Fermente aynalı sazan sucuğu

This study was carried out to investigate the appropriateness of carp (Cyprinus carpio L.) meat in the making of fermented sausage. Carp were obtained from Keban Dam Lake. Four groups of sausages were produced. The first group was made from carp meat alone, the second from mixtures of 67% carp meat and 33% red meat, the third from mixture of 50% carp meat and 50% red meat and the fourth from mixtures of 33% carp meat and 67% red meat. Samples of sausage were analysed for sensory properties, and microbiological and chemical characteristics on day 1 of production and days 7, 15 and 30 of ripening. In sensory analyses, it was observed that the quality of sausage during conservation was medium on days 1 and 7 in group I. The same group was found to be of good quality on days 15 and 30. Group II was of good quality during all periods. Group III was of medium quality on day 1 but good on other days. On the other hand, on days 1 and 7 group IV was of medium quality and on days 15 and 30 of good quality. In microbiological analyses, it was found that all groups contained coliform microorganisms on day 1. The numbers of coliform microorganisms were 1.0 x 102 cfu/g, 2.0 x 102 cfu/g, 3.0 x 102 cfu/g and 1.1 x 103 cfu/g in groups I, II, III and IV, respectively. Staphylococcus-micrococcus was detected as 1.4 x 104-2.7 x 104 cfu/g in group I, 1.4 x 104-8.0 x 104 cfu/g in group II, 1.2 x 104-3.1 x 104 cfu/g in group III and 8.5 x 103-2.3 x 104 cfu/g in group IV. The numbers of mould and yeast as cfu/g were 6.5 x 103-3.9 x 104, 1.3 x 104-7.7 x 104, 3.4 x 103-6.3 x 104 and 1.3 x 104-4.0 x 104 for groups I, II, III and IV, respectively. In the chemical analyses, moisture contents were 50.20%-38.02% in group I, 50.51-39.68% in group II, 51.58%-39.26% in group III and 50.94%-39.45% in group IV. Fat contents were determined to be 26.25%-30.76%, 26.43%-29.92%, 24.02%-30.08% and 24.51%-30.10% in groups I, II, III and IV, respectively. Protein contents were 21.02%-29.53%, 21.63%-28.97%, 22.22%-28.34% and 23.54%-28.30% in groups I, II, III, and IV, respectively. Calcium levels were 33.82-37.26 mg/100 g in group I, 26.04-30.80 mg/100 g in group II, 22.16-25.52 mg/100 g in group III and 19.86-23.71 mg/100 g in group IV. Phosphorus levels were 84.56-87.42 mg/100 g, 77.12-79.93 mg/100 g, 74.75-77.14 mg/100 g and 72.22-75.11 mg/100 g in groups I, II, III and IV, respectively. pH values were 5.77-5.46 in group I, 5.71-5.50 in group II, 5.76-5.51 in group III and 5.80-5.58 in group IV. In conclusion, these results indicate that it is possible to produce high quality fermented sausage from carp meat using permitted food additives and good technology.

Fermented Cyprinus carpio L. sausage

This study was carried out to investigate the appropriateness of carp (Cyprinus carpio L.) meat in the making of fermented sausage. Carp were obtained from Keban Dam Lake. Four groups of sausages were produced. The first group was made from carp meat alone, the second from mixtures of 67% carp meat and 33% red meat, the third from mixture of 50% carp meat and 50% red meat and the fourth from mixtures of 33% carp meat and 67% red meat. Samples of sausage were analysed for sensory properties, and microbiological and chemical characteristics on day 1 of production and days 7, 15 and 30 of ripening. In sensory analyses, it was observed that the quality of sausage during conservation was medium on days 1 and 7 in group I. The same group was found to be of good quality on days 15 and 30. Group II was of good quality during all periods. Group III was of medium quality on day 1 but good on other days. On the other hand, on days 1 and 7 group IV was of medium quality and on days 15 and 30 of good quality. In microbiological analyses, it was found that all groups contained coliform microorganisms on day 1. The numbers of coliform microorganisms were 1.0 x 102 cfu/g, 2.0 x 102 cfu/g, 3.0 x 102 cfu/g and 1.1 x 103 cfu/g in groups I, II, III and IV, respectively. Staphylococcus-micrococcus was detected as 1.4 x 104-2.7 x 104 cfu/g in group I, 1.4 x 104-8.0 x 104 cfu/g in group II, 1.2 x 104-3.1 x 104 cfu/g in group III and 8.5 x 103-2.3 x 104 cfu/g in group IV. The numbers of mould and yeast as cfu/g were 6.5 x 103-3.9 x 104, 1.3 x 104-7.7 x 104, 3.4 x 103-6.3 x 104 and 1.3 x 104-4.0 x 104 for groups I, II, III and IV, respectively. In the chemical analyses, moisture contents were 50.20%-38.02% in group I, 50.51-39.68% in group II, 51.58%-39.26% in group III and 50.94%-39.45% in group IV. Fat contents were determined to be 26.25%-30.76%, 26.43%-29.92%, 24.02%-30.08% and 24.51%-30.10% in groups I, II, III and IV, respectively. Protein contents were 21.02%-29.53%, 21.63%-28.97%, 22.22%-28.34% and 23.54%-28.30% in groups I, II, III, and IV, respectively. Calcium levels were 33.82-37.26 mg/100 g in group I, 26.04-30.80 mg/100 g in group II, 22.16-25.52 mg/100 g in group III and 19.86-23.71 mg/100 g in group IV. Phosphorus levels were 84.56-87.42 mg/100 g, 77.12-79.93 mg/100 g, 74.75-77.14 mg/100 g and 72.22-75.11 mg/100 g in groups I, II, III and IV, respectively. pH values were 5.77-5.46 in group I, 5.71-5.50 in group II, 5.76-5.51 in group III and 5.80-5.58 in group IV. In conclusion, these results indicate that it is possible to produce high quality fermented sausage from carp meat using permitted food additives and good technology.

___

  • 1.Gülyavuz, H. ve Ünlüsay›n, M.: Su Ürünleri ‹flleme Teknolojisi.Süleyman Demirel Üniv. E¤irdir Su Ürünleri Fak. Yay›n›, 1999.
  • 2. Gö¤üfl, A.K. ve Kolsar›c›, N.: Su Ürünleri Teknolojisi. Ankara Üniv.Ziraat Fak. Yay›nlar›, 1992.
  • 3. Mutluer, B.: Hamsi Bal›klar›nda Çeflitli Kutu Konservesi Yap›lmas›Üzerine Teknolojik Araflt›rmalar. Doktora Tezi. Ankara Üniv. Sa¤l›kBil. Enst., 1981.
  • 4. Kaya, A.: Keban Baraj Gölü Aynal› Sazanlardan (Cyprinus carpioL.)Ton Tipi Konserve Üretimi. Doktora Tezi. F›rat Üniv. Sa¤l›k Bil.Ens., 1996.
  • 5. Damarl›, E., Varl›k, C. ve Pala, M.: Su Ürünlerinde Kalite Kontrolu.Su Ürünleri Avlama ‹flleme Teknolojisi Seminer Tebli¤leri. 1992;90-97
  • 6. Gülyavuz, H. ve Timur, M: Bal›k Etinden Sosis Yap›m Teknolojisi.Ege Üniv. Su Ürünleri Fak. Su Ürünleri Sempozyumu. 1991.
  • 7. Arslan, A., Atefl, G., Gönülalan, Z., Kaya, A. ve Çelik, C.: K›zart›lm›flve Vakumlanm›fl Aynal› Sazan (Cyprinus carpioL.) Filetolor›n›nBuzdolab›nda Muhafaza Edilmesi. F›rat Üniv. Sa¤l›k Bil. Enst. Derg.1996; 10(2): 269-271.
  • 8. Yapar, A.: Bal›k Past›rmas› Üretimi ve Kalite ParametrelerininBelirlenmesi. F›rat Üniv. Fen Bil. Enst. Doktora tezi. 1993.
  • 9. Arslan, A., Çelik, C., Gönülalan, Z., Atefl, G., Kök, F. ve Kaya, A:Vakumlu ve Vakumsuz Aynal› Sazan Past›rmalar›n›n Mikrobiyolojikve Kimyasal Kalitesinin ‹ncelenmesi. TÜB‹TAK, Türk Veterinerlik veHayvanc›l›k Derg. 1997; 21: 23-29.
  • 10. Arslan, A., Gönülalan, Z. ve Çelik, C.: Market S›cakl›¤›ndaMuhafaza Edilen Aynal› Sazan (Cyprinus carpioL.) Past›rmalar›ndaMuhafaza Süresinin Etkisi. TÜB‹TAK, Türk Veterinerlik veHayvanc›l›k Derg. 1997; 21: 215-220.
  • 11. Arslan, A.: Keban Baraj Gölü Aynal› Sazanlar›n›n (Cyprinus carpioL.) Mikrobiyolojik ve Kimyasal Kaliteleri. TÜB‹TAK, TürkVeterinerlik ve Hayvanc›l›k Derg. 1993, 17: 251-259.
  • 12. Anonymous: D.S.‹. 9. Bölge Y›ll›k Stok Raporu, 1998.
  • 13. Y›ld›r›m, Y.: Yerli sucuklar›m›za Uygulanan De¤iflik TeknolojikYöntemlerin Mikroflora ve Kalite Üzerine Etkileri. F›rat Üniv.Veteriner Fak. Derg. 1977; 4(1-2): 52-79.
  • 14. Mutluer, B. ve ark.: ‹yonize Radyasyonla Baharatlar›nSterilizasyonu. I- Gamma Ifl›nlar›n›n Karabiber ve K›rm›z› BiberinMikrobiyel Flora, Uçucu Ya¤ ve Duyusal Niteliklerine Etkisi. A.Ü.Vet. Fak. Derg. 1986; 33(3): 464-476.
  • 15. Tekinflen, O.C. ve Sar›göl, C.: Elaz›¤ Yöresinde Tüketime SunulanBaz› Ö¤ütülmüfl Baharat›n Mikrobiyel Floras›. F.Ü. Vet. Fak. Derg.1982; VII(1-2): 151-162.
  • 16. Yentür, G. ve Bayhan, A.: G›dalarda Monosodyum Glutamat›n Katk›Maddesi Olarak Kullan›lmas›. G›da. 1989; 14(1): 39-42.
  • 17. Çakmakç›, S. ve Çelik, ‹.: G›da Katk› Maddeleri. Atatürk Üniv.Ziraat Fak. Ders Notu No: 164. 1995.
  • 18. Sa¤lam, Ö.F.: Türk G›da Mevzuat›. AB Ofset, Ocak 1999.
  • 19. Gökalp, H.Y., Kaya, M. ve Zorba, Ö.: Et Ürünleri ‹fllemeMühendisli¤i. Atatürk Üniv. Ziraat Fak. Ders Kitaplar› Serisi No:70,1994.
  • 20. Y›ld›r›m, Y., Ülgen, M.T. ve Özeren, T.: Yerli Sucuklar›n ÜretimYöntemleri Üzerine Araflt›rmalar. Ankara Üniv. Veteriner Fak. Derg.1978; XXV(1): 85-89.
  • 21. Tekinflen, O.C., Dinçer, B., Kaymaz, fi. ve Yücel, A.: TürkSucu¤unun Olgunlaflmas› S›ras›nda Mikrobiyel Flora veOrganoleptik Niteliklerindeki De¤iflimler. Ankara Üniv. VeterinerFak. Derg. 1982; 29(1-2): 111-130.
  • 22. Nazl›, B.: Researches on the Ripening of Turkish FermentedSausage Using a Local Starter Culture Combination. Tr. J. ofVeterinary and Animal Sciences. 1998; 22: 393-397.
  • 23. Lücke, F.K. and Hechelman, H.: Starter Cultures for Dry Sausagesand Raw Ham, Composition and Effect. Die Fleischwirtschaft.1987; 67(3):307-314.
  • 24. U¤ur, M.: Starter Kültür Kullan›larak Türk Sucuklar›nda KaliteninGelifltirilmesi Üzerine Araflt›rmalar. ‹stanbul Üniv. Veteriner Fak.Derg. 1984; 10(1): 41-52.
  • 25. Nazl›, B., ve fienol, A.: Researches on MicrobiologicalDecomposition of Turkish Fermented Sausages. Tr. J. of Veterinaryand Animal Sciences. 1997; 21(6): 487-492.
  • 26. Aytekin, H.: Konya'da Üretilen ve Konya Piyasas›nda Sat›lanSucuklar›n Baz› Mikrobiyolojik ve Kimyasal Analizleri ÜzerineAraflt›rma. Etlik Veteriner Enst. Mikrobiyoloji Derg. 1986; 5(10-11-12): 69-105.
  • 27. Alkan, M.: Elaz›¤ ve Kayseri Bölgesinde ‹mal Edilen FermenteSucuklar›n Mikrobiyolojik, Organoleptik, Fiziksel ve KimyasalKaliteleri Üzerinde Araflt›rmalar. Doktora tezi. Selçuk Üniv. Sa¤l›kBil. Ens., 1989.
  • 28. Aryanta, R.W., Fleet, G.H. and Buckle, K.A.: The Occurrence andGrowth of Microorganisms During the Fermentation of FishSausage. Int. J. of Food Microbiology. 1991; 13(2): 143-155.
  • 29. Türk Standardlar› Enstitüsü. T.S.1070. Türk Sucu¤u Standard›.(Teknik Kurulun 28.Mart.1997 Tarihinde Tadil Etti¤i fiekliyle),1983.
  • 30. Türk Standardlar› Enstitüsü. T.S.9298. Türk Sucu¤u Yap›mKurallar›. 1991.
  • 31. Türk Standardlar› Enstitüsü. T.S.1743. Et ve Et Mamülleri ToplamRutubet Miktar› Tayini. 1974.
  • 32. Türk Standardlar› Enstitüsü. T.S.1744. Et ve Et Mamüllerinde Ya¤Miktar› Tayini, 1974.
  • 33. Anonymus. Official Methods of Analysis of the Association ofOfficial Analytical Chemists. Ed. William Horwitz. 12thEd., 1975.
  • 34. American Public Health Agency (APHA)-AWWA-WPCF. StandardMethods for Examination of Water and Wastewater. 14thEdition.1975; PP. 466-483.
  • 35. Gündüz, T.: Kantitatif Analiz Laboratuar Kitab›. 4. Bask›. 1990;222-226.
  • 36. Türk Standardlar› Enstitüsü. T.S.3136. Et ve Et Mamüllerinde pHTayini, 1978.
  • 37. I.C.M.F.S.: Microorganisms in Foods. 1. Their Significance andMethods of Enumeration. Univ. of Toronto Press., 1982.
  • 38. Altu¤, T., Ova, G., Demirba¤, K. ve Kurtcan, Ü.: G›da KaliteKontrolu. Ege Üniv. Bas›mevi, 1995.
  • 39. Düzgünefl, O., Kesici, T. ve Gürbüz, F.: ‹statistik Metodlar› I.Ankara Üniv. Ziraat Fak. Yay›nlar›, 861. Ders Kitab› : 229, 1983.40. Ünlütürk, A. ve Turantafl, F.: G›da Mikrobiyolojisi. Mengi TanBas›mevi, 1998