Canine brucellosis in Turkey from an environmental perspective

Canine brucellosis in Turkey from an environmental perspective

Brucellosis is a zoonotic disease that affects not only livestock with economical losses but also human beings by causing serious health problems worldwide. Canine brucellosis has largely been overlooked in the world. In Turkey, brucellosis has also been one of the major concerns for decades. Canine brucellosis in this country has been reviewed and discussed from an environmental perspective in this review. As a part of prevention measures, one of the urgent practices that should be applied is to expand the routine examinations to include serological testing for all animals on arrival to kennels and then to decide the fate of the seropositive animals. It is thought that by giving wider information about stray dogs and wild Canidae in a common but not quite large habitat like that in Turkey, new studies could provide more understanding of canine brucellosis in one common environment.

___

  • 1. Alton GG, Jones LM, Angus RD, Verger JM. Techniques for the Brucellosis Laboratory. Paris, France: Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique; 1988.
  • 2. Aydın N. Brucella enfeksiyonları. In: Aydın N, Paracıkoğlu J, editors. Veteriner Mikrobiyoloji (Bakteriyel Hastalıklar). Ankara, Turkey: İlke-Emek Yayınları; 2006. pp. 145–163 (in Turkish).
  • 3. Moreno E. Retrospective and prospective perspectives on zoonotic brucellosis. Front Microbiol 2014; 5: 1–18.
  • 4. Godfroid J, Coeckart A, Liautard JP, Kohler S, Fretin D, Walravens K, Garin-Bastujii B, Letesson JJ. From the discovery of the Malta fever’s agent to the discovery of a marine mammal reservoir, brucellosis has continuously been a re-emerging zoonosis. Vet Res 2005; 36: 313–326.
  • 5. Maudlin I, Eisler MC, Welburn SC. Neglected and endemic zoonoses. Phil Trans R Soc B 2009; 364: 2777–2787.
  • 6. Pappas G, Papadimitriou P, Akriditis N, Christou L, Tsiamos EV. The new global map of human brucellosis. Lancet Infec Dis 2006; 6: 91–99.
  • 7. Hagler DS, Nicoletti P, Scarratt WK. Attempt to infect horses with Brucella canis. J Equine Vet Sci 1982; 2: 168–169.
  • 8. Baek BK, Park MY, Islam MA, Khatun MM, Lee SI, Boyle SM. The first detection of Brucella canis in cattle in the Republic of Korea. Zoonoses Public Hlth 2012; 59: 77–82.
  • 9. Uçan US, Aras Z. Seroprevalence of Brucella ovis infection in rams from some flocks in the Provinces Konya and Sivas. Eurasian J Vet Sci 2012; 23: 35–38 (in Turkish with English abstract).
  • 10. Aras Z, Uçan US. Detection of anti-brucella antibodies in Brucella abortus and Brucella melitensis infections by an antigen obtained from Rhizobium tropici. Eurasian J Vet Sci 2008; 24: 47–52 (in Turkish with English abstract).
  • 11. Yumuk Z, O’Callaghan D. Brucellosis in Turkey-an overview. Int J Infec Dis 2012; 16: e228–235.
  • 12. Yilmaz O, Wilson RT. The domestic livestock resource of Turkey: Occurrence and control of diseases of horses, donkeys and mules. J Equine Vet Sci 2013; 33: 1021–1030.
  • 13. Uçan US, Güler L, Erganiş O, Ok Ü, Kuyucuoğlu Y, Gündüz K, Durgut R, Ataman MB, Civelek T. A comparative serological study of brucellosis in horse. Veterinarium 1999; 10: 20–24 (in Turkish with English abstract).
  • 14. Hollett RB. Canine brucellosis: outbreaks and compliance. Theriogenology 2006; 66: 575–587.
  • 15. Aras Z, Ateş M, Uçan US. Brucella suşlarının izolasyonu ve biyotiplendirilmesi. Eurasian J Vet Sci 2009; 25: 51–59 (in Turkish).
  • 16. Solmaz H, Tutuncu M, Akkan HA, Boynukara B, Aksakal A. Seroprevalence of brucellosis in stray dogs in the region of Van, Turkey. Indian Vet J 2004; 81: 1086–1088.
  • 17. Carmichael LE. Abortions in 200 beagles. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1966; 149: 1126–1129.
  • 18. Aras Z, Uçan US. Detection of Brucella canis from inguinal lymph nodes of naturally infected dogs by PCR. Theriogenology 2010; 74: 658–662.
  • 19. Wankee MM. Canine brucellosis. Anim Reprod Sci 2004; 82: 195–207.
  • 20. İstanbulluoğlu E, Diker S. Serologic studies on Brucella canis. Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi 1983; 30: 14–18 (in Turkish with English abstract).
  • 21. Diker KS, Aydın N, Erdeğer J, Özyurt M. A serologic survey of dogs for Brucella canis and Brucella abortus and evaluation of mercaptoethanol microagglutination test. Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi 1987; 34: 268–277 (in Turkish with English abstract).
  • 22. Öncel Y, Akan M, Sareyyüpoğlu B, Tel OY, Çiftci A. Seroprevalence of Brucella canis infection of dogs in two provinces in Turkey. Turk J Vet Anim Sci 2005; 29: 779–783.
  • 23. Uçan US, Aras Z, Semacan A. Serodiagnosis of Brucella canisinfection in dogs by a dipstick enzyme immunoassay. Eurasian J Vet Sci 2010; 26: 109–112.
  • 24. Aras Z, Taşpınar M. Aydın İ. A novel polymerase chain reaction to detect Brucella canis in dogs. Kafkas Univ Vet Fak Derg 2014; 21: 169–172.
  • 25. Diker S, İstanbulluoğlu E, Ayhan H, Soysal G. A sero-survey of Brucella canis infections in man at Bursa District. Mikrobiyoloji Bülteni 1984; 18: 203–207 (in Turkish with English abstract).
  • 26. Köksal F, Akan E, Başlamışlı L, Diker S, Yiğit S, Özcan K. Demonstration of antibody levels to B. abortus, B. canis and C. burnetti in sera of patients with brucellosis like symptoms. Mikrobiyoloji Bülteni 1988; 22: 132–141 (in Turkish with English abstract).
  • 27. Köylü O, Aras Z, Uçan US. The seroprevalence of Brucella canis infection in a risky human population in Province Konya. İnfeksiyon Dergisi 2009; 23: 73–77 (in Turkish with English abstract).
  • 28. Sayan M, Erdenlig S, Stack J, Kilic S, Guducuoglu H, Aksoy Y, Baklan A, Etiler N. A serological diagnostic survey for Brucella canis infection in Turkish patients with brucellosis-like symptoms. Jpn J Infect Dis 2010; 64: 516–519.
  • 29. Yüksekkaya S, Aras Z, Uçan US. Investigation of Brucella canisseroprevalence in brucellosis suspected cases, Mikrobiyoloji Bülteni 2013; 47: 152–157 (in Turkish with English abstract).
  • 30. Uçan US, Aras Z, Zorlutuna M. Detection of canine brucellosis by a rapid agglutination test using Rhizobium tropici as antigen. Rev Med Toulouse 2010; 161: 51–56.
  • 31. Godfroid J, Al Dahouk S, Pappas G, Roth F, Matope G, Muma J, Marcotty T, Pfeiffer D, Skjerve E. A “One Health” surveillance and control of brucellosis in developing countries: moving away from improvisation. Comp Immunol Microb 2013; 36: 241–248.
  • 32. Uçan US, Aras Z. The “One Health” concept and a need for national monitoring of canine and feline infections. In: Proceedings of the 1st Turkish Congress of One Health. Konya, Turkey: One Health Congress; 2015. pp. 61–62.
  • 33. Day M. One Health: the importance of companion animal vector-borne diseases. Parasite Vector 2011; 4: 49–55.
  • 34. Özen D, Gürcan S, Kaya U. Determination of the number of owned cats and dogs in Ankara. Veteriner Hekimler Derneği Dergisi 2014; 85: 9–16 (in Turkish with English abstract).
  • 35. Özen D, Böhning D, Gürcan İS. Estimation of stray dog and cat populations in metropolitan Ankara, Turkey. Turk J Vet Anim Sci 2016; 40: 7-12.
  • 36. Official Gazette of the Republic of Turkey (Resmi Gazete). Türkiye’de Kuduz Hastalığının Kontrolü TR 05 03 06, Milletlerarası Anlaşma, Karar sayısı; 2006/11183. RG No: 26349. 2006 (in Turkish).
  • 37. Konya Büyükşehir Belediyesi. Faaliyet Raporu 2013. Konya, Turkey: Bilgi İşlem Daire Başkanlığı, Konya Büyükşehir Belediyesi; 2014 (in Turkish).
  • 38. Beck AM. The Ecology of Stray Dogs: A Study of Free-Ranging Urban Animals. West Lafayette, IN, USA: Purdue University Press; 1973.
  • 39. Can OE. Status, conservation and management of large carnivores in Turkey. In: Convention on the Conservation of Wildlife. Standing Committee, 24th Meeting, 29 November–3 December 2004. Strasbourg, France: Council of Europe; 2004. pp. 1–28.
  • 40. Sekercioglu CH. Turkey’s First Wildlife Corridor Project by KuzeyDoga Society. WWF Newsletter 2012. Washington, DC, USA: WWF.
  • 41. Khosravi R, Rezaei HR, Kaboli M. Detecting hybridization between Iranian wild wolf (Canis lupus pallipes) and free-ranging domestic dog (Canis familiaris) by analysis of microsatellite markers. Zool Sci 2013; 30: 27–34.
  • 42. Khojoyan S. Howling problem: conservationists deplore wolf hunting in Armenia. ArmeniaNow, 9 October 2015. Available online at http://www.armenianow.com/society/environment/57024/armenia_wolves_bounty_hunting_sheep.
  • 43. Zlatanova D, Popova E. Habitat variables associated with wolf (Canis lupus L.) distribution and abundance in Bulgaria. Bulg J Agric Sci 2013; 19 (Suppl. 2): 262–266.
  • 44. Stronen AV, Jędrzejewska B, Pertoldi C, Demontis D, Randi E, Niedziałkowska M, Pilot M, Sidorovich VE, Dykyy I, Kusak J et al. North-south differentiation and a region of high diversity in European wolves (Canis lupus). PLoS ONE 2013; 8: e76454.
  • 45. FAO, OIE. The Global Framework for the Progressive Control of Transboundary Animal Diseases (GF-TADs), Version Approved as Basic Text by FAO and OIE. Rome, Italy: FAO; 2004.
  • 46. Choi JY, Zaky J. Brucellosis Beyond Borders. Proceedings of UCLA Healthcare. Los Angeles, CA, USA: UCLA; 2013.
  • 47. OIE. Veterinary Education Core Curriculum OIE Guidelines. Paris, France: World Organisation for Animal Health; 2013.