Assessment of motor development using the Alberta Infant Motor Scale in full-term infants

The Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS) is a well-known, norm-referenced scale that evaluates the gross motor development of children from birth to 18 months. The aim of the study was to compare the Canadian norms with the AIMS scores of a Turkish sample of infants, and to investigate whether the current reference values of the AIMS are representative for Turkish full-term infants. The study was conducted with 411 Turkish infants of both sexes (195 girls and 216 boys), born with gestational age 38 weeks and older, weighing ≥2500 g at birth. Motor performance of all the cases at different ages were assessed with the AIMS which was used by a physiotherapist. The mean AIMS scores of Turkish infants were compared with the norm values of the original AIMS established in a Canadian sample of infants. The results showed no statistically significant differences between the AIMS scores of Turkish and Canadian infants during the first 18 months of life except at 0-

___

1.Kjølbye CB, Drivsholm TB, Ertmann RK, Lykke K, Køster-Rasmussen R. Motor function tests for 0-2-year-old children – a systematic review. Dan Med J 2018; 65: A5484.

2.Burger M, Louw QA. The predictive validity of general movements - A systematic review. Eur J Paediatr Neurol 2009; 13: 408-420.

3.Song YH, Chang HJ, Shin YB, Park YS, Park YH, Cho ES. The validity of two neuromotor assessments for predicting motor performance at 12 months in preterm infants. Ann Rehabil Med 2018; 42: 296-304.

4.Hoskens J, Klingels K, Smits-Engelsman B. Validity and cross-cultural differences of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Third Edition in typically developing infants. Early Hum Dev 2018; 125: 17-25.

5.Piper MC, Darrah J. Motor Assessment of the Developing Infant. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1994.

6.Darrah J, Piper M, Watt M-J. Assessment of gross motor skills of at-risk infants: predictive validity of the Alberta Infant Motor Scale. Dev Med Child Neurol 1998; 40: 485-491.

7.Piper MC, Pinnell LE, Darrah J, Maguire T, Byrne PJ. Construction and validation of the Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS.) Can J Public Health 1992; 83(Suppl 2): 46-50.

8.Campbell SK, Kolobe THA, Wright BD, Linacre JM. Validity of the test of infant motor performance for prediction of 6-, 9- and 12-month scores on the Alberta Infant Motor Scale. Dev Med Child Neurol 2002; 44: 263-272.

9.Fuentefria RN, Silveira RC, Procianoy RS. Motor development of preterm infants assessed by the Alberta Infant Motor Scale: systematic review article. J Pediatr (Rio J) 2017; 93: 328-342.

10.de Albuquerque PL, Lemos A, Guerra MQDF, Eickmann SH. Accuracy of the Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS) to detect developmental delay of gross motor skills in preterm infants: a systematic review. Dev Neurorehabil 2015; 18: 15-21.

11.Saccani R, Valentini NC, Pereira KRG. New Brazilian developmental curves and reference values for the Alberta infant motor scale. Infant Behav Dev 2016; 45(Pt A): 38-46.

12.Morales-Monforte E, Bagur-Calafat C, Suc-Lerin N, Fornaguera-Martí M, Cazorla-Sánchez E, Girabent-Farrés M. The Spanish version of the Alberta Infant Motor Scale: Validity and reliability analysis. Dev Neurorehabil 2017; 20: 76-82.

13.Syrengelas D, Siahanidou T, Kourlaba G, Kleisiouni P, Bakoula C, Chrousos GP. Standardization of the Alberta infant motor scale in full-term Greek infants: preliminary results. Early Hum Dev 2010; 86: 245-249.

14.Manuel AE, Burger M, Louw QA. Validation of the Canadian norms for the Alberta In fant Motor Scale for infants in a South African region aged four to twelve months; a pilot study. South African J Physiother 2012; 68: 23-28.

15.Valentini NC, Saccani R. Brazilian validation of the Alberta Infant Motor Scale. Phys Ther 2012; 92: 440-447.

16.Uesugi M, Tokuhisa K, Shimada T. The reliability and validity of the Alberta Infant Motor Scale in Japan. J Phys Ther Sci 2008; 20: 169-175.

17.Wang H, Li H, Wang J, Jin H. Reliability and concurrent validity of a Chinese version of the Alberta Infant Motor Scale administered to high-risk infants in China. Biomed Res Int 2018; 2018: 1-10.

18.Jeng SF, Yau KIT, Chen LC, Hsiao SF. Alberta Infant Motor Scale: reliability and validity when used on preterm infants in Taiwan. Phys Ther 2000; 80: 168-178.

19.Lee LLS, Harris SR. Psychometric properties and standardization samples of four screening tests for infants and young children: a review. Pediatr Phys Ther 2005; 17: 140-147.

20.Darrah J, Bartlett D, Maguire TO, Avison WR, Lacaze-Masmonteil T. Have infant gross motor abilities changed in 20 years? A re-evaluation of the Alberta Infant Motor Scale normative values. Dev Med Child Neurol 2014; 56: 877-881.

21.Fleuren KMW, Smit LS, Stijnen T, Hartman A. New reference values for the Alberta Infant Motor Scale need to be established. Acta Paediatr 2007; 96: 424-427.

22.De Kegel A, Peersman W, Onderbeke K, Baetens T, Dhooge I, Van Waelvelde H. New reference values must be established for the Alberta Infant Motor Scales for accurate identification of infants at risk for motor developmental delay in Flanders. Child Care Health Dev 2013; 39: 260-267.

23.Elbasan B, Kocyigit MF, Soysal-Acar AS, Atalay Y, Gucuyener K. The effects of family-centered physiotherapy on the cognitive and motor performance in premature infants. Infant Behav Dev 2017; 49: 214-219.

24.Hosbay Yildirim Z, Aydinli N, Ekici B, Tatli B, Caliskan M. Can Alberta Infant Motor Scale and Milani Comparetti Motor Development Screening Test be rapid alternatives to Bayley scales of infant development-II at high-risk infants. Ann Indian Acad Neurol 2012; 15: 196-199.

25.Blanchard Y, Neilan E, Busanich J, Garavuso L, Klimas D. Interrater reliability of early intervention providers scoring the Alberta Infant Motor Scale. Pediatr Phys Ther 2004; 16: 13-18.

26.Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A. G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods 2007; 39: 175-191.

27.Saccani R, Valentini NC. Cross-cultural analysis of the motor development of Brazilian, Greek and Canadian infants assessed with the Alberta Infant Motor Scale. Rev Paul Pediatr 2013; 31: 350-358.

28.Kelly Y, Sacker A, Schoon I, Nazroo J. Ethnic differences in achievement of developmental milestones by 9 months of age: the Millennium Cohort Study. Dev Med Child Neurol 2006; 48: 825-830.

29.Adolph KE. Learning to move. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 2008; 17: 213-218.

30.Hamadani JD, Tofail H, Hilaly A, Huda SN, Engle P, Grantham-McGregor SM. Use of family care indicators and their relationship with child development in Bangladesh. J Health Popul Nutr 2010; 28: 23-33.

31.Bartlett DJ, Kneale-Fanning JE. Relationships of equipment use and play positions to motor development at eight months corrected age of infants born preterm. Pediatr Phys Ther 2003; 15: 8-15.

32.Koren A, Reece SM, Kahn-D’angelo L, Medeiros D. Parental information and behaviors and provider practices related to tummy time and back to sleep. J Pediatr Heal Care 2010; 24: 222-230.

33.Sals JS, Silverman LN, Gatty CM. The relationship of infant sleep and play positioning to motor milestone achievement. Am J Occup Ther 2002; 56: 577-580.

34.WHO Multicentre Growth Reference Study Group. Assessment of sex differences and heterogeneity in motor milestone attainment among populations in the WHO Multicentre Growth Reference Study. Acta Paediatr Suppl 2006; 450: 66-75.

35.Ertem IO, Krishnamurthy V, Mulaudzi MC, et al. Similarities and differences in child development from birth to age 3 years by sex and across four countries: a cross-sectional, observational study. Lancet Glob Health 2018; 6: e279-e291.

36.da Rocha Neves K, de Souza Morais RL, Teixeira RA, Pinto PAF. Growth and development and their environmental and biological determinants. J Pediatr (Rio J) 2016; 92: 241-250.

37.Walker SP, Wachs TD, Gardner JM, et al; International Child Development Steering Group. Child development: risk factors for adverse outcomes in developing countries. Lancet 2007; 369: 145-157.

38.Spittle AJ, Doyle LW, Boyd RN. A systematic review of the clinimetric properties of neuromotor assessments for preterm infants during the first year of life. Dev Med Child Neurol 2008; 50: 254-266.

39.Liao PJM, Campbell SK. Examination of the item structure of the Alberta Infant Motor Scale. Pediatr Phys Ther 2004; 16: 31-38.
Turkish Journal of Pediatrics-Cover
  • ISSN: 0041-4301
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 6 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 1958
  • Yayıncı: Hacettepe Üniversitesi Çocuk Sağlığı Enstitüsü Müdürlüğü
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Grisel’s syndrome presenting with neck pain: an atypical case

Emre BİLGİN, Gökhan ÇAVUŞ, Vedat AÇIK, Yurdal GEZERCAN, Ali İhsan ÖKTEN

Risk factors of intravenous immunoglobulin resistance and coronary arterial lesions in Turkish children with Kawasaki disease

Serkan TÜRKUÇAR, Kaan YILDIZ, Ceyhun ACARI, Hatice ADIGÜZEL DUNDAR, Mustafa Çağlar KIR, Erbil ÜNSAL

Detection of allele frequencies of common c. 511C>T and c.625G>A variants in the ACADS gene in the Turkish population

Mustafa KILIÇ, Bekir ERGÜNER, Can KOŞUKÇU, Rıza Köksal ÖZGÜL

A rare cause of acute abdominal pain in a patient with Primary ciliary dyskinesia with situs inversus totalis

Kısmet ÇIKI, Özlem Boybeyi TÜRER, Mina Gharibzadeh HIZAL, Gökçen Dilşa TUĞCU, Nagehan EMİRALİOĞLU, Ebru ŞAHİN YALÇIN, Deniz DOĞRU ERSÖZ, Nural KİPER, Uğur ÖZÇELİK

Peters Plus syndrome: a recognizable clinical entity

Gizem ÜREL DEMİR, Naz Güleray LAFCI, Özlem AKGÜN DOĞAN, Pelin Özlem ŞİMŞEK KİPER, Gülen Eda UTİNE

Rotavirus encephalopathy with concomitant acute cerebellitis: report of a case and review of the literature

Cem PAKETÇİ, Pınar EDEM, Derya OKUR, Fatma Ceren SARIOĞLU, Handan GÜLERYÜZ, Erhan BAYRAM, Semra Hız KURUL, Uluç YİŞ

A rare cause of epileptic encephalopathy: a beta-propeller protein associated neurodegeneration case with a new mutation and literature review

Nezir ÖZGÜN, Leyla ÖZER, Ahmet YARAMIŞ

Cord blood delta neutrophil index values of term neonates

Melek BÜYÜKEREN, Hasan Tolga ÇELİK, Oytun PORTAKAL, Erdem FADILOĞLU, Gökçen ÖRGÜL, Şule YİĞİT, M. Sinan BEKSAÇ, Murat YURDAKÖK

Red blood cell variables and correlations with body mass components in boys aged 10-17 years

Jasmina Pluncevic GLIGOROSKA, Serjoza GONTAREV, Vesela MALESKA, Ljudmila EFREMOVA, Daniela Shukova STOJMANOVA, Sanja MANCHEVSKA

Children with extreme hyperferritinemia are at risk of receiving more chemotherapy than necessary

Seung Beom HAN, Soo-Young LEE