Epidemiological investigation of bovine tuberculosis infection dynamics in Turkey
Epidemiological investigation of bovine tuberculosis infection dynamics in Turkey
A national epidemiological research project was carried out to define the dynamics affecting the epidemiology of bovine tuberculosis (bTB) infection in Turkey and to identify the risk factors. Official veterinarian (OV) and breeder original questionnaires were produced separately as part of this study to collect thorough data regarding the disease from the field. The number of questionnaires that needed to be filled out was decided by 95% confidence interval (CI) and 5% margin of error. The findings of 371 OV and 317 breeder questionnaires completed online across the country were analyzed. In addition, 28 outbreaks determined by random method were visited. To observe regional differences and field conditions, the opinions of OVs who monitored the disease and breeders were compiled. It was observed that the data obtained from both questionnaires was largely compatible. The main factors in the epidemiology of bTB infection were found to be effective fight, development of state policy, providing adequate financing, animal purchase, ear tagging and records, animal traders, animal markets, animal movements, conditional slaughtering, slaughterhouses, postmortem inspection, premise conditions, socio-economic impact, evaluation of raw milk, disease-free premises, compensation payments, and quarantine processes.
___
- 1. O’Hagan MJH, Matthews DI, Laird C, McDowell SWJ. Farmers’ beliefs about bovine tuberculosis control in Northern Ireland. Veterinary Journal 2016; 212: 22-26. doi: 10.1016/j. tvjl.2015.10.038
- 2. Rossi G, De Leo GA, Pongolini S, Natalini S, Vincenzi S et al. Epidemiological modelling for the assessment of bovine tuberculosis surveillance in the dairy farm network in EmiliaRomagna (Italy). Epidemics 2015; 11: 62-70. doi: 10.1016/j. epidem.2015.02.007
- 3. Skuce RA, Allen AR, McDowell SWJ. Herd-level risk factors for bovine tuberculosis: A literature review. Veterinary Medicine International. 2012; Volume 2012: 10 pages. doi: 10.1155/2012/621210
- 4. Calba C, Goutard FL, Vanholme L, Antoine-Moussiaux N, Hendrikx P et al. The added-value of using participatory approaches to assess the acceptability of surveillance systems: The case of bovine tuberculosis in Belgium. PLoS ONE 2016; 11 (7): 1-19. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0159041
- 5. Palmer MV, Waters WR. Bovine tuberculosis and the establishment of an eradication program in the United States: Role of veterinarians. Veterinary Medicine International 2011; Volume 2011: 12 pages. doi: 10.4061/2011/816345
- 6. Hassan AS, Garba SM, Gumel AB, Lubuma JMS. Dynamics of mycobacterium and bovine tuberculosis in a humanbuffalo population. Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine 2014; Volume 2014: 20 pages. doi:10.1155/2014/912306
- 7. Waters WR, Palmer MV, Buddle BM, Vordermeier HM. Bovine tuberculosis vaccine research: Historical perspectives and recent advances. Vaccine 2012; 30 (16): 2611-2622. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.02.018
- 8. Cousins DV. Mycobacterium bovis infection and control in domestic livestock. Revue scientifique et technique (International Office of Epizootics) 2001; 20 (1): 71-85
- 9. Doğan Ö. History of the study on the control and eradication of Bovine tuberculosis in Turkey. PhD, Fırat University, Elazığ, Turkey, 2011.
- 10. Ciaravino G, Ibarra P, Casal E, Lopez S, Espluga J et al. Farmer and veterinarian attitudes towards the bovine tuberculosis eradication programme in Spain: What is going on in the field? Frontiers in Veterinary Science 2017; 4: 202. doi: 10.3389/ fvets.2017.00202
- 11. Bartels C, Bergevoet R, Emmerzaal A, De Gee T, Schrıjver R et al. Brucellosis and Tuberculosis Eradication in Turkey. Central Veterinary Institute, Wageningen, Netherlands; 2012