Memduh KAYMAZ, Alp Özgün BÖRCEK, Burak KARAASLAN, Ayfer ASLAN

Clinical and surgical outcomes of upper lumbar disc herniations: a retrospective study

Background/aim: Upper lumbar disc herniation (LDH), generally involving L1 L2 and L2 L3 level herniation, is less common than lower LDH and, in this retrospective study, the clinical and radiological findings of patients who suffered from upper LDH and were operated on due to this pathology were reviewed. Materials and methods: Data regarding neurological and radiological findings of patients operated on between January 2005 and December 2013 were retrospectively collected. During this period, 3494 patients had surgery for LDH, and 129 of these patients had disc herniation at the upper levels. Seventy-eight patients with proper follow-up and data were included in the study. Results: There were 39 males and 39 females enrolled in the study. Twenty-one patients (0.6%) were operated on due to L1 L2 disc herniation and 45 (1.2%) had L2 L3 disc herniation. Twelve (0.3%) patients had disc pathologies at both levels. The mean age of the population was 59.9 years old, and this was significantly higher than lower LDH averages previously described in the literature (42 years old). Cauda equina signs and urinary disturbances were frequently seen, in addition to symptoms related to back and leg pain, neurologic claudication, and weakness in lower extremities. Conclusion: Upper LDHs requiring surgical therapy are extremely rare, more so than other LDHs. They are more frequent among older patients and are often present along with signs of cauda equina and urinary dysfunction.

PDF

___

1. Rhee JM, Schaufele M, Abdu WA. Radiculopathy and the herniated lumbar disc. Controversies regarding pathophysiology and management. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006; 88: 2070-2080.
2. Iwasaki M, Akino M, Hida K, Yano S, Aoyama T, Saito H, Iwasaki Y. Clinical and radiographic characteristics of upper lumbar disc herniation: ten-year microsurgical experience. Neurol Med-Chir 2011; 51: 423-426.
3. Deyo RA, Tsui-Wu YJ. Descriptive epidemiology of low-back pain and its related medical care in the United States. Spine 1987; 12: 264-268.
4. Iversen T, Solberg TK, Romner B, Wilsgaard T, Nygaard O, Waterloo K, Brox JI, Ingebrigtsen T. Accuracy of physical examination for chronic lumbar radiculopathy. BMC Musculoskel Dis 2013; 14: 206.
5. Aichmair A, Du JY, Shue J, Evangelisti G, Sama AA, Hughes AP, Lebi DR, Burket JC, Cammisa FP, Girardi FP. Microdiscectomy for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation: an evaluation of reoperations and long-term outcomes. Evidence-Based SpineCare Journal 2014; 5: 77-86.
6. Kortelainen P, Puranen J, Koivisto E, Lahde S. Symptoms and signs of sciatica and their relation to the localization of the lumbar disc herniation. Spine 1985; 10: 88-92.
7. Ma D, Liang Y, Wang D, Liu Z, Zhang W, Ma T, Zhang L, Lu X, Cai Z. Trend of the incidence of lumbar disc herniation: decreasing with aging in the elderly. Clinical Interventions in Aging 2013; 8: 1047-1050.
8. Tutkan İ, Postalcı L, Aysal F, Oral Z. Cauda equina syndrome due to lumbar disc herniation with no motor deficit: report of two cases. Turk Neurosurg 2003; 13: 304-309.
9. Awwal MA, Ahsan MK, Sakeb N. Outcome of symptomatic upper lumbar disc herniation. Mymensingh Medical Journal 2014; 23: 742-751.
10. Azimi P, Shahzadi S, Benzel EC, Montazari A. Measuring motor, sensory and sphincter dysfunctions in patients with cervical myelopathy using the modified Japanese Orthopedic Association (mJOA) score: a validation study. Journal of Injury and Violence Research 2012; 4: 41.
11. Albert TJ, Balderston RA, Heller JG, Herkowitz HN, Garfin SR, Tomany K, An HS, Simeone FA. Upper lumbar disc herniations. J Spinal Disord 1993; 6: 351-359.
12. He SH, Zhao X, Wu XH, Ding H, Fang J. Percutaneous endoscpic lumbar discectomy for the treatment of upper lumbar disc herniation. Zhongguo Gu Shang 2012; 25: 920-922.
13. Pasztor E, Szarvas I. Herniation of the upper lumbar discs. Neurosurg Rev 1981; 4: 151-157.
14. Lee JC, Kim MS, Shin BJ. An analysis of the prognostic factors affecting the clinical outcomes of conventional lumbar open discectomy: clinical and radiological prognostic factors. Asian Spine Journal 2010; 4: 23-31.
15. Lee DS, Park KS, Park MS. The comparative analysis of clinical characteristics and surgical results between the upper and lower lumbar disc herniations. J Korean Neurosurg S 2013; 54: 379- 383.
16. Fairbank J, Hashimoto R, Dailey A, Patel AA, Dettori JR. Does patient history and physical examination predict MRI proven cauda equina syndrome? Evidence-Based Spine-Care Journal 2011; 2: 27-33.
17. Gardner A, Gardner E, Morley T. Cauda equina syndrome: a review of the current clinical and medico-legal position. Eur Spine J 2011; 20: 690-697.
18. Hurme M, Alaranta H. Factors predicting the result of surgery for lumbar intervertebral disc herniation. Spine 1987; 12: 933-938.
19. Sanderson SP, Houten J, Errico T, Forshaw D, Bauman J, Cooper PR. The unique characteristics of upper lumbar disc herniations. Neurosurgery 2004; 55: 385-389.