Cryopreservation of seabream (Sparus aurata) semen and fertility

Cryopreservation of seabream (Sparus aurata) semen and fertility

In this study, the aim was to reveal spermatological parameters of seabream (Sparus aurata), freezing ability of semen in different extenders, and fertilization capacity of frozen seabream semen. The study was conducted with 10 male and 6 female brooder seabreams. Female fish were synchronized by photoperiod and water temperature in the breeding season. Four different extenders [Mounib, Salty Mounib, Ringer, and sea water (1% NaCl)] including 10% dimethyl sulfoxide were used to assess the freezing ability of seabream semen. After postthaw spermatological examinations, three successful extenders (Mounib, Ringer, 1% NaCl) were chosen for the fertilization stage and 2 control and 3 experimental groups were formed (control I: fresh semen, control II: naturally fertilized eggs). When postthaw motility values were considered, the best results belonged to Mounib and Ringer extenders at 54.45 ± 1.18% and 58.25 ± 1.97%, respectively. At the fertilization stage, the highest hatching rates were from Mounib and Ringer at 29.20 ± 1.05% and 28.63 ± 1.12%, respectively. The statistical difference between extenders was significant (P < 0.05). Mounib and Ringer extenders gave the highest motility and fertility rates. As a result, Mounib and Ringer extenders can be used for freezing seabream semen, and semen frozen with these extenders supplies sufficient fertility results.

___

  • 1. Rottmann RW, Shireman JV, Chapman FA. Hormonal Control of Reproduction in Fish for Induced Spawning Southern Regional Aquaculture Centre (SRAC) Publication No. 424. Gainesville, FL, USA: Institute of Food and Agricultural Services, University of Florida; 1991.
  • 2. Alpbaz A. Su Ürünleri Yetiştiriciliği. Bursa, Turkey: Alp Yayınları; 2005 (in Turkish).
  • 3. Francescon A, Barbaro A, Bozzato G, Chiereghin S, Colombo L, Belvedere P. Induction of multiple spawning in the gilthead seabream, Sparus aurata L., by LH-RH analogue treatments and their influence on egg quality. Riv Ital Acquacol 1994; 29: 109–120.
  • 4. Zohar Y, Harel M, Hassin S, Tandler A. Broodstock management and manipulation of spawning in the gilthead seabream, Sparus aurata. In: Bromage R, Roberts R, editors. Broodstock Management and Egg and Larval Quality. Cambridge, UK: Blackwell Science Ltd.; 1995. pp. 94–118.
  • 5. Carnevali O, Centonze F, Brooks S, Marota I, Sumpter JP. Molecular cloning and expression of ovarian cathepsin D in seabream, Sparus aurata. Biol Reprod 1999; 61: 785–791.
  • 6. Carnevali O, Mosconi G, Cambi A, Ridolfi S, Zanuy S, Polzonetti-Magni AM. Changes of lysosomal enzyme activities in sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax) eggs and developing embryos. Aquaculture 2001; 202: 249–256.
  • 7. Andoh T, Matsubara T, Harumi T, Yanagimachi R. The use of poly-L-lysine to facilitate examination of sperm entry into pelagic, non-adhesive fish eggs. Int J Dev Biol 2008; 52: 753–577.
  • 8. Modig C, Raldu D, Cerda J, Olsson PE. Analysis of vitelline envelope synthesis and composition during early oocyte development in gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata). Mol Reprod Dev 2008; 75: 1351–1360.
  • 9. Suquet M, Dreanno C, Fauvel C, Cosson J, Billard R. Cryopreservation of sperm in marine fish. Aquac Res 2000; 31: 231–243.
  • 10. Billard R, Cosson J, Perchec G, Linhart O. Biology of sperm and artificial reproduction in carp. Aquaculture 1995; 124: 95–112.
  • 11. Zilli L, Schiavone R, Storelli C, Vilella S. Molecular mechanisms determining sperm motility initiation in two sparids (Sparus aurata and Lithognathus mormyrus). Biol Reprod 2008; 79: 356–366.
  • 12. Jamieson BGM. Fish Evolution and Systematics: Evidence from Spermatozoa. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1991.
  • 13. Billard R. Changes in structure and fertilizing ability of marine and freshwater fish spermatozoa diluted in media of various salinities. Aquaculture 1978; 14: 187–198.
  • 14. Drokin SI. Phospholipid distribution and fatty acid composition of phosphatidylcholine and phosphatidylethanolamine in sperm of some freshwater and marine species of fish. Aquat Living Resour 1993; 6: 49–56.
  • 15. Tekin N. Spermanın muayenesi ve değerlendirilmesi. In: Alaçam E, editor. Evcil Hayvanlarda Reprodüksiyon, Suni Tohumlama, Doğum ve İnfertilite. Konya, Turkey: Dizgievi; 1994. pp. 69–79 (in Turkish).
  • 16. Barbato F, Canese S, Moretti F, Misiti S, Laconi F, Rana K. Preliminary experiences for cryopreservation of Sparus aurataand Diplodus puntazzo semen. In: Bartley DM, Basurco B, editors. Genetics and Breeding of Mediterranean Aquaculture Species. Zaragoza, Spain: CIHEAM; 1998. pp. 281–287.
  • 17. Fabbrocini A, Lavadera L, Rispoli S, Sansone G. Cryopreservation of sea bream (Sparus aurata) spermatozoa. Cryobiology 2000; 40: 46–53.
  • 18. Cabrita E, Robles V, Cuñado S, Wallace JC, Sarasquete C, Herráez MP. Evaluation of gilthead sea bream, Sparus aurata, sperm quality after cryopreservation in 5 mL macrotubes. Cryobiology 2005; 50: 273–284.
  • 19. Cabrita E, Robles V, Cuñado S, Wallace JC, Sarasquete C, Herráez MP. Evaluation of DNA damage in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) and gilthead sea bream (Sparus aurata) cryopreserved sperm. Cryobiology 2005; 50: 144–153.
  • 20. Degraaf JD, King WV, Benton C, Berlinsky DL. Production and storage of sperm from the black sea bass Centropristis striata L. Aquac Res 2004; 35: 1457–1465.
  • 21. Barbato F, Canese S, Moretti F, Misiti S. Notes on a cryopreservation technique for gilthead sea bream sperm. In: Proceedings of the Commission C2, Refrigeration and Production, International Symposium Froid et Aquaculture, Bordeaux, France; 1996. p. 21.
  • 22. Salte R, Galli A, Falaschi U, Fjalestad KT, Aleandri R. A protocol for the on-site use of frozen milt from rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss Walbaum) applied to the production of progeny groups: comparing males from different populations. Aquaculture 2004; 231: 337–345.
  • 23. Atay D, Bekcan S. Deniz Balıkları ve Üretim Tekniği. Ankara, Turkey: Ankara Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi; 2000 (in Turkish).