, Gouet P. Effects of a strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Levucell SC), a microbial additive for ruminants, on lactate metabolism in vitro. Can J Microbiol 1996; 42: 927–933.
Brossard L, Chaucheyras-Durand F, Michalet-Doreau B, Martin C. Dose effect of live yeasts on rumen microbial communities and fermentations during butyric latent acidosis in sheep: new type of interaction. Anim Sci 2006; 82: 1–8.
Bergman EN. Energy contributions of volatile fatty acids from the gastrointestinal tract in various species. Physiol Rev 1990; 70: 567–590.
Stoiber C, Dohnal I, Ganner A, Reichel C, Rose S, Schatzmayr G. Influence of autolysed yeast derivatives on rumen fermentation in vitro. In: 51. Jahrestagung der Bayerischen Arbeitsgemeinschaft Tierernährung e.V. Freising, Germany; 2013. pp. 157–162.
Wiedmeier RD, Arambel MJ, Walters JL. Effects of yeast culture and Aspergillus oryzae fermentation extract on ruminal characteristics and nutrient digestion. J Dairy Sci 1987; 70: 2063–2068.
Mutsvangwa T, Edwards IE, Topps JH, Paterson GFM. The effect of dietary inclusion of yeast culture (Yea-Sacc) on patterns of rumen fermentation, food intake and growth of intensively fed bulls. Anim Prod 1992; 55: 35–41.
Newbold CJ, Wallace RJ, Chen XB, McIntosh FM. Different strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae differ in their effects on ruminal bacterial numbers in vitro and in sheep. J Anim Sci 1995; 73: 1811–1818.
Carro MD, Lebzien P, Rohr K. Influence of yeast culture on the in vitro fermentation (Rusitec) of diets containing variable portions of concentrates. Anim Feed Sci Technol 1992; 37: 209–220.
Chung YH, Walker ND, McGinn SM, Beauchemin KA. Differing effects of 2 active dried yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) strains on ruminal acidosis and methane production in nonlactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 2011; 94: 2431–2439.
Miller-Webster T, Hoover WH, Holt M, Nocek JE. Influence of yeast culture on ruminal microbial metabolism in continuous culture. J Dairy Sci 2002; 85: 2009–2014.
Vyas D, Uwizeye A, Mohammed R, Yang WZ, Walker ND, Beauchemin KA. The effects of active dried and killed dried yeast on subacute ruminal acidosis, ruminal fermentation, and nutrient digestibility in beef heifers. J Anim Sci 2014; 92: 724– 732.
Pacheco MT, Caballero-Cordoba GM, Sgarbieri VC. Composition and nutritive value of yeast biomass and yeast protein concentrates. J Nutr Sci Vitaminol 1997; 43: 601–612.
Molisa F, van Eerden E, Parmentier HK, Vuorenmaa J. Effects of inclusion of hydrolyzed yeast on the immune response and performance of piglets after weaning. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2014; 195: 136–141.