Yılmaz ÖNAL, Murat VELİOĞLU, Hakkı Muammer KARAKAŞ, İsmail YARDIMCIOĞLU

Points to consider when evaluating three-dimensional digital subtraction angiography of intracranial aneurysms and their effects on treatment

Background/aim: In this study, we aimed to investigate what should be regarded as potential determinants of treatment strategies when evaluating 3D digital subtraction angiography (DSA) images. Material and methods: Our inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) presence of at least one intracranial aneurysm demonstrated by conventional angiography, (2) having both 2D and 3D images, and (3) being over 18 years old. First, two-dimensional (2D) and then 3D angiography images of 226 aneurysms of 150 patients were scanned. Morphological characteristics such as size, configurations, relationship with parent artery, baby counts, and other incidental findings were determined. Results: Of the 226 aneurysms, 11 (4.9%) were only detected on 3D images. Four of these 11 additional aneurysms were believed to be babies of other aneurysms seen in 2D images. Middle cerebral artery (MCA) M1 segment was the most common localization in terms of missed aneurysms. Of the 28 aneurysms located in the communicating segment of the internal carotid artery, the absolute locations of 7 (25%) could not be detected in 2D images or detected in the wrong location. Of the 24 aneurysms located in the ophthalmic segment, the origin of 8 (33%) could not be clearly identified in 2D images. Truncus relationships of MCAs bifurcation/trifurcation aneurysms were seen in 41 of 63 aneurysms (65%) on 2D images, whereas all were confirmed on 3D images. Fenestrations not seen in 2D images were identified in 3D images of 4 patients (3%). Conclusion: The superiority of 3D images compared to 2D images in determining the morphologic characteristics of intracranial aneurysms has been known for a long time. The contribution of 3D images to the treatment can be summarized as evaluating the parent artery relationship, revealing the number and shapes of aneurysm babies more clearly, detecting fenestrations, and shortening procedure time by finding the correct working angle.Key words: Aneurysm, intracranial aneurysm, 3D angiography, digital subtraction angiography, DSA, interventional neuroradiology, endovascular treatment

PDF

___

1. Keedy A. An overview of intracranial aneurysms. Mcgill Journal of Medicine 2006; 9 (2): 141-146.
2. Bracard S, Anxionnat R, Picard L. Current diagnostic modalities for intracranial aneurysms. Neuroimaging clinics of North America 2006; 16 (3): 397-411. doi: 10.1016/j. nic.2006.05.002
3. Anxionnat R, Bracard S, Ducrocq X, Trousset Y, Launay L et al. Intracranial aneurysms: clinical value of 3D digital subtraction angiography in the therapeutic decision and endovascular treatment. Radiology 2001; 218 (3): 799-808. doi: 10.1148/ radiology.218.3.r01mr09799
4. Anxionnat R, Bracard S, Macho J, Da Costa E, Vaillant R et al. 3D angiography clinical interest. First applications in interventional neuroradiology. Journal of Neuroradiology 1998; 25 (4): 251-262.
5. Sugahara T, Korogi Y, Nakashima K, Hamatake S, Honda S et al. Comparison of 2D and 3D digital subtraction angiography in evaluation of intracranial aneurysms. American Journal of Neuroradiology 2002; 23 (9): 1545-1552.
6. Kucukay F, Okten RS, Tekiner A, Dagli M, Gocek C et al. Threedimensional volume rendering digital subtraction angiography in comparison with two-dimensional digital subtraction angiography and rotational angiography for detecting aneurysms and their morphological properties in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage. European Journal of Radiology 2012; 81 (10): 2794-2800. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.10.006
7. Wong SC, Nawawi O, Ramli N, Abd Kadir KA. Benefits of 3D rotational DSA compared with 2D DSA in the evaluation of intracranial aneurysm. Academic Radiology 2012; 19 (6): 701- 707. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2012.02.012
8. Brisman JL, Song JK, Newell DW. Cerebral aneurysms. The New England Journal of Medicine 2006; 31; 355 (9): 928-939. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra052760
9. Juvela, S. Risk factors for multiple intracranial aneurysms. Stroke 2000; 31: 392-397. doi: 10.1161/01.str.31.2.392
10. Loumiotis I, Wagenbach A, Brown RD Jr, Lanzino G. Small (<10-mm) incidentally found intracranial aneurysms, Part 1: reasons for detection, demographics, location, and risk factors in 212 consecutive patients. Neurosurgical Focus 2011; 31 (6): E3 doi: 10.3171/2011.9.FOCUS11234
11. Schievink WI, Wijdicks EF, Piepgras DG, Chu CP, O’Fallon WM et al. The poor prognosis of ruptured intracranial aneurysms of the posterior circulation. Journal of Neurosurgery 1995; 82 (5): 791-795. doi: 10.3171/jns.1995.82.5.0791
12. Ciceri EF, Klucznik RP, Grossman RG, Rose JE, Mawad ME. Aneurysms of the posterior cerebral artery: classification and endovascular treatment. American Journal of Neuroradiology 2001; 22 (1): 27-34.
13. Tykocki T, Kostkiewicz B. Aneurysms of the anterior and posterior cerebral circulation: comparison of the morphometric features. Acta Neurochirurgica (Wien) 2014; 156 (9): 1647- 1654. doi: 10.1007/s00701-014-2173-y
14. Cho MS, Kim MS, Chang CH, Kim SW, Kim SH et al. Analysis of clip-induced ischemic complication of anterior choroidal artery aneurysms. Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society 2008; 43 (3): 131-134. doi: 10.3340/jkns.2008.43.3.131
15. Srinivasan VM, Ghali MGZ, Cherian J, Mokin M, Puri AS et al. Flow diversion for anterior choroidal artery (AChA) aneurysms: a multi-institutional experience. Journal of Neurointerventional Surgery 2018; 10 (7): 634-637. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2017-013466
16. Elkordy AM, Sato K, Inoue Y, Mano Y, Matsumoto Y et al. Central retinal artery occlusion after the endovascular treatment of unruptured ophthalmic artery aneurysm: A case report and a literature review. NMC Case Report Journal 2016; 3 (3): 71-74. doi: 10.2176/nmccrj.cr.2015-0243
17. Fulkerson DH, Horner TG, Payner TD, Leipzig TJ, Scott JA et al. Results, outcomes, and follow-up of remnants in the treatment of ophthalmic aneurysms: a 16-year experience of a combined neurosurgical and endovascular team. Neurosurgery 2009; 64 (2): 218-230. doi: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000337127.73667.80
18. Ishihara S, Ross IB, Piotin M, Weill A, Aerts H et al. 3D rotational angiography: Recent experience in the evaluation of cerebral aneurysms for treatment. Interventional Neuroradiology 2000; 6 (2): 85-94. doi: 10.1177/159101990000600202
19. van Rooij SB, van Rooij WJ, Sluzewski M, Sprengers ME. Fenestrations of intracranial arteries detected with 3D rotational angiography. American Journal of Neuroradiology 2009; 30 (7): 1347-1350. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A1563
20. de Gast AN, van Rooij WJ, Sluzewski M. Fenestrations of the anterior communicating artery: incidence on 3D angiography and relationship to aneurysms. American Journal of Neuroradiology 2008; 29 (2): 296-298. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A0807
21. Schneiders JJ, Marquering HA, Antiga L, van den Berg R, VanBavel E et al. Intracranial aneurysm neck size overestimation with 3D rotational angiography: the impact on intraaneurysmal hemodynamics simulated with computational fluid dynamics. American Journal of Neuroradiology 2013; 34 (1): 121-128. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A3179
22. Wu TC, Tsui YK, Chen TY, Ko CC, Lin CJ et al. Discrepancy between two-dimensional and three-dimensional digital subtraction angiography for the planning of endovascular coiling of small cerebral aneurysms <5 mm. Interventional Neuroradiology. 2020 Dec;26 (6): 733-740. doi: 10.1177/1591019920925706