The comparison of various disinfectants? efficacy on Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm layers

The comparison of various disinfectants? efficacy on Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm layers

Background/aim: Because biofilms are resistant to antibiotics and biocides, they usually cause chronic persistent infections, which are arduous to cure and have high mortality and morbidity. Our study aimed to investigate the efficiency of orthophthalaldehyde, peracetic acid, hydrogen peroxide, and sodium hypochlorite on Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus biofilm layers and live microbial cells. Materials and methods: Biofilm layers were determined by crystal violet assay and live  microbial cells were determined using a resazurin assay. Results: For Pseudomonas aeruginosa, sodium hypochlorite showed the most influential disinfection because it diminished 83.6% of the biofilm layer and decreased 99.7% of live microbial cells. For Staphylococcus aureus, hydrogen peroxide was determined the most active disinfectant with 80.3% reduction of the biofilm layer. Sodium hypochlorite was also determined to be the most efficient disinfectant with 99.8% reduction of live microbial cells. Sodium hypochlorite was the most influential disinfectant on biofilm layers and live microbial cells of both microorganisms. Conclusion: We concluded that if we use sodium hypochlorite at a high level as a disinfectant for both surfaces and medical equipment, it is beneficial to prevent infections related to biofilms. More studies about prevention of biofilm occurrence and standardization of the methods for investigating disinfectants effects are necessary.

___

  • 1. Dongari-Bagtzoglou A. Pathogenesis of mucosal biofilm infections: challenges and progress. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther 2008; 6: 201-208.
  • 2. Jones CJ, Newsom D, Kelly B, Irie Y, Jennings LK, Xu B, Limoli DH, Harrison JJ, Parsek MR, White P et al. ChIP-Seq and RNA-Seq reveal an AmrZ mediated mechanism for cyclic di-GMP synthesis and biofilm development by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. PLoS Pathog 2014; 10: e1003984.
  • 3. Balaban N, Cirioni O, Giacometti A, Ghiselli R, Braunstein JB, Silvesti C, Mocchegiani F, Saba V, Scalise G. Treatment of Staphylococcus aureus biofilm infection by the quorum-sensing inhibitor RIP. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2007; 51: 2226- 2229.
  • 4. Donlan RM, Costerton JW. Biofilms: survival mechanisms of clinically relevant microorganisms. Clin Microbiol Rev 2002; 15: 167-193.
  • 5. Tote K, Horemans T, Vanden Berghe D, Maes L, Cos P. Inhibitory effect of biocides on the viable masses and matrices of Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms. Appl Environ Microbiol 2010; 76: 3135-3142.
  • 6. Tashiro Y, Inagaki A, Ono K, Inaba T, Yawata Y, Uchiyama H, Nomura R. Low concentrations of ethanol stimulate biofilm and pellicle formation in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 2014; 78: 178-181.
  • 7. Walsh SE, Maillard JY, Russell AD. Orthophthalaldehyde: a possible alternative to glutaraldehyde for high level disinfection. J Appl Microbiol 1999; 86: 1039-1046.
  • 8. Stepanovic S, Vukovic D, Hola V, Di Bonaventura G, Djukic S, Cirkovic I, Ruzicka F. Quantification of biofilm in microtiter plates: overview of testing conditions and practical recommendations for assessment of biofilm production by staphylococci. APMIS 2007; 115: 891-899.
  • 9. Lewis K. Persister cells, dormancy and infectious disease. Nat Rev Microbiol 2007; 5: 48-56.
  • 10. Smith K, Hunter IS. Efficacy of common hospital biocides with biofilms of multi-drug resistant clinical isolates. J Med Microbiol 2008; 57: 966-973.
  • 11. Fraise AP. European norms for disinfection testing. J Hosp Infect 2008; 70: 8-10.
  • 12. FDA. Cleared Sterilants and High Level Disinfectants with General Claims for Processing Reusable Medical and Dental Devices. Silver Spring, MD, USA: FDA; 2015.
  • 13. Rutela WA, Weber DJ. Disinfection, sterilization, and control of hospital waste. In: Mandell GL, Bennett JE, Dolin R, editors. Mandell, Douglas, and Bennett’s Principles and Practice of Infectious Diseases. 8th ed. Philadelphia, PA, USA: Churchill Livingstone; 2015. pp. 3294-3309.
  • 14. Tote K, Vanden Berghe DV, Maes L, Cos P. A new colorimetric microtitre model for the detection of Staphylococcus aureus biofilms. Lett Appl Microbiol 2008; 46: 249-254.
  • 15. Pantanella F, Valenti P, Natalizi T, Passeri D, Berlutti F. Analytical techniques to study microbial biofilm on abiotic surfaces: pros and cons of the main techniques currently in use. Ann Ig 2013; 25: 31-42.
  • 16. Vickery K, Pajkos A, Cossart Y. Removal of biofilm from endoscopes: evaluation of detergent efficiency. Am J Infect Control 2004; 32: 170-176.
  • 17. Bridier A, Briandet R, Thomas V, Dubois-Brissonnet F. Resistance of bacterial biofilms to disinfectants: a review. Biofouling 2011; 27: 1017-1032.
  • 18. De Beer D, Srinivasan R, Stewart PS. Direct measurement of chlorine penetration into biofilms during disinfection. Appl Environ Microbiol 1994; 60: 4339-4344.
  • 19. Henoun Loukili N, Becker H, Harno J, Bientz M, Meunier O. Effect of peracetic acid and aldehyde disinfectants on biofilm. J Hosp Infect 2004; 58: 151-154.
  • 20. Perumal PK, Wand ME, Sutton JM, Bock LJ. Evaluation of the effectiveness of hydrogen peroxide based disinfectants on biofilms formed by Gram-negative pathogens. J Hosp Infect 2014; 87: 227-233.
  • 21. Jahid IK, Ha SD. Inactivation kinetics of various chemical disinfectants on Aeromonas hydrophila planktonic cells and biofilms. Foodborne Pathog Dis 2014; 11: 346-353.
  • 22. Stewart PS, Roe F, Rayner J, Elkins JG, Lewandowski Z, Ochsner UA, Hassett DJ. Effect of catalase on hydrogen peroxide penetration into Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms. Appl Environ Microbiol 2000; 66: 836-838.
  • 23. Cochran WL, Mcfeters GA, Stewart PS. Reduced susceptibility of thin Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms to hydrogen peroxide and monochloramine. J Appl Microbiol 2000; 88: 22-30.
  • 24. Simões M, Carvalho H, Pereira MO, Vieira MJ. Studies on the behaviour of Pseudomonas fluorescens biofilms after orthophthalaldehyde treatment. Biofouling 2003; 19: 151-157.
  • 25. Tachikawa M, Yamanaka K. Synergistic disinfection and removal of biofilms by a sequential two-step treatment with ozone followed by hydrogen peroxide. Water Res 2014; 64: 94- 101.
  • 26. Presterl E, Suchomel M, Eder M, Reichmann S, Lassnigg A, Graninger W, Rotter M. Effects of alcohols, povidoneiodine and hydrogen peroxide on biofilms of Staphylococcus epidermidis. J Antimicrob Chemother 2007; 60: 417-420.
  • 27. Aparecida Guimaraes M, Rocchetto Coelho L, Rodrigues Souza R, Ferreira Carvalho BT, Marie Sa Figueiredo A. Impact of biocides on biofilm formation by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (ST239-SCC mec III) isolates. Microbiol Immunol 2012; 56: 203-207.
  • 28. Cabeça TK, Pizzolitto AC, Pizzolitto EL. Activity of disinfectants against foodborne pathogens in suspension and adhered to stainless steel surfaces. Braz J Microbiol 2012; 43: 1112-1119.
  • 29. Giaouris E, Heir E, Hébraud M, Chorianopoulos N, Langsrud S, Møretrø T, Habimana O, Desvaux M, Renier S, Nychas GJ. Attachment and biofilm formation by foodborne bacteria in meat processing environments: causes, implications, role of bacterial interactions and control by alternative novel methods. Meat Sci 2014; 97: 298-309.
Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-0144
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 6 Sayı
  • Yayıncı: TÜBİTAK
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Özge Telci ÇAKLILI, Banu BAŞOK, Gülcan YAVUZ, SELCAN TÜLÜ, Banu MESÇİ, Aytekin OĞUZ

Sex-related differences in the efficacy of dexamethasone pretreatment for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled study

Cheol LEE, Jae-Yoon CHUNG, Myeongjong LEE

Decreased oxidative stress may contribute to the disease process in placenta accreta

Özcan EREL, Ali Turhan ÇAĞLAR, Aykan YÜCEL, Sibel ÖZLER, Merve ERGİN, Nuri DANIŞMAN, Dilek UYGUR, Efser ÖZTAŞ, Başak GÜMÜŞ GÜLER

Gönen BAŞER, Oya Nermin SİVRİKOZ, Eyyüp KARAHAN, Emine Şeker ÜN, Hakan YILDIRIM, Sülen SARIOĞLU

Clinical and surgical outcomes of upper lumbar disc herniations: a retrospective study

Memduh KAYMAZ, Alp Özgün BÖRCEK, Burak KARAASLAN, Ayfer ASLAN

Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric assessment of the Turkish version of the Vulnerability to Abuse Screening Scale

Güler DURU AŞİRET, Nalan AKBAYRAK, Münevver ÖZCAN, Gülcan BAĞCIVAN, Beste BAŞAK ERÖKSÜZ, Nuran AKDEMİR

Mehmet CEYHAN, İnci YILDIRIM, Hasan TEZER, İlker DEVRİM, Emmanuel FEROLDI

Endovascular embolization in the management of traumatic and postoperative abdominopelvic bleeding: a single-center experience

Mehmet Halil ÖZTÜRK, Hasan DİNÇ, Ayşegül CANSU, Abdulkadir GÜNDÜZ, Dilek SAĞLAM

Luping HUANG, Yuanyuan PAN, Sijia CHEN, Minyuan ZHANG, Xiuxiu ZHUANG, Shenhui JIN, Junlu WANG, Qinxue DAI, Yunchang MO

Neuroendocrine disorder in chronic fatigue syndrome

Dajana LENDAK, Snezana BRKIC, Milica MEDIC STOJANOSKA, Aleksandra NOVAKOV MIKIC, Slavica TOMIC, Daniela MARIC