Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric assessment of the Turkish version of the Vulnerability to Abuse Screening Scale

Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric assessment of the Turkish version of the Vulnerability to Abuse Screening Scale

Background/aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Vulnerability to Abuse Screening Scale (VASS). Materials and methods: This was a methodological study. The sample included 140 elderly individuals. Data were collected by using a questionnaire form, the VASS, and the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS). The Cronbach alpha value was calculated and test retest reliability was tested for the reliability analyses. Results: The Cronbach alpha value calculated for the VASS (12 items) was 0.819. There was no difference between test and retest mean scores of the VASS. A statistically significantly positive and strong relationship was found between the test and retest scores of the individuals. A statistically significantly positive and moderate relationship was found between the VASS and GDS scores. Factor analysis revealed that a total of four factors accounted for 63.66% of the total variance with an eigenvalue of >1. These results show that the Turkish version of the VASS is a valid and reliable scale. Conclusion: This study showed that the adoption of the translated VASS in Turkey is reliable and valid to evaluate the risk of abuse in adults over the age of 65.

___

  • 1. Krug EG, Dahlberg LL, Mercy JA, Zwi AB, Lozano R. World Report on Violence and Health. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2002.
  • 2. World Health Organization. The Toronto Declaration on the Global Prevention of Elder Abuse. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2002.
  • 3. National Center on Elder Abuse. Elder Abuse Awareness Kit: A Resource Kit for Protecting Older People and People with Disabilities. Washington, DC, USA: National Association of Adult Protective Services Administrators; 2001.
  • 4. Stark S. Elder abuse screening, intervention, and prevention. Nursing 2012; 42: 24-29.
  • 5. Soares JFJ, Barros H, Torres-Gonzales F, Ioannidi-Kapolou E, Lamura G, Lindert J, de Dios Luna J, Macassa G, Melchiorre MG, Stank M. Abuse and Health Among Elderly in Europe. Kaunas, Lithuania: Lithuanian University of Health Sciences Pres; 2010.
  • 6. Keskinoglu P, Pıcakcıefe M, Bilgic N, Giray H, Karakus N, Ucku R. Elder abuse and neglect in two different socioeconomic districts in Izmir, Turkey. Int Psychogeriatr 2007; 19: 719-731.
  • 7. Özden D, Kelleci M, Güler N. An investigation on mental status of the elderly in terms of exposure to violence and some other properties and of individuals. Turkish J Res Dev Nurs 2010; 12: 5-13 (in Turkish with abstract in English).
  • 8. Tatara T, Kuzmeskus LB, Duckhorn E, Bivens L, Thomas C, Gertig J. National Elder Abuse Incidence Study: Final Report. Washington, DC, USA: National Center on Elder Abuse; 1998.
  • 9. Day K. Elder abuse in context of poverty and deprivation and emergency department care. Australasian Emergency Nursing Journal 2007; 10: 169-177.
  • 10. Bilgili N. Detection of the problems encountered by the families providing care for the elderly. PhD, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey, 2000 (in Turkish with abstract in English).
  • 11. Schofield M, Reynolds R, Mishra G, Powers J, Dobson A. Vulnerability to abuse, perceived control and psychological stress among older women: Women’s Health Australia study. J Appl Gerontol 2002; 21: 24-39.
  • 12. Neale AV, Hwalek MA, Scott RO, Sengstock MC, Stahl C. Validation of the Hwalek-Sengstock Elder Abuse Screening Test. J Appl Gerontol 1991; 10: 406-418.
  • 13. American Medical Association. Diagnostic and Treatment Guidelines on Elder Abuse and Neglect. Chicago, IL, USA: American Medical Association; 1992.
  • 14. Reis M, Nahmiash D. Validation of the indicators of abuse (IOA) screen. Gerontologist 1998; 38: 471-480.
  • 15. Buri HM, Daly JM, Jogerst GJ. Elder abuse telephone screen reliability and validity. J Elder Abuse Negl 2009; 21: 58-73.
  • 16. Fulmer T. Elder abuse and neglect assessment. J Gerontol Nurs 2003; 29: 8-9.
  • 17. Schofield MJ, Mishra GD. Validity of self-report screening scale for elder abuse: Women’s Health Australia study. Gerontologist 2003; 43: 110-120.
  • 18. Yesavage JA, Brink TL, Rose TL, Lum O, Huang V, Adey M, Leirer VO. Development and validation of a Geriatric Depression Screening Scale: a preliminary report. J Psychiatr Res 1983; 1: 37-49.
  • 19. Ertan T, Eker E. Reliability, validity and factor structure of the Geriatric Depression Scale in Turkish elderly: are there different factor structures for different cultures? Int Psychogeriatr 2000; 12: 163-172.
  • 20. Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine 2000; 25: 3186-3191.
  • 21. Şencan H. Sosyal ve Davranışsal Ölçümlerde Güvenilirlik ve Geçerlilik. Ankara, Turkey: Seçkin Publishers; 2005 (in Turkish).
  • 22. Çam M, Arabacı L. Qualitative and quantitative steps on attitude scale construction. Turkish J Res Dev Nurs 2010; 2: 65-68 (in Turkish with abstract in English).
  • 23. Alpar R. Spor, Sağlık ve Eğitim Bilimlerinden Örneklerle Uygulamalı İstatistik ve Geçerlik-Güvenirlik. Ankara, Turkey: Detay Publisher; 2010 (in Turkish).
  • 24. Polit DF, Beck CT. Nursing Research: Generating and Assessing Evidence for Nursing Practice. Philadelphia, PA, USA: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins; 2008.
  • 25. da Silva Maia R, Maia EM. Brazilian Portuguese cross-cultural adaptation of the Vulnerability to Abuse Screening Scale (VASS) for screening of violence against the elderly. Cad Saude Publica 2014; 30: 1379-1384 (in Portuguese with abstract in English).
  • 26. Tavşancıl E. Tutumların Ölçülmesi ve SPSS ile Veri Analizi. İstanbul, Turkey: Nobel Publisher; 2010 (in Turkish).
  • 27. Büyüköztürk Ş. Sosyal Bilimler için Veri Analizi El Kitabı: İstatistik, Araştırma Deseni, SPSS Uygulamaları ve Yorum. Ankara, Turkey: Pegem Akademi; 2011 (in Turkish).
  • 28. Fidanci BE, Acikel C, Fidanci K, Yildiz D, Karaman, D, Demirkaya E. Validity and reliability: to use in pediatrics. Annals of Paediatric Rheumatology 2012; 1: 147-155.
  • 29. Dong X, Simon MA, Odwazny R, Gorbien MJ. Depression and elder abuse and neglect among community-dwelling Chinese elderly population. J Elder Abuse Negl 2008; 20: 25-41.
  • 30. Dong XQ, Simon MA, Beck TT, Farran C, McCann JJ, Mendes de Leon CF, Laumann E, Evans DA. Elder abuse and mortality: the role of psychological and social wellbeing. Gerontology 2011; 57: 549-558.
  • 31. Dyer CB, Pavlik VN, Murphy KP, Hyman DJ. The high prevalence of depression and dementia in elder abuse or neglect. J Am Geriatr Soc 2000; 48: 205-208.
  • 32. Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. Using Multivariate Statistics. New York, NY, USA: Harper Collins College Publishers; 1996.
Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-0144
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 6 Sayı
  • Yayıncı: TÜBİTAK