The effectiveness and clinical outcomes of the Minerva cervical thoracic jacket in patients with type II odontoid fractures

The effectiveness and clinical outcomes of the Minerva cervical thoracic jacket in patients with type II odontoid fractures

Background/aim: The objective of this study was to carry out a detailed analysis and assess the outcomes for the Minerva cervical thoracic jacket(CTJ) in patients with type II odontoid fractures who could not be surgically treated. Materials and methods: Twenty-six patients for whom the Minerva CTJ was used rather than surgery for different reasons were included in the study. All patients were fitted with the Minerva CTJ within the first 24 h following diagnosis. The patients were followed 4 weeks after hospital discharge and then at 2-week intervals. Results were considered significant at P < 0.05 and a 95% confidence interval was calculated. Results: Of the 26 patients, 17 were male and 9 were female. The mean age was 49.03 years old (range: 16 86 years old). Fusion occurred in 25 of the 26 patients (P = 0.004), and the mean time to fusion was 6.8 weeks (P = 0.002). The mean length of hospital stay was 4 days and the mean follow-up period was 7.3 weeks. None of the patients had any complications due to the Minerva CTJ and the mortality rate was 0%. Conclusions: The Minerva CTJ application was a safe and cheap technique in the management of type II odontoid fractures. It had a high fusion rate and no complications.

___

  • 1. Husby J, Sorensen KH. Fractures of the odontoid process of the axis. Acta Orthop Scand 1974; 45: 182-192.
  • 2. Anderson LD, D’Alonzo RT. Fractures of the odontoid process of the axis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1974; 56: 1663-1674.
  • 3. Hadley MN, Dickman CA, Browner CM, Sonntag VK. Acute axis fractures: a review of 229 cases. J Neurosurg 1989; 71: 642- 647.
  • 4. Fagin AM, Cipolle MD, Barraco RD, Eid S, Reed JF, Li M, Pasquale MD. Odontoid fractures in the elderly: should we operate? J Trauma 2010; 68: 583-586.
  • 5. Ivancic PC, Beauchman NN, Mo F, Lawrence BD. Biomechanics of halo-vest and dens screw fixation for type II odontoid fracture. Spine 2009; 34: 484-490.
  • 6. Nourbakhsh A, Shi R, Vannemreddy P, Nanda A. Operative versus nonoperative management of acute odontoid Type II fractures: a meta-analysis. J Neurosurg Spine 2009; 11: 651- 658.
  • 7. Koech F, Ackland HM, Varma DK, Williamson OD, Malham GM. Nonoperative management of type II odontoid fractures in the elderly. Spine 2008; 33: 2881-2886.
  • 8. Perry J, Nickel VL. Total cervical spine fusion for neck paralysis. J Bone Joint Surg 1959; 41: 37-60.
  • 9. Thompson H. The halo traction apparatus: a method of external splinting of the cervical spine after injury. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1962; 44-B: 655-661.
  • 10. Richter D, Latta LL, Milne EL, Varkarakis GM, Biedermann L, Ekkernkamp A, Ostermann PA. The stabilizing effects of different orthoses in the intact and unstable upper cervical spine: a cadaver study. J Trauma 2001; 50: 848-854.
  • 11. Garfin SR, Botte MJ, Waters RL, Nickel D, Nickel VL. Complications in the use of halo fixation device. J Bone Joint Surg 1986; 68: 320-325.
  • 12. Lind B, Sihlbom H, Nordwall A. A halo-vest treatment of unstable traumatic cervical spine injuries. Spine 1988; 13: 425- 432.
  • 13. Glover AV, Zakaria R, May P, Barrett C. Overtightening of halo pins resulting in intracranial penetration, pneumocephalus, and epileptic seizure. Int J Spine Surg 2013; 7: e42-44.
  • 14. Sawers A, DiPaola CP, Rechtine GR 2nd. Suitability of the noninvasive halo for cervical spine injuries: a retrospective analysis of outcomes. Spine J 2009; 9: 216-220.
  • 15. Lewis E, Liew S, Dowrick A. Risk factors for non-union in the non-operative management of type II dens fractures. ANZ J Surg 2011; 81: 604-607.
  • 16. Kim SK, Shin JJ, Kim TH, Shin HS, Hwang YS, Park SK. Clinical outcomes of halo-vest immobilization and surgical fusion of odontoid fractures. J Korean Neurosurg S 2011; 50: 17-22.