Field investigation of Trypanosoma evansi and comparative analysis of diagnostic tests in horses from Bahawalpur, Pakistan

  In order to assess the prevalence of Trypanosoma evansi, a parasitological, molecular, and serological-based investigation was carried out in randomly sampled horses (n = 375) belonging to different age groups, sexes, and localities from the district of Bahawalpur, Pakistan. The diagnostic performance of applied tests was also compared. The prevalence was recorded as 0.5% with Woo's test, 1.3% with both ITS CF/BR PCR and RoTat 1.2 PCR, and 14.4% with CATT/T.evansi. Based on CATT/T.evansi, significant differences (P ≤ 0.05) were observed for prevalence estimates according to different localities, sexes, body condition scores, and origins. A nonsignificant difference (P ≥ 0.05) was observed among different age groups and variable parity numbers. Our study declares district Bahawalpur to be a high risk area for surra and proposes the potential use of CATT/T.evansi as a field test of choice for surveys in horses. However, the status of seropositive animals should be confirmed using a more sensitive molecular tool such as the satellite DNA target. A widespread status of anti-Trypanosoma antibodies calls for control measures and further investigation of various species (camels, cattle, sheep, goats, buffaloes) inhabiting the same area to identify reservoir status.

___

  • Goraya K, Iqbal Z, Sajid MS, Muhammad G. Frequency distribution of equine diseases in three metropolises of the upper Punjab, Pakistan. Int J Agric Biol 2013; 15: 1067-1074.
  • Desquesnes M, Holzmuller P, De-Hua L, Dargantes A, Zhao- Rong L, Jittaplapong S. Trypanosoma evansi and Surra: a review and perspectives on origin, history, distribution, taxonomy, morphology, hosts, and pathogenic effects. Biomed Res 2013; 2013: 194176.
  • Urakawa T, Verloo D, Moens L, Büscher P, Majiwa PA. Trypanosoma evansi : cloning and expression in Spodoptera frugiperda [correction of fugiperda] insect cells of the diagnostic antigen RoTat 1.2. Exp Parasitol 2001; 99: 181-189.
  • Gutierrez C, Juste MC, Corbera JA, Magnus E, Verloo D, Montoya JA. Camel trypanosomosis in the Canary Islands: assessment of and infection rates using the card agglutination test (CATT/ T. evansi ) and parasite detection tests. Vet Parasitol 2000; 90: 155-159.
  • Desquesnes, M, Kamyingkird K, Vergne T, Sarataphan N, Pranee R, Jittapalapong S. An evaluation of melarsomine hydrochloride efficacy for parasitological cure in experimental infection of dairy cattle with Trypanosoma evansi in Thailand. Parasitology 2011; 138: 1134-1142.
  • Verloo D, Holland W, My LN, Thanh NG, Tam PT, Goddeeris B, Vercruysse J, Buscher P. Comparison of serological tests for Trypanosoma evansi natural infections in water buffaloes from North Vietnam. Vet Parasitol 2000; 92: 87-96.
  • Claes F, Radwanska M, Urakawa T, Majiwa PA, Goddeeris B, Buscher P. Variable surface glycoprotein RoTat 1.2 PCR as a specific diagnostic tool for the detection of Trypanosoma evansi infections. Kinetoplastid Biol 2004; 3: 3.
  • Economic Advisor’s Wing. Economic Survey of Pakistan. Islamabad, Pakistan: Economic Advisor’s Wing, Finance Division, Government of Pakistan; 2006.
  • McDowell DM. Equine Industry Welfare Guidelines Compendium for Horses, Ponies and Donkeys. 3rd ed. Warwickshire, UK: National Equine Welfare Council; 2009.
  • World Organisation for Animal Health. OIE Terrestrial Manual. Trypanosoma evansi Infection (Surra). Paris, France: World Organisation for Animal Health; 2012.
  • Bajyana SE, Hamers R. A card agglutination test (CATT) for veterinary use based on an early VAT RoTat 1-2 of Trypanosoma evansi . Ann Soc Belg Med Trop 1988; 68: 233-240.
  • Njiru ZK, Constantine CC, Guya S, Crowther J, Kiragu JM, Thompson RC, Davila AM. The use of ITS1 rDNA PCR in detecting pathogenic African trypanosomes. Parasitol Res 2005; 95: 186-192.
  • Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977; 33: 159-174.
  • Hassan M, Muhammad G, Gutierrez C, Iqbal Z, Shakoor A, Jabbar A. Prevalence of Trypanosoma evansi infection in equines and camels in the Punjab region, Pakistan . Ann NY Acad Sci 2006; 108: 322-324.
  • Muieed MA, Chauhdry ZI, Shakoori AR. Comparative studies on the sensitivity of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and microscopic examination for the detection of Trypanosoma evansi in horses. Turk J Vet Ani Sci 2010; 34: 507-512.
  • Reid SA, Husein A, Copeman DB. Evaluation and improvement of parasitological tests for Trypanosoma evansi infection. Vet Parasitol 2001; 102: 291-297.
  • Desquesnes M, Dávila AMR. Applications of PCR-based tools for detection and identification of animal trypanosomes: a review and perspectives. Vet Parasitol 2002; 109: 213-231.
  • Ijaz MK, Nur-E-Kamal MSA, Mohamed AIA, Dar FK. Comparative studies on the sensitivity of polymerase chain reaction and microscopic examination for the detection of Trypanosoma evansi in experimentally infected mice. Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis 1998; 21: 215-223.
  • Nantulya VM. Trypanosmiasis in domestic animals: the problems of diagnosis. Revue Scien Tech 1990; 9: 357-367.
  • Ngaira JM, Njagi EN, Ngeranwa JJ, Olembo NK. PCR amplification of RoTat 1.2 VSG gene in T. evansi isolates in Kenya. Vet Parasitol 2004; 120: 23-33.
  • Masiga DK, Smyth AJ, Hayes P, Bromidge TJ, Gibson WC. Sensitive detection of trypanosomes in tsetse flies by DNA amplification. Int J Parasitol 1992; 22: 909-918.
  • Holland WG, Thanh NG, My LN, Magnus E, Verloo D, Buscher P, Goddeeris B, Vercruysse J. Evaluation of whole fresh blood and dried blood on filter paper discs in serological tests for Trypanosoma evansi in experimentally infected water buffaloes. Acta Tropica 2002; 81: 159-165.
  • Tehseen S, Jahan N, Qamar MF, Desquesnes M, Shahzad MI, Deborggraeve S, Büscher P. Parasitological, serological and molecular survey of Trypanosoma evansi infection in dromedary camels from Cholistan Desert, Pakistan. Parasit Vectors 2015; 8: 415.
  • Aslam A, Chaudhary ZI, Rehman H, Ashraf K, Ahmad N, Yaqub T, Maqbool A, Shakoori AR. Comparative evaluation of parasitological, serological and DNA amplification methods for diagnosis of natural trypanosomal infection in equines. Pak J Zool 2010; 42: 371-376.
  • Nadeem A, Aslam A, Chaudhary ZI, Ashraf K, Saed K, Ahmad N, Ahmed I, Rehman H. Indirect fluorescent antibody technique based prevalence of Surra in equines. Pak Vet J 2011; 31: 169-170.
  • Claes F, Ilgekbayeva GD, Verloo D, Saidouldin TS, Geerts S, Buscher P, Goddeeris BM. Comparison of serological tests for equine trypanosomosis in naturally infected horses from Kazakhstan. Vet Parasitol 2005; 131: 221-225.
  • Eyob A, Mekuria S, Regassa A, Abebe R. A cross-sectional study of equine trypanosomosis and its vectors in Wolayta zone, Southern Ethiopia. J Vet Med Anim Health 2011; 3: 21- 26.
  • Sumbria D, Singla LD, Sharma A, Moudgil AD, Bal MS. Equine trypanosomosis in central and western Punjab: prevalence, haemato-biochemical response and associated risk factors. Acta Trop 2014; 138: 44-50.
  • Bhutto B, Gadahi JA, Shah G, Dewani P, Arijo A. Field investigation on the prevalence of trypanosomiasis in camels in relation to sex, age, breed and herd size. Pak Vet J 2009; 30: 175-177.
  • Gari FR, Ashenafi H, Tola A, Goddeeris BM, Claes F. Comparative diagnosis of parasitological, serological, and molecular tests in dourine-suspected horses. Trop Anim Health Prod 2010; 42: 1649-1654.