Thiruvothur Venkatesan RAJA, Satish Kumar RATHEE, Bharat Singh RATHOD, Harshad PANCHASARA, Achintya Kumar DAS, Umesh SINGH, Sushil KUMAR

Comparative efficiency of five mathematical functions in modelling the first lactation milk yield of Kankrej cattle

Modelling of first lactation milk yield of Kankrej cattle was done using five different non-linear mathematical functions viz., exponential decline function (EDF), gamma function (GF), inverse polynomial function (IPF), mixed log function (MLF) and parabolic exponential function (PEF). We compared their efficiency in describing variations in first lactation milk yield of animals maintained under field conditions. A total of 3994 fortnightly daily milk records of 203 Kankrej cattle calved during the years between 2011 and 2017 at farmers’ herds in the Banaskantha region of Gujarat State, India were utilized for the study. The PROC NLIN procedure of Statistical Analysis Software (SAS) using Newton method of iteration was applied to generate the model parameters and corresponding standard errors. Different parameters like adjusted R2 -value, root mean square error (RMSE), Durbin–Watson (DW) statistic, Akaike information criterion (AIC) and Bayesian information criterion (BIC) were used to compare the efficiency of different models. Results inferred that mixed log function was the best non-linear mathematical function for explaining variations in the first lactation milk yield of Kankrej cattle followed by gamma function and parabolic exponential function. The exponential decline function was the least efficient in fitting the lactation curve in Kankrej cattle, followed by inverse polynomial function.

PDF

___

1. Pundir RK, Singh PK, Singh KP, Dangi PS. Factor analysis of biometric traits of Kankrej cows to explain body conformation. Asian Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences 2011; 24: 449- 456.
2. Macciotta N, Vicario D, Cappio-Borlino A. Detection of different shapes of lactation curve for milk yield in dairy cattle by empirical mathematical models. Journal of Dairy Science 2005; 88: 1178-1191.
3. Rathod B S, Patel M P, Chaudhari A B, Gami Y M, Panchasara H H. Conservation and Improvement of Kankrej Cattle (Bos indicus): Status vis-à-vis strategies. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 2020; 90 (8): 102-105.
4. Brody S, Ragsdale AC, Turner CW. The rate of decline of milk secretion with the advance of the period of lactation. Journal of General Physiology 1923; 5: 441-444.
5. Sikka LC. A study of lactation as affected by heredity and environment. Journal of Dairy Research 1950; 17: 231-252.
6. Nelder JA. Inverse polynomials, a useful group of multifactor response functions. Biometrics 1966; 22: 128.
7. Wood PDP. Algebraic model of lactation curve in cattle. Nature 1967; 216: 164-165.
8. Guo Z, Swalve HH. Modelling of the lactation curve as a sub-model in the evaluation of test day records. In: Interbull Meeting Open Session Programme; Pruhonice, Prague, Czech Republic; 1995. No. 11
9. SAS Institute. Getting Started with SAS® Text Miner 4.2. 2010. 1st Edition. Cary, NC, USA: SAS Institute Inc., pp 84.
10. Bangar YC, Verma MR. Non-linear modelling to describe lactation curve in Gir crossbred cows. Journal of Animal Science Technology 2017; 59: 3.
11. Zadeh GHN. Comparison of the parameters of the lactation curve between normal and difficult calving in Iranian Holstein cows. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research 2019; 17 (1): e0401.
12. Boujenane I. Comparison of different lactation curve models to describe lactation curve in Moroccan Holstein-Friesian dairy cows. Iranian Journal of Applied Animal Science 2013; 3 (4): 817-822.
13. Bahashwan S. Lactation curve modelling for Dhofari cows breed. Asian Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances 2018; 13: 226-231.
14. Singh U, Raja TV, Alyethodi RR, Rathod BS, Prakash B et al. Genetic improvement of Kankrej cattle through associated herd progeny testing under field and farm conditions. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 2018; 88 (3): 314-318.
15. Farhangfar H, Rowlinson P. Genetic analysis of Wood`s lactation curve for Iranian Holstein heifers. Journal of Biological Sciences 2007; 7: 127-135.
16. Rashia Banu N. Genetic evaluation of the lactation curve in Karan Fries cattle. PhD Dissertation. National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal, India, 2010.
17. Zadeh GHN. Comparison of non-linear models to describe the lactation curves of milk yield and composition in Iranian Holsteins. Journal of Agricultural Science 2014; 152: 309-324.
18. Zadeh GHN. Application of growth models to describe the lactation curves for test-day milk production in Holstein cows. Journal of Applied Animal Research 2017; 45 (1): 145-151.
19. Gahlot GC, Gahlot RS, Jairath LK. Pattern of lactation curve in Rathi cattle. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 1988; 58 (9): 1112-1114.
20. Thorat BN, Thombre BM, Bhoite UY. Comparative study of fitting various lactation curve models in Holdeo crossbred cattle. Indian Journal of Animal Research 2019; DOI: 10.18805/ ijar.B-3590.
21. Dongre, V, Gandhi RS, Singh A. Comparison of different lactation curve models in Sahiwal cows. Turkish. Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences 2012; 36 (6): 723-726.
22. Ali TM, Narang R, Dubey PP, Kaur S. Characterization of lactation curve patterns using non-linear models in crossbred dairy cattle. Indian Journal of Animal Research 2021; B-4789: 1-7 doi: 10.18805/IJAR.B-4289