Detoxification of aflatoxin B1 by bacteriocins and bacteriocinogenic lactic acid bacteria

The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of lactic acid bacteria and their bacteriocins in detoxifying aflatoxins. Aflatoxin B1 detoxification abilities of lactic acid bacteria both in liquid culture and as concentrated pellets, their bacteriocins, and mixtures of these 3 were evaluated. Mixed cultures of the 2 bacteria were also investigated. Lactobacillus plantarum and Lactococcus lactis were separately able to detoxify aflatoxin B1 in solutions. Lb. plantarum had a better detoxification rate (46%) than Lc. lactis (27%). After heat treatment, only the groups that contained pellets released the bound toxin back into the solution. Although bacteria and their bacteriocins were effective individually at detoxification, their efficacy was increased when they were used together. When Lc. lactis and Lb. plantarum were incubated in separate tubes and then mixed, that group had a significantly increased ability to bind toxins (59%) compared to their use alone. When these 2 strains were incubated together in a single broth culture, the most successful detoxification rate (81%) was achieved. Within this co-culture group, the bacteriocins alone were the most effective (90%) at removing aflatoxin B1 from solution.

Detoxification of aflatoxin B1 by bacteriocins and bacteriocinogenic lactic acid bacteria

The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of lactic acid bacteria and their bacteriocins in detoxifying aflatoxins. Aflatoxin B1 detoxification abilities of lactic acid bacteria both in liquid culture and as concentrated pellets, their bacteriocins, and mixtures of these 3 were evaluated. Mixed cultures of the 2 bacteria were also investigated. Lactobacillus plantarum and Lactococcus lactis were separately able to detoxify aflatoxin B1 in solutions. Lb. plantarum had a better detoxification rate (46%) than Lc. lactis (27%). After heat treatment, only the groups that contained pellets released the bound toxin back into the solution. Although bacteria and their bacteriocins were effective individually at detoxification, their efficacy was increased when they were used together. When Lc. lactis and Lb. plantarum were incubated in separate tubes and then mixed, that group had a significantly increased ability to bind toxins (59%) compared to their use alone. When these 2 strains were incubated together in a single broth culture, the most successful detoxification rate (81%) was achieved. Within this co-culture group, the bacteriocins alone were the most effective (90%) at removing aflatoxin B1 from solution.

___

  • Eaton DL, Gallagher EP. Mechanisms of aflatoxin carcinogenesis. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 1994; 34: 135–172.
  • Ravinayagam V, Jaganathan R, Panchanadham S, Palanivelu S. Potential antioxidant role of tridham in managing oxidative stress against aflatoxin B 1 -induced experimental hepatocellular carcinoma. Int J Hepatol 2012; 1–9.
  • Zhang YJ, Wu HC, Yazıcı H, Yu MW, Lee PH, Santella RM. Global hypomethylation in hepatocellular carcinoma and its relationship to aflatoxin B 1 exposure. World J Hepatol 2012; 4: 169–175.
  • International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans: some traditional herbal medicine, some mycotoxins, naphthalene and styrene. IARC Monogr 2002; 82: 1–171.
  • Bata A, Lasztity R. Detoxification of mycotoxin-contaminated food and feed by microorganisms. Trends Food Sci Tech 1999; 10: 223–228.
  • El-Nezami H, Kankaanpaa P, Salminen S, Ahokas J. Ability of dairy strains of lactic acid bacteria to bind a common food carcinogen, aflatoxin B1. Food Chem Toxicol 1998; 36: 321–326.
  • Haskard CA, El-Nezami HS, Kankaanpaa PE, Salminen S, Ahokas JT. Surface binding of aflatoxin B1 by lactic acid bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 2001; 67: 3086–3091.
  • Topcu A, Bulat T, Wishah R, Boyaci IH. Detoxification of aflatoxin B 1 and patulin by Enterococcus faecium strains. Int J Food Microbiol 2010; 139: 202–205.
  • El Khoury A, Atoui A, Yaghi J. Analysis of aflatoxin M1 in milk and yogurt and AFM1 reduction by lactic acid bacteria used in Lebanese industry. Food Control 2011; 22: 1695–1699.
  • Zinedine A, Faid M, Benlemlih M. In vitro reduction of aflatoxin B1 by strains of lactic acid bacteria isolated from Moroccan sourdough bread. Int J Agr Biol 2005; 7: 67–70.
  • Kabak B. Lactobacillus acidophilus ve Bifidobacterium bifidum’un Aspergillus flavus gelişimi ve aflatoksin B 1 ve aflatoksin M 1 üzerine etkisinin in vitro şartlarda araştırılması. MSc. Çukurova University Institute of Science, Adana. 2002 (in
  • Turkish with an English abstract). Fuchs S, Sontag G, Stidl R, Ehrlich V, Kundi M, Knasmüller S. Detoxification of patulin and ochratoxin A, two abundant mycotoxins, by lactic acid bacteria. Food Chem Toxicol 2008; 46: 1398–1407.
  • Hernandez-Mendoza A, Garcia HS, Steele JL. Screening of Lactobacillus casei strains for their ability to bind aflatoxin B1. Food Chem Toxicol 2009; 47: 1064–1068.
  • Klaenhammer TR. Bacteriocins of lactic acid bacteria. Biochimie 1988; 70: 337–349.
  • Sezer C, Güven A. Investigation of bacteriocin production capability of lactic acid bacteria isolated from foods. Kafkas Univ Vet Fak Derg 2009; 15: 45–50.
  • Budde BB, Hornbaek T, Jacobsen T, Barkholt V, Koch AG. Leuconostoc carnosum 4010 has the potential for use as a protective culture for vacuum-packed meats: culture isolation, bacteriocin identification, and meat application experiments. Int J Food Microbiol 2003; 83: 171–184.
  • Paster N, Lecong Z, Menashrov M, Shapira R. Possible synergistic effect of nisin and propionic acid on the growth of the mycotoxigenic fungi Aspergillus parasiticus, Aspergillus ochraceus, and Fusarium moniliforme. J Food Prot 1999; 62: 1223–1227.
  • Yang EJ, Chang HC. Purification of a new antifungal compound produced by Lactobacillus plantarum AF1 isolated from kimchi. Int J Food Microbiol 2010; 139: 56–63.
  • Vanos V, Cox L. Rapid routine method for the detection of lactic acid bacteria among competitive flora. Food Microbiol 1986; 3: 223–234.
  • Torriani S, Felis GE, Dellaglio F. Differentiation of Lactobacillus plantarum, L. pentosus, and L. paraplantarum by recA gene sequence analysis and multiplex PCR assay with recA genederived primers. Appl Environ Microbiol 2001; 67: 3450–3454.
  • Pu ZY, Dobos M, Limsowtin GKY, Powell IB. Integrated polymerase chain reaction-based procedures for the detection and identification of species and subspecies of the Grampositive bacterial genus Lactococcus. J Appl Microbiol 2002; 93: 353–361.
  • Oluwafemi F, Kumar M, Bandyopadhyay R, Ogunbanwo T, Ayanwandel KB. Bio-detoxification of aflatoxin B 1 in artificially contaminated maize grains using lactic acid bacteria. Toxin Rev 2010; 29: 115–122.
  • Peltonen KD, El-Nezami HS, Salminen SJ, Ahokas JT. Binding of aflatoxin B 1 by probiotic bacteria. J Sci Food Agric 2000; 80: 1942–1945.
  • Haskard C, Binnion C, Ahokas J. Factors affecting the sequestration of aflatoxin by Lactobacillus rhamnosus strain GG. Chem Biol Interact 2000; 128: 39–49.
  • Kabak B. Bazı mikotoksinlerin detoksifikasyonunda lactobacillus ve bifidobacterium suşlarının kullanımı. PhD. Çukurova University Institute of Science, Adana. 2007 (in
  • Turkish with an English abstract). Khanafari A, Soudi H, Miraboulfathi M, Karamei-Osboo R. An in vitro investigation of aflatoxin B 1 biological control by Lactobacillus plantarum. Pakistan J Biol Sci 2007; 10: 2553– 25
  • Lahtinen SJ, Haskard CA, Ouwehand AC, Salminen SJ, Ahokas JT. Binding of aflatoxin B 1 to cell wall components of Lactobacillus rhamnosus strain GG. Food Addit Contam 2004; 21: 158–164.
  • El-Nezami HS, Kankaanpää P, Salminen S, Ahokas J. Physiochemical alterations enhance the ability of dairy strains of lactic acid bacteria to remove aflatoxin from contaminated media. J Food Protect 1998; 61: 446–448.
  • Bovo F, Corassin CH, Rosim RE, Oliveira CAF. Efficiency of lactic acid bacteria strains for decontamination of aflatoxin M1 in phosphate buffer saline solution and in skimmed milk. Food Bioprocess Tech 2012; 5: 1–5.
  • Sarımehmetoğlu B, Küplülü Ö. Binding ability of aflatoxin M1 to yoghurt bacteria. Ankara Univ Vet Fak Derg 2004; 51: 195– 1
Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-0128
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 6 Sayı
  • Yayıncı: TÜBİTAK
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Research progress in China on the virulence factors of Streptococcus suis serotype

Xiuwei YUE, Yixuan HOU, Xiuguo HUA, Shujie WANG, Zhibiao YANG, Xuehui CAI

Effect of oxytocin treatment on the reproductive performance of sows after artificial insemination with liquid semen

Kamil DUZINSKI, Damian KNECHT, Pawel GAJEWCZYK

The first record of pseudoscorpions in honeybee hives in Turkey

Ahmet Onur GİRİŞGİN, Oya GİRİŞGİN, Mark HARVEY

Gastroscopic evaluation of gastric ulcer syndrome in sport horses with poor performance

Mehmet Alper ÇETİNKAYA, Alper DEMİRUTKU, Mahir KAYA

Detoxification of aflatoxin B1 by bacteriocins and bacteriocinogenic lactic acid bacteria

Çiğdem SEZER, Abamüslüm GÜVEN, Nebahat BİLGE ORAL, Leyla VATANSEVER

Evaluation of canine anti-Leishmania IgG subclasses and their relation with skin signs in naturally infected dogs in the northwest of Iran

Ali Shabestari ASL, Majid SHARIFI, Mehdi MOHEBALI, Zabihollah ZAREI, Zohreh BABALOO, Behnaz AKHOUNDI

The levels of trace elements and selected vitamins in goats with chronic fluorosis

Nuri ALTUĞ, Sezai ARSLAN, Nazmi YÜKSEK, İhsan KELEŞ, İbrahim Hakkı YÖRÜK, Yıldıray BAŞBUĞAN, İsmail AYTEKİN

Comparative evaluation of liquid-phase blocking ELISA and solid-phase competition ELISA methods for the detection of antibodies to the structural proteins of foot-and-mouth disease types O and A viruses

Murat ŞEVİK, Fahri Ferudun ÖZTÜRK

H-reflex and M-wave studies in the fore-and hindlimbs of rabbit

Erkut TURAN, Cengiz ÜNSAL, Aykut Göktürk ÜNER

Consumer preferences and consumption situation of chicken meat in Ankara Province, Turkey

Yılmaz ARAL, Erol AYDIN, Pınar DEMİR, Ahmet Cumhur AKIN